HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-06-25 90-260 ORDERDate WJune 25, 1990 Item No. ' 90-260
Item/Subject: Order, Accepting Various Categories of State Funds
Responsible Department City Manager
Commentary: Both State Law and City Ordinances require the Council
to accept various categories Of State Funds. This acceptance must
be filed with the State prior to the State releasing any funds to
The attached order would fulfill this requirement. Also
attached you will find separate summaries of each of the funding
programs. These summaries meet the requirements of our City
ordinance. We will be prepared to discuss any ofthisinformation
with you on Monday.
a
- OptlmnfNaad
manga's Comments:
CirY M+ry^Sv
Associated Information Order, State Funds Summary Sheets, MMA notice,
State Certification Form, Attorney General opinion, letter from
Sudan Approval: States DepmaIsseeb ef Finance_
Finance Dmcto
Legal Approval:
cy Solicits,
Introduced For
DPauage
❑ First Reading Page—of—
Referral
age—of—
Referral
90-260
Anipmd to Councilor Stone, June 27, 1990
CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE.) (orbgrAccepting various Categories of State Funds
By Ow City CooxeR of W aty ofBanpor.
@fl9M3a1p
TWT The City Council of the City of Bangor hereby accepts the
following categories of State funds during the fiscal year beginning
July 1, 1990:
1. Municipal Revenue Sharing
2. Local Road Assistance
3. State Aid to Education (including Federal pass-through
funds and property tax relief).
4. Public Library State Aid car Capita
S. Civil Emergency Funds (Emergency Management Assistance)
6. Snowmobile Registration Money
]. Tree Growth Reimbursement
0. General Assistance Reimbursement
9. Veterans Exemption Reimbursement
10. State Grants or Other Funds (including all funds
received from the State that are not included in
items 1 through 9 above).
BE IT FURTHER ORDERED, THAT:
The City Clerk is ordered to file the "Certification of
Municipal Vote to Accept State Funds" form with the Commissioner
of the State Department of Finance by the earliest practicable date.
90-260
IN CITY COUNCIL
June 25, 1990 Accepting Various Categories of
Pawed by the following yea and no State Funds.
votes. Councilors voting yes
Baldaccf, Blanchette, Cohen, England,
Sawyer, Saxl. Sosmud, Stone and
Sullivan.
6.—dl. as I z�
CITY CLEM
i
®Maine Municipal
Association
WMMMIN DRIVE
NI W&MNNE04330
M7) 621O428 .. .. _ ..
......:" ss
NOTICE NOTICE *•:NOTICE **',NOTICE—** NOTICE"** _.`.
10: Key Municipal Officials
FROM: Crary C. Wood, Director, State and Federal Relations
DATE June 6, IM _.
RE: Enclosed Mailing by Department of Finance re Acceptance of State Funds .
PLEASE NOTE THAT A "CERTIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL VOTE TO
ACCEPT STATE FUNDS" FORM (SEE THE ENCLOSED BLUE SAMPLE) IS A
SUBSTITUTE FOR COPYING AND PROVIDING THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
WITH YOUR MUNICIPALITY'S WARRANT ARTICLES) ACCEPTING STATE
FUNDS.
THE ENCLOSED ATTORNEY GENERAL'S MEMORANDUM INDICATES
THAT COPIES OF THE WARRANT ARTICLES HAVE TO BE CERTIFIED BY THE
MUNICIPAL CLERK AND PROVIDED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE.
THIS DOES NOT HAVE TO BE DONE IF YOU USE THE CERTIFICATION OF
MUNICIPAL VOTE TO ACCEPT STATE FUNDS FORM. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO
DO BOTH
COMPLETING THE "CERTIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL VOTE TO ACCEPT
STATE FUNDS" FORM AND MAILING IT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
CONSTITUTES ADEQUATE PROOF OF ACCEPTANCE. -
NOTE, COPY FOR YOUR II1p0AMA1TON ONLY
CBRTIFICATIaN OP MUNICIPAL
m6.
