HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-10-09 234-U ORDINANCE234-8
Introduced by request, Norman Minsky, Oct. 9, 1967
gip' CITY OF BANGOR
(TUTEE.) (OTbtttancee Amending Seeing ordinance- Portion of land Off Sunset
Beit ordained by the May Cannata of the ON ofBam/pr, w fdo oam: Mat the Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Hanger as established on January 7, 1954 as amended be hereby amended as
follows:
Change from Residence ^A" to General Business Zone a portion of land off
Sunset Avenue being more_articularly described as foliose:
Beginning at an iron halt on the southeasterly Sideline of Sunset Avenue and
666 feet, more r less, from a versonsent at the intersection of Union and Sunset Avenue
monument located on the aoutheasterly sideline of Union Street;
Thence soutinesterly along the northwesterly sideline of Interstate 95 for a
distance of 678.3 feet, mere or less, to a consonant;
Thence continuing southwesterly along the Interstate line a distance of 598.5
feet, more or less, to an iron bolt
Thence northwesterly an inside angle of 97030` for a distance of 434.2 feet,
more or less, to a concrete monument at the southeast line of Dow Air Force Base;
Then B
northeast direction along said mv Air Force Base southeast line
for a distance of 1,260_5 feet, Seare or less, to a concrete monument booking the
southeast corner of land occupied by cos Air Force Base;
Thence in southeast direction for a distance of 161.7 Feet, more or lees, to
an iron bolt;
Thence in the some approximate direction of southeast for 264 feet, more or less,
to another iron hold
Thence running approximately southeast again for a distance of 171.4 feet, more
OX less, to Ne iron colt at She point of beginning.
thus describing a parcel of land containing 16 acres more or less.
IN CITY COUNCIL
Sept. 25, 1967
Notion to receive
under suspension
of rules was defeated by the following
yes and no
vote: Councilors voting
Yes; Brown, n uston, MrKay, Minsky.
Councilors voting n Baldacci, Barry,
Brouster, Hunt, Porter.
IN �CCUNCIL
Per. 16, 1967
Referred to Planning Board, taJoled.
--------------
CONN L
Per. 23, 1967
Retain on table.
234-u
ORDINANCE
(if11E,) Amending Zoning ordinance - Portion of
IntroZ rtw by
cttwm
Mus oolemma is mmr;tty epgm5,gei.
Notion to r n table failed by the
follwing yes no vote: Councilors
voting ye:: Houston, Porte[. Councilors L6BK
Hating no: Baldxef. Pallor, Bazry, Brown, V\\\1 \\v
Hunt. Measy. o Inde Taken from table,
motion made to indefinitely postponed was
secondedand ration to table pealed Ey the
following yes , B n vote: Couen, Houston,
lors voting
yes: Baldacc i. Ballou, B[OYm. Houston,
gAni tree on
CITY
%n¢tvsvei pdtwxes
CITY CO C
Hunt,
McKey, Minsky, Porter. Councilor
Nov.
13, 1961
Barry
voting no.
Taken from table, retabled.
C CLBI:I(
CIT LERI(
Y�SIN
CITY CTNCIL
IN
CITY COUNCIL
Her.
11, 1967 - Taken from table, indefinitely
Nov.
27, 1967
POSTPONED.
Notion to r n table failed by the
follwing yes no vote: Councilors
voting ye:: Houston, Porte[. Councilors L6BK
Hating no: Baldxef. Pallor, Bazry, Brown, V\\\1 \\v
Hunt. Measy. o Inde Taken from table,
motion made to indefinitely postponed was
secondedand ration to table pealed Ey the
following yes , B n vote: Couen, Houston,
lors voting
yes: Baldacc i. Ballou, B[OYm. Houston,
September 21, 1967
Attention:
Mr. Jay Alley
City Clerk
City Hall
Bangor, Maine
Dear Jay:
Will you please advise the Bangor City
Council and/or the Chairman (Mr. Houston)
that I respectfully requast, ( under DUE PROCESS )
that my application of August 25, 1967, for re -zoning of
our Sunset Ave. property, be signed and forwarded to the
Planning Board, without further delay.
care
Dyer
W-61 Stale street
Thpkm 9429541
Banca.. Meme
APPLICATION FOR ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP AMENDMENT
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATE August 25, 1967
THE PLANNING BOARD OF BANGOR, MAINE
NO
( do not write in this space)
1. I (WE) Ralph Dyer
2, of 61 State Street Sensor 942-5544
Address City or Post Office Telephone
hRreby petition to amend the zoning ordinance of the City of Bangor,
Maine by reclassifying from Residential zone to the Business zone
the property outlined in red on mattached hereto, which are
part of this application, and described as follows;
3. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY (if any) Nest end of Sunset Ave.
Total area (acres or square Feet) Bangor, Maine appm 16 acres
4. PROPERTY LOCATION (Genal Description): Example -South side of
State Street 400 Yds. East of Pine Street
Penobscot Reg. of Deeds Book#2031
5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Assessors Map no.Parcel no—
METES AND BOUNDS - (Attach on separate sheet) page 39
6, PROPOSED USE: Commercial -Residential --Motel
Roselle M. Dyer
7. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD: Name Sohn1ph A. B. Dyer
EaDyer
Address c/o 61 State Street
angor, ane
S. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACT OWNER (if an 'for E stern
De
velo went
orp. Gerald McCarthy
i
9. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACT OWNER: b a h a a e
RETURN FORM AND DUPLICATE TO PLANNING BOARD CITY HALL COR MAINE
Action for a zoning change will be initiated with the Bangor city
Council and refermed to the Bangor Planning Board. Statutes require
a Public Hearng a ore the Planning Board, after a public advertising
(at Least 10 days prior to such public hearing), for all changes to the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Bangor City Council for final action.
lar-
B.mgar, the cent" of Maine ---the Ganmay to Maine's North Wants and Seashore Record
CARL J, K090DRUD
(gal of �Naagari AIaw
AsANNING DEPARTMENT
November 9, 1961
T0: Yne Honorable City Council
FROM: Planning Board
RB: CC. Order No. 234-U - Change from Residential A Zone to General
Business Zone a parcel of Land off Sunset Avenue between Interstate
95 and Dow field.
Gentlemen
Please be advised that the Planning Board held a public hearing o
the above request an November 6, 1967.
The Planning Board carefully considered the proposal presented, as well
as the opposition of a number of residents of the area.
After careful consideration of the request and its relation to, and
effect on, the general plan, the Planning Board voted to deny the request for
a zone Choose.
The Board felt the following were some of the important considerations in
denying the request.
1. Residential Use - because of the location, general area and access
is the best development use for this area - and the City as awhole.
2. It is important to retain the integrity of residential zoning to
prevent chaotic development and diminishing valuation on all land
in an area.
3. Changing this parcel would probably result in additional areas
being added creating s narrow strip of commercial development
squeezed between Interstate 95 and the proposed Campus a with
inadequate a and having a detrimental effect on thesurrounding
area, both residential and institutional.
4. Me proposed Motel use of part of the area would result in a parceling
f 11 y //n/13
of the whole piece creating a unstable development patterns
effecting the nearby residential area.
5. Because
of the location and size, the parcel (Motel a of the
frontpart), would realistically prevent rue of the balance for
residential use.
Yours truly,
Carl Kt
Planning Director
rr
CTK:jb