Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-08-27 01-337 RESOLVEItem No. 03-337 DMC: 8-27-01 Item/Subject Resolve, Making an Appropriation from Me General Fund's Undesignated Fund Balance for Certain purposes Related W the Waterworks. Responsible Department City Manager Commentary: Me City has been working with Me Coostel America program since last spring in an effect to rermvate and reuse Me Waterworks Complex. A series of meetings have recently been hNd with a variety of reprecentadves of this program, and it has became apparent Mat some preliminary expenditures are requiredto determine Me feasibility of using Mis mechanism for this purpose. Aslbelieveyouare under this program, various federal resources are used to provide labor for projects designed to enhance the natural and human environment in coastal areas. Various costs, however, remain the responsibility of Me local organization, in this case Me City. Based on Mese conversations, the City must First update a structural study of Me building to determine whether it is in a safe condition for work to be performed. In addition, a number of environmental remediation steps must also be taken W address such issues as asbestos and lead paintremoval, We should also recognize Me potential for additional City expenditures for each items as roof and Floor repairs and installation of a railroad crossing. The City Engineer has develop Preliminary estimates for Me range of costs Me City may be required to absorb to bring the structure into the necessary condition to utilize the labor that can be provided by Coastal America. This cast estimate is attached. This imbal expenditure level should be seen as a part of our effort to determine the feasibility ofthis approach toward renovating the waterworks. While this work is proceeding, staff will continue to discuss the project with Coastal America, proceed with Me necessary permitting, and further explore the potential end uses for the complex. Should we determine Mat renovation is rent financially feasible, the majority of these expenditures, particularly those related W environmental issues, en um be required should the City decide and receive permission to remove the structures. At this pointe I would recommend your approval of this appropriation. Dearmnenl Head! Manager's Commends: U Gty Manager Associated Information: Real Coat Estimate unoger wpprovan ac� F nx Dl Dlrett Legal Approval: 10 Gty golicimr Introduced for Passage XMrst Reading page _ of Rehmal 01-337 Assiguea to eo�ucilor varde s August 27, zaol V CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) Resolve, Making an Appropriation from the General Fund's Undesignated Fund Balance for Certain Purposes Related to the Waterworks By Me CRY Coonoy of the CW y ofBaiyw.. Be R Resolved that the amount of $150,000 is hereby appropriated from the General Fund's Undesignated Fund Balance for certain purposes related to the Waterworks Including updabngs structural analysis of the facility, undertaking various environmental remediation steps, and performing such other work as may be necessary to calamine the feasibility of renovating the complex in association with the Coastal America Program. The Finance Director is authorized to establish the necessary capital account for Mese purposes. IN Can fL®CIL August 27, 2001 First Beading nn/I (75 a]aff IN CITY COUNCIL September 26, 2001 Baden Made and Secaaded for Passage Passed cI CLERK RESOLVE (T1TLEJMakint anRtdigyi the General Bmd'OtifM Balance for Certain Purposes Belated Assigned10 CUmm110r 01-337 WATERWORKS COMPLEX RESTORATION In Conjuncdon With COASTAL AMERICA Projected City Costs: (Very Preliminary) 1. STRUCTURAL EVALUATION $20,000-$25,000 2. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP $80,000-$100,000 3. FLOOR REPAIRSAtEPLACEMENT $50,000-$800,000 4. ROOF REPAIRS &. RECONSTRUCTION $40,000-$600,000 5. RAILROAD CROSSING/SIGNALIZATION $200,000-$350,000 6. MATEMALS/EQUIPMENT -. $500,000-$700,000 NOTE: MAY BE ABLE TO GET MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT DONATED. TOTAL ESTIMATED RANGE OF COSTS: $1,700,000-$2,575,000 NOTES: • ITEMS 1) AND 2) MUST BE DONE BEFORE ANY SUBSTANTIAL WORKCANPROCEED. • ITEM 6) CAN BE REDUCED SIGNAFICANTLY THROUGH DONATION/ SPONSORSHIP OF MATERIALS 8. EQUIPMENT. • ABOVE FIGURES DO NOT REFLECT LONG TERM MAINTENANCE/ OPERATING COSTS. • DEMOLITION OF FILTER HOUSE COULD REDUCE OVERALL COSTS COSTS BY ABOUT 25%.