HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-08-22 83-289 ORDERlntroduced by Councilor Frankel, August 22, 1983
CITY OF BANGOR
(11nE) (PrUri.-.-.-Approving Mobilehome Park Construction Permit __..
Park Mobilehome Park
By the City Counol ofµ City ofBamwn
ORDERED.
I I_.
THAT
in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XI, Article
4, Section 1.5
the Bangor City
Council hereby grants approval of a
Mobilehome Park Construction
Permit for a revision of aplan for
Holiday Park
Mobilehome Park.
STATEMENT OF
FACT:. The Mobilehome Ordinance requires that after
review by the Zoning and. Code Enforcement Officer,
- the Health Officer, and the City Engineer, the
Planning Board shall hold a public hearing and
report its findings to the City Council for final
action. The Planning Board held a public hearing
_
on the request for a Mobilehome .Park Construction
_
Permit for Holiday. Park Mobilehome Park at its -
meeting of August 15, 1983 and voted unanimously
- to recommend to. the City Council that it grant the
Mobilehome Park Construction Permit for Holiday
Park Mobilehome Park.
IN CITY COUNCIL
August 22, 1983
Moved from Consent Agenda
to Nen Busineas after 83-297.
sassed by the following yea and
votes. Ccuncilor voting yes:
Brown, Cm:, Davis, Frankel,
Soucy, Weyanuth and Willey.
COumilor voting no: Gass. CwpcilO
ab ,irg: Jordan.
CYy
CL0i1(
83-289
ORDER
Title,
.Agp. vim Mobilehome Park
.................
Constr.uction Parmit Holiday Park
................................
Mnbilehome Park.
Introduced and filed by
..✓ Qnc�w (Q. moi. /.V'"...!..........
Councilman
b9 ,u1, )F
CI11'L_tA ,
Bangor, the center of Mono—the Gateway to Maims Abnh Woods and Seadore Rwrtr
DATE: August 16, 1983
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: The Planning Board
SUBJECT: Holiday Park Mobilehome Park Construction Permit
Please be advised that the Planning Board held a Public hearing
n the above request for a Mobilehome Park Construction Permit at
its regular meeting on August 15,.1983.
The Planning Boardvotedunanimously to recommendto the City
Council that it grant the Mobilehome. Park Construction Permit for
the revision. to the Holiday Park Mobllehome Park Plan.
t
SMl/P
ROONGY .went/
CRY HALL
WWI'
000.uMHG 0410
••Lp,/••,<>,
JOHN M. LORD
P1inun0O'"•••
CHU
of ParBar,
Pairm
DATE: August 16, 1983
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: The Planning Board
SUBJECT: Holiday Park Mobilehome Park Construction Permit
Please be advised that the Planning Board held a Public hearing
n the above request for a Mobilehome Park Construction Permit at
its regular meeting on August 15,.1983.
The Planning Boardvotedunanimously to recommendto the City
Council that it grant the Mobilehome. Park Construction Permit for
the revision. to the Holiday Park Mobllehome Park Plan.
t
SMl/P
August 10,1983
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sandy Smith
FROM: William M. Shook, Jr.
SUBJECT: Holiday Park Construction Permit Revision
Sandy, in reply to your transmittal of August 2nd, I do
not see any problem of a public health nature as a result of
Thomas Walsh's proposal to add 38 new trailer lots and a
new access road to Holiday Trailer Park on Essex Street.
Our problems in the past with Mr. Walsh and Holiday Trailer
Park have not been the design layout of the facility, but
rather with the actual construction and use.
1. Improperly compacted and graded shoulders on
earlier Park construction.
2. Installation and maintenance of the Park swimming
pool.
3. Improper installation of sewer and water connectors
for trailers and failure to cap these on vacant lots in ex-
isting Park areas.
WMS/[c
�S=—'V A�
AUGlp 1983 LJ
Bangor Coo 'e Emlorra",
By—_
CITY OF BANGOR, MAINE
Engineering Department
MEMO August 9, 1983
To: Chairman, Bangor Planning Board
From: Sohn T. Frawley, City Engineer
CC: Sohn M. Lord, Planning Officer
Subject: ,Holiday Mobile Home Park Expansion
This office has reviewed the Plan entitled "Survey Layout
Plan, Solid �v Park Expansion, Essex Street, Bangor, Maine"
prepared by n• W Bartlett, dated July 23, 1983, and the Plan
is considered to be acceptable.
The distance between the two driveways (285'+) is con—
sidered to be adequate, and because of the good alta distance
and anticipated low traffic volumes, the connection of the new
driveway to Essex Street is not considered to have any adverse
impact upon traffic.
M