The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-12-11 96-58 ORDER_ COUNCIL ACTION Date: 12-11-95 Item No 96-58 Item/subject: OADRA, Establishing Sewer User Rates to go into s PPegt for Accounts Billed January through larch 1996 Responsible Department: Legal This Order would increase the City's current sewer rates by 5.08 for the period ,January -March 1996. Consistent with the Council's recent practice, the full rate increase is phased in 0n a weekly basis over a 12 week period beginning January 1, 1996. A similar Order was passed on June 26, 1995 regarding sewer accounts billed for the period July -December, 1995. Bea Council Order $95-263, attached. Order, C.O. 95-263, NmMNMYLr+rt� eAlgund,¢. Budget Approval: PTNAN('F NTRF!'TOR Legal Approval: r —IntroducedFor passage _ eiret Reading Page__J._oP_A_ Referral AMENDED 96-58 Assigned to C ncflor Woodcock December 11, 1995 CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) MrbtT1 ............ ._Establishing Sewer User Estee .to_go..into ............ Effect for Accounts Billed January Through March 1996 BY Na Cur c4n+mu oleM G`tr n/Banpor: ORDERED, THAT the following sewer user rate increases shall become effective on accounts billed on or after: Quarterly Monthly Date Rate - Minimum Minimum 01-e1-96 4.05 48.60 16.20 01-0)-96 4.06 48.72 16.24 01-14-96 4.06 48.72 16.24 01-21-96 4.07 48.84 16.28 01-28-96 4.08 48.96 16.32 02-04-96 4.09 49.08 16.36 02-11-96 4.09 49.08 16.36 02-18-96 4.10 49.20 16.40 02-25-96 4.11 49.32 16.44 03-03-96 4.12 49.44 16.48 03-10-96 4.13 49.56 - 16.52 03-17-96 4.13 49.56 16.52 03-24-96 4.14 49.68 16.56 96-58 Miped to Qw *e Woodcock December 11, 1995 CITY OF BANGOR (TITLEJ (DCBE% ....... ._..Establishing Sewer _user..Eetes .fo..go..iato _.. Effect for Accounts Billed January Through March 1996 By ehs C4u CasmR of We COY ofD&mP. e. ORDRRM - TUT the following sewer user rate increases shall become effective on accounts billed on or after: Quarterly Monthly 01-01-96 4.06 48.72 16.24 01-07-96 4.07 48.84 16.28 01-14-96 4.09 49.00 16.36 01-21-96 4:10 49.20 16.40 01-28-96 4.12 49.44 16.48 02-04-96 4.13 49.56 - 16.52 02-11-96 4115 - 49.60 -16.60 02-18-96 4.16 49.92 16.64 02-25-96 4.18 50.16 16.72 03-03-96 4.19 50.20 16.76 03-10-96 - 4.21 50.52 16.84 03-17-96 4.22 50.64 16.88 03-24-96. 4.24 50.00 16.96 IN CITY COUNCIL December 11, 1995 _ ll11 96-58 3 Charles Cqrran, Pine Street,, suggested king sever bill 't O R E R par[ of tax bills. Against rate' increase. and concerned about motion made to table this order. - Title, Establishing Sever User Bates to gb Charlie Bickel, Randolph Drive, .into Effect for Accounts Billed January againsc.vate increase 6 urged '- - through March 1996. collection of monies owed the """""""""""""""""'.."' City by the Towns of Norman 4 - Hampden for the construction ................ 6............. 6 ....... of Treatment Plant. Motion to postpone until next (iWA/rca!{' Q. meeting. Ae®gned to Motion Failed Passage Vale: 5 no, 4 yes III ...