HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-04-15 Planning Board Minutes �� �
�
.
���i� � �; ������ ��'� � �'�a"�Q��'�
�� � __T _ ..
�a � o I��V.EL,���E1`�T
. �
CITY �� BANGCaR.
PT.,hNtluI1�IC DIVIS[C�V�I
PLANNING BOARD
TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 2025, 7:00 P.M.
PENOBSCOT ROOM, LOWER FLOOR OF PENQUIS CAP
262 HARLOW STREET
MEETING MINUTES
Board Members Present: Chair Reese Perkins
Vice Chair Jonathan Boucher
Michael Bazinet
Ted Brush
Ken Huhn
Janet Sanborn Jonas (via Zoom)
Citv Staff Present: Anja Collette, Planning Officer
Jefferson Davis, City Engineer
Grace Innis, Assistant Solicitor
Brian Scannell, Planning Analyst
Chair Perkins called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
OLD BUSINESS
1. Meeting Minutes — March 18, 2025
Member Huhn moved to approve the minutes of March 18, 2025, seconded by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call
vote conducted —all voting members in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
CHAIR INTRODUCTION
Chair Perkins made his introduction, and noted that, as there are only six Board members in attendance,
the applicants presenting at tonight's meeting have the option to postpone their application review until
the next Board meeting.
Charles Cole, applicant for 1593 Essex Street, presented to the podium and stated that he will proceed
with application review at this meeting.
Sara Caldwell, applicant representative for 915 Odlin Road, presented to the podium and stated that she
will proceed with application review at this meeting.
Sean Thies, applicant representative for 1105 Hammond Street, presented to the podium and stated that
he will proceed with application review at this meeting.
73 HARLOW STREET,BANGOR,ME 04401
TELEPHONE: (207)992-4280 FAX: (207)945-4447
WWW.BANGORMAINE.GOV
City of Bangor Planning Division
Planning Board Meeting Minutes-Tuesday,April 15, 2025
NEW BUSINESS
LAND DEVELOPMENT PERMITS
2. Land Development Permit — Flaq Lot — 1593 Essex Street — Map-Lot R52-002 - Land
Development Permit Application — Site Development Plan for creation of a flag lot at property
located at 1593 Essex Street, Map-Lot R52-002, in the Rural Residence & Agricultural District
(RR&A). Owner & Applicant: Charles & Melissa Cole.
Chair Perkins introduced the agenda item and asked for any potential conflicts of interest-there were none.
Member Brush moved that the Board find that application was deemed complete on April 15, 2025, the
applicant paid all applicable fees, the proposed project is creation of a Flag Lot, and the plat was reviewed by
the Engineering Department and a written report was received from the City Engineer on April 8, 2025.
Seconded by Member Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Applicant Charles Cole presented to the podium and gave an overview of the application.
Chair Perkins asked the staff for comments - Planning Officer Anja Collette noted that there is a requested
approval condition regarding the elevation of any future structure(s) on the subject property.
Vice Chair Boucher asked if there is any concern regarding the existing pipeline easement on the subject
property-Applicant Cole responded and clarified the terms of the easement and noted that he has been in
contact with Bangor Natural Gas regarding any effects of future construction in regards to the pipeline.
Chair Perkins asked if missing information for subsurface wastewater permit had been obtained - Planning
Officer Collette responded and confirmed that it had. Perkins also asked if additional clarification could be
added on the approval condition regarding any future construction in flood zone- Collette responded and
confirmed that this could be added.
Chair Perkins opened the public comments.
Member of the public Andrea Oldenburg presented to the podium and expressed concern over the potential
construction of multiple homes on the subject property. Applicant Melissa Cole presented to the podium and
confirmed that only one single-family home is proposed for the subject property.
Chair Perkins closed the public comments.
Chair Perkins asked the Board for any questions or comments -there were none.
Vice Chair Boucher moved that the Board find that based on Exhibit 2, the Project meets the requirements of
Land Development Code §165-68B(1) and §165-68B(6), regarding minimum street frontage and minimum
access strip width. Seconded by Member Huhn. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion
passed.
