HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-07-22 24-237 Ordinance24-237 07/22/2024
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Council Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Item No: 24-237
Responsible Dept: Planning
Action Requested: Ordinance Map/Lot: n/a
Title, Ordinance
Amending Chapter 165, Land Development Code, by Exempting Certain Uses from Requiring a Land
Development Permit.
Summary
This Ordinance will amend Chapter 165, Land Development Code, by replacing the language in subsections 7-
10 of §165-111(A) with language that more closely matches the State subdivision requirements. The current
language requires a Land Development Permit for construction or renovation of uses with 3 or more residential
or commercial units.
While the Code does need to require this permit for new construction of 3 or more residential units to comply
with State subdivision law, the additional requirements on renovation and on commercial units are more
restrictive than the State's subdivision requirements, they discourage investment into renovation of existing
structures, and they create a burden for small scale property owners simply wanting to add 1 dwelling unit to
their property or wanting to renovate previously discontinued units to bring them back online. This work is in
keeping with the Comprehensive Plan and the Council directive to reduce regulatory barriers to housing
development.
Committee Action
Committee: Planning Board
Action:
Staff Comments & Approvals
Meeting Date: August 6, 2024
For:
Against:
a-�* 10-;-) AW�4 - -
City Manager V City Solicitor I Inance
Director
Introduced for: First Reading and Referral
24-237 07/22/2024
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE
Date: July 22, 2024
Assigned to Councilor: Fish
ORDINANCE, Amending Chapter 165, Land Development Code, by Exempting Certain Uses from Requiring a
Land Development Permit.
WHEREAS, at present, the current language in Chapter 165 requires a Land Development Permit for
construction or renovation of uses with 3 or more residential or commercial units;
WHEREAS, while the Code does need to require this permit for new construction of 3 or more residential
units to comply with State subdivision law, the additional requirements on renovation and on commercial units
are more restrictive than the State's subdivision requirements;
WHEREAS, this language discourages investment into renovation of existing structures and creates a burden
for property owners wishing to create 1 or 2 dwelling units;
WHEREAS, this work is in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan and the Council directive to reduce
regulatory barriers to housing development;
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANGOR AS FOLLOWS, THAT
Chapter 165 of the Code of the City of Bangor is amended as shown below:
§ 165-111 Site developments requiring permit.
A. Any activity covered under this chapter shall require a land development permit under the following
conditions:
Tjx-C-A-P5ARU-1EtiE)R E)F renevatmen ef ene eF ngere buildings with three eF n9ere dwelling units, indudi
uses. Construction or placement of 3 or more dwelling units on a tract or parcel of land within a 5-
year period, including the division of a new structure or structures on a tract or parcel of land into
or more dwellina units or the division of an existing structure or structures previously used for
commercial or industrial use into 3 or more dwelling units. "Tract or parcel of land" and "new_
-QX structure or structures" take the same definitions outlined in 30-A M.R.S.A. W01.
-etmen er renevatmen ef three er mere eemmereial units, ineluding but net limited te busil 1—
k�117---rUTT-Use er site develepn9ent which, by adding ene er n9are residential er eemn9ereial units
J..L►1:lR.l�ll
24-237 07/22/2024
Additions underlined, deletions struc4kr
ffi W
M
e �'1 f� `
I �� ���.�.�� ��� "" �� �./ � �1. F 1.�.�
//;
.q
w '' I�EV'�� L����1"�T
� M�
.�
CIT� �F BAI�T+G+C�R.
PLANV�IC�ICr QIWI51ClN
Memorandum
To: Honorable Bangor City Council
Debbie Laurie, City Manager
From: Anja Collette, Planning Officer
Date: August 21, 2024
CC: Courtney O'Donnell, Assistant City Manager
David Szewczyk, City Solicitor
Anne Krieg AICP — Director of Community & Economic Development
Re: Planning Board Recommendation August 20, 2024
Amending Chapter 165, Land Development Code, by Exempting Certain Uses from
Requiring a Land Development Permit
Please accept this memorandum as the recommendation from the Planning Board for the noted item.
