HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-12-14 35-S ORDER3is
Introduced by Councilor Dinsmore, Dec. 14, 1964
CITY OF BANGOR
Qp�TLEJ �rbfrr-_Amending Parking Regulations.- Parking Prohibited Except
for Loading or Unloading - Pickering Square
By the qty Cwmil of the qty ofBamyor.
ORDERED,
THAT in accordance with Chapter 111, Article 6, Section 2.6 of the
Revised Ordinances of the City of Bangor, the following areas designated
by the City Manager as Parking Prohibited Except for Loading or Unloading
be added to Schedule M.
Pickering Square, thirty-eight feet In front of W. A. Bean Company,
as defined by yellow curb.
Pickering Square, thirteen feet in front of Bangor Hardware Company,
as defined by yellow curb.
35-S
RECEIVED
1964 DEC 10 IM 2: 23 ORDER
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Title,
^TY OE UNCCP. MAINE
IN CITY CWNCIL
Dec. 14, 1964
Referred to Publ3e Safety Commuttee,
tabled. 'IntrodycedaM-£SLed b
� � Councilmen \
G
Park:>np Peobibited kept fee loading
acd Unloading - Pickering Square
.....................................
CITI RK
IN CITY COUNCIL
Dec. 28, 1964
Taken from table, PASSED
Bangor, the renter of Maine ---the Gateway to Maines North Woods and Seashore Resorts
494 of Pte, Ad=
PLANNING December DEPARTMENT21,1964
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: The Planning Board
IN RE: change from Residence ^G^ Zone to General Business Zone a portion of land
n the west side of Union Street the area bounded on the mouth by Inter-
state Highway No. 95; on the east by the westerly sideline of Union Street;
mn the north and west by land of U.S. Air Force and land now or formerly of
urrey.
Steps
Please be advised that the Planning Board has held a public bearing and given
careful consideration to the above request.
The Planning Board Members felt that:
1. This was taking land zoned for residential use,
2. The 95 Interchange would create traffic hazards on the residential
streets and increase traffic volume in the area,
3. Noted the strong apposition by residents,
4. The lack of specific site control was a disadvantage if this were
approved as a General Business area,
S. It may have an adverse affect on the downtown development.
Considering these factors the Planning Board voted to deny the request.
Respectfully submitted.
Carl J. Kosobud
Planning Director
CJK:k
EASTERN MAINE GENERAL HOSPITAL
DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGY
eAKROE MAINE
Monday, January ll. 196$
To the Members of the Council
of theCity of Bangor
Gentlemen:
Because of Sickness I an unable to be present and speak before you in
person.esd hence most resort to this letter.
As a long term resident oP 768 Union Street ( 19 years this caning November)
I an strongly opposed to the proposal you are considering this evening that
the residential honing of our family neighborhood be changed to a commercial category.
I refer specifically to the proposal that the large tract of land running along
the Easterly side of Union Street from the Interstate MOIRA, right up to our property
be removed Prom residential sorung restrictions by sae type of machan'i z each as
spot homing And be converted to colmserelal use in the form of another Shopping Center.
To allmr the construction of Each An enterprise atoll be disastrous to the
homeawers of this entire neighborhood and in my opinion a poor and abort -sighted
policy on the part a the City of Bangor.
The deleterious effects scald be neap And scald include the following:
A coameroiallaina and cheapening of the entire Trion St. area with old residents
leaving and new hometown denied access to benesites.
An overereading of streets and outs and entrances to the Interstate Highway
and Union Street, further c0mmanding the load of AS already bwdemome Bow traffic.
A lase in city Lex revenue if the area were conmereialised as proposed and eat
developed entirely for homes and All the textile property which the ente.l.
Unnecessary and harmful competition to the already too navy slapping centers,
chain stores, down tow businesses, ate. with which we are Presently blessed.
A direct blow to the prowlgation of down -tow wbau renewal projects.
The establishment of a form of business Eiuch is eat in shanty creative by mines
in producing, making, growing goads and services cint which would be purely Parasitical.
It is sip opinion that if the present owes, or subsequent overs, of the
land in question will sell prospevtive home -0=81`5 lets With sufflaient frontage
And depth,at reasonable prices, to deka attractive homes and a pleasant
evviroIDnevt, all of the land will be disposed of, a fine neighborhood of h®a`mmecs
established, end good wall come to the people of this area.
high LA_e//]Lv"cSmith
Ye the una.rtl.gued are opposed to tbs aavatug of 16IIon 9Exeet ea.
/,yqy/yI� isthe8"ov�®bbeer i'!th issue of�[t/h—a �ngox Deily mews
lit
Im CA,
'ppri��/rir+�z- q��7.2c 3if 5y
Aa the undersigned are opposed to the rezoning of Hn46n Y. lest ea propoaed
in the Novvmber 17th issue of the Hangar Dally Nevar a
,
or s fir,, , o,- J?
anao f p�uw✓i.�-
ti'aJi
�( O4
y%—
ilg-..
`r�
fop / /
Ns the undersigned are oppased to the reaming of Dalm Street as pio—
posed in the November 17th issue of the Bangor Deily News, p
�.. '%u•�.�f4'8 :ilk—C' `_!/Naso/.�-�er�w.��.� �W.�A��/ .7r/
6
%/%%/-��F✓� 689 �q�rpi_ G�f�,,,,//(/ �e��-�
74,�1�
Av, ice
Avd
�7ue V�-Pia-��el/7aS (L�lipfio a -c i/y 7�,�s�
t:/ 9 ;
As the undersigned are opposed to the rezoning of n Street as proposed
In the November 17th issue or the
,�cs....na,o�,f s� • n� -,lam �y—
'U�'+"' /911-/s/ff,1
i>e_/
9�k q 3o-
0
oai7y Neva ,
i164ct . 6 tiGQc,
775
':Pe, the undersigned, strongly object to changing the zoning
of Onion St., from the Interstate to Dov Air 'orce Base,
from A Residential to General Business.
P,
We, the undersigned, strongly object to changing the zoning
of Union 3t., from the Interstate to Dow Air Po me Base,
from A Residential 2to General Busiress.
15 f'o
-ra.ceI r
�3-ism
3f /sem
,h `
33-ecc�llan.ft.
Ikd
—15-q
v is (I"13t_
�9-
16Th -sT
lc� a 9 Aea qa� DL