HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-01-12 83 AD RESOLVE83 M
Introduced by Councilor Soucy, January 12, 1976
CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE.) gm bC Accepting.giey.Erczineer's.R.pott ._.Grant
Street Sewer
By ✓e Cft Cs, Ode Cit c(Baaoar
RESOLVBD, that the attached Report of the City Engineer
relative to the estimated cost of extending sewer
service o
Grant Street from Congress Street be and hereby is accepted;
and be it further
RESOLVED, that said sewer be constructed as soon as weather
conditions permit, and be it further
RESOLVED, that the am of $2,300.00 be appropriated from
the Reserve for Sewer Construction Fund.
In CITY CwWxc e3 M I+
` Sannazy 12, 1976
passed.- RE sot VE
CTTYC
%cepting City E gineer'S Report
Crant sengst sewer stenion.
RECEIVED
CITY OF BANGOR
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
'76 JO 5 PH 3 tl
CITY OF BANGOR, MINE _
Engineering Department
T
January 2, 1976
To the Municipal officers:
Pursuant to City Council Order No.f365 AC passed October
15, 1975 directing the City Engineer to make a,oat study for
the extension of sewer service on Grant Street, the following
report is submitted:
The proposed sewer extension would consist of the instal-
lation of 140 feet of 8" pipe and 1 manhole, extending north
from the existing sewer on Congress Street. The sewer i
initially intended to serve the property owned by Michael
DemkeW of 15 Grant Street. The total estimated cost of the
sewer extension is $2,300.00, of which 50%, or $1,150.00
would be paid by the City. The remaining share would be
assessed proportionately againA the property which benefits
by the sewer installation.
In addition to the Demkow property at 15 Grant Street,
a lot of land owned by W. and Mrs. John M. Long adjacent
to their house at 28 Grant Street would also benefit by the
ewer installation. It is felt that the benefit is equal
between Long and Demkow so that their individual assessments
would be $575.00 each. Mx. Demkow indicated that he was in
favor of the sewer installation, and Mr. Long indicated that
he was opposed. Since the Long property is vacant and would
not receive any immediate benefit from the sewer nstallation,
rr
e
it is proposed that the assessment be deferred until such
time as development might occur and sewer
entry was required.
In this respect, the deferred assessment would be increased
by 50%, to $862.50.
It is recommended that the sewer as described above be
constructed as soon as weather conditions permit.
Respectfully submitted;
John T. Frawley,
City Engineer