The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-06-25 84-253 ORDERM-253 Introduced by Councilor Davis, Tune 25, 1984 CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) (Orbgr, -endo s ng Appl,icaaron io State Delor"At o _ Educational @ Cultural Services for Funding of Renovations at the Fifth Street Middle School By t" OUR C"nett or dw my ofBaayor: ORDERED, THAT the application, a copy of which is on file, in the office of the City Clerk, for funding of renovations at the Fifth Street Middle School is hereby endorsed, and that the filing of the same with the State of Maine Department of Educational s Cultural Services is hereby approved by the Bangor City Council, Municipal Officers of the City of Bangor. ea-zs3" O R D E R 84 JLU a1 P356 IN CITY Cw IL 3 Jule zs, 1984 pp Pe d Title, ECENM ° a YOF OANOOh CITY CLERK e✓� 'r-- „F949"jnssex lication to state Depavtment ...................... 6..r ues for Of ......icwl . Cultural fierv. ..............bone at th Funding of of watlm�s e[ the F1£tM1 Street ' ' Middle 6<Fooln duced,md filed by ......l .....aoT/L .... - dr Councilman /�ESoc y ji - JS3 PA -1 Admin. Unit EM OR SCHOOL DEPARTMENT AddkE64 73 HARL STREET We l JULY 1984 Alain State Depu emt o6 Fdueati 9 C en..P Swices Aug"tm, wine 64330 Att'n: Nvistan oA Schoot FaciLi.Lies Dean Sin: A6te% a ean6at Study 06 4CAaot 6aeitititq neE& in ME BANGOR SCHOOL e the BOM"+6 ineatu Choot Cmay.itteal W voted on 18 June1984 lVatel by a vote o6 4 - 0 to nequeet couidcutiaw-o6 the att4CW eo"t4ction Wject emitted FIFTH STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL RENOVATIONS AOJe L OW tocated at 143 FIFTH STREET. BANGOR, MAINE 04401 IspeeziZa maject LO&En[on ,�'. Signed—1sw>�enz 06 senoo" I ------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- [To be compteted by att but Sehaot Adminietnative Di4ttfct41 The SCE¢e9ron-vx City Couneit have viewed thus pwWaaC a d ane—/"e wt— in agreement with its pnav"to". COMMENTS: I SIGNATURES+ n PA -1 FIPTH STHEEiMbDOLE SCHOOL RENOVATIONS R0lEC7 TTTLE----- 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW A. Brief statement of need: The facility, as _originally designed in 1940. was built as a grade I-9 _ Junior Hih School. Standards for, facilities now being constructed for 6-8 middle schools a distinctly different from tore World War 11 era Junior Huh Be ool, ad specific components of the facility needs to be addressed are shown below__ S. Brief description of project: SAPETT: The second story corridors in both the western and eastern wings of the building exceed the maximum corridor length specified by the Life Safety Code relative to egress he case of fire. Kitchen facilities are located in the basement, causing eafety roblems in case of fire and vio- _latyng stat�ldellnes which as that the kitchen and storage facilities should be on the around floor. A safety hasard is also created for students and employees who must carry their food trays up the stairs, thus not being able to e hand rails. Buses aye loaded/unloaded at the rear of the building in a dangerous locatimi the school driveway should be relocated to the front of the building. The gym asite is only about It be size recommended by waste standards. This causes safety problems and there 1s no spectator seating. There is n storage for Physical Educationquipmen equipment must be stared In the gymnasr whe_studmnts can collide with It. RAND1IAPPEO ACCESS: The second floor instruction., library and co FIFIN STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL RENOVATIONS PA -2 Wage 2 purer cancer areas are not accessible to students, parents, and the general public who may be handicapped. MUSIC FACILITIES: Band and orchestra practice are scheduled in the audi- torium, which disrupts nearby classroom learaing activities. Pte large "sound- proof' moats room, with a musical instrument storage area, is needed. 1NDUS'I'RIAL ARTS SPACE: The school contains industrial arts space Mich is only one-third to one-half of the size standards ser by the state for industrial education programs. SPECIAL EDUCATION CLASSROOMS: A resource room is -needed, along with one self-contained special education classroom. 