HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-12-11 29-V ORDER39-V
Introduced by Councilor Baldacol, Oec, 11, 1961
CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE.) f®Cb¢C Accepting Report sewer nates
By the CNy (an nofl Of GUY ofBuyyor.
ORDERED,
T116T In accordance with Order 0169-U, the City Council accept
the report of Little, Gray 6 Horton relating to sewer rates.
opw
_LJvCD
"- - 1267 IEC -7 'M 5:01
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
.I CF re ullde. mtm
IN CITY COUNCIL
Dec. 11, 1967
PASSED
CIEE
29-V
0RO ER
rine,
..?:cPPFi^9. report, c. sower. npcee,..,,.
.....................................•
Introduced and rued by
councilman
Xan GG.A liW C.PA,
Culp Gnv. e,.
Ydwlm R No.wu, k.M9A
City Council
City of Bangor
Bangor, Maine
Gentlemen:
LITTLE, GRAY & HORWX
Cooftel P,Mw .M&mmamw
w
814maA, Nuu
Aon mdp sw
3 5
November 38. 1967
pursuant to request we have prepared the following exhibits reflecting
estimated annual revenue to be earned at the proposed rates to be charged
users of the sewer system in the City of Bangor:
Exhibit A . . . . . . . . . pro Forma Income Statement
Exhibit 3 . . . . . . . . . Estimated Annue_ Billing
Exhibit C . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Meter Readings
Exhibit D . . . . . . . . . Billing Ra tea
Determination of Estimated Use and Revenue
Analysis was made of all meter readings by the Beazer Water District for
the most recent twelve-month period. Tabulation and pricing of these readings
produced results consistent with the District's reported revenue. Slight
variations were attributable to partial billings not utilized in the survey.
Number of bills and total consumption within specified limits are set forth
in Exhibit C. Analysis of the District's service area indicated certain areas
not presently served by City sewers. Readings from tiese areas were eliminated
from tSe totals in Exhibit C. Monthly bills and readings including the
conjunctiva Air Force billings were converted to a quarterly basis and also
included in Exhibit C. Amounts so determined were priced up in Exhibit E
according to the proposed rats presented in Exhibit 0. Based on the present
annual use of water in the City, revenue of $493,846 can be anticipated at
the proposed rates.
Relation To Water District Readings:
No provision hes been made in the Exhibits for reductions to customers
who may discharge only a portion of their water intake into the City sewer.
The total amount is believed to be quite small and should be offset by two
commercial customers not now served by the District. Nor has provision been
made for a sewer rate to cover additional tenants in buildings served by a
single water and sewer service. mere appear to be 2,952 such customers in
areas served by the City sewers. Water District c.arges to this group amount
to $35,424. This type charge was formerly used quite widely by water utilities
in Hain to ease the change from flat fates to meters but new appears to be
phasing out. The proposed rates compensate for this by the higher minimum
and the addition of a short second step of 3,600 cubic feet. This step is
also designed to take into account those customers having a somewhat heavier
use on the system by garbage disposal units. Following is a comparison with
Water District rates:
Cubic
Feet
Nater
Sewer
0 -
1,200
$ 6.00
$ 8.40
1,200 -
4,000
.22
.33
4,000 -
21,000
.22
.20
21,000 -
150,000
.20
.22
150,000 -
11500,000
.14
.15
Excess
.30
.11
While there is no necessity that there be any relationship in the two rates,
either in the meter steps or in the charges, it does seem prudent to maintain
a reasonable relationship since both are billed from a common source of
information. It is also noted that the percentage of operating expenses to
total expenses is quite similiar in both instances.
_2_
Annual Revenue Requirements:
Pro forma income and expense totals are presented in Exhibit A. This
assumes a full years revenue at the proposed rates and normal consumption.
Operating expenses contemplate full operation of pumping stations and treat-
7
Some adjustment
will probably be necessary to laundries and others where
from 1050 to 1967 per records of the City engineering department plus 1% on
there may be a great
deal of steam. The
rates also provide for adjustment due
7
lawn and use
upon application.
These should not affect the estimated
to garden
debt of $2,272,640 the annual amortization requirement is $124,920
7
revenue projections,
however. Ila tea for
willingness to serve on property
abutting on severed
streets would have a
neglible effect on revenue.
