HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-02-12 149 AG ORDER149 AGJ
Introduced by Councilor
McKernan, February 12, 1979
CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE.) (orbgrt.APproving the nal P1ae - B mak Associates Subdivision -
By dw City Caaaal of the aro of8aspor
ORDERED.
TWT the final subdivision plan for Banmak Associates, located.
on the access reed between Rogan Road and the Bangor Mall, having been
reviewed by the Planning Board and found to be in general conformance
with local subdivision laws and State of Maine Statutes, Title 30,
Section 4956,be approved. -
/0.
RAG >
9D E R .9S9
IN CITY CDUMM Man 12119'A
VOTE TO MWS TO M BUSINESS - Titles
8 YES 1 NO VOTING YES BALMCCSs
mrouwx q inure q swap NRYMOUYN... AEFBQY3M.TXBfFiNNi.Tl.RL.FNtHRKA§BW-
NILLEY,,NOODs ZEumw -
VOTI ,To am SUBDIVISION WWR MIL
SIDERm .......................................
CON2NvS��%�TFE�TI�rJNG','/�/
G - GL '77 �
Introduced and filed b
CITY CLLRK U
- Coweilman
MOST CUUNCIL RRSMRY 26,1979
CI CL6T
PAINE aE LYNOH
ATTORNEYS 'NO COUNSELLORS AT LAW
A,111 a, 111c. RANGON MAINE SAUDI 207-047-OPAN
Aeunw—M. les,
February 13,-1979
Robert B. Miller, Esq.
City Solicitor -
city Ball
Bangor, ISE 04401
Be: Banmak Associates - Bangor Mall Subdivision
Bear Bob:
This letter is written as a follow up to our telephone conversation
relative to the above captioned subdivision.
It is my understanding -that Sam members of the Council have erpresaeed
concern that approval of the final subdivision plan may impose sure
Obligation on the Citywith regard to Bangor Mall Boulevard because .the
plan bears the notation "to be dedicated to the City of ¢angor."
I will take this opportunity to alleviate that concern and do hereby
assure you that Banner Associates In Say intends this language to in
anm Say. obligate the City to accept Bangor Mall Boulevard as a public
way or to impose any other obligation upon the City with regard to the
Boulevard.
I have been authorized on behalf of Bmmak Associates to give the
Council every assurance that approval of the final plan will in way
impoa obligation on m on the City nor will they ever make any future
assertion to that effect.
As you know, we have by separate agenda item requested the City to -
accept the Boulevard as
a public way, but this IB An entirely separate
issue and will rise or fall on its-oun merits.
I would like to point out that further delay in approval of the sub-
division could be critical in its development. We have several parties
who are interested In purchasing aM developing the lots but we cannot
consu®ate any transactions until final approval.
These parties would like to start construction as soon Ins weather
allows, but they all need to obtain site plan approvals for their
projectsfromthe City and the DU and to make arranamments for final-
ization of financing before beginning construction. it is almost
Robert E. Miller, Esq. -2- February 23, 1979
certain that W and they will encounter unforeseen delays during that
process so you c see that further delay at this point could hinder the
project. - - -
'I would appreciate it if you would advise the Council to.trest the
" approval of the subdivision plan separate and apart free the question of
acceptance of the Boulevard, without any fear that the City will become
obligated with regard to the Boulevard as a result of approval of the
subdivision. '
Very truly yours, '
c
C. LYNCB. ESQ. -
TGL:blm