01a1'ICE SPACE: The building Boas not contain suitable office areae and comfcroncL spore for guidance and substance abuse counsellors. Additionally, a .mull conference roam is needed for Pupil Evaluation Team meetings for 8-12 persons. Tba building contains no teacher work areas for planning and the placement of mimeograph, duplicating and photocopying machines. GYMNASIUM, In addition to the safety problems previously noted. the gymnnnfum is designed as a one teaching station facility and the present middle .:Aural staffing requires a two teaching station multi-purpose facility. The intramural component of middle schools is severely limited by the present facility. COMPUTER LABORATORY: A computer laboratory of I2 work stations to needed to miir curriculum plans. CENFRAL RCFURBtSHINC: A general refurbishing of classroom lighting, floor cova.rmy, plumbing and beat distribution systems is needed, along with a up- dor Ly: 4 interior design. ENkRGY CONSERVATION! Fuel and Electricity consumption of 99.000 BTU/Ff2 1n Wue.ua g f.cility is significantly higher than currently acceptable standards berrmsa the building is 44 years old. PA -3 It. RATIONALE A. for each existing school building provide the following: (Attach extra sheets as required.) I. School name s date builHywlE gTgpnm s ran 2. Building location:: gTpwwT RANCOR. MAINE 04401 - 3. Burger of rwva 15 CLASBWGNS 4. Grade levels housed:yyppd_g_ 5. Pupils per ream by grade (list): 'CLANCY 27 WAGNER 27 WRIGHT 28 - BRANS 29 COX 26 AMES 27 GARDINER 27 ABLE 26 MANN 29 TRASH 28 BRYAN -28 FINCH 28 O'RRIEN 28 GILLETTE 7 6th 7th GRADE 165 GRADE 200 6. Designed capacity of building:__ 450 7. Size of siW IACHANCE 24 MAIDLAW 22 - HATFIELD 24 PLANAR" 25 COREY 24 ROBINSON 25 CAPEHARI 24 WILLETTE 2 8th CRAM 170 MAL ENWLLIffiNf 535 J. Description of building condition (refer to rating criteria sheet. first priority): The building has a significant safety hazard intthat the existing egress from the second floor of the east and west Rings violates Life Safety Code standards. The small site of the gymnasium and accompanying lack of storage also endangers the safety of students,using a sub-staMard sire physical education area which contains protruding physical education equipment. Traffic circulation for bus loading express students to hazards for bus loading and PA -4 B. Birth Statistics Using State Department of Health and Welfare Statistics, provide a record of live births within your unit for the past 10 years. 1973 534 1974 487 1975 468 1976 434 1977 478 1978 425 1979 469 - 1980 427 1981 452 1982 480 C. Population Changes I. Past 10 years - Indicate and explain any significant changes in local populn '-over the past 10 years. Include data such as toning. Industries,.; public Musing. trailer parks, etc. 1968 CENSUS 38,912 1979 CBNSUS 33,168 - 1980 CENSUS 31,168 t JULY 1982 32,016 (Maine Dept. Of Human Services) 2. Anticipated (A) 1985 34,550 1986 35,250 1987 35,950 1988 36,700 1989 - 37,450 1990 38,200 1991 38,950 SOURCE: Maine Capertment of Durso Services,Bureau of Bealth Planning and Development Division of Data and Research PA -5 (s) 1983 31,030 1986 30,738 1989 30,453 SOURCE: Urban Decision Synteme, Inc., Me American city Corporacion 0. Enrollments (total for unit) 1 October 1983 MiedLibign REPORT L Lut our cunei[ an re ro nt brade: Res. , Total Res. Tuition Total K 295 0 295 166 34]_ 0 347 2 306 0 306 3 285 0 283 _ 6 212_0 272 5 __ _Q_ 6 _469..— 1 0_315 — Res. Tuition Total L 8 n 62 9 154 1� 166 10 169 is_ 177 11 out of �_ IT 747 11 gin pecial,AA 4321 62 4383 Note: Place an asterisk beside any grades being tultioned out of unit. PA -6 2. Projected Enrol invents (Attach extra sheets as required). a) A minimum of 5 years projection. See attached cohort survival projection peepaxed by Ca£farella and Caffaxella. b) Describe method used. Cite any unusual factors Involved. Cohort survival. See attached pages. OCT ,1; l9o, Cohort SuIvlVel Enrollment Prcjo tiun For Bangor Maine SCM1ool OepaKmant Por October of E11h Yoar Preperetl on 10/16/83 Prepared by Edaerd P. CaFFar Blla CaFFarella C CaFfarella 2322'n r St. RiCnmondeVA 23229 004-345-0795 Projection flunber 1210/16/8309:53:54 Not Corrected for Lo=el Conci9rona Cohort SunVlvel Enrollment projection fon O