HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-12-28 95-57 ORDERoat. / .a �.. a, Item No. 2 s�
Item/Subject: Autho[fafttg the Execution of a Contract with Browning-Ferris
Industries of Maine, Inc. for the Disposal of Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge
Responsible Department Engineering
Commentary:
For the past six months, the City of Banger has been contracting with Sawyer
Environmental for the disposal of treatment plant sludge. During this period
of time, CH M-Hill has conducted a study to evaluate long term disposal options.
That studyyhas been received, and alternatives are being evaluated, including
construction of a newCity-owned composting facility using 55% grant money from
the Federal Goverment. In order to provide time for thorough evaluation of
alternatives, and possible construction of anew facility, an RPP was issued for
e
sludge disposal ever the seat twelve months. on December 7th, 1994 proposals
wart received from BFI, Inc. and Sawyer Environmental. Attached is aaandum
from the City Engineer recommending award to BFI, Inc. A copy of BF2'sproposal
is also attached.
Payment for disposal services will come from the Wastewater Treatment Plant's
operating budget, which has sufficient funding to cover tbvfprojected expense.
el"mm��.
Manager's CommenhpY/ &
Ciry Maw n
Apsociated m...e Sera � m.� -
f
Budget Approval:
reO
Legal Approval save
cirysalueor
Introduced For
Passage
❑ First Reading Page _ of
❑Referral
95-5)
Aerigned to CounNor Blanchette December 28, 1994
//pp CITY OF BANGOR
GIRL) @liff Authorizing ing the Execution of a Contract with Browning-Pertfa_
Industries of Maine, Inc. for the Disposal of Wastewater Treatment Plant
BY the City CMUMM U at Ad CUP Of Bagger.
ORDERED[
TUT Edward A. Barrett, City Manager, 1s hereby authorized to execute
a Contract with Browning -Perris Industries of Maine, Inc. for the disposal
of wastewater treatment plant sludge for a term of twelve (12) months.
In City Council December 28, 1994
Motion torefeito finance Comitte
failed Motion to reject all Proposals
and send it out for another round of
proposals Failed
Order Passed Vote 6 yes I no 1 absent
voting yea Baldaccf, Blanchette, cohen,
Saucy, Sullivan, Tyler Voting No Popper
Absent FRankel
✓G�
CitycClerk
95-57
O ROER
Title,
Authorizing the Execution of A contract
with Brownie - Ferriss Industries of
Mai6a,'kn.c Browning
blap4al' Bf' Wastewater
Treatment Plant Sludge
la
00 Awigved to
Councilman
CITY OF
RINE
BID mm(s): Sludoe Removal Sem"."
DEPART) B : Wastewater Treenneaz Plant
Resider Appmp^azim Budget
X Entegume Fundltem
Other
Numbv of Bids Sca 6
Daze Advarised:
Nounnber2s
1994
COMMENT$:
Requisition No,
Budgeted Anpunt S 32940000
TdalAnairti f
Award Rsmmnendericn $ 322.023.00v
NumbvofBids RedvN: 2
Bid Opening Dare: D nberT 1994
95-5)
Award the contract for Mudge removal services to BPI, Inc. of Brewer the low bidder at an
estimated cost per week of $6,19235
APPROVALS
C=COUNCIL MB CE COM1RseTfEE:
"This is an estimated cos[ for 52 weeks at $6,192.75 per week
2%.
CITY OF BANGOR Page 1 of 1 95-57
BID TABULATION Bid Opening: December 7, 1999
SLUDGE DISPOSAL SERVICES
'AVerag9 weepy tdnage Is between 90 and 140 wet tons.
BFI
Bnwwar, Maine
Sawyer Environmental
Hem en, Maine
ITEM
DECRIPTION I OTY.` UNIT
Unit
Pnce
Item
Total
Unit
Price
Item
Total
1.
Sludge Disosal 115 tons
47.85
5502.75
55.00
6,325.00
2.
