Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-12-28 88-56 ORDINANCE88-56 Introduced by Councilor Sullivan. December 28, 1987 - x CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) (Pdrinnnnei Repeal of Chapter XII, article 13 of to Ordinances of the city of Bangor - subdivision variances _.. ......_. ......_... ........... ............ .I ............... _._ Be B nMainsd by tM My Coaneti of Gtiry ofBanuor, an foyav er — THAT the provisions of Chapter XII, Article 13, Section 1, including Subsection 1.1, are hereby : ended. 7%, -In City Council Decanter 28,1987 ( T1TIE,) Repeal of Chapter XIIj ticle 13 i mfetedio plerming bcerd s cnde and ordinanc ', mnelder n .t rtceting of the Enrdinencas of tbs City of Banpr Subdivision iances C' Cle In[roLxei ami Riad by Caum tlm'm. -87 OEC 23 P 4 :10 iUCITY Of BANGOR CITY CLERK In City Council January 11,1988 refer 1 to plamming board and code and ordinance oamittee' msdle[ nest rgetin9 In City Council February 22.1988 /1 Amended and Panned Amendment Attached (/�� i Vote Yee 2 absent Ci C1 voting yen Blanchette.Absentgland,Frahuber ' SasL Su111van,Tilley Absent SauyeL Sfiube[[ iLRie=, Cit Clerk In City council January 25,1988 Refered to code S ordinance asam. amt Planning board consider 2!ral rastin�g in furriery us2y cle ` PE Y ammo,. ,um„e - n.,, r„sm,m e.,,wm e,,,,er RODNEY 0. WHAT CITY HALL JOHN MLORD ,•L.20 7 /04 ,.061 "H"" CtU of Pangar, c4ladu DEPARTMENT W PLANNING 1.0 COMMIMITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: February 18, 1988 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: The Planning Board SUBJECT: Referral of Amendment to Chapter XII, Subdivision Regulations - Subdivision. Variances C.O. p 88-56 After reviewing the revision to this proposed amendment which included some standards to be used in granting subdivision variances, the Planning Board voted five in favor and none opposed to recommend that the amended ordinance be adopted by the City Council. THAT the provisions of Chapter %II, Article 13, Section 1, including Subsection 1.1, are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced by the following: CHAPISB %II Article B - variances Sec. 1 vaziances 1.1 The fissuring Board ma authorize a ce from [M design or autmittal regurrenen[saofvers Ordinance arly upon an affirmative finding of the following: A. that the variative flan the design or sukrnittal sWWards is re irW due to particular h sisal site oarZ tions or coW rtroas in the exrst n street or ut lit —System; B. that the grantinq of the v will not result n circmxven[ion of the health and safety pro- visions of this ordinance; and C. that the strict application of the standards of this Ordinance would make suNivision of an owner's property non -feasible. For purposes of this subsection, feasibility shall he determined by physical, practical, and economic considerations PWEO PN.".NoIR:Nf 1 CWWIL ORDINANCE i88-56 MT the provisions of Uapter xIi, Article 13, Section 1, including Subsection 1.1, are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced by the following: - CBAPfDR %II Article 13 - variances Sec. 1 variances 1.1 The Planning Board may authorize a variance fro¢ -the design o sutmittal requirements of this ordinance only uE an affirmative finding of the followim: - A. that the variation from the design Or suWitial standards is required due to particular Physicai site condition mnd It Ions in the existing street o< utilityrsys[erts; B. that the granting of the variance will not result in ention of the health and safety Pro, visions of this Ordinance; and C. that the strict application of the standards of this Ordinance would make aandivision of an owner's property non -feasible. nir purposes of this subsection, feasibility shall De Bete[mined by physical, Practical, and - ernnomic am deratios. pang,,, Maine — Nex EquId LYDIA Cm:n RODNEY 6. F&I CITY HALL MANOR BANGOR, MAINE 04401 '" °''°" (Jag of �Rn r, AInu¢ •E•.3O„901.m•• JOHN ON Was ""DEPARTMENI PLANNING Hd COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: January 20, 1988 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: The Planning Board SUBJECT: Referral of Amendment to Chapter XII, Subdivision Regulations.- Subdivision Variances C.O. 9 88-56 After being informed that the Code and Ordinance Review Committee had tabled action on this amendment to give Staff time to provide standards to make this provision of the Ordinance workable, the Board voted five in favor and none opposed to table action until the Legal Staff provided a revision to this proposed amendment.