Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-10-23 17-379 ORDINANCETitle, Ordinance 17-379 10/23/2017 CITY COUNCIL ACTION Council Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 Item No: 17-379 Responsible Dept: Legal Action Requested: Ordinance Map/Lot: N/A Amending Chapters 165, Land Development Code, and 177, Marijuana, of the Code of the City of Bangor, By Banning Retail Marijuana Stores Summary This Ordinance amendment would ban retail marijuana stores in Bangor. The Marijuana Legalization Act (MLA) passed in November 2016, setting the stage for legal recreational use of marijuana in Maine. The MLA gives municipalities' wide latitude in regulating retail (as opposed to medical) marijuana including the ability to ban retail marijuana stores. In a series of workshop discussions, members of the Council recommended that a ban on retail marijuana stores be implemented with the understanding that the Council may revisit zoning for retail marijuana stores after the full implications of allowing such uses in the city are understood. Committee Action Committee: Council Workshop Action: Staff Comments & Approvals This ordinance was discussed at a number of meetings. City anage r Introduced for: First Reading Meeting Date: October 11, 2017 For: "5;;Irl Y Ll F City Solicitor Against: Finance Director CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE Date: October 23, 2017 Assigned to Councilor: Graham 17-379 10/23/2017 ORDINANCE, Amending Chapters 165, Land Development Code, and 177, Marijuana, of the Code of the City of Bangor, By Banning Retail Marijuana Stores WHEREAS, the Marijuana Legalization Act, an initiative legalizing the recreational use of marijuana, was passed by Maine voters in November 2016; and WHEREAS, the initiative allows municipalities to regulate or prohibit the operation of retail marijuana establishments; and WHEREAS, many portions of the initiative are due to take effect in February of 2018; and WHEREAS, marijuana is a drug with significant potential effects on the health, safety, and welfare of the City and its citizens, both inherently and as a result of impaired driving; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City of Bangor to have further deliberations and discussions on the issues surrounding the locating of retail marijuana stores in the City of Bangor; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to prohibit retail marijuana stores as these discussions continue. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANGOR AS FOLLOWS, THAT Chapter 165 of the Code of the City of Bangor be amended as follows: § 165-13. Definitions. For the purpose of interpreting this chapter, the following terms, phrases, words and their derivations shall have the meanings given herein: RETAIL MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT A retail marijuana cultivation facility, retail marijuana products manufacturing facility, retail marijuana store, or retail marijuana testing facility. § 165-86.12. Enumeration. 17-379 10/23/2017 Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, including Article III, Nonconformities, and Article XIII, XIV and XV, the following uses are declared to be prohibited uses throughout the City of Bangor: E. Retail marijuana stores. Additions are underlined, deletions struck h. MEMORANDUM DATE: December 6, 2017 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: David G. Gould, Planning Officer SUBJECT: Amending Chapter 165 — Land Development Code to Ban Retail Marijuana Stores. Council Order #017-379 Please be advised that the Planning Board at its meeting on December 5, 2017, held a Public Hearing on the above Amendment to ban retail marijuana stores in the City of Bangor. Chair Kenney opened the Public Hearing and Assistant City Solicitor Paul Nicklas provided the Board with an overview of the proposed amendment. The intent is to ban retail marijuana stores in the City prior to the current moratorium expiring. The council has expressed interest in revisiting this ban in the future, after the effects of marijuana legalization can be seen in other communities. No proponents spoke regarding the proposed text amendment. Mr. Chris Gagne spoke in opposition, noting that the City should not need to ban the stores outright because it will still have control of these establishments via licensing. Member Parizo stated that the City already has effective methods of regulating adult recreational substances, such as alcohol, and felt that the City could develop more nuanced regulation than an outright ban. Chairman Kenney expressed his discomfort with this ban and is concerned that this ban may be difficult to rescind in the future. Member McCarthy was uncomfortable with the ban because she felt this law would chase away prospective legal businesses. Chairman Kenney felt that the City should wait until the State was finished developing its regulations before adopting our own. He stated that he would rather see the moratorium extended until those regulations were adopted, rather than an outright ban. Several Planning Board members expressed similar concerns to the above. Member Durgin made a motion to recommend that C.O. #17-379 be adopted by the City Council. Member Boothby seconded the motion. Two Board members voted to recommend the council adopt the ordinance change, six voted in opposition. IN CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 23, 2017 COr 17-379 FIRST READING /'ep.A.) zraoyee ., ) CITY CLERK IN CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 11, 2017 COr 17-039 PLANNING BOARD VOTED THAT THIS ITEM OUGHT NOT TO PASS, THEREFORE SIX AFFIRMATIVE VOTES ARE REQUIRED FOR PASSAGE. MOTION MADE AND SECONDED FOR PASSAGE GEOFF GRATWICK INDICATED THAT THE CITY SHOULD HAVE MORE INFORMATION FROM THE STATE BY THE THIRD WEEK IN FEBRUARY. VOTE: 5-4 COUNCILORS VOTING YES: GRAHAM, NEALLEY, TREMBLE, WESTON, SPRAGUE COUNCILORS VOTING NO: DAVITT, NICHOLS, PERRY, SUPICA DID NOT PASS 0J Rv )cJpBGc.�t.� CI Y CLE