Trona ovation 1 115 tons
5.00
690.00
5.00
575.00
TOTAL AMOUNT BID IAEENLYCOST
$6192.75
$5900.00
'AVerag9 weepy tdnage Is between 90 and 140 wet tons.
95-57
CITY OF BANGOR, MAINE
Engineering Department
Date: December 19, 1994
To: David N. Pellegrino, Purchasing Agent
From: James D. Ring, City Engineer
Subject: Proposals - 12 Month Disposal of Wastewater Treatment
Plant Sludge
I have reviewed the proposals submitted on 12/7/94 by BPI, Inc.
and Sawyer Environmental for 12 month sludge disposalservices. The
BPI proposal is $47.85/T for disposal by composting plus $6.00/T for
transportation, and the Sawyer proposal is $55.00/T for landfill
disposal plus $5.00/T for transportation. Because of the close
proximity of the 5awyer landfill, Treatment Plant could do the
hauling, which would cost $1.96/con. Based on an average sludge
production of 115 tons/week, the estimated disposal costs for the
twelve month period would be as follows:
BFI (disposal + transportation)
Disposal - 5980 T x $47.85 - $286,143
Tramp. - 5980 T x $6.00 35,880
$322,023
SAVER (disposal + transportation)
Disposal - 5980 T x $55.00 - $328,900
Tramp. - 5980 T x $5.00 - 29,900
$358,800
SAWYER (disposal only)
5980 T x $55.00 - $328,800
City transportation
cost (5980 T x $1.96 - 11,720.90
$340,520.80
Pa youare aware, I received a call from Marty Drew of Sawyer
last week, whereinhethat the intent of their proposal was
a total disposal cost, including State fees of $53.00 per poo rather
than $55.00 stated in their proposal. Since you have determined that
Paragraph 1. of their proposal clearly states that disposal coats of
"$53.00 per tan plus $2.00 per con State fee totalling 55.00 per ton",
I have used the $55.00/ton disposal figure in my cost analysis.
-1-
95-5I
I had also indicated to you that we had same concerns about
some carding contained in the HFI proposal relative to load weights,
sludge solids concept, etc. I have ontacted BFI regarding this, and
late last Friday I received the attached letter from BFI which satis-
factorily addresses our concerns.
Both proposals will include disposal of treatment plant grit.
Sawyer will also accept screenings, but BPI cannot otcompost screening
material. If we select the BFI proposal for sludge and grit disposal,
it will be necessary contract elsewhere for screenings disposal.
Since only coot[ fie tons of screenings are generatedannually, a
ny
additional coat over Sawyers proposal would only amount to about
$1,000 [0 83,W
Based on the foregoing, It 1s my recommendation [ contract
with BFI, Inc. I you have any questions of need further Information,
please advise. ?D*
-2-
OEC -10-94 FRI 3:00 Pp
Organics
December 16, 1994
Mr. James Ring
City Engineer
73 Harlow Street
Bangor, Maine 04401
PonA^EienEfu aeremircm memo 76T
�
e
sP-yme
"'� 7HS-4YY
RE! BFI's December 7th Biosolids Recycling Service Proposal
near Mr. Ring:
P. I
95-5]
I an writing to clarify assumptions that were contained in our
proposal and respond to your request to consider handling grits and
screenings. Jamie Ecker, Hawk Ridge compost Facility manager, and I
met with Brad Moore at the treatment plant this morning to respond to
the grit and screening question.
1. Grits. We are willing to accept the grits at Hawk Ridge Compost
Facility on a regular basis for a processing fee of $47.85 per wet
ton, the same price qu ted for biosolids in o December 7th
proposal. we would like to retain the option to divert the material
to another disposal option should there be seasonal contamination
(which is beyond the control of the treatment plant) by inerts such
as plastic and metal.