Oangbr H'i" School Depart ... A Actual Enrollment for October of Each Year PrapareO an 10/16/63 by Edward P. CeFFanella CaFfanella 6 Caffarellp, 2322 Wistar St., Richmond, V4 23229 Number 1210/16/8309:59:54 Net Corrected For Locel Conditian5 School Births KOGN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 Specl el Year yr number eln sec 70-01 (65) 939 502 571 594 578 560 525 SOS 532 530 408 510 451 441 119 14 71-72 (65) 868 560 545 542 551 571 535 531 507 516 500 547 421 364 114 44 7243 (67) 643 510 569 522 491 519 567 509 524 507 499 500 445 385 127 54 7344 (66) 676 485 511 444 470 476 491 532 521 504 484 509 473 396 130 71 7445 (69) 662 536 475 474 417 450 462 474 533 503 512 478 457 384 142 71 7546 (70) 706 499 479 414 445 412 449 434 475 507 476 534 403 397 167 56 76-77 (71) 658 459 443 439 302 421 401 426 415 469 488 909 455 404 196 0 77-78 (72) 539 379 419 409 410 370 411 382 423 410 457 459 450 412 143 13 7e-79 (73) 534 352 394 375 381 37G 350 382 352 399 398 456 402 400 143 5 79-80 (74) 407 325 351 352 369 365 345 356 3GO 351 398 441 404 352 135 14 30-81 (75) 46B 304 334 343 344 359 362 352 3G4 360 356 436 379 344 Ila 33 91-82 (76) 434 300 333 306 318 329 343. 335 3G6 353 353 389 3G5 311 125 52 82-83 (77) 478 322 327 290 294 326 304 333 354 347 367 354 302 344 121 67 83-84 (70) 425 295 347 306 2B5 272 307 315 343 335 354 352 335 297 127 40 Cohort Survival Enrollment Projection far L,f Sensor main, school Oeparament PFoja t,d Enrollment for October OF Each Year Prepared nn 10/16/03 by Ed."d P. La Ffara113 CoFFerella 6 Numher 1210/16/0309:59:54 C,fFaralla. 2322 'AtstaF St., Bltnmohd, Not Corroded For VA Local Conditions 23229 School Year Bietde yr number KOGN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 Special aim sec 33-B4 (78) 425 295 347 306 265 272 307 315 343 335 354 362 335 297 127 40 64-BS (79) 469 326 318 318 301 275 256 296 324 325 342 367 343 329 124 41 05-e6 [80) 427 296 351 291 312 290 259 247 305 307 331 354 347 337 120 41 86-87 (el) 452 314 319 321 286 301 273 250 255 289 313 343 335 341 116 40 B7-88 [82) 488 339 338 292 316 276 283 264 257 241 295 324 325 329 116 38 83-89 (83) u u 365 309 207 304 259 273 271 243 246 305 307 319 u 35 89-90 (84) u u u 334 304 277 2B6 251 282 257 248 255 269 302 u 32 30-91 (65) u u u u 328 293 261 276 258 267 262 257 241 234 a 31 91-92 (B6) u u u u u 316 276 252 2B5 244 272 271 243 237 u. 30 92-93 (87) u u u u u u 298 266 259 269 249 292 257 239 a 30 93-94 (BB) u u u u u u u 268 274 245 275 258 267 253 u 31 Survival Factor 0.69 L09 0.92 0.98 0.96 0.94 0.97 1.03 0.95 1.02 1.04 0.95 0.93 0.05 0.03 Modal Nunbar 2 2 3 2 1 2 0 - 2 2 2 0 2 2 Enpected Accuracy Correlation Mean Std Deviation 0.98 0.3 3.7 0.91 -2.2 4.a 0.97 -0.8 3.5 0.97 -0.5 3.1 0.96 -0.0 3.7 0.93 0.8 3.9 0.96 0.84 -1.2 -0.2 4.0 4.7 0.95 0.1 3.4 0.99 -0.9 1.9 0.89 -0.1 5.5 0.88 0.7 6.8 0.91 -1.4 5.4 The leiter u lndicatns t s quantity is u • The First line OF onrallaant on this cage is - alo11Te Conant Survlvel Ennalh aot Projection for OD . 21,91, Maine School Oapantmant - Actual Total, for October of Each Year Prepared an 10/16/63 by Edlard P. Caffarells Caffaralla 6 Caffe,alle, 2322 Ni9tar St., Richland, VA 23229 Numb,, 1210/16/8309:59:54 Not Corrected for Local Conditions YEAH ALL K-5 K-6 K-8 6-5 7-8 7-9 9-12 10-12 E9-95 K-2 3-5 75-71 7021 3431 3936 4990 1567 1062 1550 1890 1402 133 1757 1564 71-72 6256 3312 3843 4066 1556 1025 1525 1832 1332 153 1655 169 7243 6738 3178 3567 4718 1540 1031 1530 1029 1330 191 1601 1577 73-74 6504 2085 3417 4442 1557 1025 1509 Iasi 1377 201 1440 1445 74-75 6360 2014 3288 4324 1510 1036 1548 1031 1319 213 1485 1329 75-75 6217 2696 3132 4114 1416 982 1456 1270 1394 233 1332 1305 76-77 5077 2545 2971 3655 1310 884 1372 1856 1360 166 1341 1204 77-70 5557 2398 2700 3613 1215 833 1290 1780 1331 156 1207 1191 7849 5169 2234 2616 33G7 1133 751 1149 1656 1258 145 1121 1113 79-80 4929 alas 2464 3175 1067 711 1109 1605 1207 149 1028 1060 80-81 4790 2856 2408 3132 1076 724 1060 1515 11a9 151 gal 1375 91-82 450a 1929 2264 2993 1064 .729 1082 1418 1065 177 939. 