Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-12-28 89-49 ORDERGevo pap 12/20/88 Ilan No,ft2->s Item/Subject: Approving the Final Plat - Fieldstone Subdivision Responsible Department: Planning Division Commentary: The Planning Board, at its regularly scheduled meeting of December 19, 1988, held a public hearing on the above subdivision application. Mr. Darrell Cooper, the applicant, spoke in favor of the final plan. No one spoke in opposition. The Board voted 5 to 0 in favor of a motion to approve the final subdivision plan with a recommendation for a waiver of bond. mp,.rmmxas Waster's comments: CiN Morvan Assaiated Information:0n.�+t I � -- Budget Approval: p .y FG,axn Oiren Legal Approval: Cd SOlioib Introduced For ®Bases" ❑ First Reading Page of ❑ Referral 89�4Y Aeugned to CowwJw Stone, December 28, 1988 CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) Mrbtr,........... Approving the Final Plat -.,Fields tone, Subdivle ion By W Cap CaarwB Of W my Of DA#rw: ORDEMD, TIMT the final subdivision plan for. Fieldstone Subdivision locatedwff Reason .Avenue, and consisting of 13 lots, having been reviewed by the Planning Board and found to be in general conformance with local subdivisionlaws and StateofHain Statutes, Title 30, Section 4956, be approved with a waiver of bond. IN CITY COUNCIL - Decembei 28, 1988 Passed as Amended -'Amended by adding in the last line and subject to filing vith the City of a guarantee in a form and amount as may be approved by the Finance Committee. Passed as Amended. 89-49 ORDER Title, ,Ap[rwing ;the Final Plat Fieldstone Subdivision �gnea to .... 4.4G}d1t�«?i�Z�A............. Councilman M 8912 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 14, 19aa To: The Planning Board FROM: The Planning Staff SUBJECT: Agenda Review - December 19, 1988 Meeting CONSENT ADENDA Item No. 11 Site Plan Revision - 614 Broadway - Grant Trailer Sales, applicant a. Applicant requests an extension of the completion date for the construction of anaddition to the existing building lo- cated at 614 Broadway in a C-2 Zone. It. The site plan was approved by the Planning Board on duly 18, lTaa with a completion date of November 30, 1988. Applicant is now requesting an extension of that date to July 20, 1989. C. As the requested data falls within the two-year time provi- sion, from the date of approval, for completion of site plans (Article 21, Section 10(0), Staff would recommend site plan revision approval. PUBIC HEARINGS Item No, 21 Contract Zone Change - Blake Place - Sheldon Hart - stone - C.D. # 89-27. a. Applicant requests a contract zone change for approximately 33,000 sq. ft. of land located Off Market Street. The zone change requested is from Residential 4 Zone to Residential 3 Zone. b. At the time of this memorandum, applicant does not have standing to bring this application. Staff would recommend the Planning Board continue this item to the first meeting in January or until such time as the applicant acquires the necessary legal interest. {Stem No. 3,1 Final Subdivision Plan Musson Avenue - Property -- - "- Investments. a. Applicant requests final subdivision plan approval for a 13 -lot subdivision located off Musson Avenue in a Rapidan - tial 4 Zone. The proposed subdivision is located behind the existing Morningside condominium project. M b. This prodect received preliminary plan approval on September -19, 1908 with the condition that the City Engineer approve the storm drainage plan. The City Engineer has reviewed a revised store drainage plan which meets with his approval. c. The proposed subdivision involves one street, Fieldstone Drive, which serves the thirteen lots. All lots will be served by public water and sewer utilities. d. Staff would recommend final plan approval an the condition that the applicant post bond, o, some other form of guaran- tee for the public improvements .HfORW616:'4_t Zone Change - LaSalle Drive - City of Bangor, - C.O. a a9-28. a. Applicant requests a zone change from Residential 5 Zone to Residential 3 Zone for approximately four acres of land a LaSalle Drive. The property in question is presently before the Board far site plan approval of several multi -family buildings. b. The present zoning at this location has been in place since 1973- Prior to 1973 this -a coned agricultural. On May 30, 1973, the City Council rezoned this area to Resi- dence A, Residence C, And ,general Business. (See attached Map.) When the 1974 Zoning Ordinance was adopted the zones were converted to R-19 A-5, and C-3. The 1979 Land Use Plan revision identified those areas as low density residential, high density residantial, and commercial, consistent with the zoning and intended uses. C. The main problem that Staff has with the zoning an LaSalle Drive is that it is generally our w that the Residential 5 Zone w not designed far nowmulti-family development but rather was designed as a holding area a far very high-density existing residential development in the in -town a (That is, that R-4 zoning, for a ample, would be consistent with a land use policy of high-density residential f an sucharea as this and would be the preferred zoning from our point -of -view.) The question as to whether it is appropri- ate to zone the site R-3 has several facets to it: some of these have legal implications and same are simply normal planning and zoning concerns s such as what is appropriate at this point in time in thislocation. We will defer legal concerns to others at other times as we feel that it i appropriate for the City Solicitor's Office to comment on any questions that arise in this regard, (Also, many legal concerns which are raised in argumentation before the Planning Board are beyond the scope and the ability of the Board to deal with as wall.) Vp` ' 6z 3ur p /f MANHf Is. 1. REALTY MANAGEMENT INC. 2 HAMMOND STREET, a. o. Box sia. BANGOR, MAINE ANN . i2071e424e15 December 15, 1988 Mr. Robert Millet City solicitor City Hall Bangor, Maine 04401 Dear Bob, Eli It is my understanding that the city has decided to implement its policy regarding the bonding of the construction of proposed public streets. I will be appearing before the Planning Board on Monday for a subdivision off Hanson Avenue, with a proposed road to be accepted by the city. I certainly ds not have any problem in the city's concept regarding bonding, and it is certainly much more lenient than ➢ion's, and my question to you is whether or not if the contractor provided a Payment and Performance Band could I assign it to the city of Bangor? After you have had an opportunity to reflect on this. would you be kind enough to let me know your thoughts. DC/eb B Darrell Cooper REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT / CONSULTATION E