Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-01-06 Penjajawoc Watershed Citizen Review Panel MinutesPenjajavi Watershed Citizen Review Panel Wednesday, January 6, 2010@ 4:301 Rangeley Hall, EMCC Minutes The Penjajawsc Watershed Citizen Review Panel met at Rangeley Hall at 4:30 pm. In attendance were panel members Tom Davis, George Elliott, Charles Rohn, James Gately, Joyce Hedlund (Vice -Chair(, Jim Tyler, Benita Deschaine, John Cashwell (Chair), Valerie Carter, and Lucy Quimby, and staff members Jim Ring, Art Morgan, Wendy Warren, and Paul Nickles. 1. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the August 6, zoos and September 24, 2009 meetings were approved. 2. Staff presentation and O+A— Watershed Management Plan Weedy Warren identified the nine EPA -required elements of a watershed management plan. The question of how mobile stone flies, one of the indicators of stream health, are was raised. Art Morgan went over the causes of stream impairment, and noted those most pertinent to the Penjalawoc watershed. The high cost of rock baskets, DEWS method for assessing me biota in a stream, was discussed Valerie Carter suggested partnering with the University of Maine to reduce the cost, and John Cashwell volunteered to contact the State's entomologists. The need to contact the State regarding sah was also noted. An went on to describe the channel and uparlan restoration efforts currently underval despite the efforts of the resident beaver community, and the stom isiter retrofits being built. Many of these protects were under consideration for Compensation Fee Utilization Plan funds, and are being done with many received through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Lucy Quimby mentioned the existence of a pot of money for improvements that can be accessed by private landowners. It was also recommended that a list of shovelreadymitigation projects be sent to DEP. An noted the level of priority given to projects and watershed areas, making reference to a series of maps coded to show the prioritization. 3. Progress report —WMP Paul Nicklas gave a brief explanation of the Cil new Stormwater Maintenance Ordinance. An update on stimulus projects currently under contract was put off until the next meeting 4. update— water quality monitoring and testae plan Water quality monitoring, including the need for additional biota monitoring, was discussed during the presentation on the Watershed Management Plan. 5.1 Staff presentation and OaA— best practices of other Whets Wendy noted that many watershed management plans are for communities with very different concerns than Bangors, such as flooding. Staff will continue to look for watershed management plans covering municipalities similar to Bangor, particularly with respect to climate. 6. Progress report— materials binder Paul said he Intends W have the binder completed for the next meeting. J. Other business Agenda items for the next meeting include an update on stimulus projects, discussion of more parts of the Watershed Management Plan, and a presentation on the utility district feasibility stuff