HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-08-14 332 AF ORDER332 AF
Intradueed by Counrilor sassy, August 14, 1978
CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE.) wl/rUrr Possible Reclassification of Burleigh Road
BY W City CW a a 11 ofdw City of Bangor:
ORDERED,
THATWHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Bangor,
as adopted in 1969, classifies Burleigh Road extending from
Broadway to Essex Street as an Arterial Street, so as to even-
tually provide a circumferential belt from Union Street, by way
of Griffin Road, Strickland Road, and Burleigh Road, extended
to Hogan Road, and
WHEREAS, the 1978 Capital Street Reconstruction Program
includes provisions for reconstructing Burleigh Road for a
distance of 2,000 feet East from Broadway, and
WHEREAS, Arterial Street designation would dictate the need
for either (1) a 24 foot wide paved surface with 8 foot gravel
shoulders and open ditches on both sides, or (2) a 40 foot paved
width with a storm sewer system, end -
WHEREAS, a Petition has been received from. varigj}s property
owners on Burleigh Road, opposing any widening of the road beyond
its present width, S copy of said Petition being attached,
NOW, THEREFORE, be it
ORDERED, that the Planning Board be and hereby is directed
to reconsider the present classification of Burleigh Road between
Broadway and Essex Street, and to submit a Report to the City
Council for further action.
STATEMENT OF FACT
The existing street has a 24 foot wide paved width with approxi-
mately 4 foot wide shoulders and open ditches, with no adjustments
in the width having been made since 1958. The reconstruction as
proposed by the City Engineer would bring the road in conformance
with the classification as presently recommended by the Comprehensive
Plan, whereas the reconstruction of the road to its present width,
as recommended by the Petition, would barely meet the requirements
for a Residential I Street.
332 AF
IN CIW COUNCIL 0 R U E R
August 14, 1978
Title,
D
CITY CLERK Possible...
Aeclassificet ion of Bnxlel..
Read
. .............. I........ I..............
Introduced d f d by
��_
3.;
I
333 AF
I ad a Resident of Burleigh Mad. i oppo88 any widening of the
road beyond its present width. It should be repaved and the stoma draimge
should be added. -
333, p
I ato a Resident of garletgh Road. I oppose any widening of the
road beyond its peasant vidta. It Should be reposed and the Storm drainage,
should be added.
GU 63 3 4 Edi,
ow
Ra
CCU)"Pl
�Raagon the amts, of Mains—the Gaamay to Maiui Monk Woods and Seashore RLI
RODNEY G. WKAY CITY HALL
eNP"r LANNON, MAINE GLEN
P.M" 0111.. 0% of �Iamgor, 'Main
DATE: August 23, 1978
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: The Planning Board
SUBJECT: Possible Reclassification of Burleigh Road
Council Order No. 332 AF
Please be advised that the Planning Board at its meeting on
August 21, 1978 reviewed the request for reconsideration of the
classification of Burleigh Road initiated at the August 14, 1978
Council meeting.
The Planning Board voted to table this item until their meeting
of September 18, 1978 in order to have sufficient time to review the
concerns expressed by area residents at the August 21st meeting and
to have prepared and reviewed information from the Planning Staff on
this issue.
The Planning Board would like to submit a report to the City
Council for its mee[i.� on September 25, 1978 if such a time table
would meet the Council a needs.
Bangor, the anter of Maim—the Gateway to Maine's North Woods and Senrhore Roasts
RODNEY 0. MCKAY CITY HALL
"GA.. SANGm. MAINE 04MG
sIa.i.e office, Og of Cesar•
DIPARTMENT of PLANNING nd COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 20, 1978
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: The Planning Board
RE: Possible Reclassification of Burleigh Road
Council Order 332 AT
At your request the Planning Board has reviewed the classification
of Burleigh Road between Essex Street and Broadway.
At its meeting on August 21, 1978, the Board heard from the
residents of Burleigh Road and Essex Street area as to their feeling
about the present classification and future function of Burleigh Road.
The Board then requested that the Planning Office prepare a report
(which is attached) on this question for their review by the next
seting (This report was given to the Planning Board at their meeting
on September 5, 1978.) and that the item be placed on the September
18, 1978 Agenda for action.
At its meeting on September 18, 1978, the Planning Board voted to
recommend to the City Council that Burleigh Road between Broadway and
Essex Street continue to be designated as an arterial street. This
action was based on the conclusion by the Board that the present use
and traffic volume (19DO care per day average daily traffic in 1977)
warranted such a designation. (The vote was four in favor, none
opposed, and one abstention.)
