Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-02-14 83-90 ORDER83-90 Introduced by Councilor Willey, February 14, 1983. CITY OF BANGOR d (TITLE.) G®X11CTe AeoegtiaG City, Eaginear'e Aeyort -Fuel Coat of Yenjejaw a Sewer Extension to.8 & A Restaurant By the City Ceurolt ofd My ofBwwor. 'THAT the attached report of the City Engineer showing the final cost of the exteasion of the sanitary sewer on Fanjaj8wen Stream north from Bangor Rall Boulevard to eerve the 8 & N Restaurant be end hereby is accepted, end be it further ORDERED, THAT the remaining balance of the Developer's prepaid share be refunded. In City Couwil February 14,1983 83-90 Passed - 0 R 0 E R Wrr.P.�L j "ns T tl rsR o ri ur C y Clerk n - c°o.oeeLq:So?P S 9?tY+ ^a ePrt.Yv ^ CRYCITY: CiEn Pes3ajawoo.8ewer atennron n c. ....:...........W; ..:................. F� to 3,&H HeeSaura¢t ' u .15Vedney and ,ilea by o _ Connciiman 'v' � C rp C i, k i a CITY OF BANGOR, MAINE Engineering Department February 10, 1983 To the Municipal Officers: Reference is made to City Council Order No. 82-160 passed Jane 149 1982, authorizing the extension of the sanitary sewer along Penjajawoc Stream north from Bangor Mall Boulevard to serve the 8 & N Restaurant. All work has been completed, as follows: The sewer extension consisted of the installation of 492 feet of 10 inch pipe and 2 manholes, at a total actual cost of $9,616.18, substantially less than the original estimate of $16,920.00. Since a 10 inch pipe was installed to serve not only the subject property, but also to serve an a collector for the eventual sewer extansioas on Stillwater Avenue, and since the restaurant development would have required only an 8 inch sewer, it "a recommended in the original report that the estimated coat of the sewer for the purpose of determining the assessment be reduced by $3.00 per linear foot to $15,440.00. It was on this basis that the Developer prepaid fifty percent, or $7,720.00. AccorHingy, lit is recommended that the actual cost of installation for the purpose of determining the final assess- ment be also downgraded in a proportional amount to reflect the installation of a 10 inch pipe. On this basis, the cost of an 8 inch pipe would have been $8,974.00, the amount recom- mended to be used for determining the Developer's share. Of this amount, fifty percent, or $4087.00 would be considered as the Developer's actual share of the installation. Since the Developer prefunded $7,720.00, a refund in the amount of $3,333.00 is in order. It is recommended that the assessment be adjusted to the actual cost of installation as shown above, and that the refund in the amount of $3,333.00 be paid to Mr. Stephan Raggan. Plane showing the actual sewer installation are on file in the office of the City Engineer. Respectfully submitted, 6 John T. Frawley, 1 City Bagineer