990 22-83 4452 1063 2196 2997 1034 701 1062 1367 1000 Ise 939 324 83-04 4320 1012 2127 2005 993 678 1032 1348 994 157 948 054 Suatatals for grade group, do not include special education students. Hounding may Cause the totals displayed to vary slightly from the Son of the individual slap". E5 and as are abbreviations for 830mentary and secondary spacial education. Cohort Survival Enrollment Projection for 4, 8angcr Haines School Department Projected Totals for October of Each Year Prepared on 10/16/83 by Eduard P. OaFfarelle 6 Caf Farella, 2322 Mister SE., Numbsr 121O/1e/0309!59:54 Not Corrected Caf Ferella Hi,hmand, VA 23229 For Local Conditions - YEAR ALL K-5 K-6 K-6 6-8 7-0 7-9 9-12 10-12 E9-55 K-2 3-5 53-84 4320 1812 2127 2805 993 678 1032 1348 994 167 - 948 094 84-85 4283 1792 2089 2738 945 649 991 1380 1039 165 961 832 05-66 4198 1799 2046 2653 aso 512 944 1369 1038 161 938 960 66-87 4097 1814 2063 2607 793 544 857 1333 1019 158 954 860 87-86 4034 1843 2107 2605 762 498 793 1273 979 156 969 874 88-89 u u u u 788 519 761 1178 932 u u 051 89-90 u u u u 789 539 787 1094 846 u u 667 90-91 u u u u 801 525 787 1045 783 u u 082 91-92 u u u u 781 529 801 1024 752 u u u 92-93 u u u u 795 529 778 1027 778 u u u 93-94 u u u u 807 520 795 1052 777 u u u Subtotals For grade group% do Rounding may c tals E5 and 99 are abbreviations For The first line of enrollment not include special education etudanta. displayed to very sLlgntly From the Sul of the alerentary ansecondary Special education. on this Pepe laactual a'rallment. individual aradea. Explanation of the procadurea and models used with chase projections The projections tri thisImport 111, don with r En 011m t Praje clo Sys da .loped by Or. r Edward P. C,Ffa ells The al, in the Enrollmentc Projection Sy, - utilize the basic .... mations ofthe cohort survival enrollment projection Methodology. The bests For the cohort methodology is the ratio of students progressing Fcom one e grade to the n The percentage is called t cohort s rvlval Factor. The survival incorporatesmal promotion, and r s but also takes into account other changes such as death,, in -migration and out-mlgration. Ruvlval fa gr than t a Indic In m in the ofstudents. 4 fa ta n e the Indic door',,, in the numberof students-For.pl. IF the enrollment inthe third glad, I, equalthe previous ye r second grade .n n enroll then the r survival Fa ill be 1.00. Similarily, IF the fifth enrollment ollm is Sa and the previous year'sFourth grade enrollment was 100 than .90 will be the survival Factor. The Enrollment Projection System us , four modal, to determine the survival Factors far each grade. The modal selected For each grade is indicated at the bottom of the projection. Por each grade level. Model number 0 use, an average from all the a 0 actual enrollments shown on the report. Madel number t also ue, a11t or the actual enrollments but v,Ightg ther m t years heavier than the earlier years. Model n umber 2 usonly the m etyea, t celculat, the survival Factor. Model number 3 sea the average of the middle three survival Factor, from the last File year,. The system tests each model to determine which accurately. will project a specific grad, nset The models a tested by determining has a e the models would hole Seen if they had been used in thes past. The to statistics Include a Pearson product-mcnent correlation coefficient, a mean percentageof ar, and a standard deviation for the percentage of a The model whim will yieldthe best values For these statistics is selected to produce the actual projection for a glvsn grade level. Explanation of the procedures and 'addle used with theca projections (continued) The Pe.F. on product -moment correlation coe FFiclent shows oho closeness OF the match botween the projected enrollment and the actual a .aliment' IF the projected enrollment and the alollm n Far a given' @fade always equal,....la ula be Perfect w1th a value OFh 1.00. IF c tch isalmoet perfect, the c ralatlon will be between 0.9 and I.G. A correlation between 0.0 end 0.9 is a good match. Generally, IF the correlation In less than 0.7, the match between projected and actual enrollments is not good. The then of the xpe atl cy the n percentage OF error between o measures a oC endure are mea Fcen o cxe the projected and the actual ne aland nM1a standard deviationof this erh rAn errorof