�/1!gR& Councilors voting no: Councilman ........... Baldacci. Preakel, Leen, Poppe[ 4 Sullivan Councilors voting yes: Blanchette. Soucy, Tyler 4 Woodcock Nation to Amend order to a oz increase for January 1996 Motion Failed Passage Vote: 5 no, 4 yes Councilors voting no: Blanchette, Leen, Soucy, Tyler 4 Woodcock Councilors voting yes: Baldaccf, Frankel, Popper 4 Sullivan Motion to Amend Omer to a 2.5% increase Motion Passed Vote: 5 yes, 4 n CouhcllOrs voting yes: Baldaccl, Frankel, Leen, Popper 6 Sullivan Councilors voting ue: Blanchette, Soucy„ Ty$Ae: 6 Woodcock Passed As Amended Vote 5 yes, 4 n Councilors voting yes: Baldaccf, Frankel, Leen, Poppe[ 6 Sullivan Councilors voting no: Blanchette. Soucy, Tyler d _ Woodcock 96-58 iSiW3fa7:Equ 1 b To: Honorable Council Chan and Members ofNe City Cound From: Edward A Barrett, City Manager Re: Sewer Fund Proforma Date: Decemba6,1995 Attached you will fed a series of Sewer Fund proformas which Ron Heller has developed to outgrsa the various available to the Council in regard to a sewer rate adjustment, if my, for Jammy of 1996. The first ofthe attached proformas is the one we initially developed for review by the Municipal Operations Committee. The next four assume sewer rate increases of 7.5%, 5%, 2.50/, and 0%/ The overall effect ofthese various options on projected sewer rate increase is shown on the final page. Byway ofbackSmund, the City began adjusting he sewer rata in MO to recognition of Ne extreme costs associated with complying with our consent agreements with the Some and Federal goverameminregardtothe Chian Water Act Themmaryinpactsofthisconsentdecreewere therequirementtown aasecondary Maimemplantaacostofappmx tely$25Mandto undertake a fi8cen-year combined sewer ovngow abatement and reduction program at an estimated cost ofappmxdmately$27M. Recognizing the significam impact of mem capital expenditures, we began increasing sewer rates by 1011 twice each year in MO. This level of increase continued until July of 1994 when the iomwse was dropped to 7.5%. Similarincreasm were adopted in January of 1995 and July of 1995. At the time of me last increase, our projections anticipated similar 7.5% increases for January and July of 19%and Jammy of 1997 with subsequent reductions from that point forward. As youwgl see in reviewing the revised attached projections, each of Nem improves the situation from what was anticipated last July. The level ofamounts adopted for January, 1996 will directly affect the increases required nem July end January (1997). For example, a 7,5% increase now results in two 2.5%increases neat year. A5% increase new leads to two 5.011 incenses meat year. A2.5% increase leads to a mo increase in July of 19%. A 0%inaease would require a ]0%iaeease in July and a 5% increase in January; 1997. There are also some minor and varying implications in future years. In terms of evaluating the level ofincresse to be established for January, I would suggest some of Na fallowung guidelines'. 1. I would recommend avoiding my option whim might resuh in an increase greater than 7.5% in either the current or any future year. Having reduced our rate of increase; from 101A to 7.5%q increasing above that level, even it was a ore -tine a year adjustment, would most Rely be viewed m backsliding on our efforts to decrease the one of increase in sewer rates. 