P a g e 2�9
City of Bangor Planning Division
Planning Board Meeting Minutes-Tuesday,April 15, 2025
Member Jonas moved that the Board find that based on Exhibit 2, the Project meets the requirements of Land
Development Code §165-68B(3) and §165-68B(4), regarding the access strip not being used in the
computation of the minimum area and dimensional requirements for the rear lot, and regarding the rear lot
meeting the requirements of the district in which it lies. Seconded by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call vote
conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Bazinet moved that the Board find that based on Exhibit 2, the Project meets the requirements of
Land Development Code §165-68B(5), regarding the requirement that only one tier of rear lots shall be
permitted behind the tier of lots fronting on the street. Seconded by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call vote
conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Huhn moved that the Board find that based on Exhibit 2, the Project meets the requirements of Land
Development Code §165-68B(7), regarding the requirements for lots in the Rural Residence and Agricultural
District with access strips exceeding 200' in length. Seconded by Member Brush. Roll call vote conducted -all
in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Brush moved that the Board find that based on Exhibit 2, the Project meets the requirements of Land
Development Code §165-68B(9), regarding application plans being stamped by a professional land surveyor.
Seconded by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Vice Chair Boucher moved that the Board find that based on Exhibit 2, 9, and 10, the Project meets the
requirements of Land Development Code §165-126F(1), regarding compliance with State of Maine guidelines
for subdivision approval contained in 30-A M.R.S.A. §4404. Seconded by Member Jonas. Roll call vote
conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Jonas moved that the Board find that based on Exhibit 2, the Project meets the requirements of Land
Development Code §165-126F(2), regarding compliance with existing zoning regulations regarding lot
dimensions and areas. Seconded by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed.
Motion passed.
Member Huhn moved that the Board find that based on Exhibit 2, the Project meets the requirements of Land
Development Code §165-126F(3-4), regarding the requirement for at least one side of a lot to abut a street and
regarding the angle of side lot lines. Seconded by Member Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none
opposed. Motion passed.
Member Brush moved that the Board find that based on Exhibit 2 and 9, the Project meets the requirements of
Land Development Code §165-126F(6), regarding the plat containing all information required in 165-126D(1-
8). Seconded by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call vote conducted - all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Vice Chair Boucher moved that the Board find that based on the findings made in Parts 1 and Part 2 of Section
IV of this document, the Project satisfies the requirements of Land Development Code §165-114A regarding
subdivisions. Seconded by Member Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion
passed.
P a g e 3�9
City of Bangor Planning Division
Planning Board Meeting Minutes-Tuesday,April 15, 2025
Member Brush moved that the Board find that the project meets the requirements for a Land Development
Permit for a Flag Lot, and therefore grants the Land Development Permit for the proposed Project, with the
condition that if any structure is built on the lot within a flood hazard area, it will need to be constructed with the
lowest floor, including the basement, at least 1 foot above the 100-year flood elevation. Seconded by Member
Huhn. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
3. Land Development Permit — Conditional Use — 915 Odlin Road — Map-Lots R10-001, 001-
A, -002-A, 003, & -008-B - Land Development Permit Application — Conditional Use for
extension of previously approved quarry permit, at property located at 915 Odlin Road, Map-
Lot R10-001, 001-A, -002-A, 003, & -008-B, in the Urban Industry District (UID).
Applicant/Owner: Eurovia Atlantic Coast, LLC.
Chair Perkins introduced the agenda item and asked for any potential conflicts of interest- Member Bazinet
noted that he is listed as the contact for one of the abutting properties, but noted that that property is owned by
his father and clarified that he has no business interests in the application or subject property.
Member Huhn moved that Member Bazinet does not have any conflict of interest, seconded by Member Brush.