While investigating materials handling options at the treatment plant
we presented the idea of using the plant's small fork truck mounted
tipper carts to load the grits into the Sludge Containers daily to
Brad Moore. Brad Suggested that the grits continue to be loaded into
the 10 yard Container and the City could haul the one load per week
to Hawk Ridge Compost Facility ( CF). Direct hauling of the grits
by Bangor to HRCF will work fine with BFI.
2. Screenings. Due to the composition (mixture of organics and man
made inorganics) it is our recommendation that landfilling of this
material be continued as it cannot be handled in the compost process.
]. Solids content. we understand that the average solids content of
Bangor's biosolids is 26 - 27& and through normal operations there
will be loads below 258. Since solids contents vary at treatment
planta through normal operations, working with an average solids
content of 25% is fine.
4. Load size. We are comfortable with a business relationship
where the intent is to work together to maximize leads within legal
weight limits. Our intent is to maximize the load weights balancing
the needs of the plant and the practicality of loading containers.
Utilizing the two loading shoots, We believe loads in the 21-22 tons
can be achieved. If we are not able to achieve these weights with a
30 yard container we will rotate a 40 yard can in at no additional
cost to Bangor. Should one be needed, BFI is also willing to absorb
the cost of a deflector on the second Shoot to maximize load weights.
This approach nce
as the
treatment plant iwas ll wresponsive ork based oto excessiven our eweight S issues when e
h n we
Eo SPARKS AVENUE • BREWER, ME N412 • (207( 9094000 • FAX R0]) 9094057
AUGUSTA, ME: C071522d'W • WATEPVILLE. ME: Mn 872 8163 • S]A]EMDE: (SM 2a? 9SU
95-57
serviced you this spring. Utilizing the =11 off trailers, we now
have the opportunity to haul the heavier loads.
I trust this information addresseeur concerns. BFI organics can
handle the vast majority of the residuals produced by the waste water
treatment plant in a long term environmentally sound, cost
competitive manner. We look forward to the OPPOrtUmitY to serve
Bangor. If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to
call.
sincerely,
David M. Bell
organics Manager, BFI of Maine
cc: Ralph Mishou, Bangor
Brad Moore, Bangor
Bob Sparks, BFI
Jamie Ecker, BFI
CFPY OF BANGOR
SLUDGE DISPOSAL PROPOSAL
December 7,1994, 2:00 P.M.
IN"PRODUCPION
95-57
Brownmg-Fm lvdus4ies, lac Organics group is proposug to mmpm[ Baogers municipal dielge a our
EPA award wmviag Ha wk Ridge
omwtat Wcity woCudprefer
aa east
BeaCuitud owompossldogoospwtieve veerrsuslmd Bnvg.oPr oBiu
moidextvu6hrecentty wmpleletl bag krmsludge aNdyrecunLLywmpmredwbehillf to e'
ekit is
thedty.
Our Hawk Ridge( post FaaLty u a azare a 6e art fxiMy with 3q mmposdvg oomwft m fully unclosed
tunnels. The composting process in mnWlled by eondauaus c®pnler mnvitoring.
BFI stands ready to continue Bmgoes bog tradition of towelled sludge Composting
L BIOSOLIDSTTIRNKEYCOMPOSTING SERVICES
BFT will provide the followwg b am service package:
• Two(2)'Phirry(M)Yard Sludge Contu'vers uiW Gasketed Tail Gates
• Timely, Profeunacal Servru(oordmation
• Modell To Hawk Ridge Comport FacWty
• Biosolids Recycling by Composing
H. BFI BIOSOLIDS HAULING CAPABH.FTIES IN MAINE
• 18 Thirty M) Yard Sludge Comaners
• 1 Roll-on, Roll -off Trailer Prapued.