2. Bate increases should be structured tothe greatest went possible to contirme to kap the Sewer Fund selfwffhciwt. All ofthe proformas which have been presented attempt to maintain a cash balance in the Sewer Food which generally ranges between $200,000 and $250,000. This is the mhdmum cash balance which we believe is necessary for the Sewer Fund to operate without caft upon the cash reserves of the general fund. This allows us to provide a small margin for emergencies should major equipment repairs be reputed on an mavficipated basis and to fulfill a nomirement that we maintain a reserve on those portions of ora treatment system which were origtaBy wrnnmcted through the use of Federal funds. In addition to these considerations, the Council should also be aware that the City Solicitors office continues to negotiate with the towns offlerrnon and Hampden in regard to a new and comprehensive finer -local agreement for the sewer services which we Provide to those comenutdties The eveomal result of mace negotiations will be payments from those communities for a portion of the capital costs incurred by the City in constructing the secondary comment plant. Based on our analysis, the eventual total payment m the City may be in excess ofS2M. Unfortunately, we cannot predict with certainty whom these funds will beware available. A portion or all of these funds may be available as early as the coercing year. We may not receive eventual payment, however, until as late as FY99. Due to the uncertainty in reedwag these finds, they have not been included or the attached profonnas. At the request of the Municipal Operations Committee, however, we are providing some updated proformms which will be available prior to or at Mondays meeting which show the effeet of these finds In discussions with the Legal Department, it is my understanding that they are attempting to aggressively tattoos the conclusion of this agreement. There are, however, outstanding issues between the City of Bangor and Hampden which may spoke agreement impossible. Ifan agreement owned be negotiated, it is possible [last other steps may be restudied. It is clear, however, that as won as these funds do become available to the City ofBangor, we will be able to hold our rate structure for a period oftime. Anted, we will he Ale to provide additional infamnfion regarding this once we have revised and recalculated our profession assuming the availability of them funds The Municipal Operations Committee recommended, on a 2-1 vote, a 50% sewer race increase for lmnary,1996. Coumilm Popperwasthedissonsingvote. grand anyone on the Council &me further information N regard to sewer rates or any of the issues associated with them, please feel fro to maw me. Edward A. Herren, City Manager EAB/jdr Enclosure cc: Bon Hoffer,F ane Dvectw PROFORMA CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS SEWER UTILITY FUND FISCAL 1996-2003 INITIALLY PROJECTED INCREASES OlbnmbinBan OIM1V Pevmum U.$3w."