HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-01-25 88-92 ORDER88-92
Introduced by Councilor Sullivan, January 25, 1988
CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE.) (®rDEr, Authorizing Amendment to Contract, with Woodard 6 Curran, Inc. -
Treatment Evaluation
By tM1e CAV Couwtl offAa CIN' W BmmWr:
p};Iadad17
TUT , NNEMBAS, ,the City of Bangor, by Council Order No. 86-368, passed
September 18, 1986, entered into a Contract with Woodard A Curran, Inc..
Consulting Engineers from Portland, Maine, for consulting services pertaining
to secondary sewage treatment evaluation. said Agreement containing five
separate casks; and
WHEREAS, additional work has been required pertaining to Task 1, Financial
Capability Analysis, to further evaluate financing options forsecondary waste-
water
tand ongoing s rehabilitation work, and Task 5which included
assistance in r
nthe preparation of an Application for possible Federal funding of
the upgrading of the Carr Brook Sewer system;
NOW. THEREFORE, Be It
ORBEREB. THAT the existing Agreement with Woodard b Curran. Inc. be amended
by the addition of Attachment 5, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the
City Clerk, which wouldprovide for the fallowing:
The cncal estimated cost of Task I is increased from $12,200.00 to
$19,900.00, and the estimated amount of Task 5 Is Increased from $60,790.00
to $80,360.00: the total estimated Contract amount is increased from $255.200.00
to $282.470.00; and be it further
ORDERED, THAT the additional cost be paid for out of existing Capital
Account No. 52-60-20 (5244).
STATEMENT OF FACT:
Me proposed Amendment will also allow for limited additional service
during the spring months of 1988.
In City Council January 25,1988 Title, V JAN 21 P2 W
P"Sw
An[Iiorizin9 Amand�nt to Contract wit
....'"..""............ CITY UI BANI
Wcodorecd s Curran Inc, SITres t CITY CLERIK
Cty cler ......... 6........................... ..
Ealuation -
Introduced and filed by
oCouncilman
.. AGREEMENT BETkEN
CITY OF BANGOR
AND
WOODARD b CURRAN, INC
ATTACHMENT 5
PHASE I
Task S- Assist Witb the Implementationf h t Treatment
Program and the Collection System R h b'i't P
Description
This Attacbment 5 details the work performed and the manhours and
costs incurred by the Company to assist the City With two work items
that were outside the originalscope of Task 5 as indicated in
Attachment 4 and forwarded to the City on July 22, 1987. These two
work items are described below:
1. MC50 'Reserve Fund Application Preparation: The Company
prepared, on the behalf of the City, an application document
that was forwarded to the Maine DEP and subsequently to the
U.S. EPA. This application requested that the City be given
consideration by the EPA for funding of two major I/l removal
projects for the Carr Brook and Hancock Street subsystems to
allow the elimination of the two Marino Combined Sewer
Overflows (MCS0) that exist for those two subsystems. This
funding .would originate from the MCSO Reserve Fund that was
established as part of the Water Quality Act of 1987. The
Company's work included meeting with DEP personnel, gathering
the necessary data to prepare the document, compiling the
document, writing various descriptive sections, contacting
various state and regional agencies for input and additional
documentation, mailing the application to the DEP, responding
to DEP and EPA inquires concerning the application, and
tracking its progress.
Work items beyond October 31, 1987 include attendance at the
November 9, 1987 EPA site visit, discussions and meetings
with the Department of Marine Resources, responding to the
EPA written requests for additional information, further
tracking of the application's progress and continued
availability to respond to DEP or EPA inquires concerning the
application. The full extent of the Company's involvement
with the application cannot be determined at this time. An
0481C
estimate to allow the City to budget for this work is included below.
MANHOURS AND COST INCURRED AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1987
Task
Principal
Project Manager
Engineer
DEP Meeting
4
4
_
Application Prep.
2
29
57
ESTIMATED FUTURE
MANHOURS AND
COST
EPA Visit Prep
8
8
-
EPA Visit
8
-
_
Response Prep
4
8
8
Tracking, etc.
2
8
8
Total Manhours 28 57 73
Cost $ 2660 $ 3990 $ 2920
Total Estimated Cost $ 9570
2. Operating Trickling Filter Plant Survey: To further document
the need for a trickling filter pilot study, or eliminate the
need altogether, the City Staff requested, during a meeting
On September 4, 1987, that the Company perform a nationwide
phone survey of operating trickling. filter plants that are
exposed to cold climatic conditions. The effort was to find
operating data that would provide the necessary design
criteria for a trickling filter that would be subjected to
cold climate and cold influent temperature conditions. The
Company performed a phone survey of nearly 80 trickling
filter facilities that are operational in the northern tier
of states in the U.S.. Four facilities exhibiting the
coldest influent wastewater and the use of plastic media
trickling filterss the principal treatment process were
contacted a secondtime to obtain detailed operating data
over a year-long time span. The data from two of these
facilities was analyzed via computer program to assess the
facilities' operation. Theesults of this effort were
presented to the City staff at a progress meeting on October
20, 1987.
0481C
Task 1 - Financial Capability Analysis
Description
This Attachment 5 details the work plan andmanhours and costs
estimated by the Company to assist the City in further evaluating
the financing options for the Secondary Wastewater Treatment
Facility and ongoing sewer rehabilitation work.
The project financing analysis to be conducted by the Company in
conjunction with Mr. Ted Jellison and Mr. Ralph Mishou includes the
following:
1. Service Availability Charges (SAC) relative to determining
excess design capacity;
2. Developer financing relative to sewer impact fees which could
be assessed to residential, commercial and industrial clients
to reduce upgrading project costs;
3. Financing alternatives which allow individuals to prepay debt
costs thereby significantly reducing financing cost debt
level and potentially opening the door to a CDBG application
(if they survive D.C. budget cutting) to pay debt prepayments
for low income housing;
4. Update of project cost for justification of rate increases
required for July 1988.
MANICURE AND COST ESTIMATE
Less Remaining Task.2 Amount: $1,000.00
Total Task 1 Amendment: $7,700.00
0481C
Principal
Project Manager
CPA
Manhours
30
30
40
Cost
$ 2850
$ 2100
$ 3000
Labor Cost
$ 70950
Expenses:
$ 750 (GFOA
Financial Consultants
Included)
Total Cost:
$ 8,700
Less Remaining Task.2 Amount: $1,000.00
Total Task 1 Amendment: $7,700.00
0481C
MANHOURS AND
COST INCURRED
AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1987
`
Principal
Project Manager
Engineer
Manhours
20
- 30
150
Cost
$ 1900
$ 2100
$ 6000
Total Cost
$10,000
TOTAL TASK 5
AMENDMENT
$ 19570
0481C