I Ruaaell J mc K nna4Tf the duly authorised. Clark for,.the
- Yleaae Print or lypa)
municipality Of Dan9ot hereby cartify that th
.. - (Please Pram or 'Type)
legislative body of the municipality voted on'. Ju 27,
19 2Q_ r
to accept the following categories Of State funds during the fiscal year
beginning July 1. 19 -90 .� ... _
Check all categories included is above were:
1. Municipal Revenue Sharing - -
X 2. Local Road Assistance
3. State Aid to Education (including Pederal pass-through funds and x
property tax relief)
X 6. public Library State Aid par Capita
X 5. Civil Rmexgency panda (Emergency Management Assistance) 3"
_y_ 6. Snowaobile Registration Money -
`I:
Y J. Tree Growth Reimbursement
- r S. General Assistance Reimbursement w
_ * 9. Veterans Exemption Reimbaraament - -
X 10. State Grants or Other Funds (This category includes all funds received -i`
from the State that are not included 1n 11 -
items 1 through 9 above)-.-
. Dated: June 29,1990 19 Signed:
Muni5lp 1 Clerk
PI.RLSH SEND BY JUNE 30, 1990 T0: Ctl4Q5SIDN01t - --"`
(1£ an action is taken after DEPARUKERy OF FINANCE .. ...
June 30, send certification STATE HOUSE STATION 70
as soon as possible.) - AUGUSTA, NAIIffi 04333
1oEn Rqui
R. Mlm, it N. Satin Millen. h..
6,W,v, Comnivbm
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
wephoae c1p) 259,11,16
June 4, 1990
➢ear Municipal Clark:
As you may know, recant legislation requires that, effective July 1,
1990, each miticipalitym et - through its legislative body - vote
affirmatively to accept State funds before such funds can be paid to the
municipality (30-A, MRSA, Section 5682). It is critically Smpoxtunt that ve
receive acceptable evidence that year municipality has complied VM this
containment Or the State will have no alternative but to withhold the payment
of womb funds that have not been locally accepted.
With this in mind acmmittes Of State officials, representatives of the
Attorney General's Office and Maine Municipal Association have been meeting to
develop Simple, but acceptable, procedures to verify compliance with this n
law. Bodes" yaw will find a copy of A legal mmtrendm fron the Departomt
of Attorney General that provide an interpretation of the lou. Alen enclosed
is a Certification Form that we have determined to be acceptable in meting
the requirements of proof of acceptance a contained in the law and
interpreted in the Attorney General's memorandum. To make sure that we do not
have to withhold any State funds from your municipality, copies of this letter
and enclosures are being sent to the Chairs of Boards of Selectmen, Town and
City Councils, Plantation Boards of Assessors, Municipal Premature, as well
s to Superintendents of Schools. We only need to receive one form from each
municipality and are therefore directing this letter to youand have designed
the enclosed form to be completed and signed by you as the Municipal Clerk. I
am asking that you magalmot, sign, and Veld the enclosed form tun as on or
before June 30, 1990. If you moat hold a special meting after June 30 to
take this required vote, forward your certification form to me f®ediately
after that meeting.
If you have any questions regarding this law or the enclosed materials,
you any want to call Maine Municipal Association (Department of State and
Federal Relations) at 1-800-452-8786 for advice and assistance. Thank you in
advance for your anticipated cooperation in complying with this important
request.
Sincerely,
Commissioner
Yom(
Pc! Chairs, Boards of Selecment, Town
and City Councils
Chaim, Plantation Boards of Assessors
Municipal Presenters
Superintendents of Schools
Star Coca Station 79, Augusn, Maine 0333 —Omec Loused on 3N Moon Sale Office guiding
Department of Attornev General
MostoPANDUM
To: M. Sawin Millett, Jr.,Ommissioner, Finance
From: Crombie J.D. Garrett�Deputy Attorney General
Date: May 29, 1990
Subject: Municipal Acceptance of State Funds
As you are aware, 30—A M.R.S.A. 5 5682, effective July 1,
1990, imposes strict requirements on municipalities which
receive state funding. This statute requires an affirmative
vote by the appropriate municipal legislative body to accept
each category of state funds in order for the munieil)ality to
be eligible to receive such funds. State agencies disbursing
funds to municipalities on or after July 1, 1990, must have
proof of municipal acceptance of each category of state funds
prior to payment Of those funds to the municipality. A copy of
the appropriate warrant article(s) certified by a municipal
clerk would constitute adequate proof of acceptance.
State Revenue Sharing
5.1% of all sales and income taxes received by the
State are allocated to the Revenue Sharing Fund.
This is then allocated to each community based on
that communities Dercentage of the State's assessed
value.
k1�Nj�Fii?aSYUND
Estimated at $2,300,000 for £Y91
None. These are unrestricted funds which may be
used for any municipal purpose.
N/A
N/A
no MOM �91
Private School Subsidy Program
2. BASLE PM CAFLTFATINI. TMAIlSF = �
50% of actual costa for school transeortation and
books based upon actual expenditures two years ago.
3. ATIIINP fir=
$59,500
$133,032
State Formula reimburses only SG% of posts based
on actual costs two years ago.