hnX indicatesthatthe projected and actual enrollments w equal. value a greater a 0.0% indicates that the projection anr by boo high. Conversely, a value lessthe, 0.0% indicates that the projection as too low. For a district with an average class size of thirty, a F of 3.31; indicates that the projection may be in error by o student per classroom. error error OF 5.7% indicates an error of two students par classroom. Theindic es the all for yo into the Future. This is indicatorm of the a ecy of a particular projected grade. The mean, an, year into CSe Future, should be within the range from -5% to +5%. The standard deviation lndicatea the amount of cluataring or spread around the lean. A standard deviation c1050 to o indicates clans clu%taring around the neon. The standard deviation anould be within the Fango from 0% to 10X. The Enrollment Projection System methodology hes bden Utilized to prepare s v rel hundred projections. These projections have had aoverall at acy rate of 96.'0%. Far a pall number of c nities there nay be changes In enrollment whicIn will am different than the projection. For ma t districts, honaver, the projections praparatl wity the Enrallment Projection Syatamdhould be an accurate indication of Future enrollment. ALL an rollment projections should be updated each year s that the most recent data is used toproject the future a roll.man0. This willinsure that the best passible projection is used For Future planning. IZ61 III. PROGRAM Explain briefly howw this project will meet program newls'in the following areas: A. Enhancement of existing programs. B. Creation of new programs. C. Provision for extraordinary programs. Note: Attach a copy of your schools schedule. This project will help meet the program needs of a middle school. Me facility, as Originally designed In 1940, v constructed a a grade 7-9 Junior HighSchool. Standards for facilities now being constructed for 6-8 middle schools are distinctly different from a pre World War II era Junior High School. Suitable space needs to be provided for acomputer omputer laboratory, a age-appropriate industrial arts a and a soundproof 11 The gymnasium is only about one-half the State -recommended size, and me rossment of the school mandates a two teaching station gymn rum/multi-purposarea, rather than the current single sunshine stationeadapted to atwo teaching station program. Middle School emphasis on intramural sports cannot be appropriately met with the existing gymnasium. Office space is needed for a Substance Abuse Coun- selor, with accompanying space for small conference room for group comseling and PET evaluations. A r m is needed, along with self-contained Special Education classroom, of which were provided for in the original building plane. 6/84 CLASS SCHEDULE Classes are organized into a seven period day, with school opening at 8:30 a and closing at 2:30 p.m. 6th gr.We: Self contained classrooms, with English, mathematics, science and Social Studies being caught by the classroom teacher. Physical education classes are held in the gymnasium. A rotating, quarterly, exposure program to the "unified arts is also offered in the subject areas of industrial arts, home eco - notice, music and art. Classes are held in the areas of the facility dedicated to these subject areas. 7th grade: Same curriculum as the 6th grade, except that students change classes in all subject areas, with care curriculum subjects being taught by specialists within teaching teams of 2-4 faculty members. ILe basic 7 period schedule is maintained, but with a "flexible schedule" concept. Irk grade: The curriculum stays the same as for 7th grade, except that a foreign language, computer and algebra are offered as electives. Flexible scheduling is more limited, and teaching teams are 4-5 members in PUPIL'S DAILY PROGRAM Roma 1 2 4 7 -,F IV. FINANCING A. Bonding capacity B. Outstanding indebtness C. Supplemental funds available (gifts, building funds, etc.) PA -8 $ 59,160,000 30 Tune 1903 $ 2,652,355 30 June 1903 $ a B. Estimate additional operational fists Incurred as a result of this project. $ ) S00 OL --[utilities) f. Can additional operating costs be assumed under present funding limitatlans n /-7 ym No