The Board also moved that the proposed connector from Essex Street/
Burleigh Road area and the Rogan Road/Stillwater Avenue area be main-
tained in the City's Major Street Plan and that the City Council be
requested to direct the City Engineer's Office to conduct a preliminary
engineer"ng study to enable the City to decide if such a connector was
economically feasible and what the probable location of such a facility
might be. (The Board supported this motion unanimously.) The Board's
request of the City Council was Based upon a concern to have the City
decide definitely whether the proposed connector should be in the
circulation plan or out. If it becomes necessary to eliminate this
proposal from the plan the Planning Board feels that study of alternatives
to the. City's circulation problems and proposed solutions should be
started immediately.
'6 r
o n r
Planning Officer
DATE: September 5, 1978
TO: The Planning Board
FROM: The Planning Staff
SUBJECT: Burleigh Road Reclassification and its Relationship
to the Major Street Plan.
Background
Burleigh Road is classified as an arterial street in the Major
Street Plan in the Comprehensive Plan (Page 55). The City Council has
requested that the Planning Board "reconsider the present classification
of Burleigh Head between Broadway and Essex Street and to submit a
report to the City Council for further action" (Council Order 332 AF).
The proposal in the 1978 Capital Street Reconstruction Program
included the reconstruction of Burleigh Road for approximately 2,000
feet east from Broadway and this proposal brought about concern on the
part of residents of the area which in turn prompted the Council Order.
The Council Order notes the fact that there is a proposal to provide a
circumferential system of arterial streets from Hagan Road to Essex
Street, Broadway and Union Street. There are, in fact, two separate but
inter -related policy positions to evaluate:
1. Whether Burleigh Road is properly classified as an arterial
street in its present use and function in the highway system
as a connector between Essex Street and Broadway; and
2. Whether the proposed new arterial from Hogan Road to Burleigh
Road has merit.
Existing Conditions
Burleigh Road connects Broadway to Essex Street, a distance of a
little over one mile. This area is largely undeveloped with approximately
a dozen homes spread out along the street. The Bomarc Industrial area
is serviced by Burleigh Road approximately 1500 feet from its junction
with Essex Street.
A 1977 average annual daily traffic count at the intersection of
Burleigh Road and Broadway was 1900 cars, - just under the projected
figure of 2,000 cars anticipated in the middle 1980'0 in the Compre-
hensive Plan.
1978 turning movement counts indicate that traffic at the Burleigh
Road and Broadway intersection isabout equally distributed between in-
town connection between Burleigh Road and Broadway and a through movement
exchange between Burleigh Road and Strickland Road, while there is a
heavy out-of-town movement from Burleigh Road to outer Broadway during
the afternoon peak hours. This would indicate that the Stuart traffic
is certainly influencing utilization of Burleigh Road at this time. Both
the averagge daily traffic figure of 1900 cars in 1977 and the hourly
volumes of over 200 cars per hour would indicate that therer a con-
siderable amount of traffic which is using Burleigh Road as athrough
street or as access to the Bomarc site.
Comprehensive Plan Proposal
The proposal in the present Comprehensive Plan is for a circumfer-
ential arterial system which would actually tie in the Od11n Road, I-395
area, by way of Illinois Avenue to Griffin Road, Strickland Road, Burleigh
Road and with the proposed connector to Hogan Road. This system was one
of the major proposals of the major street plan at that time. The Plan
called for immediate realignment and widening of the required right,-of-
way in order to reduce costly acquisitions at a later date. Some of this
right-of-way has been acquired and the improvements in the Griffin Road
and Strickland Road rights-of-way are basically the first steps to
implement this proposal.
Burleigh Road Without the Hogan Road Tie-In
The proposal to widen the pavement on Burleigh Road to 40 feet in
the 1978 Street Reconstruction Program was made on the assumption that
arterial street specifications were necessary for Burleigh Road in its
present capacity (rather than on the assumption that the circumferential
system was to be constructed).for safety as well as traffic capacity.
The proposal would be to put storm drainage underground and provide for
direct access from the pavement to the existing driveways along Burleigh
Road.
The question of whether low density residential development belongs
along an arterial street is somewhat one of individual preference. How-
ever, there are extensive, high-quality single -family residential areas
in the City with much higher traffic flaw volumes than Burleigh Road
which have been sustained as viable neighborhoods. The assumption that
-
the introduction of any arterial traffic volume automatically means that
the land use on such a facility must change from low density residential
to some other use is clearly erroneous. At the present time, Griffin
Road and Strickland Road have traffic volumes between 5,000 and 8,000
cars average daily traffic and are residential areas. Outer Hammond
Street has average daily traffic between 7,000 and 8,000 vehicles and
it is an extensively developed single -family residential area. Center
Street is another area which has in excess of 6,000 cars average daily
traffic and it has both single family and multi-family residential use.
The way in which the traffic on such a facility were handled will effect
the development fronting on it and with proper protection from zoning,
there is no reason to believe that residential use of such areas is
not possible.