Assistant City Solicitor Grace Innis confirmed that she does not have any comments or concerns regarding
this. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Huhn moved that the Board find that application was deemed complete on April 15, 2025, the
applicant paid all applicable fees, and the proposed project is a Conditional Use. Seconded by Member
Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted - all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Applicant representative Sara Caldwell, Eurovia Atlantic Coast, presented to the podium and gave an overview
of the application.
Chair Perkins asked the staff for comments -there were none.
Chair Perkins asked the Board for any questions or comments.
Chair Perkins asked about one of the lot lines on the site plan, and noted that the 100' setback is not noted.
Applicant representative Caldwell responded that the abutting property at this lot line is also owned by the
applicant, so this setback was not required to be shown. Planning Officer Collette confirmed this.
Chair Perkins asked about the expiration date of the previous permit, and whether the approval of this
extension should be made retroactive to the expiration date in February 2025- Planning Officer Collette
responded and confirmed that this could be done.
Chair Perkins opened the public comments -there were none. Public comments closed.
Vice Chair Boucher moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2 and 11, the applicant satisfied Land
Development Code §165-32.A's requirement that the use is not seriously detrimental to the neighborhood and
P a g e 4�9
City of Bangor Planning Division
Planning Board Meeting Minutes-Tuesday,April 15, 2025
would not be detrimental to the adjacent waterways, and that the permit will not seriously lower air quality
according to standards promulgated by the State Department of Environmental Protection, Air Quality Bureau.
Seconded by Member Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Jonas moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibit 2, the applicant satisfied Land Development
Code §165-32.B's requirement that no excavation shall be permitted within 50 feet of a right-of-way line of an
existing or approved street, or within 100 feet of a property line. Seconded by Member Brush. Roll call vote
conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Bazinet moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2 and 11, the applicant satisfied Land
Development Code §165-33's requirements regarding filling, grading and earthmoving activities and §165-
33.1's requirements regarding Erosion and Sediment Control best practices. Seconded by Member Huhn. Roll
call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Brush moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2 and 11, the applicant satisfied the Land
Development Code §165-84 requiring adequate provisions for surface water and storm drainage. Seconded by
Member Boucher. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Jonas moved that the Board find that, based on the findings made in Part 1 of Section IV of this
document, the Project meets the requirements of§165-96.B for a use within UID (Urban Industry District).
Seconded by Member Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Boucher moved that the Board find, subject to findings that the standards in Part 4 have been met,
and based on the findings made in Part 1 of Section IV of this document, the Applicant has met the standards
for a quarry in UID (Urban Industry District). Seconded by Member Huhn. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor,
none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Brush moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2 and 11, the applicant satisfied Land
Development Code §165-114.D's requirements for preventing adverse effects from stormwater runoff and
ensuring adequate capacity of stormwater collection systems to handle runoff from the development.
Seconded by Member Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Jonas moved that the Board find that, based on the findings made in Parts 1-3 of Section IV of this
document, the project meets the standards and use conditions of the district in which the property in question
is located and that there are not any variance requirements or other standards that would impede the granting
of the permit. Seconded by Member Huhn. Roll call vote conducted - all in favor, none opposed. Motion
passed.
Member Bazinet moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 4 and 11, the project will not create
unreasonable traffic congestion or hazardous conditions on contiguous or adjacent streets. Seconded by
Member Brush. Roll call vote conducted - all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Vice Chair Boucher moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2, 4, and 11, the proper operation of the
Page 5�9
City of Bangor Planning Division
Planning Board Meeting Minutes-Tuesday,April 15, 2025
conditional use will be ensured by providing and maintaining adequate and appropriate utilities, fire protection,
drainage, parking and loading and other necessary site improvements. Seconded by Member Huhn. Roll call
vote conducted —all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Vice Chair Boucher moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibit 2, 4, and 6, the proposed use, although
not appropriate for every site in the zone, is appropriate for the location for which it is sought because the
proposed use will conform to the general physical development pattern of the immediate area as to intensity of
site use. Seconded by Member Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted —all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Huhn moved that the Board find that the project meets the requirements for a Land Development
Permit for a Conditional use, and therefore grants the Land Development Permit for the proposed Project,
retroactive to the ending date of the last permit. Seconded by Member Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted —all in
favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
4. Land Development Permit — Maior Site Development, Conditional Use, and SLODA
Modification — 1105 Hammond Street — Map-Lot R18-008-E & -008-H - Land Development
Permit Application — Major Site Development, Conditional Use, and SLODA Modification for
proposed changes to the site layout, including relocation of fuel islands, parking
reconfiguration, expansion of carwash drive-thru lane, and a 300sqft building addition, at
property located at 1105 Hammond Street, Map-Lot R18-008-E & -008-H, in the General
Commercial & Service District (GC&S). Applicant/Owner: R.H. Foster Energy, LLC.
