Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-05-08 139-U ORDER�i 139-U Introduced by Councilor Haldacci, May 8, 19" CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) (OnVerp--. M bilebare Park Southeast Side of Stillwater Ave. By City Conrad of the City ofBaayor: ORDERED, TEAT the application, race by Queen City Mobile Home Park, Inc., for permit to operate a Mobilshoun Park on the Southeast side of Stillwater Ave. is hereby granted. f 1 y Y 13y IN CITY COUNCIL Aug. 14, 1967 Taken from table, 4 .f3 tabled to Oct. 23IN IJc( e cS L. UI 0 A D 6 R CITY AK Y is OFHCL Title, SNIN TY " Oct. 23, 1967 Mobilehrme Park — 8oatht Taken from table, PMSM IN CITY COUNCIL.••.......................eae......Side of..... May 8, 1967 Referred to Planning Board, tabled. ,$,ti],Zrr{?t<F A.el14e.................... CI" Introduced and filed by e � q IN C CCWIL K May 22, 1967 Co ]man Taken firm table, Planning Board report read, referred to PlazuutVv Board, tabled. IN CITY COUNCIL June 26, 1967 Taken from table, Clerk directed to C�,RK adveitiae public hearing to be held July 10th, tabled. IN CITYCOONC IL June 12, 1967 Taken from table, Planning Board CITY P.RIS report read, retdcled. IN TY COUNCIL July 10I 1967 Taken from table, bearing held, tabled. CTTY CLB K CLERK IN Y COUfC21 Jell 24, 1967 Aemain on table. EAK TO: City Council PROM: planning Board RE: Mobilehome Park Application CC Order 1339 Please be advised that the Planning Board scheduled a public hearing, on June 5, 1967, to consider the application for a Mobilehome Park permit. At the request of Mr. Twitchell, attorney for the applicant, the meeting 1s being continued until a later date to allow the applicant to review their proposal. Further action will be taken by the Board at that time. /nUYours truly, n C]K:jb Planning Director \, Qd� Bcngae, Me renter o/ Moine---the Gans ay m M<iael North Woods and Ssuthory Rmoru an a IN U. Own No Yph "N's 'rem. (gag of Pm%", ftliaim sey 'i I;V A° Iel d 2 they have.wColl IL PLANNING DEPARTMENT .e.w. `" June 8, 1967 TO: City Council PROM: planning Board RE: Mobilehome Park Application CC Order 1339 Please be advised that the Planning Board scheduled a public hearing, on June 5, 1967, to consider the application for a Mobilehome Park permit. At the request of Mr. Twitchell, attorney for the applicant, the meeting 1s being continued until a later date to allow the applicant to review their proposal. Further action will be taken by the Board at that time. /nUYours truly, n C]K:jb Planning Director \, Qd� Banger, the meter of Maine--tbe Ganuety to Maine's Numb Woods and Seasbere Reason @Sitg of PaltgoB, Maim 1L111110 ICIA.IMC�� Nay 16, 1967 TO: City Council FROM: Planning Board Rd: Mobllehome Park Application Council Order 139-U Gentlemen Please be advised that the Planning Board considered the application for a Nobllehome Park on the Southeast aide of Stillwater Avenue. In its consideration the Board took note of the proposed location and the proposed lot layout phase. The Planning Board recommended against approval of the application. 1. Plan as presented does not meet a number of requirements of the Mobile - home Ordinance such as front ran lots undersized R -O -W not 30' short streets do not end in a Cul -de -Sac rear raw not 75' from highway 2. Use not consistent with land use being proposed by 117011. In addition from a visual aspect the raw of trailer parallel to Stillwater Avenue and the rbacking up to Interstate 95 would not be an asset to either the cities image or to possible development in that area. Sincerely yours, J Carl d. Rosebud Direct Planning Director C]Kjb CITY OF BANGOR ORDERED, IN CITY COUNCIL THAT The [ollowingapph®Hon fmlimambe rgen(v�. arym................... Smtmg hlaity ............ ..............Chy athe. their Nblic Car, Trac, Capess or jWer. me IMe...... ApM1 2lv..1.96.Z......................................... ion is hereby made for a 3fmoctmt................................... Cash deposit with this appheeeoa i. _.-.-............... ........... ......... _.. Is this a rmewely No,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ....................... I hereby aiisee to operam the above m aeraNanm with the 9mwa of the State and tha Oadivaame of the City. Sig.,4go eeN Cl Ty Aett e 1�bM ;f97 _INC, P.O I hereby certify that the above mored app4mt owes m fixes m the City d Amgor. rnyr.lnm..._. I hereby ontl(y [lest rise eppb®at by wmpAerl with Chapter a d the pabAahed Ordmanaes d 1998. ..... _...... .............. C'ty ©erk. Clle Bangor, the team of Maine ---the Gaemay to Maine's North Woods and Seashore Resorts 1AAL J, K011111 GIitg of �fansae, Maine To: City Council MOM: Planning Board RE: Mobilehome Park Permit June 26, 1967 CC Order 139-U Gentlemen: On Friday, June 23, 1967, the Planning Board continued its conside- ration of a MobiLehome Park Permit on Stillwater Avenue. The Board reviewed the revised plan submitted by the proponents and had considerable discussion and review of previous meetings. The Planning Board unanimously voted to recommend that the permit be denied. In recomiending against the permit the Board considered many aspects of the problems including the following: 1. The '70Ls Land Use Plan proposed that the area should be developed as an industrial Park. 2. The City has made a commi tment for development of that entire area in a compatible nature. 3. The existing Mobilehome Park still has substantial room for deve- lopment. 