71. DE6[RIPl'ICd!/1@ME OF PIQ9
Snowmobile Registration
a. a�sxs lm csscur�xxxc xxmm clxr tacexves
State of Maine establishes the amount, presently,
$6.00 per registration
1991 estimated receipts; $3,600
(600 registration at $6.00 per registration)
F Ute-495>�lVr•11�'1aF�31Ti9Y.Ya['i'lGle}nul
$8]] based upon 8 minutes per registration
(Student, client, Roai Mile, A-ayas, Son.)
$1.46/registration
�I �
FIREMMOMM
Highway Block Grant. Grant program began as way of
reimbursing municipalities for maintenance of State
Highways and to assist in overall highway maintenance.
2. H.4S15 FYAt ra.rtrt.nm...c A}r CITs HgBBlygq
Based on actual City road mileage
:mem_ i�s�7
$200,000
$2,000,000 (Highway Maintenance -- Summer and winter)
5. 1dPAt e..cm49)T® COST PER UNIT OF SShvHCE
(Student, Client, Read Mile, Program, Son.)
13,793 per mile
State program not intended to pay Full cost. Program
does not even provide full funding for maintenance
required on State designated highways within the
Compact Boundary.
"
State AeVOlVing Loan Fund. This fund provides low
interest loans to municipalities who are constructing
secondary Treatment Facilities.
RIM 6 �Y_ MR , IO a te;
Based on the City's estimated cost of construction,
Funds are allocated on a priority basis.
$25 million over a two to three year varied
$25 million. City's costs will actually be repayment
of principle and interest on the loan. Our current
estimate is that interest costs will be approximately
$13 million over a 20 year period.
The Secondary Treatment Program will cost approximately
$25 million.
6. BBASON FOR DIPPFlt@LE, IF ANY. BN1W�i QQt 6'BP Alm STATS FUNDING
Federal Sewage Construction Grant Programs have been
eliminated and replaced by low interest loan programs.
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
S.T.D. Clinic
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Salaries b Fringes for two (2) full time staff
Salty for part time Lab Tech
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
STO Grant - 56,175
HIV Grant - 2,450
Fees - 28,262
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
-0-
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
Varies depending of function being performed.
Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Dur Cost and State
Funding. ��,Ql1
N/A 6�A cgYwe o• ---g ° n
State Airport Improvement Project Funds
�hMOM MY4
5% of total Federally approved AIP projects
$90,000
$90,000 from Airport Revenues in addition t0
approximately $1.8 million in Federal Funds
AIP Program is set up on a formula: 908 Federal,
58 State; 58 City.
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FDNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME of FUND
Section 9 4ederal urban mass transportation funding
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
50 - 50 match is based on usage of parking garage/bus
shelter.
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
initial application only
C. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
$67,500 4or paving and curbing and 412.250 40r traffic signal
5. ESTIMATED COST F'ER UNIT OF SERVICE
N/A
6. REASON FOR DIFERENCE IF ANY BETWEEN OUR COST AND STATE
FUNDING
No state 4untls involved.
ACCEPTANCE. OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Section 9 federal urban mass transportation and state funding
for operating assistance.
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Federal is based on 50 percent of operating deficit and state
funding is based on 10 percent of operating deficit.
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
Initial application only, request is for $161,465 federal and
$32,297 state funding.
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
The total budget for the bus is 8565,550 and the local share
far Bangor is %60,1!2.
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
Total cost per passenger was $1.19.
Total cost per mile was $1.27.
6. REASON FOR DIFERENCE IF ANY BETWEEN OUR COST AND STATE
FU'NDINO
None expected. A,wa M
ASSESSING DEPS.
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE BURGS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Veter8R5 aaas tltll
2. BASIS FORD CALCULATING
AMOUNT
CITY
RECEIVES
S ta...
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
1989 - $6,457.36
1990 - Estimated $7,000.00
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
NIL
5, ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
N/A -
6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
NIA-
ASSESSING DELT.
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Tree GrwN Reirtdwcsarent
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING MOUNTCITYRECEIVES
909 Of Tax lost based an the lessor of the State or City valuation oaxne (1)
acre of undevelopal land.
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
1989 - $2,591.08
1990 - $2,600.00 Estimated
6. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRM
,1�
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
N/A -
Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and state
Funding.
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Coastal Zone Management Planning Grant ("CZM")'(Approved by
Council Order No. 89-144).
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
50-50 matching grant (Local share in this case split equally
between Bangor and Brewer.).