Chair Perkins introduced the agenda item and asked for any potential conflicts of interest—there were none.
Member Huhn moved that the Board find that application was deemed complete on April 15, 2025, the
applicant paid all applicable fees, and the proposed project is a Major Site Development, Conditional Use, and
SLODA Modification. Seconded by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call vote conducted — all in favor, none opposed.
Motion passed.
Applicant representative Sean Thies, Haley Ward, presented to the podium and gave an overview of the
application.
Chair Perkins asked the staff for comments— Planning Officer Collette noted that there is a requested
approval condition that the two subject lots be combined.
Member Jonas asked about the vegetated buffer requirements for the west side of the subject property—
Applicant representative Thies responded and clarified that the existing vegetated buffer would be maintained,
and that if additional vegetation ended up being required, this would be done. Planning Officer Collette
confirmed this.
Chair Perkins asked whether there are more fuel pumps on the lot than were shown on the original approved
site plan —Applicant representative Thies responded and clarified that there are only four fuel pumps on the
lot, which were all shown on the original approved site plan. Perkins also asked whether the requested
P a g e 6�9
City of Bangor Planning Division
Planning Board Meeting Minutes-Tuesday,April 15, 2025
approval condition should have a deadline- Planning Officer Collette responded and confirmed that this is not
required, but that the decision letter would note that this is requested prior to obtaining a building permit.
Chair Perkins opened the public comments -there were none. Public comments closed.
Chair Perkins asked the Board for any questions or comments -there were none.
Member Huhn moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2, 12, and 20, the applicant satisfied Land
Development Code §165-33's requirements regarding filling, grading and earthmoving activities and §165-
33.1's requirements regarding Erosion and Sediment Control best practices. Seconded by Vice Chair Boucher.
Roll call vote conducted - all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Jonas moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2 and 20, the applicant satisfied Land
Development Code §165-72 requiring adequate parking spaces including handicapped accessible spaces,
§165-73 regarding parking area location, setbacks, and screening, and §165-74 regarding minimum design
standards for surface parking and parking lot design. Seconded by Member Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted -
all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Brush moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2 and 20, the applicant satisfied Land
Development Code §165-76 requiring loading space, §165-77 regarding the loading space size, and §165-78
regarding general loading space requirements. Seconded by Member Huhn. Roll call vote conducted -all in
favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Bazinet moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2, 17, and 26, the applicant satisfied the
Land Development Code §165-82 requiring adequate fire protection. Seconded by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll
call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Vice Chair Boucher moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibit 2, the applicant satisfied the Land
Development Code §165-83 requiring adequate electrical services. Seconded by Member Huhn. Roll call vote
conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Jonas moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2, 16, and 18, the applicant satisfied the
Land Development Code §165-84 requiring provisions for surface water and storm drainage. Seconded by
Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Bazinet moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2 and 20, the applicant satisfied §165-135
of the Land Development Code regarding impervious surface ratio and buffer yards. Seconded by Member
Huhn. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Brush moved that the Board find that, based on the findings made in Parts 1 and 2 of Section IV of
this document, the Project meets the requirements of§165-102.B for a use within the GC&S (General
Commercial & Service District). Seconded by Member Huhn. Roll call vote conducted - all in favor, none
opposed. Motion passed.
