Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-12-14 35-S ORDER3is Introduced by Councilor Dinsmore, Dec. 14, 1964 CITY OF BANGOR Qp�TLEJ �rbfrr-_Amending Parking Regulations.- Parking Prohibited Except for Loading or Unloading - Pickering Square By the qty Cwmil of the qty ofBamyor. ORDERED, THAT in accordance with Chapter 111, Article 6, Section 2.6 of the Revised Ordinances of the City of Bangor, the following areas designated by the City Manager as Parking Prohibited Except for Loading or Unloading be added to Schedule M. Pickering Square, thirty-eight feet In front of W. A. Bean Company, as defined by yellow curb. Pickering Square, thirteen feet in front of Bangor Hardware Company, as defined by yellow curb. 35-S RECEIVED 1964 DEC 10 IM 2: 23 ORDER CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Title, ^TY OE UNCCP. MAINE IN CITY CWNCIL Dec. 14, 1964 Referred to Publ3e Safety Commuttee, tabled. 'IntrodycedaM-£SLed b � � Councilmen \ G Park:>np Peobibited kept fee loading acd Unloading - Pickering Square ..................................... CITI RK IN CITY COUNCIL Dec. 28, 1964 Taken from table, PASSED Bangor, the renter of Maine ---the Gateway to Maines North Woods and Seashore Resorts 494 of Pte, Ad= PLANNING December DEPARTMENT21,1964 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: The Planning Board IN RE: change from Residence ^G^ Zone to General Business Zone a portion of land n the west side of Union Street the area bounded on the mouth by Inter- state Highway No. 95; on the east by the westerly sideline of Union Street; mn the north and west by land of U.S. Air Force and land now or formerly of urrey. Steps Please be advised that the Planning Board has held a public bearing and given careful consideration to the above request. The Planning Board Members felt that: 1. This was taking land zoned for residential use, 2. The 95 Interchange would create traffic hazards on the residential streets and increase traffic volume in the area, 3. Noted the strong apposition by residents, 4. The lack of specific site control was a disadvantage if this were approved as a General Business area, S. It may have an adverse affect on the downtown development. Considering these factors the Planning Board voted to deny the request. Respectfully submitted. Carl J. Kosobud Planning Director CJK:k EASTERN MAINE GENERAL HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGY eAKROE MAINE Monday, January ll. 196$ To the Members of the Council of theCity of Bangor Gentlemen: Because of Sickness I an unable to be present and speak before you in person.esd hence most resort to this letter. As a long term resident oP 768 Union Street ( 19 years this caning November) I an strongly opposed to the proposal you are considering this evening that the residential honing of our family neighborhood be changed to a commercial category. I refer specifically to the proposal that the large tract of land running along the Easterly side of Union Street from the Interstate MOIRA, right up to our property be removed Prom residential sorung restrictions by sae type of machan'i z each as spot homing And be converted to colmserelal use in the form of another Shopping Center. To allmr the construction of Each An enterprise atoll be disastrous to the homeawers of this entire neighborhood and in my opinion a poor and abort -sighted policy on the part a the City of Bangor. The deleterious effects scald be neap And scald include the following: A coameroiallaina and cheapening of the entire Trion St. area with old residents leaving and new hometown denied access to benesites. An overereading of streets and outs and entrances to the Interstate Highway and Union Street, further c0mmanding the load of AS already bwdemome Bow traffic. A lase in city Lex revenue if the area were conmereialised as proposed and eat developed entirely for homes and All the textile property which the ente.l. Unnecessary and harmful competition to the already too navy slapping centers, chain stores, down tow businesses, ate. with which we are Presently blessed. A direct blow to the prowlgation of down -tow wbau renewal projects. The establishment of a form of business Eiuch is eat in shanty creative by mines in producing, making, growing goads and services cint which would be purely Parasitical. It is sip opinion that if the present owes, or subsequent overs, of the land in question will sell prospevtive home -0=81`5 lets With sufflaient frontage And depth,at reasonable prices, to deka attractive homes and a pleasant evviroIDnevt, all of the land will be disposed of, a fine neighborhood of h®a`mmecs established, end good wall come to the people of this area. high LA_e//]Lv"cSmith Ye the una.rtl.gued are opposed to tbs aavatug of 16IIon 9Exeet ea. /,yqy/yI� isthe8"ov�®bbeer i'!th issue of�[t/h—a �ngox Deily mews lit Im CA, 'ppri��/rir+�z- q��7.2c 3if 5y Aa the undersigned are opposed to the rezoning of Hn46n Y. lest ea propoaed in the Novvmber 17th issue of the Hangar Dally Nevar a , or s fir,, , o,- J? anao f p�uw✓i.�- ti'aJi �( O4 y%— ilg-.. `r� fop / / Ns the undersigned are oppased to the reaming of Dalm Street as pio— posed in the November 17th issue of the Bangor Deily News, p �.. '%u•�.�f4'8 :ilk—C' `_!/Naso/.�-�er�w.��.� �W.�A��/ .7r/ 6 %/%%/-��F✓� 689 �q�rpi_ G�f�,,,,//(/ �e��-� 74,�1� Av, ice Avd �7ue V�-Pia-��el/7aS (L�lipfio a -c i/y 7�,�s� t:/ 9 ; As the undersigned are opposed to the rezoning of n Street as proposed In the November 17th issue or the ,�cs....na,o�,f s� • n� -,lam �y— 'U�'+"' /911-/s/ff,1 i>e_/ 9�k q 3o- 0 oai7y Neva , i164ct . 6 tiGQc, 775 ':Pe, the undersigned, strongly object to changing the zoning of Onion St., from the Interstate to Dov Air 'orce Base, from A Residential to General Business. P, We, the undersigned, strongly object to changing the zoning of Union 3t., from the Interstate to Dow Air Po me Base, from A Residential 2to General Busiress. 15 f'o -ra.ceI r �3-ism 3f /sem ,h ` 33-ecc�llan.ft. Ikd —15-q v is (I"13t_ �9- 16Th -sT lc� a 9 Aea qa� DL