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
$15,000. State Award
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY £%PENOITURES FOR PROGRAM
$],500*
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
N/A Consulting Contract - $28,000* and. Bangor -Brewer
Admin. Costs.
6. Reason for Difference, If My, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
(Expectation is to cover total project cost $30,000 within
matching budget.)'
Matching Grant Program
{ - ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
8: I. D. E. reimbursement
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Salary and benefits of three persons involved
on a monthly basis.
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
$114,267
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED
CITY
EXPENDITURES
FOR
PROGRAM
$114,267
Coat
and
State
Funding.
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
N/A
6. Reason for
Difference,
If
Any,
Between
Our
Coat
and
State
Funding.
None
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Traffic Safety Grant
I. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
The grant is for $15,000.
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
_
Expenditure reimbursement
up
to
$15,000.
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRM1
$5,000 in-kind match (salary of Services Division lieutenant)
S. ESTIMATED COST. PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Nile, Program, Etc.)
N/A
_. 6. ReasOn for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost, and State
Funding.
N/A
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NME OF FUND
School Dental Program
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
$2.00/participant - Fluoride Program
$1.50/participant - Education Program
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
$5,075 - Based upon 2,178 participantsfluoride
510 participants. education.
4. TOTAL
ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR
PRDORRyl
$3,804
- 14% of hygienist's. time (mJI is"
H
S. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
Total cast per fluoride participant - $3.48 (City.- $1.48/Ptata - $2.00)
Total cost per education participant - $3.63 (City.-.$1.12/State - $1.50)
6. Reason for Difference, if Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
Program pays for materials only., -
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Iumanisation program
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Total cast of program
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
$42.003
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
-0-
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
Varied depending on type of function being performed.
Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding. �j�
N/A 6Wrt�CEN+^fi1 4
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
General Assistance
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Program Costs Only
50% Reim1sursement--1$-$153,645
908 Reimbursement --Over $153,645
3C AMOUNT RECEIVED
$452,347
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
Administration -4216,600
Program --$124,547
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
Total Cost Per Household Per Month:
Administration --$63.22
Program --$169.73
6. Reason for Difference, I£ Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
Structure of program makes city responsible for percentage
of program costs and 1001 of administrative costs.
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Public Health Nursing --MCH
2. BASIS FOR
CALCULATING
AMOUNT CITY
RECEIVES
Flat Grant
amount plus
minimal C.O.L.A.
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
$]1,541
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITTY
FOR
PROGRAM
'E'XPEENNDITURES
S"F�)
$89,]36 (,,,,; ,
S. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
$22.43/home visit
6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
Grant was initially designed to fund two (2) positions --
over time. the C.O.L.A, granted each year has been in the
28 range and the percent of the program funded by the
grant. has fallen further and further behind..
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME
OF
FUND
W.I.C.
RECEIVES
Total
2. BASIS
FOR CALCULATING
AMOUNT
CITY
RECEIVES
Total
cost of program
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
$244.630 administration
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
59.65/case/mo.
6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
N/A (� U QAJ 0 1
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Children's DentalClinic
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Flat rate Medicaid Grant - $16.000
Standard Medicaid Fees 40.000
G.A. @ Medicaid Bates 8.000
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
$64.000
4. TOTAL ESTIMATEDCITYEXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
$56.958 �d)aXa J
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client. Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
Total cost/visit = $40.31 (City cost/visit - $19)
6. Reason for Difference. If Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
Nedlcade rata pay far lees than actual cost of service on the private
market.
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Breeder Stakes Refund for 1989
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
City receives back what it paid out for Breeder Stakes
during the
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
$52,025 for 1989
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
$52,025
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
None
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Bangor State Fair Stipend Fund for 1989
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Rased on the racing handle for pari -mutual harness racing
meet.
1.13% from exotic and regular wagers.
5% from taxes paid to the State.
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
Regular stipend $13,428
4. TOTAL ESTINATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
N/A
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE Etc.)
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program,
N/A
6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between our Cost and State
Funding.
None
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
a
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Facility Improvement Stipend for 1989
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Based on premiums paid by pari -mutual fairs.
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED
CITY
EXPENDITURES
FOR
PROGRADR
N(s,ul
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE Etc.)
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program,
NSR
6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS`
R
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Purse Supplement for 1989
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Total purse supplement generated by state law is divided
by total racing dates to create a reimbursement. This
was $1,2998]3 per day in 1989.
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
$5],881
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED
CITY
EXPENDITURES
FOR
PROGRAM
r)/A-
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
N/A
6. Reason for Diffezence, If Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
None
ACCEPTANCE
OF
STATE
FUNDS
L
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Commercial Meet Stipend
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Percentage of the excess over $37,000,000 pari -mutual handle.