The Planning Board considered this item at two noticed public hearings on August 6 and August 20,
2024.
The meeting at which the vote was made (August 20t") was conducted in the Council Chambers at
City Hall and on Zoom. Members in attendance in the Chambers were Chair Reese Perkins, Vice
Chair Ted Brush, Members Trish Hayes, Jonathan Boucher, Don Meagher, and Mike Bazinet, and
Alternate Member Janet Jonas.
At the August 6t" meeting, the Planning Board voted to postpone their vote on the changes so that
staff could evaluate changing the proposed language to be more user-friendly since there were
concerns that the language from the State statute was difficult to understand. Staff returned with
follow-up information and recommendations at the August 20t" meeting. The information in the
memos from both meetings is outlined below.
From the August 6t" staff inemo:
A. The purpose of this proposal is to replace the language in subsections 7-10 of §165-111(A)
(included in your packets) with language that more closely matches the State subdivision
requirements. The current language requires a Land Development Permit for construction or
renovation of uses with 3 or more residential or commercial units.
B. In order to comply with State subdivision law, the Code does still need to require this permit for
new construction of 3 or more residential units, as well as conversion of commercial or industrial
space into 3 or more dwelling units. However, the additional requirements on renovation and on
the construction of commercial units go above and beyond the State's subdivision requirements.
They also discourage investment into renovation of existing structures and they create a burden
for small scale developers and property owners simply wanting to add 1 dwelling unit to their
property or wanting to renovate previously discontinued units to bring them back online.
73 HARLOW STREET,BANGOR,ME 04401
TELEPHONE: (207)992-4280 FAX: (207) 945-4447
WWW.BANGORMAINE.GOV
CITY OF BANGOR PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL 8.20.2024
Te�t Change-Land Development Permit Requirements
C. Additionally, there isn't currently a clear need for requiring this permit for renovation since
renovation often only affects the interior of a building and if it does significantly affect exterior
work, it would typically trigger the need for Planning Board or staff approval via other portions of
the Code. Similarly, construction of commercial units would already trigger Planning Board
approval through the requirement for any uses in the City's commercial zones to receive a Land
Development Permit.
D. The proposed amendment to replace the noted language in the Code with language mirroring the
State subdivision statute is in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan and the Council directive to
reduce regulatory barriers to housing development.
From the August 20t" staff inemo:
A. This item was reviewed at your last meeting and was postponed to give staff time to determine if
the wording of the proposed language could be changed on the current Council order. Staff have
determined that it would not be possible to change the wording on this order and that the order
would either need to be approved or denied as is, and a new order would need to be brought
forward with revised language.
B. Additionally, upon further discussion, staff have determined that it would not be advisable to
deviate from the State language since using this language ensures that the City is following State
law. Other communities such as Portland simply refer to the State statute in their codes rather
than attempting to create language at all for this purpose.
C. It should also be noted that this section of the Code will be revisited during the land use code re-
write that is about to begin. During that process, staff and the consultants will analyze this section
very closely to ensure that it is both user-friendly and compliant with State law.
Member Boucher stated that he felt comfortable relying on staff to interpret the proposed language of
the ordinance if inembers of the public or others have questions about it since this is something that
is already done for the Code in general.
There were no comments from the public.
Member Boucher moved to recommend to City Council that the proposed changes ought to pass.
Member Bazinet seconded the motion. The motion passed 7:0 with all members voting in favor.
The result of the vote is that a majority of Planning Board members voted to recommend that the
proposed changes ought to pass.
Anja Collette
Page 2 � 2
IN CITY COUNCIL
JULY 22, 2024
COrd 24-237
First Reading and Referral to Planning Board Meeting on August 6, 2024
�����:,w�,��° '" .�� ��°,„�,��"���,°��*°.������
��
CITY CLERK
IN CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 26, 2024
COrd 24-237
Motion made and seconded for Passage
Vote: 7—0
Councilors Voting Yes: Deane, Fish, Fournier, Hawes, Tremble, Yacoubagha, Pelletier
Councilors Voting No: None
Passed
���.�` � M,�� �������w������
� �s�
CITY CLERK