HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-04-11 90-158 ORDERDere 04-03' 90 0 Item No. 90-138
Item/SubjM: REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND CHANGE OF TIMED ZONES
SCHEDULE VI: PARHING LIMITED TO TWO HOURS.
Responsible Department. BANGOR POLICE DEPARTMENT -
Commentary: This matter is presented at the request of local
businessman David Giroulx regarding review o re -con
sideration of recent changes in Parking Ordinances
in the Front St. area, which includes areas beneath
the Joshua Chamberlain Bridge and the rear of the
Former Viner Warehouse.
These changes are NOT RECOMMENDED as it would
make enforcement Vett difficult and promote the
Use Of un -regulated areas intended for recreational
parking by all day parkers which would monopolize
this area.
67pal nr Hftd
Manager's Comments: ryy - ._ _ �� - �1 .� -4/_ 1 ��
CIvLT+MA.UC.. �
CU wxx.se,°
Amaciated Information' t ✓hid
Budget Approval: _U
m Director
Legal Approval:
crzysw;awr
Imtr uced For
Passage
EFirst Reading
❑ Referral
Page—01—
90-158
Aeapmd to CoameRrc Balaecci, April 11, 1990
CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE.) (DT1iPCa-_.-_Avthon2rng Changes to. -.Schedule YS.....Arhicle 6, ..
Section 2.3 - Parking Permitted Limited to Two Hours.
( Non -Metered )
By ttt CitV Caanca ofd a CTtV ofBawxw:
ORDERED,
THAT BNLY, the following areae be RECINDED from Schedule VI,
Chapter III, Article 6. Section 2.3 - Parking Permitted
Limited to Two Hours, Non -Metered.
FRONT ST.- From the intersection of May St. in an
Easterly direction on the;
North Side - of Street boardering the
Springfield Terminal Railroad
tracks for a distance of 140'
feet.
EAST SIDE- all of the area beneath the
Joshua Chamberlain Bridge utilized
as a waterfront park area and
defined as PARKING AREAS for a
distance of Approx. 194' feet.
SOUTH SIDE- boardering the Penobscot River
from the area
a beneath the Joshua
ChamberlainBridge on the East
to the right of may on the South
dividing thus parcel from the
Bangor Public Landing at a
rectangular area to the rear
of
the former Vicar Warehouse98'
x 73' feet.
IN CITY COUNCIL
April 11, 1990
Failed Passage by the
following yea and n es.
Councilors voting yor
baldacci and Sosnaud.
Councilors voting n
Blanchette, Cohen, England, Sauyer,
Seal and Scone-. Councilor absent.
Sullivan.
LjPCA -
90 -Ise
O ROER
Title,
Authorizing Changes to Schedule VI,
Article 6, Section 2.3 - Parking Peimittgd
Limited to We Hours (Non -Metered)
................................ ...
C.6MN0gm(.-
reatn
. .Councilman
^WW01� URION ST.
SMD BROAD\$T.
i � "PROPOS&D"
"UN -REGULATED"
EA Y1
1401 FEET
OR 15. SPACES
SPRINGFIEELD I AREA Y2
TERMINAL
R.R. TRACKS 20
MY ST.
90-158
/ 'P&OPO
" UN-
REGULATED -JOSHUA CMIRSSIAIN BRIDGE �
AREA Y3 194' FEST
A
i.
ow
c Z ^
01,0 VINER
WAREHOUSE
f
6
RIGHT OF WAY
BANGOR CITY URGING
iSONT ST.
II
•CITVOF 90—Ise &—®PX
MAINE
OEPAfliMENT of COMMUNITY aM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 19L. mPmaamm
March 16, 1990
Mr. David: F. Giroux
PRO Realty
Onion Plaza
4 Onion Street
Bangor, Maine 04401
Dear Mr. Giroux
This letter is a follow-up to our conversation of yester-
day. As I was explaining, prior to your hanging up on me,
the proposal to regulate parking around the Vicar Building
was discussed with City Councilors long before the lease
agreement with Taylor's was contemplated. We had
recommended the changes for the following reasons.
1. The shuttle was no longer operating from
Front Street. We felt that there was no longer
a need to provide free, all day parking on City
Property when other parking areas in the downtown
area required permits.
2. The City has continued to operate the shuttle from
the gasworks parking lot but with reduced ridership.
Downtown business people had expressed their belief
that former shuttle riders were still parking on
Front Street. They recommended that all day, free,
parking be eliminated so that a true test of the
shuttle's performance at the gasworks could be
measured.
3. Your Complaint in 1909 was that all day parking was
impacting your business (zea attached letter dated
May 9, 1989). As you know, the lack of turnover
affects the capacity for customer parking.
.Recently, we conducted an all day analysis of cars parked
near the Vicar Building. Only 3 of 32 cars were parked
less than 3 hours. Clearly,the area is being used for
long tem parking. It in our recommendation that city
Policy should not permit free, all day parking on City lots
in downtown Bangor end at a location only 830 East from the
City's parking garage.
Page 2
I am sorry that miscommunication resulted in your not
attending last Monday's council meeting. Therefore, we
will net post the 2 hour parking signs near the Vine[
Building until a dfacuasion item regarding this issue is
conducted by the Municipal Operations Committee. This will
be discussed by the Committee when they meet on March 28,
1990 starting at 3t30 p.m. you are encouraged to attend.
Sincerely,
Kenneth R. Gibb
Director
o or
pc
c: Bdward Barrett, City Manager
Patricia Blanchette, Councilor
Gana 88 r1• Councilor
Gerard
Baldacci, councilor
Chief Richard
8toekf ord
PRO Realty
Union Plaza 4 Union Street -=-"`-=-
Bangor, Maine 04401
Tel. 207-947-6463
May 9, 1989
Bangor City Dosern
73 Harlow street
Bangor, Maine 04401
Attn: Maty SLlliven, Dheirxrnen
DoeZ M. Sullivan:
I ore talon Plaza at 4 Union street, Bangor, Maine. I renovated
the Prorerty in anticipation of the great things the city is atterpting
to do with banger's waterfront.
I am getting see srtely fnstrated with the city's Progress regard-
ing Parking. The city has jarred up the area rear the Vi,.e. Wilding
with all day parking. The parking lot near the coal works and near
Durkin mats on keine Street regain P pty, yon are destroying the
hs'mmes in W area and am Causing me financial strain.
chis is hardly the way to oncwrzge further developsent of this
area. She city Reneger has continually said that the parking garage will
solve this Problem. The parking garage appears to be grossly behind
sch mule. I was of the understanding that this was to be w:Qleted in
the fall of 1988.
Ant ever bagaened to parfomence requimmzdn s and penalties? At
the rate of noogres the garage is going, it will he lucky W be dom
this sumer. With the hosting season omdng, this area is going to be
a parking nightmare. we lwy extra razes as Part of the Bangor W,mtom
District, yet all we ever get is these proylorts shifted to s. I have
yet to detern5ne the benefits of. thisextra tan.
Also, the waterfront district is not identified by pmper signage.
In Portland them are directional signs leading people to the area. I
have requested this of the council bafam and have yet to receive a
rsWrse. na canons of past Aare had great vision. I an in hopes
that the current council will ret destroy the :maentua established by
your predecessors.
The waterfront could be a trmmndous stiaelas to Camtown. Days
work together to ameoplish this dream.
Y.
( nda/vtd�F.
Gimus
DFD/aml