$3w." 3100.00 E)At.WO E]OGWO E300.WJ 3]0.00 Mobil Piceline SeWemml 05050.00w0o D,,WU E60.M7 $60.681 M,489 SW.487 $W,47 BFinin8De &me 13.40.501 Mj84.612 0.196.969 0.200.05 U.WI.WI nW4.15$ S1.87/p42 U.N6b15 HewDeMBervla $181.126 N ..485 $6250 U90U6 1959.677 $1,133.90 11313461 Tocol MemebonlMrce 13.540301 AS/1]47 11.593,454 W87V 1 UM.w S,. 14 $4.0117793 5 ,M5i 1911% NneuOBm 1413.15,4 SM3.831 $610,450 1588.119 006191 %E1j61 5921,16 1969.500 ivn4eS�W 136,411 $159311 SS%,409 SIMS" 11.46911 5214,186 W25p46 S4j 9,3 30172,0 5244$ 5395909 51.20&859 S1.196.9p 52.03,186 1;359,66 4.24998 .019.093 ILeyArmpllom: 0 inbw 5,M6 5.0% SP.b 5m 5.0% 5.0% 50% 5.0% mwhBVM -10% -10% -1.0% Im 4.O% -10% -10% LM Re¢111pm100wWRnvde: M'm 5461 $515 M41 SSb9 $598 %18 %.60 p eY 111 M 100 wbivRrtwaln 11.34 %W %.28 $555 55.13 %13 %H 86.11 Smi�mnual:minnmel/I 1.5591 11%6 5W% 150% 250% 230% 250% 250% 9mi�wwalwe'uwmrc l/1 150% 5.W% 2.56% 150% 250% 2.M 250% 2503b AvmtlM6pw,tq, mmn IS56% 12M%- 1b2% 506% 8.%% 5.06% - 106% 5.06% 59.11% EIDimS Bxe Bev l/1.1191 M.03.522 ¢,020.286 0.316.459 33.60194 0.148X2 0.391.980 $4.05/516 W20.IN 5 'mme6 BneR 1/1.6/30 E2.w5$o 0.250.4X/ $3$48.128 77.690.659 X3,86,803 0.998.211 51.156$65 UI 59.99$ Glimue6lvarcmmul It" 7/1.12AI $1921199 516.205 sI?o Q9 $82.531 19].]31 VS.981 591.993 SIWA85 Wlltl6 Nnemmvl by 1/1600 $208.13 $158.001 59L415 $94}61 M,:121 598.983 SIPo.531 $10.953 TOW Annual Rvenm l/1-690 U.986J28 $6.655.935 $3,183631 0.424.312 S2.YY/.698 $8.M.=6 $8/I6.90 $8.24525 Iv:1%IwaMwwllWnblu 1112.128 $133.110 $16.623 $149.481 SI55354 $161885 $163339 $115.172 wotl IUv IMWO 15.10.651 $6.5U.856 $1.09,958 $2JN,841 33.622.144 77,932,41 $"V36 ".583}0 G BillWloilo, _ 140.612,868 139.206.T39 132.814.6X/. 136.436525 35.032,IW 133]21,4]8 02.]"jN 01.00,481 PROFORMA CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS SEWER UTILITY FUND FISCAL 1996-2003 7.5.4 INCREASE IMS A"Mllmsu apncNeOmh 0" 5219!1x51 53121426/ OMIJ02 U460062 1}$96,191 U.63y66 WMw n,e +uom ome..m WAM MaB vm ZOO." $3001Wo E3nm Maw mm000 5300.044 S30Q00o Uoo.mo Mobilpipeline Se Me 5 o0 bOeMWWu l $200. $32148 530.9]2 ,41913 U 143 21.833 53029] 531.m TMlWM. 111M1 leO $770 l 5312,229 $MM S 1913 mtl43 5331,&13 590}9] ll31,9M 01M1e.cW amOmm em GF OA, 344,41 $0.48] 56,4U .06 E)TkeMiwnia Siicary ,4.5400 , Ap846R 0,296,9 53W945 $3,09441 $974250 T877M2 S7H.615 evry $1817 500 $W.948 E79 $99) ,413.44 13<6) IidnWO hOxeS.d ham, _ 0$90.441 0$117P 0.79,1 51,M081 $3,,4M 51,99M< ,41,83 $4N69 19.21% Nd mhllw $2881144 %6 1311 SIMI UA94 661N11 (530.]15) 528013 ("1%6 6 536})252M$72 $219.440 5235261 $2428 236655 M1950 $234693 EMinmb 3144$9 S219A40 SAB$61 52COS $236x55 5]05,910 SSN.693 SIM,R9 Key Assvmptie . E.ip Mflpw 58% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% S.o% 50% ilow.bnmm .I.m -IO% .1.6.4 -50% .1.0% -1.0% 10% Rale)/I Sa lta wbio &n wekr KW 56.65 $4" 0.08 025 $549 ES.A $608 Rek l/I pn lW wbie fatwmr U,34 M56 $9.H 5508 $528 $5A9 55]9 %N Semiwemlm Mercu]/1 ]U% 250% 544% 600% IW% IW% 5.56A SW% Sew Mllm Mu ,V] I5o% 2.50% 044% 000% 0l V.W% 0.00% O.M All"pem~I"MIR 1556% 506% - SW% "0% 4. 