Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-02-09 134 AD ORDINANCE—: 134 ;.D Introduced by councilor Somme, February 9, 1975 CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE) (A)rbiLLM CRy a aim, chapti vxxx ars{m Q s ntron, 3 Bs Y ondaiamd by the City Caused of EM City of Braden, as ib =.' _ MT Chapter =1, article 9, section 3, Residential 4 Zone, be amended by the addition of a new subsection,Q) (e) as follows: (e) On a lot having a minimum of four (4) sores, any combination o4 residential u including multi -family uses, may, be permitted provided all others requirements as provided herein under Section 2 above are omplied with; and that the maximum density shall not exceed 12 inits per acre, nor shall any onerbuilding contain more IN CITY COUNCIL f 139 AD y February 9, 1976 SG) Recei4ed 1st reading, referred to ORDINANCE Planning Board - Consider next meeting. I TIME, ) Boarding Chapter VIII, Article 9. CI BpR Section 3, Residential 9 Zone. IN CITY COUNCIL February 23, 1976 Report from Planning Board read. Receive. 2:W reading andfinal passage by the following yes eeN Bivote. Councilors voting yes: gney, Brouster, Finnigan, Henderson, Mousey, Nosey and Sc las. Councilors absent: "Ballou and Gass. CITY CLERK - InG�2Lrce1 poi (iiei Dy " �Ylc ttwN 9Tts wfitmrce l8 correct ly eri$ras.�3 Gamitw ON ftmssei OHtnanpes. RECEIVED CITY OF BANGOR CITY CLERK'S OFFICE °75 FED 5 PH 3 54 Ma W, the Center s( Maine -.the Gnaawy to Maine's North Wards and Seashore Rams .RL A ,...m. g QIitg of Farrar f9Aauie February 18, 1996 10: Honorable City Council FROM: Planning Board RE: Amending Zoning Ordinance Article 9, Section 3, Residential 4 Zone Council Order 134" Please be advised that the planning Board held a Public Hearing on February 17, 1996 on the proposed change. Me Board Considered the proposed change and the purpose Roo such, Change,e�ely topallow as a special exception in the oments limited to a density, not to exceed 12 units par acre, and not over 16 unite par building. Me Planning Board unanimously approved the change, indicatinis they Pelt that it allowed consideration of medium density developments without resconing to the Residential 5 zone, with the additional uses anddensity8-5 would allow. Carl J. a and Planning Director CJK:lgl