Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-11-25 92-35 RESOLVEk,ounw Data t1-25'otvr'v'r Item No. 93-35 hmmSubloct: RES(Mw' Callfsg Upon ibe Stare Iegisletuxe to [4LrWn the CSs:xaR Mmicip 1 parents Sbacin3 us gran Responsible Department: City Cpupciy Commentary: glass attactsxi P mlve would Call upon tba Sxntc iegislav¢e m catfms tfsa ement riusi PaI1 IVnams Slnrftg Pz Fam. As you axe asaixe, tls bae paw euspe11diN this p a over tis last six months of this ffacal year at ttre preanal lass of $1 mfllfms cl llaxs fa tts City of Bangor. Yttis lcssr causisg fn mid yeaxr uoulci x t fn sly ff ant to the sexvixes uFirF axe eurxvstly lavvided to t1e Citizens Of angor. rlhe folly Resolve h sirally ammeriza3 mnch of the discussion vhfch ose have bald vith tis legislative Dalegatfon f= aysper. it is rcLvmeMetl fox feseage. Ostp,roftew Ilmd {prMManager's Comments:��y I_UPt af .tlt1.lKW) I P✓O-w� ✓�i1i-�-7 a4 city ma..ye. Aesomated Information: Budget Approval: n j FimWeDma[tur Legal Approval: Lity Solieirur Intr used For Passage Paye _ of — First Reading ❑ Referral 92-35 Assigned to Councilor Frankel, November 25, 1991 CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) �RMOIU9, C�.Lg �..� stare teytsT�, to iatnrni.. the_ _._... ......... By W City Canal of W city 014ra m: RESOLVED. Ya®aiAS. municipal Peuemge ".,bar'ing wine e+acral wear n.esrty 3'eara ago m a replan ¢et for the E;siress Inventory Tax and as an effort W provide a zschmod s n for significaw;t property tax relyefi and wHMffAu, l5uticipal P mare STaring Ms not cantributal W time current State deficit syrse regurnme adoring a}peazs no where w:rthin The Stare h d9 t and disbursements W communities vary di tly w1th State Sodas and frc ew tax wllectiom; std wlmsss, %ie City of Bangor's Spending and personnel have grwxr at a shgnificsntly slayer rare tan the (tate fidget and State aiploynent; Iasi wugdy.A;, 9e Lwin of thisprayam would must tea City of Bob p $1 n llion dollars aver rle last six months of the currant fiscal year and $2million dollars over a full fiscal year: and gdg E , This lava would represent a Loa retention fn municipal, tion-echwl spoofing and, if pasaeri on W the taxpayers, would be equal W an 8-108 increase in property tame; ani bNaNuouN, rase of this program would result in aignnificmt reduction fn public servioa ani prcg in police, fire, public voras, ad p arl ani recreation: and WFhF6A5• 'lie proposal W eliminate Stare marriages amd reaee the Canty budget would have W effect on rte currant year's fidget aM minimal eff m rmrt year's budget. - NaV, 9 OliE• BE TT I EMM BY THE = CCUNCJi. OF 936 CPM Cy BM]LDR, TIIXf wE ugr this State legislature W centime the caxant Municipal Dara sharing prza¢am and to investicpte otba altenativm W deal with the State fidget deficit. Araya W be reviesed alrnild lrclude ackHmioal cuts W the State budget, the Possibility of ext ding Ws sales tax W certain servlma, and tie reviav of ariating sales tax eeptiras. In City Council November 25,1991 Passed 92,35 R E S O L V E C ing upon the State lagislatureto Maintain the current Municipal Revenue Sharing Program