4.44% 5.50% 500% 61.91% Eslimx6Bm Rav]/1-11431 O,W3.M $3,mO.786 0,142.175 S3.267x55 0,430,93 0$30246 $3,63."7 0.)94198 memd13ix U, 1/1 0.8401780 $3,MXO V3 W.661 51.465,488 0,563905 53.670.60 $3,0$50 0.984,236 timtle0lnuwenlY M'l/Ii 2Ol VW99 375,50 S154427 $196361 5133,316 508.562 $19%"5 SM.561 ntw,k lnaawnm Rev l/x[1730 $205127 S75,568 $0 10 50 $0 W SO Tmal Anmel N< ...l/1 6n0 U,M,378 026$273 56599262 $6,938A00 $7,130.054 57,339.482 V,"2A65 E7.966,W1 Un 2%buWunwlkucbkv "$11),28 SIW85 $131,985 $13&568 $142,WI $1461" S153,249 S159.320 N6A... Revenm+N30 $51765x51 $6.113.887 5 46]?T/ $6,70,436 M.9OA53 $]1792x9$ S),5W,216 0,806,681 F+IBilYble Fbw 116612.868 39?06,139 137,814,672 IXOM25 133p]51W 133.721A38 132.M2N 131,0%/17,383 PROFORMA CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS SEWER UTILITY FUND FISCAL 1998-2003 6,0%INCREASE11158 .,a, I'll TOGO TOGO TAM 24llI1 1aM 2003 %@aow CM1ugu (m Swicelv+u fw) S5,7W.646 3[312,058 56}68,143 46,289,836 56989,453 33.191,691 $938,216 $7,gM,N1 3694% O N $2,"O 13 $?919500 53,025.915 13.329.334 0391.262 U,560,826 53,750862 13.915 10 4091% Appemlmvk openling vlM1 flow 51,910616 S3 17,558 53$91,968 S3$60,M1 33396139/ UMIJI66 53.990149 S1.B 71 33]3% omee.mhmaow3 (NxT mvu 330o,oW MAI $Mw Aoo.WO wW.OW 9o.000 $3mM Uo0M0 Mobil pipelae Smlemml 6050,000 InkwlNwme 110000 518,818 $11060 MZW $31)91 131.988 001360 Ul9W Tanl ghu mYinnonv SITIy00 $313817 $3311060 I=J)% 33n$91 301988 Sno,460 33 "m Olhrtenvh oWllwv Oue W GP E60.M2 MoAH9 $60.483 W,487 560.482 En6Wg IXhtSunvc $a,W501 D.3",M V% 90 13,200.605 0,00,601 892[250 32,87/,441 8.814615 w Rht6wme $182.126 VtA8j $625,608 1600 3959,633 5113396/ $1.313,461 Teul olhncWivulOexs _ S3,540581 S3$91,243 U903A54 W37X1 9.0960360 ".994,414 $071}93 60320,559 1931% XuoN nm 5140145 344,6E MATS $417M (561353) (S3o$591 $18.916 (S2r B ming n[h SMAn 1196$69 RElyl6 SII I.OW 3115816 SU9.96J I209,ZM w in $Ming ea[h Sn6.559 5311$86 5141,080 3603316 =)9,763 5309$114 608.110 313032[ Key,klllp '$: S>xpweiMwm - 5.0% 5 m 50% 56% 50% GM Sd% 50% ilow6eNkv .I.M4 -I m .14% -1.0% -I m -10% -113% -1,094 Ro22/I pu l00 obit fen wNu K.M HAS 6099 53.08 M28 U.49 U.N %09 Rett 111 pu 100 mbiefalwelev $4.24 867 SLH U.08 $518 $519 1399 "OB $emi.mm,d me inunu 2/1 930% 560% 2.50% 6.60% 400% 40M3 5.50% 560% Seml.vmu1i MI, =M Vl s0o% 500% oW% 000% o00% 060% 000% 06M AnnonWeO pmlMG,94 ina[ew - IS%/% 10]5% 2.So% 9.00% 460% 4.60% 550% 5$026 61.60% GsOmve6 Om Rc 2/1-1131 $260,522 . 53.95483 0.213,933 U}63,655 0.930,03 0,530,146 0,633,942 01794198 mna6BV Rev 1/160]0 "840,380 0,093$0 3)1300.661 U,465A88 53565,905 0,690,653 0.832,513 0984,96 malW lnuemenlJ Rev 3/I-1301 41Mj99 I199263 4H I,61I $195261 41 ]],31fi Ep8.583 5195,995_ 3187$69 bhOmaW lnuavenW Rev 1/IMO $13800 $151,132 10 M EO W m fo TWtl Arcual Rnvenoe 311-600 $3,816,986 16p43936 $6,600198 E6.08AM $7,130.054 0,339461 S7,66 465 ".966,MI uss 2%ImeWunmllWebk[ $1Mmo $126,09 S132.005 $138568 $142,601 1146,190 8151139 509,3" Na Annoy Aevenvev WO S5,1%,646 36217,058 %.468,243 %389.06 36982.453 53,193,693 $509116 E3,BM.681 1. 