HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968-10-14 246-V ORDINANCE296-v
Introduced by councilor Balleu, Oct. 14, 1968
CITY OF BANGOR
ED
(TITLE,) MrbinanrC, Amara .69 z nine Ordinal nd,E _. i tarx
.Crosby. apxl Olive Streets.
$ gozdaissad hytim City Opun4ltofAhm CgyofPanger, bfolbwa: That the zone boundary lines
as established by the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Bangor on January ], 1954, as
amended, be hereby further amended as follows;
To change from Industrial Park and Residential "C' zones
o General Business
zone a parcel of land being more particularly described asfollows;
Beginning ata monument on the southeasterly side line of Crosby Street and
being approximately557feet southwest of the southwest corner of Crosby and
Thatcher Streets.
Thence
southeasterly direction for a distance of ]]8 feet more or less to a
point onthe northwest side line of Olive street.
nence in a northeast direction along the northwest side tine of olive Street
for a distance of 282 feet more or less to a point.
Thence in a northweat direction for a distance of 780 feet more or less to a
point on the southeast sideline of Crosby Street.
Thence in a southwesterly direction along the souther at side line of Crosby
Street for a distance of 281 feet more or less to the Point of beginning.
Thus describing parcel 2 of City Assessors Sheet 18 of the City of Bangor.
This parcel containing 5 acres more or less.
246-V
RECEIVED ORDINANCE
1968 OCT 10 AN 10: 36 CME.)
Amaadina
zoning
aa. - xmostresi
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Park -
Crosnv and
outs
stases
mi mdm om nim w
O�ieti im
MIS ONIMM9 w cerre.tiy el rxNSed
0xwiEte9 m
8NrtA93m PdlmlMeB.
`� PE Offscor R'V64
AWaR 6EO ZOrfV a.W1/l,'E
CROSBY # OUVE STS.
sr4"D
£XmmtNG =96 UN£5
APPLICATION FOR SWUNG ORDINANCE AND NAP AMENDMENT
TO: ME CITY COUNCIL AND DATE ge„tmbar 20, 2e6A
THE PLANNING BOARD OF BANGOR, MAINE:
NO.
(Do not write in this space
t. j fm MRSR-FROST LAND CO.
2. of W Mafv Strea B® orNab
Address City or Post Office Telephone
hereby petition to ®® d the ;rang ordinance of the City of Bangor, Maine by
reclassifying from Q j'�e„r:}l�Pjlrk ®a onto the Genarel AYfneeewine
the property outlined in red on the rape attached hereto, which 'are Part of this
application, and described as follows; See Exhibit "A"
3. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY (if any)
Total Area (acres or square fee[) 5.6 acres, r lea
4 PROPERTY LOCATION (General Description): Example - South side of State Street
400 yds. East of Pine Street. North side of Oliva Street and South aide
of Crosby Street
5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Assessors Map No. 1E Parcel No. 2
METES and BOUNDS - (Attach on separate sheet)
6. PROPOSED USE: Automotive Garage
I. NAME ANO ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD: Name Nabbar-Frist Tana Co.
SEE Hain Street
Address Bangor, Maine 04401
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACT POTHER (if such):
�vsHBEE,R-PROSY
9. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACT DdNER: e -Y asp)
. rySPEP
RETURN FOMANO WPLIWTE TO PLANNING BBPARTMENT. CITY CL. BANGOR, MAINE
V
Action for a awning change will be initiated with the Bangor City Council and
referred to the Bangor Planning Board. Statutes require a Public Hearing before the
Planning Board, after a public advertising (at least IO days prior to such public
hearing), for all changes to the zoning Ordinance of the City of Bangor. The r -
sanendation of the Planning Board is than returned to the Bangor City Council for
final action.
METES AND BUTUDS DESCRIPTION
A certain lot or parcel of land situated between Crosby and Olive
Streets, in Bangor, Penobscot County, Maine, and bounded and described
as follows:
Beginning at a monument on the southeasterly sideline
of Crosby Street and on the northeasterly line of
land of The Boy Senate of America; thence southeasterly
by and along the northeasterly line Of no Boy Scouts
of America seven hundreds enty-eight (778) feet,
r
S less, a point on the northwesterly sideline
of Olive Street; thence northeasterly by and along
said sideline of Olive Street two hundred eighty-two
(282) feet, m r less, to the southwesterly line
of a right-of-ore
war land of Webber and leading to
property located northwesterly of Webber Supply Company,
said southwesterly line of said right-of-way being
two hundred eighty-one andseventy-five one hundredths
(281.75) feet methods terly along the northwesterly
sideline of Olive Street from the southwesterly side-
line o Olive utree } thence northwesterly by and
along the eoutfiwesterly line of said right-of-way and
other land seven hundred eighty (780) feet, more
o
les monument on the southeasterly sideline of
Crosby Street: thence southwesterly by and along said
sideline of said Crosby Street two hundred eighty-one
andseventy-three one hundredths (281.73) feet to the
poinof beginning. Containing 5.06 acres, more or
lees.
^
EBHIBTT
n6"
C.S.I
49 ACRES /..Cv
Bangor, the center of Maine ---the Gatnoay to Maine's Nomb Woo and Seashore Racers
'All A .......so....,.
(94 Bf'Pai%Ge, faint
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
November 6, 1968
To: The Honorable City Council
From: The Planning Board
Subject: City Council Order 246V .Amending Seeing Ordinance, Crosby and
Olive Streets.
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that the Planning Board held a public bearing
on the above request on November 4, 1968.
The Board gave very ca reful consideration to the request as well
as to those opposed to theproposed change.
After considerable discussion, a motion to deny the request was
approved by majority vote.
In reaching its decision, the major factors were.
1. There seems to be no great and compelling need for such a change
at thistime, considering the existing Industrial Park seeing
an 3/4 of the site which presumably would allow the proposed use.
2. The question of this rezoning
oning must be considered effecting the
entire Residence C zone In that area and must be considered in
that light.
3. The long-range land use of this area
a has not been finalized at
this time by the Planning Board orCouncil.
4. If the long-range land a commercial (as the Planning
Department is proposing forconsideration)the method and
timing of such change constitutes considerable problem and does
net necessarily imply immediate implementation.
5. Individual zoning changes such as this may have a greater detrimental
effect on residential valuations and may not be the best approach.
Respectfully submi ttetteedd,,v�(/,
C//
Carl i d
Planning
Director
Dirac [or