Annual Revenue Requirements:
_1-
Pro forma income and expense totals are presented in Exhibit A. This
assumes a full years revenue at the proposed rates and normal consumption.
Operating expenses contemplate full operation of pumping stations and treat-
ment plant. Depreciation iscomputed at 1% on the cost of mains installed
from 1050 to 1967 per records of the City engineering department plus 1% on
construction and a composite rate of 4% on buildings, machinery
mains under
and equipment. No provision is made for depreciation on the Federal and State
shares of the Kenduskeag Stream Interceptor Project On present oustanding
debt of $2,272,640 the annual amortization requirement is $124,920
sewer
7
thorough 1977. Interest for 1968 is $86,768, and declines about $4,700 per
year. Restatements will increase by an estimated $80,000 per year on completion
lof
Stage 11 along the Kenduskeag. At its reported present rate of discharge
]
into the stream, it is estimated that the Maxfield Pill would be charged
$12,800 per year redacing annual additional requirements to about $61,500,
l
1
considering the p es_nt es -mated net income. This would indicate an increase
c
7
in rates of about 12%. Within this period, however, if is expected that Dow
Field and related housing will be converted to other uses. Under the present
J
conjunctive billing these units will average only about 12q per 100 cubic feet.
_1-
Under present plans for the area the average revenLe would probably be at
least twice this amount although the agree might be reduced. The City
Engineer's report of February, 1966, contemplated additional revenue from
this area of about 25% or $10,500 at the proposed rates.
Billing Procedure:
The Bangor Water District bills most customers on a quarterly basis,
approximately 1/3 rd. each quarter. A few large customers including the Dov
group are billed monthly. Readings start about the 20th of the preceeding
month are are completed by the 20th of the month of billing. All bills are
mailed on the last day of the month. I£ the proposed sewer rates are to be
effective on January 1, 1968, and this date is strictly adhered to, all
Initial bills will be for a period less than three months. Those in the
first cycle read from December 20, 1967 to January 1, 1960 would receive no
bill. The remainder of the cycle would have bills up to a maximum of 20
days. The second cycle would have bills for periods ranging from 20 days to
50 days, and the third cycle from 50 to 80 days. Those in the first cycle
read between March 20 and 30 would also have a reduced bill. All subsequent
bills would be at the full threewntha rate. The effect on the first years
cash flow will be quite profound. It appears that the equivalent of too
quarterly cycle billings will be accrued and unbilled at the close of the
first year. The entire December 31 billing, $41,000, would be outstanding
along with an undetermined amount of previous billing.
4-
Administration and Procedures:
1 Early consideration must be given to staffing for the billing and collection
7 procedures. A chart of accounts using the uniform waste water disposal system
should be set up including cost values and debt to be transferred to provide
for a completely separate accounting system. This would not preclude the
continued use of public works facilities and equipment on a rental basis, nor
the transfer of personnel to other City departments. Cash should be controlled
1 in the same manner as City general funds. General accounting records might
best be maintained by existing City employees until such time as the treatment
plant is in operation and personnel and duties clearly defined. Classification
l of property for depreciation purposes should be made on completion of the
project. m w t
It would s e'1 to send a letter to all Water District customers a
an early date notifying them of the proposed sawer charges and providing for
notification if cloy ,acre not on Citysewers.
We wish to express *or appreciation to the City officials and to the
] superintendent and personnel of the Bangor Water District for their cooperation
7 in the preparation of these rates.
17
J
5_
1
BM'GOR SEWER DEPARTMENT Exhibit A
PRO FORMA INCOM STATEMENT
Operating Revenue $ 493,846
Operating Expenses:
Mai tenanceand Operation - Existing System $ 65,000
Maintenance and Operation - Dov System 25,000
Operation of Stations A Plant 90,000
Customer Accounting and Administration 20,000
200,000
Depreciation 76,500
Debt Service:
Debt Retirement $ 124,920
Interest Expense 06,786 211,706
40920'
Net Income $ X640
BANGOR GNMR DEPARTMENT
ESTIM \TED ANNUAL BILLING
Exhibit B
Billing
Number
Total
Billing
Billing
Limits
of
Cubic
On
At Block
Total
Cubic
Feet
Bills
Feet
minimum
Rate
a111ing
0 -
1,200
7,441
$ 62,504.40
$
$ 62,504.40
1,200 -
4,800
16,470
40,426,200 "
- 138,348.00
68,185.26
206,533.26
4,600 -
21,000
2,571
21,358,500
21,596.40
30,543.48
25,249.56
77,389.44
21,000 -
150,000
494
25,173,100
4,149.60
5,868.72
22,407.04
32,550.02
64,984.10
150,000 -
1,500,000
57
21,710,800
478.80
677.16
2,585.52
16,176.60
19,741.20
39,659.28
Over
1,500,000
4
36,253,200
33.60
47.52
181.44
1,135.20
8,100.00
33 278.52
42 776.28
27,037
144,921,800
$ 227,110.80
$ 266,736.04
$ 493,846.84
Yj 91NGOR SEWER DEPARTMENT Exhibit C
7 CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY METER READINGS
1966196667
Cubic Feet Billed
876,800
Cubic
Feet
448,800
Neter
2,461,800
Billing
Range
Site
Min.