1n1.ei. IT.w 1406118U 139.106139 133814672 M436$9 135.02.160 10,8113)8 I];104p4 1]1,060j81 PROFORMA CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS SEWER UTILITY FUND FISCAL 1996-2003 2.6A INCREASE 111196 au Re9wle.Oftrre) 55.632,W $6,0393 56.507.444 56829."8 $],@].164 VX5.962 E2XVC $].]9.7,586 3836. O 2.190,00 53929 00 0.05.925 $3}29,224 5)391,262 056026 $3]38%] S3.9)3.810 4011% Approalmltl Mmdmg 111M1 Oow W42.641 $3,V4 3 DAMAO $3690124 S3,6J5902 "M"Q 53,718,5'/6 $356].7]6 M 6% OlbvoM lnOowe pher P.erenrce 000000 $301"0 0M,000 $30.000 $3001M 00.00 $300,000 $30018" Mabil PipeGrc9Memem N50.000 InW llnwme MAN $25425 D6817 Sn558 $31626 $33}Y D2,531 $31 00 TaW ngvuellnMa $] Aee 5325028 5320817 S39K333 S33;626 33208 032$31 $33461 01M111eb 1u ws P WGP 560,482 UOA82 S60.4D $W,M2 $04" 'ting RM5wio0 $3.540501 0,384,622 S3,2W569 53$00,945 U,%3,601 52924250 $2,822.42 0,846615 NewDblSwiw 1182.126 SW640 $35948 5190446 "59.6]] 51,133961 $11346] Telel olbnws%,,M"s S3,5 l D, 91120 $.7003034 0pe]?51 U,9H534 "."4A14 $407503 S4,231A69 1931% Nebnb Ow 37;141 $27,774 Wj2 52032 DSO" 4309"3 (5".486) 021=6 6egning neb 06422 31"063 $lmy 9111" $LUS10 258,619 S00W UdinSeneb $188135) sjJ 36 S191.1" 501140 32"164 050619 S23011M $208" Key MumMN : KJPenx mfl m 50% s.o% 5G% s.0% 5.0% 50% sox son Fl dmnln, -L 015 -1.ax -I L% .Lox -I.% -lo% .1.0% -IA% Ratt]/I pv lW cubic RMmb H00- $4.55 H82 KAI 0.31 35.50 $575 %W bml/I pu IW eobi, lenwver H.14 $4.55 5082 $511 0.31 0.50 $535 U.M S=i.MMMI mile 1111 150% IOW% 600% 6W% AO 13.3 1.50% 45056 550% S®1.11110 miff a 1/1 250% OW% 0W% OW% ODMS 0.00% 0.00% OW% Annutllad wneolne lemeue 10.19% ]e.W% 6W% 6.W% 4.00% 340% 4.50% 5m 6151% U8,xd 9nee Rer O/1.1701 0043$22 0.881.50 $3,135284 0%88,120 $3951.94 $3,550,304 0,640,566 0,062.986 &Omelyd Bve Rcr l/1 WO 0,&10180 S3.IW.953 $3.321134 S3,485.90 S3.586166 0,62]140 $3^046 0.920.653 EslMaled 11crtmen41 Rev 2/1-19/31 sl%a" 0871664 $183,631 $195,261 $13.7416 $123184 SIQ3 29 4%.971 E9imued muemenml Rur 1/16 0 S69,392 $0 $0 SO W W' N EO TOWAnnualR =7/1-&O 0.747,593 56.330.192 IW0249 5690935 $2,170.526 0453.@8 S7.60,%2 $2,95?639 l 12%111=1llwllmnbl" $114.952 $12660 512805 3139.387 $143,412 3147,M1 $152.199 $159,09 Net MOual Rwenun 6/ JO S56];641 W203.593 $6502,444 %Mn."8 $2,032,164 $2,205,967 51.952.24) Y1.193.5ta nn ndmme 71.. 140.612868 0006239 130.814,62 136.436,525 135,M160 133,151A]B 12284.230 1JI,OLdA62 PROFORMA CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS SEWER UTILITY FUND FISCAL 1996-2003 NO INCREASE 111186 Cub III from apamWm 1996 1997 1998 ]999 ZVVV I Chugu(m 3anin(u... tw) - S5,%IAI 56201,731 56.3 M09 10839.94$7.1%.070 $7.306,478 1747.]43$831,8680,74% $2,NO.MO M.939.500 11.0759/5 0,559.774 W9120 $3,560876 $3.734867 53955,810 40.71% AppaatlmMap,rAng caab Vm S2^07 ,7}7;331 6I¢ 34 liMU0,174 pplMag 01545,651 AABA]6 819%,afl 4MB% OU"MM'Onm 0(h"R Mm VAN)() ll04M0 S300.000 53M,000 530),0)0 PM.000 $300,00) woo.VW Mobilpipeline R0kmm1 SMW lnmwl lomnu RUp909 $53.153 =.760 W688 1133.086 535303 MIX T,bla reaahlnOwa 890,700 §lKKZ= $323.10 A75.90 83Z/,NB $318,786 Ell2= 9311}66 OlhmauhomOmm OuemOF $60,487 $60.07 $0.4V 111,487 $0.461 EWIing Oed Swi¢ V,54"I S3,384,653 8;5%.969 $3.500945 9.03.601 $5974250 0,877.443 5 146.615 New RMSmi¢ SIO.IM N%415 