4. Considered that the Mobilebome Park development at this site is not in the best interest of the City of Bangor. Si crassly yours el :b �n Planning Director EECY O✓-( I ' f EMC: (2) 7 June 16, 1967 l6MORANDIM TO: Planning Board PROM: Carl J. Rosobud, Planning Director RE: Mobllehme Park Permit - Stillwater Avenue The Planning Board, has before It for consideration. a request for a permit to establish a Mobilehome Park on the southeast aide of Stillwater Avenue, in the triangle formed with Interstate 95. There are several questions that need clarification from a legal point: 1. It is my feeling that the requirement to set back 751 from a street or highway - means the property line or right-ofway line. Because of the wince of a Mobilebme Park, and that it does not Te - quire a subdivision but my in fact be as permanent - the intent was to move them back away from the roadway. To me this nems a very reasonable requitement for such a development, and an effort to help soften the effect of a group of trailers into an area, with addiciwas l screening. 1. Aspect of zoning the area Industrial Park In the "701". The -1701" has proposed that this entire area be zoned for Industrial Park Development. Considering the need for prime interstate location for high grade development, which we need to off -set the economic lose of DOW, and the fact that this area and across Interstate 95 is in effect the my such available land - this should bea very important consideration. We do need to replace the economic loss of DOW with mew industry - and we need available sites with whichto interest prospective chants. This upper end of the triangle •erviceable by existing severe pointed to as the first choice location by n industry that was onsidering Bangor. It would seem prudent to give such prospective development a chance - in fact this is the primary bases for long-range planning. To obtain the best development, an area may have to renin open for a period of time. It seems to me more logical that if there is need for additional trailer sites in this a - they could best be developed in Conjunction with the existing park and not spread out to both aides of Stillwater Avenue. It would also s from the and advantageous frthe developers standpoint - s well e a hefter total development for that entire section of the City, considering the proposed uses for Parke, Industrial Parks, and Cc®elCial Areas. As you have tenatively at least agreed to the land use pattern, if you approve this Residential use you are yourself setting a precedent that will very likely be thrown back at you In the future when question of conforming to the Master Plan coas up. I feel that the Board should reco®end that the permit be denied because: 1. There is considerable apace to be filled In the existing development across Stillwater Avenue. 3. The beat use of the land would be for Industrial Development. J. Any increase In site should be done in conjunction with the existing area rather than spreading on both aides of Stillwater Avenue. 4. If in several years it appeared that it would not be feasable site for Industrial use - then another use could be considered. 5. Act the Air Force leaves there will be acme additional apace available in Singer. In conclusion I dont believe this developoent is in the best interest of the City of Bangor at this time. cc: NPC Basgas, ahs eases of Maine ---the Gateway to Maines Nonb Woo& and Seas"" Report; QIq of Pala", cADf'rte ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPF�4FPTM Jane 19, 1967 SON Carl J. Rosebud, Planning Director PRESS Peter R. DPhrico, Economic Director SOB.IeCh Use of Property between Stillwater Avenue and Interstate 95 Over Car LN This is in aneaer to your question about the use of property between Still - motor Avenue and Interstate 95. As you knows Land on the north ride of Interstate 95 was under considerations by the Sprague electric Company. We is the last remaining Interchange in Bangor Nat offers Industrial sites for companies requiring fairly sizeable tracts of land outside of a built-up avec. In recent months, I have had the opportunity of shoring this area to a rel firms conducting surveys for plant locations in this area each of which have Commented that this arve would suit their needs. The comber of inquiries of industries that have actually beat in the community bas increased significantly in the pest two years. We must not forget that the Inter- state Highway, to Bangor only opened in 1966 providing us With a better advantage of a geographic location cat we did net have prior to the construction of the new road. yelps to 1964, it sea difficult to interest industrial prospects in coming to see anger. Since the completion of the highway, that obstacle has beat removed. Presently, I sum waking with a firm Who has s site requirement between 50 and 100 acres with good blghway empowers and accessibility --in an area not already developed by other firma. It is difficult for me to say exactly site am might interest a firm in A 10I time are, but I feel that we should give a reasonable amoWt of time to attap to de- valop this area for high Industrial use. Carl J. Kosobud -2- June 19, 1967 I would like to sea this area between Stillwater Avenue and Interstate 95 zoned for industrial use in anticipation of seeing is developed in a similar fashion as exhibited by the Sylvania development. Again let me stress, I am handicapped within the city to find sites along the new highway to provide fairly large treats of land to meet the requirements of fired who have large site requirmnents. P. R. D'grrico Milk