1,200
4,800
21,000
150,000
4
Bills
441800
21000
150000
115001000
All (later Netera
Net rc Sewer Users:
5/8
7,334
37,920,400
10,945,200
050,300
3/4
401301,700
195
2,164,000
3,393,000
1,158,200
22,174,400
1
13,673
88
955,700
4,162,500
4,963,700
1,024,400
1 1/4
21563
2,300
23,100
1 1/2
22
152,900
1,680,300
5,349,500
331,000
2
8
30,900
1,284,900
7,893,700
7,300,100
3
12,300
48,200
2,036,300
5,075,700
4
44,500
92,000
371,500
21404 500
8,036,900
Cubic Feet Billed
41,258,500
21,737,200
22,623,200
15,135,700
No. of Bills
7,647
16,815
2,621
477
49
Not Served By Sewer
5/8
207
817,100
150,700
26,500
3/4
39,300
104,900
No. of Bills
1
6
20,400
91,900
61,500
1 1/2
Total 144,921,800
114,600
134,400
2
25,173,100
8, bill
226,400
F00
3
2.451.81n0
Cubic Feet Billed
876,800
470,700
448,800
2,461,800
No. of Bills
213
356
58
14
4
Net rc Sewer Users:
Cubic Feet Billed
401301,700
21,266
300
22,174,400
13,673
900
No. o1 Bills
7,434
16,459
21563
463
so-
Monthly Meters Converted
To Quarterly Basis
44,500
92,000
2,990,700
8,036,900
So. or Bills
7
11
8
31
12
Air Force Billing - Over
1,500,000
36,253,200
No. of Bills
Total 144,921,800
40,426,200
21,358,500
25,173,100
21,710.
F00
325
Total Bills 27,037
7,441
16,47D
2,571
494
57
_200
4
BkNGOR STJER DFPARSMENT
RILLTNG RATES
Exhibit D
Ou'rt.erly
Cubic
Rate per
Billing
Average
Feet
100 Cu. Pr.
A,no_n[ Per
100 Cu. Ft.
1,200
.70
8.40
.IO
3,601
.33
11.88
2.80
4,000
1,200 - 4,800
20.28
.42
16,200
.28
45.36
4,800 - 21,000
21,000
.28
65.64
.31
129,000
.22
283.80
.22
150,000
6.48
349.44
.23
1,35C,000
.15
2,025_00
41.48
1xcess00
Excess
R 33I� 4.64
.lfi
Excess
It
Monthly
400
.70
2.60
.70
1_200
.33
3.96
1,600
5.76
.42
5,600
.20
15.12
7,000
21.83
.31
43.000
.22
91.60
50,000
116.48
.23
450,000
.15
675.00
500,000
791.48
.16
Excess
.11
Short Formula For Conyut_up, Bills
9i11inR
Limits
Rate let
Ade Per
3111
Qaaraaer1
Monthly
100 CuL.
.
Quarterly
Mec_hly
0 - 1,200
0 - 400
Min
8.40
2.80
1,200 - 4,800
400 - 1,600
.33
4.44
1.48
4,800 - 21,000
1,600 - 7,000
.28
6.84
2.28
21,000 - 150,000
7,000 - 50,000
.22
19.44
6.48
150,000 - 1,500,000
50,000 - 500,000
.15
124.44
41.48
Excess
Excess
.11
724.44
241.40
LITTLE CRAY Is HOUSTON , CIURTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOVINTANTIC , RABWOPTC MAINt