S625MZ $190.0)6 1959677 $1,133.9W 51313 __ Tunl Mb,, mhoWOorve 13.540.501 OA0,747 0,703.4H S3.887XI 93934AN ,)3994,04 S4A71p SII,Mg 9 1931% NdmbM S4.136 $51511 M,IN ,78.550 S101965 015.676) 030,7151 116255 h1imW5nW SMA55 $40,59 WA69 $115.0)0 1153,757 10)1,719 Si46041 II n 6n6IR�h 140$58 $0,069 1115201 S153,757 SM1219 SU6A43 SRSA9 SN3AM K@ Anomplion 0ymciu0brx 50% 5.UA SA% 5p% 5.0% 5Wi 50% 5.0% FlowhOYa .1.0% -1M L0 -1.0% -110% 1.0% -1M Rne 711 pw 100 Cubic Sm w SOW $4M UM $511 0.37 $550 $5.75 96.10 Pat, 1/I w 100 mble lmx W.04 $4.66 N12 $5.11 95.37 15.50 15.75 9610 5¢ nivmnoelnklnwent/1 7.YJ.6 10.0)% 3.50% 60)% 50M 5.50% 450% 60)% Semi-amwl MMiIMIN 1/1 0.00% 5.00% 000% 0.0)% 000% IM O.0)% 0(N% Ann,uVrtl pe ,e pinwne 7.50% 15,50% 0.50% 6.0)% SaV% MM 4.9% 6.0)% 6123% Et0mna6 WmR ?Il -1301 R.N3,555 8.811,976 9211,72 31,518.120 $3}51.034 S3.M.421 $3.610366 $3261.986 - ECIimnNBvxPevIII 0)o V,MUSO $3. ..390 $3,32034 $3AW.953 $3,650,687 9.677,740 $3.06W6 13.997,%2 &Iimlecl Rev l/1-1WI S1W299 574.194 SIOB,BN 5195261 SI73,311 U5.99 $163273 =.374 1e61nucmenlel Rev l l 1- 6,70 M $151,137 W M S0 $0 10 SO IDUmnVmnovl Rcenoe l/L W0 35,678,201 Sk33629t 56N1.214 $6969,335 S7MI.093 S7.19.549 $7,0)9,942 $7,991,705 luny%IonW ...11eoublm 1113,564 S136.566 $115,25 $139J81 8145.07 $14701 SISM99 5159.834 Na Annoel Revmwv600 $5,5&1,637 56501731 $6.504409 %859,948 V.MWO P,306478 S7A57.743 15,831,868 pnn.11.her. v 140.613868 1392%139 137814,673 136,76505 05,72.160 133,721,438 132.3&.94 131.GA' .383 COMPARISON OF INITIALLY PROJECTED SEWER RATE SCHEDULES WITH CURRENTLY PROPOSED SCHEDULES FISCAL 1996-2003 Cumulative increase 15.6% 30.4% 40.4% 47.5% 55.0% 62.8% 71.0% 79.7% Cumulative cash balances $244,572 $598,409 $1,208,859 $1(196988 $2,503,186 83,325,446 $4,7A9,588 $5,219,093 7.5% increase Jan 1. 1996 Increaseoflul1 7.5% 2.5% 5.0% 6.0% 4.0034, 4.0% 5.5% 5.0% increase ofJan l 7.5% 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0°/a 0.0% Annualimd increase 15.6% SI% S.0% 6.0% 4.0% 4.0% 5.5% 5.0% Cumulativeincreane 15.6% 21.4% 27.50/. 35.1% 40.5% 462% 54.2% 61.9% Cumulative cash balances 8244,572 $219,440 $238461 $242,855 $236,655 $205,940 5234,693 5226,729 Cumulative increase 12.9% UA% 27.6% 35.2% 40.6% 46.2% 543% 62.0% Cumulative cash balances 5176567 $221,206 M41,080 $245,816 $239,763 $209,204 $238,120 $230,328 2.5% increase Jan L 1996 Increase of lull 7.5% 10.0% 6.00/0 6.0% 4.0% 3.5% 4.5% 15% Increase ofJan 1 2.5% 5.0% 0.00/0 0.0°/a 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0/1 0.0% -Annual ed increase 10.2% 10.0% 6.0% 6.0% 6.0% 4.0% 4.5% 3.5% 4.5% 5.5% Cumulative inerease 102% 21.2% 28.5% 36.2% 41.6% 46.6% 53.2% 61.6% Cumuiatme cash balances $108,563 $136336 $191,168 $233,520 $266,564 $250,619 $230,133 $208,848 No increase Jan 1. 1996 Increase of lull 7.5% 10.0% _ 3.5% 6.0% 5.00/0 2.5% 4.5% 6.0% Increase of Jan 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Annualized increase TW 15.5% 3.5% 6.0% 5.0% 2.5% 4.5% 6.070 Cumubliveineress, 7.5% 24.2% 205% 36.2% 43.0% 46.6% 53.2% 62.4% Cumulative cash balances $40558 $63,069 $115,203 $153,757 $261,719 $246,043 $225,329 $242,084