HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-06-12 265 AF ORDINANCE( 265 AP
Introduced by Councilor Mc%exnan, dune 12, 1976
a _ CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE.) Mtbilt=t, Amending Chapter VIII, Article zi seen 10 (3) (d)
Be 0 arAdvat by W Cft Ceawal of W City ofBaacer. as IbBlewe:
THAT Chapter VIII, Article 21, Section 10 (3) (d) of the Ordinances of the City
of Bangor be amended as follows:
Add the following:
.The Planning Board may shorten the time periods prescribed above where such
action beat serves the intent of the Ordinance and does not impose an
unreason-
able
burden upon the applicant. The applicant shall indicate comeneement and
starting dates on his site plan application.
Expiration of the applicable dates prior to commencement or substantial completion
of the work shall void the applicant's site plan approval unless the Code Enforce-
ment.Officer has granted him an extension of time, not to exceed sixty (60) days.
The Code Enforcement Officer Abell grant such an extension if he finds that R_.__1
applicant has diligently pursued his obligations under site plan approval and
test an extension is ,Justified by adverse weather, ,by delay in material delivery
due to no fault of the applicant, or by other valid; reason. If the Code Enforce-
ment Officer denies a request for an extension, the applieant may appeal to the
Planning Board which may reverse the decision of the Code Enforcement officer
where such decision was in error. If additional the
Planing Board may grant such extensions, even beyond the one year and two year
requirements prescribed above, based upon the same standards.
IN. CITY COUNCIL JUNE 1201995
REFIRED TO PLATING BOARD
CONSIDER NEXT MEETING
c/ Z4
CITY CLERK
IN CITY dmwlL
d e 26, 1978
Received tat reading -
Considera n xt meeting.
Y fC eW
c ex
IN CITY COHNGM JULY 1091998
PASSED AS A MED valwa YES
BRODNTAS. FINNIGAH9 GAH59 NCKERNAN9
SO S, WEYt90UTH, WTLLEY
SEE ANENDMNNT ATTACHED
"2f5 ORDINANCE
( TITLE,I ANED)ING CHAPTER VIII ARTICLE
a SECTION 10 Q A ) (0)
ImtrWwrei and (ilea 6y
iveit�:hAn
lmalt .
11Y fj F(:f('f (li r�.F-
i.
r
11Y fj F(:f('f (li r�.F-
265 AF (Amended)
v CITY OF BANGOR
rE
(TITLE) MTNn CP,Amending Chapter VIII, Article 21, Section 10 (3)
............. ............. .... _.... ...I -
(d)__... _..
(d) - Site Plan Time Requirements for Construction.
Belt ordairvd by the City Cwnwl of W City ofBanyw."fo x
THAT Chapter VIII, Article 21, Section 10 (3) (d) of the Ordinances
of the City of Bangor be amended as follows: _
Add the following:
The Planning Board may shorten the time periods prescribed above
where such action best serves the intent of the Ordinance hX
avoiding an unnecessarily long time period yet and does not
impose an u— nreaHHFEIeiGur�en upon one licanc. The applicant
shall indicate commencement and starting dates on his site plan
application.
Expiration of the applicable dates prior to commencement or
substantial completion of the work shall void the applicant's
site plan approval unless the Code Enforcement Officer has granted
him an extension of time, not to exceed sixty (60) days. The
Code Enforcement Officer shall grant such an extension if he
finds that applicant has diligently pursued his obligations under
site plan approval and that an extension 1s justified by adverse
weather, by delay in material delivery due tono fault of the
applicant, or by other valid reason. If the Code Enforcement
Officer denies a request for an extension, the applicant may
appeal to the Planning Board which imay reverse the decision of
the Code Enforcement Officer where such decision was clearly in
error. If additional extensions are required, the Planning Board
may. grant such extensions, even beyond the one year and two year
requirements prescribed above, based upon the same standards
employed by the Code Enforcement Officer.
265 AF (Amended)
CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE.) (liriY[1TB111rE�._Amending Chapter Vlll,Atticle 21 ,._Section 10,_,53) (d)
Site Plan Time Requirements for Construction.
Be k ordaisd WGu Ctty Coamdi ofW+Cav WBa«oo.. wfu'lwl.
THAT Chapter VIII, Article 21, Section 10 (3) (d) of the Ordinances of
the City of Bangor be amended as follows:
Add the following:
The Planning Board may shorten the time periods prescribed above
where such action best serves the intent of the Ordinance by avoiding
an unnecessarily long time period yet does not impose an unreasonable
burden upon the applicant. The applicant shall indicate commencement
and starting dates on his site plan application.
Expiration of the applicable dates prior to commencement or
substantial completion of the work shall void the applicant's site
plan approval unless the Code Enforcement Officer has granted him an
extension of time, not to exceed sixty (60) days. The Code Enforcement
Officer shall grant such an extension if he finds that applicant has
diligently pursued his obligations under site plan approval and that
an extension is justified by adverse weather, by delay in material
delivery due to no fault of the applicant, or by other valid reason.
If the Code Enforcement Officer denies a request for an extension,
the applicant may appeal to thePlanningBoard which may reverse the
decision of the Code Enforcement Officer where such decision was clearly
in error. If additional extensions are required, the Planning Board
may grant such extensions, even beyond the one year and two year require-
ments prescribed above, based upon the same standards employed by the
Code Enforcement Officer.
Bangor, the Center of Maim—the G teuuy to Maine's North Woods and Seashore Resorts
DATE: July 6, 1978
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: The Planning Board
SUBJECT: Amending Zoning Ordinance
Council Ordinance 265 AF
Please be advised that the Planning Board at its
regularly scheduled meeting on June 19, 1978, held a public
hearing an the above request.
At its July 5, 1978 meeting, after careful deliberation
the Board voted four in favor and one opposed to recommend
approval of the above zoning amendment as revised.
9V� �
or
P arming Officer
J�
MAINE MANCI
LORD
,.i.
zo, t<.,ow,
a.."oJOHN o,.."
(gag
of Pauses, �7{atne
DATE: July 6, 1978
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: The Planning Board
SUBJECT: Amending Zoning Ordinance
Council Ordinance 265 AF
Please be advised that the Planning Board at its
regularly scheduled meeting on June 19, 1978, held a public
hearing an the above request.
At its July 5, 1978 meeting, after careful deliberation
the Board voted four in favor and one opposed to recommend
approval of the above zoning amendment as revised.
9V� �
or
P arming Officer