Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-01-25 88-92 ORDER88-92 Introduced by Councilor Sullivan, January 25, 1988 CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) (®rDEr, Authorizing Amendment to Contract, with Woodard 6 Curran, Inc. - Treatment Evaluation By tM1e CAV Couwtl offAa CIN' W BmmWr: p};Iadad17 TUT , NNEMBAS, ,the City of Bangor, by Council Order No. 86-368, passed September 18, 1986, entered into a Contract with Woodard A Curran, Inc.. Consulting Engineers from Portland, Maine, for consulting services pertaining to secondary sewage treatment evaluation. said Agreement containing five separate casks; and WHEREAS, additional work has been required pertaining to Task 1, Financial Capability Analysis, to further evaluate financing options forsecondary waste- water tand ongoing s rehabilitation work, and Task 5which included assistance in r nthe preparation of an Application for possible Federal funding of the upgrading of the Carr Brook Sewer system; NOW. THEREFORE, Be It ORBEREB. THAT the existing Agreement with Woodard b Curran. Inc. be amended by the addition of Attachment 5, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, which wouldprovide for the fallowing: The cncal estimated cost of Task I is increased from $12,200.00 to $19,900.00, and the estimated amount of Task 5 Is Increased from $60,790.00 to $80,360.00: the total estimated Contract amount is increased from $255.200.00 to $282.470.00; and be it further ORDERED, THAT the additional cost be paid for out of existing Capital Account No. 52-60-20 (5244). STATEMENT OF FACT: Me proposed Amendment will also allow for limited additional service during the spring months of 1988. In City Council January 25,1988 Title, V JAN 21 P2 W P"Sw An[Iiorizin9 Amand�nt to Contract wit ....'"..""............ CITY UI BANI Wcodorecd s Curran Inc, SITres t CITY CLERIK Cty cler ......... 6........................... .. Ealuation - Introduced and filed by oCouncilman .. AGREEMENT BETkEN CITY OF BANGOR AND WOODARD b CURRAN, INC ATTACHMENT 5 PHASE I Task S- Assist Witb the Implementationf h t Treatment Program and the Collection System R h b'i't P Description This Attacbment 5 details the work performed and the manhours and costs incurred by the Company to assist the City With two work items that were outside the originalscope of Task 5 as indicated in Attachment 4 and forwarded to the City on July 22, 1987. These two work items are described below: 1. MC50 'Reserve Fund Application Preparation: The Company prepared, on the behalf of the City, an application document that was forwarded to the Maine DEP and subsequently to the U.S. EPA. This application requested that the City be given consideration by the EPA for funding of two major I/l removal projects for the Carr Brook and Hancock Street subsystems to allow the elimination of the two Marino Combined Sewer Overflows (MCS0) that exist for those two subsystems. This funding .would originate from the MCSO Reserve Fund that was established as part of the Water Quality Act of 1987. The Company's work included meeting with DEP personnel, gathering the necessary data to prepare the document, compiling the document, writing various descriptive sections, contacting various state and regional agencies for input and additional documentation, mailing the application to the DEP, responding to DEP and EPA inquires concerning the application, and tracking its progress. Work items beyond October 31, 1987 include attendance at the November 9, 1987 EPA site visit, discussions and meetings with the Department of Marine Resources, responding to the EPA written requests for additional information, further tracking of the application's progress and continued availability to respond to DEP or EPA inquires concerning the application. The full extent of the Company's involvement with the application cannot be determined at this time. An 0481C estimate to allow the City to budget for this work is included below. MANHOURS AND COST INCURRED AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1987 Task Principal Project Manager Engineer DEP Meeting 4 4 _ Application Prep. 2 29 57 ESTIMATED FUTURE MANHOURS AND COST EPA Visit Prep 8 8 - EPA Visit 8 - _ Response Prep 4 8 8 Tracking, etc. 2 8 8 Total Manhours 28 57 73 Cost $ 2660 $ 3990 $ 2920 Total Estimated Cost $ 9570 2. Operating Trickling Filter Plant Survey: To further document the need for a trickling filter pilot study, or eliminate the need altogether, the City Staff requested, during a meeting On September 4, 1987, that the Company perform a nationwide phone survey of operating trickling. filter plants that are exposed to cold climatic conditions. The effort was to find operating data that would provide the necessary design criteria for a trickling filter that would be subjected to cold climate and cold influent temperature conditions. The Company performed a phone survey of nearly 80 trickling filter facilities that are operational in the northern tier of states in the U.S.. Four facilities exhibiting the coldest influent wastewater and the use of plastic media trickling filterss the principal treatment process were contacted a secondtime to obtain detailed operating data over a year-long time span. The data from two of these facilities was analyzed via computer program to assess the facilities' operation. Theesults of this effort were presented to the City staff at a progress meeting on October 20, 1987. 0481C Task 1 - Financial Capability Analysis Description This Attachment 5 details the work plan andmanhours and costs estimated by the Company to assist the City in further evaluating the financing options for the Secondary Wastewater Treatment Facility and ongoing sewer rehabilitation work. The project financing analysis to be conducted by the Company in conjunction with Mr. Ted Jellison and Mr. Ralph Mishou includes the following: 1. Service Availability Charges (SAC) relative to determining excess design capacity; 2. Developer financing relative to sewer impact fees which could be assessed to residential, commercial and industrial clients to reduce upgrading project costs; 3. Financing alternatives which allow individuals to prepay debt costs thereby significantly reducing financing cost debt level and potentially opening the door to a CDBG application (if they survive D.C. budget cutting) to pay debt prepayments for low income housing; 4. Update of project cost for justification of rate increases required for July 1988. MANICURE AND COST ESTIMATE Less Remaining Task.2 Amount: $1,000.00 Total Task 1 Amendment: $7,700.00 0481C Principal Project Manager CPA Manhours 30 30 40 Cost $ 2850 $ 2100 $ 3000 Labor Cost $ 70950 Expenses: $ 750 (GFOA Financial Consultants Included) Total Cost: $ 8,700 Less Remaining Task.2 Amount: $1,000.00 Total Task 1 Amendment: $7,700.00 0481C MANHOURS AND COST INCURRED AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1987 ` Principal Project Manager Engineer Manhours 20 - 30 150 Cost $ 1900 $ 2100 $ 6000 Total Cost $10,000 TOTAL TASK 5 AMENDMENT $ 19570 0481C