Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-08-16 Penjajawoc Watershed Citizen Review Panel MinutesPenjajawoc Watershed Citizen Review Panel Monday, August 16, 2010 @ 12:00pm Rangeley Hall, EMCC 9}dnntes The Penjajawoc Watershed Citizen Review Panel met at Rangeley Hall at 12:00 per. In attendanwe were panel members Chuck Rohn, lames Gerety, George Elliott, Benita Descbaine, Jim Tyler, Tom Davis, John Coluvell, Dan Belyea, and Bob Quirk, and staff members Jim Ring, Art Morgan, and Paul Nickles. 1. Approval of Minutes The minutes from the May 28 and June 22 CPP meetings were approved, with several changes to the June 22 minutes. 2. Expanding the CRP Citywide Discussion of the proposed CRP expansion began with a review of comments from the Infrastructure Committee at their two meetings at which the topic was discussed These included suggestions that certain interests be represented, such as the housing Authority and the Guard. Representatives can be encouraged to apply, and the final decision is that of the Council. It was also suggested that there be representation for each watershed, and that too many representatives would make the group unwieldy. The recent draft of the CPP charter, which provides Por a devote expansion, provides that the terms of certain members will go Beyond the stated end date of the CPP, in order to provide for staggered terms in case the CRP lasts beyond 2011. CRP members concluded to let the City decide which members would fill which terms. No new vice -chair has been selected yet by the City Council Staff will ask members through a survey if they would like to be transferred to a new Citywide committee, and which length of term they would prefer. It was then suggested that the role of the CPP and the timeline for the utility district needs to be reviewed. A discussion on the role of the CRP then ensued. A suggestion was made that members state their opinion as to what their role is. Another suggestion was to have Council representatives in the CRP, or to have a Council stormwater committee. The topics of data, fundin& and a Use Attainability Analysis came up, along with the possibility of hiring Bill Kreutaberger again. Members and staff determined that three items need to be discussed at the next meeting: the timeline of the utility feasibility study and implementation; current and prospective data monitoring activities, along with cost estimates and where the. sufficiency and cost estimates are coming from; and what the responsibilities of the group are. After these have been discussed, the group will come back to the details of a citywide expansion. 3. Other Business The meeting concluded at approximately 1:30pm.