HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-11-25 92-35 RESOLVEk,ounw
Data t1-25'otvr'v'r Item No. 93-35
hmmSubloct: RES(Mw' Callfsg Upon ibe Stare Iegisletuxe to [4LrWn the
CSs:xaR Mmicip 1 parents Sbacin3 us gran
Responsible Department: City Cpupciy
Commentary:
glass attactsxi P mlve would Call upon tba Sxntc iegislav¢e m catfms tfsa ement
riusi PaI1 IVnams Slnrftg Pz Fam. As you axe asaixe, tls bae paw
euspe11diN this p a over tis last six months of this ffacal year at ttre
preanal lass of $1 mfllfms cl llaxs fa tts City of Bangor. Yttis lcssr causisg fn
mid yeaxr uoulci x t fn sly ff ant to the sexvixes uFirF axe
eurxvstly lavvided to t1e Citizens Of angor.
rlhe folly Resolve h sirally ammeriza3 mnch of the discussion vhfch ose have
bald vith tis legislative Dalegatfon f= aysper. it is rcLvmeMetl fox feseage.
Ostp,roftew Ilmd
{prMManager's Comments:��y I_UPt
af
.tlt1.lKW) I P✓O-w� ✓�i1i-�-7
a4
city ma..ye.
Aesomated Information:
Budget Approval: n j
FimWeDma[tur
Legal Approval:
Lity Solieirur
Intr used For
Passage Paye _ of —
First Reading
❑ Referral
92-35
Assigned to Councilor Frankel, November 25, 1991
CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE.) �RMOIU9, C�.Lg �..� stare teytsT�, to iatnrni.. the_ _._...
.........
By W City Canal of W city 014ra m:
RESOLVED.
Ya®aiAS.
municipal Peuemge ".,bar'ing wine e+acral wear n.esrty 3'eara ago m a
replan ¢et for the E;siress Inventory Tax and as an effort W
provide a zschmod s n for significaw;t property tax relyefi and
wHMffAu, l5uticipal P mare STaring Ms not cantributal W time current State
deficit syrse regurnme adoring a}peazs no where w:rthin The Stare
h d9 t and disbursements W communities vary di tly w1th State
Sodas and frc ew tax wllectiom; std
wlmsss, %ie City of Bangor's Spending and personnel have grwxr at a
shgnificsntly slayer rare tan the (tate fidget and State aiploynent;
Iasi
wugdy.A;, 9e Lwin of thisprayam would must tea City of Bob p $1 n llion
dollars aver rle last six months of the currant fiscal year and
$2million dollars over a full fiscal year: and
gdg E , This lava would represent a Loa retention fn municipal, tion-echwl
spoofing and, if pasaeri on W the taxpayers, would be equal W an
8-108 increase in property tame; ani
bNaNuouN, rase of this program would result in aignnificmt reduction fn public
servioa ani prcg in police, fire, public voras, ad p arl ani
recreation: and
WFhF6A5• 'lie proposal W eliminate Stare marriages amd reaee the Canty budget
would have W effect on rte currant year's fidget aM minimal eff
m rmrt year's budget. -
NaV, 9 OliE• BE TT I EMM BY THE = CCUNCJi. OF 936 CPM Cy BM]LDR, TIIXf
wE ugr this State legislature W centime the caxant Municipal
Dara sharing prza¢am and to investicpte otba altenativm W deal
with the State fidget deficit. Araya W be reviesed alrnild lrclude
ackHmioal cuts W the State budget, the Possibility of ext ding Ws
sales tax W certain servlma, and tie reviav of ariating sales tax
eeptiras.
In City Council November 25,1991
Passed
92,35
R E S O L V E
C ing upon the State lagislatureto
Maintain the current Municipal Revenue
Sharing Program