Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-10-27 398 AC ORDER_ 39Xse - Introduced by Councilor Moone.y &tousr 37, 1975 CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) (Odd A .Apting city -Engineer's Report Final cost of Arctic Brook sewer Extension _........ .... .......... .._... __... __. _._ .....—.- BY W ..BYW MY Coanadlofl Cap of Danger: ORD&6ED. TXAT tle attached report of the City Engineer relative to the final 'coats of the extension of the Arctic Brook Sewer ffom Grandview Avenue to Essex Street be and hereby is accepted, and be it further ORDERED, that the assessments for said sewer construction be levied as noted therein. - " 'INICITY 27, 147 1 Clroctcaiirec 19]5 C, -Clip k'd rearms to advertise :..next.e'eearg. consider . Y nak[ m¢eting.- CLTY C IN CITY COUNCIL November 10, 1975 Nearing held,, hearing closer. Consider next meeting. 6 IN CITY COUNCIL = Novamber 12% ?1975 Consider ne Enmeeting. CITY C IN CITY COUNCIL mremMr 24, 1975 passed. CITY C18 ecitRa O.R DER Wile, L ,rK PPt}Pg. C3LY. ENB)P m p. PPPPFF..... t c fi—Y'_ 1G vn .:k"MT].1PHt, o% AXStjp. 9Fook. Sewey..... Extension. Introduced and filed by RECEIVED CITY OF BANGOR CITY CLERICS OFFICE '7s BET 16 PH 4 OE Y RECEIVED CITY OF BANGOR CITY CLERICS OFFICE '7s BET 16 PH 4 OE CITY OF BANGOR, MINE Engineering Department October 15, 1975 To the Mnicipal Officers: Referencemade to City Council order No. 271 AA, passed October 10, 191.,, which authorized the construction of the Arctic Brook Sewer Extension, extending in a northerly direction from Grandview Avenue to Essex Street. The work has been completed, and the following report is submitted: The sewer extension consisted of the installation of 1,856 feet of 14" pipe, 728 feet of 10" pipe, and 7 manholes, with the sewer terminating in Essex street approximately 2,000 feet north of the intersection of Grandview Avenue. The final costofthe sewer installation was $33,440.05. As mentioned in the previous report which was accepted by Council Order No. 271 AA, the entire cost of construction would be paid by Nr. Thomas Walsh, to be paid upon completion of the sewer construc- tion. Furthermore, Nr. Walsh would be reimbursed annually in the amount of 8 times the sewer user fee revenues received as a result of the sewer installation, until such time as Nr. Walsh has received full reimbursement of the amount which he paid. It is recommended that the first reimbursement be computed as of the last sewer user fee billing of 1975. It is recommended that the cast of the sewer installation be billed to Nr. Walsh immediately, with reimbursement to be made as noted above. �Respectfully submitted, John T. Frawley, City Engineer