HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-02-09 134 AD ORDINANCE—:
134 ;.D
Introduced by councilor Somme, February 9, 1975
CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE) (A)rbiLLM CRy a aim, chapti vxxx ars{m Q s ntron, 3
Bs Y ondaiamd by the City Caused of EM City of Braden, as ib =.'
_ MT Chapter =1, article 9, section 3, Residential 4 Zone, be amended
by the addition of a new subsection,Q) (e) as follows:
(e) On a lot having a minimum of four (4) sores, any combination o4
residential u including multi -family uses, may, be permitted
provided all others requirements as provided herein under Section
2 above are omplied with; and that the maximum density shall not
exceed 12 inits per acre, nor shall any onerbuilding contain more
IN CITY COUNCIL f 139 AD
y February 9, 1976 SG)
Recei4ed 1st reading, referred to ORDINANCE
Planning Board - Consider next
meeting.
I TIME, ) Boarding Chapter VIII, Article 9.
CI BpR Section 3, Residential 9 Zone.
IN CITY COUNCIL
February 23, 1976
Report from Planning Board read.
Receive. 2:W reading andfinal
passage by the following yes eeN
Bivote. Councilors voting yes:
gney, Brouster, Finnigan,
Henderson, Mousey, Nosey and Sc las.
Councilors absent: "Ballou and Gass.
CITY CLERK
- InG�2Lrce1 poi (iiei Dy
" �Ylc ttwN
9Tts wfitmrce l8 correct ly eri$ras.�3
Gamitw ON
ftmssei OHtnanpes.
RECEIVED
CITY OF BANGOR
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
°75 FED 5 PH 3 54
Ma W, the Center s( Maine -.the Gnaawy to Maine's North Wards and Seashore Rams
.RL A ,...m. g
QIitg of Farrar f9Aauie
February 18, 1996
10: Honorable City Council
FROM: Planning Board
RE: Amending Zoning Ordinance
Article 9, Section 3, Residential 4 Zone
Council Order 134"
Please be advised that the planning Board held a Public
Hearing on February 17, 1996 on the proposed change.
Me Board Considered the proposed change and the purpose
Roo such, Change,e�ely topallow as a special exception in the
oments limited to a density, not to
exceed 12 units par acre, and not over 16 unite par building.
Me Planning Board unanimously approved the change,
indicatinis they Pelt that it allowed consideration of medium
density developments without resconing to the Residential 5
zone, with the additional uses anddensity8-5 would allow.
Carl J. a and
Planning Director
CJK:lgl