The fact that Burleigh Road connects two major access streets to
the center of the City and is over a mile in length means that it
serves a through traffic function and will continue to do so in the
future. It appears from the standpoint of present and anticipated use
(without the introduction of a tie between Burleigh Road and Hogan Road)
that Burleigh Road must be constructed to adequate specifications to
handle the existing (and some increased) traffic volumes. The proposal
for reconstruction addressee itself to these needs and as such should be
considered a sound one.
Proposed Circumferential Arterial System
The proposed link between Burleigh Road and Hogan Road is part of
the over-all circumferential arterial system concept developed in the
1967 Comprehensive Plan. There have already been commitments made in
terns ofrealignment of Strickland Road and additional right-of-ways
have been acquired to begin the implementation of this concept. Further-
more, the 1978 Turning Movement Studies indicate that the cross traffic
on Griffin Road and the Griffin Road and Ohio Street intersect—Ion aU__
on the Griffin -Strickland Road alignment at the intersection of those
streets and Kenduskeag Avenue is the dominant movement through these
intersections. That is, that the in and out-of-town traffic on Ohio
Street and Kenduskeag Avenue is considerably leas than the cross-town
traffic between Union Street and Broadway. This verifies, to a certain
extent, the function of this link in the proposed circumferential system.
The question has been raised as to alternatives to the existing
proposal. There are several problems with such alternatives: (1) the
existing bridge over the Kenduskeag Stream is a facility which cannot
be duplicated without considerable expense; (2) the investment in Griffin
Road and Strickland Road alignment and rights-of-way is one which is
substantial in terms of implementing this proposal; (3) the Burleigh
Road right-of-way itself from Broadway to Essex Street being available
as a link in the system is also a atnificant economic factor; and (4)
alternatives between Essex Street and Broadway are extremely limited
and would be very high cost in nature.
A suggestion has been made that a link between Hogan Road and Essex
Street could cross to the north of the Bomarc site and join outer Broadway
at some point in the neighborhood of Greeley Street. This proposal would
be extremely limited in terms of feasibility because of the additional
cost of the link between Essex Street and Broadway and because of the
limited usefulness to the rest of the highway system of such a street
at that junction with Broadway. Furthermore, there might well be a
tendency for traffic to be diverted from the facility at the point at
which it joins Essex Street in order to get back into the Strickland
Road -Griffin Road alignment.
The only other option would appear to be an inner route which would
leave Stillwater Avenue somewhere in the neighborhood of Gilman Road,
cross Essex Street behind the High School site, cross Broadway at the
tope of the hill and then proceed down an extremely steep slope across
4
the corner of the Russon College Campus, This route would have a dis-
ruptive affectuponthe already congested area at the top of Broadway
hi11 and would encroach upon the Husson College Campus to an extreme
degree, as well as requiring considerable longer new right-of-way and
construction in order to tie back into Strickland Road and the bridge.
It would appear, if there were to be a link between Hogan Road and
the Strickland Road alignment, that one which utilized at least a sig-
nificant portion of Burleigh Road is probably the most logical and least
costly alternative. (This does not mean that such a circumferential
system moat be constructed.)
The benefits of the circumferential system would appear to be
primarily for those developed and developing areas from the Interstate
alignment outward and would primarily serve Bangor residents as a cross-
town route. It is questionable whether large numbers of persons from
outside the community would use such a route to gain access to the Hogan
Road shopping complex. Only a few Route 15 inbound travelers would pro-
bably use such ac,access. However, benefits of siphoning off a certain
amount of traffic either to or from the Hogan Road -Stillwater Avenue
area are tremendous in terms of the reduction in pressure on a number of
strategic points in the highway system such as the Hogan Road interchange,
the section of Stillwater Avenue inside the Interstate where it goes
through the Broadway Park area to Broadway, and, to a lesser extent, a
few high volume points such as the Broadway and I-95 junction.
Conclusion
The conclusion from examination of trends in traffic volumes and
movement through this area of the City's major street system is that
the present classification of Burleigh Road is probably a necessary and
desirable one. The merits of a connection between Essex Street and
Stillwater Avenue in the vicinity of the Bogan Road junction are also
reasonably obvious from a traffic flow point of view.
One consideration in the final decision in terms of what the City's
policy should be with regard to the circumferential proposal is the,type
of facility which would be built to service this function. It is anti-
cipated that a facility should be designed in such a way that it could
be a divided street with limited access for extensive sections of it
(particularly between Essex Street and Stillwater Avenue.) The facility
could have additional design elements included which would reduce highway
noise by such techniques as some partial separation of grades between the
facility and adjacent development and with the addition of planting and
other sound reduction elements. If the facility were properly designed
and built, and if the City's land use policies prevented any encroachment
of commercial uses into what is programmed to be a predominantly residential
area (that is Burleigh Road and Essex Street) then such a facility might be
an asset not only to the City's circulation system, but to the adjacent
properties which front upon it.