• 5 Roll-ou Roa-ofihucls
• 10 Professioaa1Roffloltphivms
• 1 operations Slatow
• 1 Safety Manager
•
4 C ower Serria/MiutCh Represeotativea
95-5]
IB. BFI COMPOSTING CAPABILITIES IN MAINE
4 Pemo4 FLIITmeSYatf
• 6GicamTh , OmnpuW Process Control
• 2 Fmm Fmd Leaders
• 1 Mins
• 1 Smuv and Stac4ivg Comeyar
• 1 Mofdtu for Odor Redaction
W. BIOSOLIDS SERVICE COSTS
A. Onnp fing (disposal):
Sap.Mper utm
B. Haii*&e s:
5fmrrwalton
C. lireming Costs:
Noce
D. Roll -off Cumunw Rental:
Wcluded
E Service Commencement Wo wecka from award of cavhaot.
V. BIOSOLIDS PROPOSAL ASSUMPTIONS
A. All Sl br of Mdse fees imduded.
B. bGo®vm biosotids solidsrwtmt ofl5%.
C Hauling ms[baud mamaaimum of225wr1 taus, and amivimum d21 tmvspw Wed Porloads
less thm 21 wet toms the ha W W g service fee will assume 21 wut tom
D. HFf andHmgorwill worktogethu m sri AuW l loadper dry. BF[ umdemtuvds Owe will be days
whm 2 bads will mrd to be hawrd.
E lam =4 ft City ofwJlwmk Fogethumdevebp mutually prIXeclive WdeuScatim
leaguaB toerk responcontract.
P. City ofBmgquarterly
uarerly msibles o StmeofMzlnpar Fa3valrequired matydea aprrad la
waLprovide plasm ematysesofbiosolids for parametvsrwmWedWMauve Chapmr56]b1a
parametvs plus Amwi4 Molyidevum, and Selenium.
95-5J
EQUIPMENT AND EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAME
In accordance with the specifications, each bidder shall answer the fallowing questions. All questions must be
;^"=we[ed or the bid will not be accepted.
1. Current E at:
a. Number of refuse container vehicles presently owned by your organization. Section 2
b. Nameof Uuurmcecarner section 3
c. Amountofinsuranceoneachvehicle section 3
d. Name of Body manufacturer
e. Capacity Section 2
L Year manufactured section 2
S. Years of actual service section 2 -
h Presentcondidon
i. Type of body
(mo
Additional Ecurrintsm Planned:
a. Will new vehicles be purchased for this contract? v
b. Type of body
c. Capacity 15-50 yards
3 Disnasal Facility
a Location of the disposal facility owned by or available to your organization
H,wk Ridge Coolest E
b. Approved by State ofMaine arid/or Corinzy?(Yes cr No) v..
Approvalor Permit Numbers
c. Approved and licensed by Municipality, uin
d. Numberofyearsoperating s 11.1..
Page 1 of3
95-52
e. Will the sludge be composted? Yes x Na_
f. Number and type of equipment used andmethod ofcompostingused at the facility.
nrinsed Tunnels
2 Front End Loaders �`
L Screen
1 Biofilter - Odor Control
g. Serwngwhatmunicipalides section 5
4. EEx gPS—:
a. How many years experience as sludge disposal contractor? 10 years
b. From what municipalities have you provided sludge disposal services? Name each municipality
5
5, f d Hi
a. if a corporation, state: Corporacion
b. Date when organized 1/25/89
c. Under the laws of what state organized pelavare
d. Names of oficers/pdncipals of the firm: s«.a,n
7. Have you failed at any tone to complete a contract? Use, list client and state eocurasmnces.
NO
S. Have my of your partners or my officers of your corporation failed to complete a contract? No
Fso, state the name of the individual, municipality, and give reason therefore.
Page 2 of'
95-5]
9. Did your organization or any member of it, when the lowest bidder on a municipal contract withdraw its
bid?
(-4-
10. Have artyliens of any kind been filed against any ofyour contracts? Give details.
11. M there any umatisfiedjudgments recorded against you, your partnership, or my member of it against
your corporation? xo
12, if so, give the some and address of eachjudgment creditor and the amount ofeachjudgment.
Page 3of3