P a g e 7�9
City of Bangor Planning Division
Planning Board Meeting Minutes-Tuesday,April 15, 2025
Member Huhn moved that the Board find that, subject to findings that the standards in Part 5 have been met,
the Applicant has met the standards for a Conditional Use (§165-9). The Board also finds, based on review of
Exhibit 2 and 20, that the project meets the specific requirements in §165-102.D for a gasoline service station
and drive-in business. Seconded by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed.
Motion passed.
Member Jonas moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2 and 20, the applicant satisfied the
requirements of Land Development Code §165-114.B-C, regarding the proposed parking and loading layout
and the proposed access drives from the site to any public right-of-way being arranged in a reasonable and
safe configuration, including the provision for safe pedestrian travel to all on-site uses. Seconded by Member
Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted - all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Bazinet moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2, 16, and 18, the applicant satisfied Land
Development Code §165-114.D's requirements for preventing adverse effects from stormwater runoff and
ensuring adequate capacity of stormwater collection systems to handle runoff from the development.
Seconded by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Brush moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2 and 20, the applicant satisfied Land
Development Code §165-114.F's requirements for landscaping, tree preservation, and species type. Seconded
by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Vice Chair Boucher moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2 and 20, the applicant satisfied Land
Development Code §165-114.G's requirements for building location and setbacks. Seconded by Member
Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted - all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Huhn moved that the Board find that, based on the findings made above in this document and exhibits
2, 9-16, and 18-19, the applicant satisfied Land Development Code §165-114.J, regarding compliance with 38
M.R.S.A. § 484 and applicable Department of Environmental Protection regulations, which includes Chapters
371, 372, 373, 375, 376, 377 and 500. Seconded by Vice Chair Boucher. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor,
none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Jonas moved that the Board find that, based on the findings made in Parts 3 and 4 of Section IV of
this document, as well as based on review of Exhibit 2 and 20, the project meets the standards and use
conditions of the district in which the property in question is located and that there are not any variance
requirements or other standards that would impede the granting of the permit. Seconded by Member Brush.
Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Bazinet moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2, 8, and 20, the project will not create
unreasonable traffic congestion or hazardous conditions on contiguous or adjacent streets. Seconded by
Member Huhn. Roll call vote conducted -all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Vice Chair Boucher moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibits 2, 8, 16, 18, 20, and 26, the proper
operation of the conditional use will be ensured by providing and maintaining adequate and appropriate
P a g e 8�9
City of Bangor Planning Division
Planning Board Meeting Minutes-Tuesday,April 15, 2025
utilities, fire protection, drainage, parking and loading and other necessary site improvements. Seconded by
Member Brush. Roll call vote conducted —all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Member Brush moved that the Board find that, based on Exhibit 2 and 8, the proposed use, although not
appropriate for every site in the zone, is appropriate for the location for which it is sought because the
proposed use will conform to the general physical development pattern of the immediate area as to intensity of
site use. Seconded by Member Bazinet. Roll call vote conducted —all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
Applicant representative Thies presented to the podium to request clarification regarding the timeline for the
approval condition, as building permit may not be required for the site improvement portion of the project. Chair
Perkins and Planning Officer Collette agreed that it would be acceptable to require that the condition be met
within 60 days of Planning Board approval.
Member Jonas moved that the Board find that the project meets the requirements for a Land Development
Permit for a Major Site Development, Conditional Use, and SLODA Modification, and therefore grants the Land
Development Permit for the proposed Project, with the condition that Map-Lots R18-008-E & -008-H be
combined within 60 days of Planning Board approval on April 15, 2025. Seconded by Member Brush. Roll call
vote conducted —all in favor, none opposed. Motion passed.
OTHER BUSINESS
5. Follow Up on Thouqhts on Land Development Code/Land Use Plan
No comments from Board members or staff.
Meeting adjourned at 8:09 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Sarah Maquillan,
Development Assistant
Planning Division
P a g e 9�9