Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-11-13 9-V ORDINANCE9-V Introduced by Councilor Baldacci, NOV. 13, 1967 CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) Mr1bf==, zone Merge.. x sidenne A Zone w hsal Business zone to,,, Be itardaiad by the City Coa Offfia Ciey0fBaMper, afoibma: Mat the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Bangor as established on January ], 1954 as amended be hereby amended as follows: to General Business Zone Change from Residence "A" Zone and Local Business ZomAe portion of land south of Eam:rond Street and East of Dow AFB, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south side line of Hs®oed Street and being at the southeast corner of Hammond Street and a proposed right-of-way so called Carmen Avenue. Thence in a southerly direction for a distance of 146.1 feet more or less to a point. Thence in as easterly direction for a distance of 106.5 feet more or less to a point. Thence in a southerly direction for a distance of 1125 feet more or less to a point. Thence in a northwesterly direction for a distance of 425 feet more or less to a point being on the east side line of Dow AFB. Thence in a northerly direction along this line for a distance of 996.]] feet more or less to a point on the south side line of Balanced Street. Thence ins easterly direction for a distance of 165.10 feet along the south side line of Hammond Street to the point of Replacing, Thus describing a tract of land containing parcels B them 43 of the Assessors Map 42 of the City of Bangor to be changed from Residence "A" Zone to General Business Zone{ also describing parcel p of Assessors Map y2, to be changed from Local Business Zone to General Business Zone. This parcel containing 0.25 acres more or less. N cITy' COUNCIL . 13, 1967 Referred to Planning Board, tabled. TY C IN CITY COUNCIL Nov. 27, 1967 Remain on table. CI CLBRR IN CITY COUNC L — Dec. 11, 1967 Remain on table. CLERK IN CITY CWNC IL Oec. 27, 1967 Remain on raids. CLERK QOVNCIL Jan. 8, 1968 Taken from table, motion to table failed by the following yes andl n vote: Coupoilors voting yea: Baldacci, Rallou, Moray. Councilors voting n Barry, Brown, Houston, Hunt, Minsky, Porter. till, Y C — ' 9-V ORDINANCE (TIRE, 1 - Hammond St & CaENBD Ave. mt"And and ftled by /^� 0 Y�� Om, from TMS ordinance IN ao,wtly a Mped. IN CITY COUNCIL 8, 1968 Failed to pass 1st reading by the following yes and no vote: Councilors voting yesi Brow, Hunt,Porter. Councilors voting W. Balaacci, Ballot, Barry, Houton, NCKny, Minsky. hangar, the center of Maine ---the Gateway to Maine's North Woods and Seuebare Reborn QIifu of �6;mzvrl Almiim MANNING WEPARTIMENT November 27, 1967 To: The Honorable City Council MOM: Carl S. Rasobud, Planning Director BE: zone Change, Hammond scree[ CC. Order No. 9-Y Gentlemen: The Planning Board will bold a public hearing an this proposed Zone Change December 4, 1967 at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chamber. CM:jb -moi (LGu.e,' Bangor, We center of Moine---the Gateway to Maine's North Woob and Seashore Room December ], 1967 To: The Honorable City Council FROM: The Planning Board HE: CC Order No. 9V - Change from Residential "A" and Local Business Zone to General Business Zone a portion of land south of Hammond Street and east of Dow AFB. Gentlemen: Please be advised that the Planning Board held a public hearing, December 4, on the above request. Me Planning Board gave very careful consideration to the proposal presented, as well as the objections of those opposed to the zone change. Me Board felt the following were some of the important considerations: 1. Effect on an established residential area. 2. Effect of "open" General Business development on the area and on development of Dow, both as a major entrance and on adjacent areas. 3. Sewer problems should be investigated as to whet degree of deve- lopment can be handled, and what municipal problems may be involved. 4. Change here would stimulate additional requests. for General Business - squeezing the residential area even more. After careful consideration of the request and its relation to, and effect on the general plan as well a effect on the a involved, the n Planning Board voted to deny request for a zone change to General Business. Yours trul Planning Director ENC: C]K: jb (gag of December ], 1967 To: The Honorable City Council FROM: The Planning Board HE: CC Order No. 9V - Change from Residential "A" and Local Business Zone to General Business Zone a portion of land south of Hammond Street and east of Dow AFB. Gentlemen: Please be advised that the Planning Board held a public hearing, December 4, on the above request. Me Planning Board gave very careful consideration to the proposal presented, as well as the objections of those opposed to the zone change. Me Board felt the following were some of the important considerations: 1. Effect on an established residential area. 2. Effect of "open" General Business development on the area and on development of Dow, both as a major entrance and on adjacent areas. 3. Sewer problems should be investigated as to whet degree of deve- lopment can be handled, and what municipal problems may be involved. 4. Change here would stimulate additional requests. for General Business - squeezing the residential area even more. After careful consideration of the request and its relation to, and effect on the general plan as well a effect on the a involved, the n Planning Board voted to deny request for a zone change to General Business. Yours trul Planning Director ENC: C]K: jb December 9, 1967 To: The Honorable City Council FROM: The Planning Board R8: CC order Mo. 9V - Change from Residential "A" and Local Business Zone to General Business Zone a portion of land south of Hammond Street and east of Dow AFB. Gentlemen: The Planning Board has considered the request for aechange and acted upon the request a stated. They do feel, however, that the proposal for a Motel,as presentedowould be: 1. a reasonable use of the property 2. would be compatible with the residential area 3, would be compatible with and an asset to the development of Dow 4. the availability and capacity of the interchange and with Hammond Street being a primary e Dow s to D - such a location would be a good Motel site - if swagefacilities would be adequate. The Board unanimously voted to express their c with the inadequacy of the present zoning law and the needs for comprehensive planning in relation to development of the area. Further, they would consider a Motel development under Residence "C" Zoning a reasonable and compatible use of the Land, should the owner make such an application. CdK:jb