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
$5,757.73
6. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
N/A
5. ESTIMATED COST PER OMIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile] Program, Etc.)
N/A
6. Reason for Difference, I£ Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
N/A
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
.1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Extended Meet Stipend
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Shared by extended meets in proportion to their percentage
of contribution to the total wagered.
3, AMOUNT RECEIVED
$15,545.53
4. TOTAL
ESTIMATED
CITY
EXPENDITURES
FOR
PROGRAM
N/A
5, ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT of SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
N/A
6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and state
Funding.
Norte
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND -
^EXPANSION OF CITY OF RANCOR RECYCLING PROGRAM^
This in a grant program administered by the Maine Haste Management Agency,
expressly for the purpose of purchasing recycling equipment.
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING M40UNT CITY RECEIVES
Tae grant program provides far reimbursement of 75% of the cost of
purchasing recycling equipment, _
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
Estimated reimbursement is $151.575 based on cosQ estimates provided in
the grant application uhirh was approved by the Waste Management Agency.
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM
Total Estimated Cost: - $202,100
Less: 75% State Reimbursement : — 151.575
Net Estimated Cost me City : $ 50:525
5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.)
The proposed program will serve approximately 7,500 households, making Lee
oat per household approximately $27.00 (equipment only), labor and
operating coats will be approximately $7.55 per household annually.
6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State
Funding.
Grant Program requirements stipulate that 2% of capital investment cost
moat be bores by the municipality, and also that labor and cperating costa
are non-reimeursible.
Fire inspections for State Licenses, child Boarding Homes,
Adult Foster Homes, Group Day Care, Day Care Centers and
Nursery Schools.
per license
3. AMOUNT NOCE=
10.00 per inspection
155 inspections per year=$1,550.00.
M/p Y44. 1i• yM4 26 +ii Y9 • e. i\
$4,650
5. TOTAL FSlIlMTED CO3r PER DNPP OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Read Mile, Pt yms, Imp.)
$30.00/inspection
6. REASON FOR DIFFERENCE, IF ANY, BE1N®i OUR OSP AND SfATE FUNDING
In addition to the $10.00 received from the State, each
licensee must may $10.00 tothe City for a certificate of
occupancy. Code Enforcement has requested that the State
fee be increased to $20.00. If this is done, the State
reimbursement and Certificate of Occupancy fee will cover
Our costs.
TO: James F. Doughty; School Committee; City Council
FROM: Rager A. Moody
SUBJECT: GRANT REVENUE ESTIMATED TO BE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE OF MAINE
IN 1990-91
DATE: June 1, 1990
GENERAL FUND REVENUE - DEPARTMENT 71
State Education Subsidy
Basis for Calculation: The State of Maine provides an educational subsidy to local school districts
based on a formula determined by the Slate Legislatureand incorporated In Statute. Thefbrmule
takes into account actual expenses from two years prior to the year being fu Med, the number of
pupilsenrolled, act I nel uses special adjustment features for special education, vocational
education, pupil transportation, debt service, and the State valuation for Bangor.
Amount anticiepted for 1990-91: $9,765,600.75
Amount M be expended: $9,768,600.75
Cost per pupil: $2982 for K-8 students
$4213 far 9-12 students
Will costa exceed grant amount? Yes
SPECIAL REVENUE - DEPARTMENT 73
Division 73-01: Chapter 1
Chapter I is a federally funded program that provides supplementary help to children from law
income familles for supplemental instruction in reading, math, and language arts to help them
achieve at grade level. Bangor students in grates K through 8 in five schools are served, as well
as the children in two private schools (total of 700 students).
Basisfor calculation: Federal allocation to State,based on number of studentseligible for free
lunches as determined by family income levels asteblished bg federal government.
Amountanticipsted for 1990-91:$500,000 -
Amount to be expended: $500,000
Cost per pupil: $770
Will costs exceed grant amount?: No
Division 73-02: Chapter II Funds
The Chapter II program:
1. provides the initial funding to enable state and local educational agencies to implement
promising educational programs that con be supported by state and local sources of funding
alter such programa are demonstrated t0 be effective;
2, previous a continent lg source of innovation, educational improvement and support for library
andlrntructional materials;
3. meet the special educational needs of at- risk and high cost students;
4 enhances the quality of tsami ng and learnt ng through i hitter ng and expo ndi ng effective school
programs.
Basta for calculation: Federal allocation at $13.30 per pupil, based on family incomes below
poverty level and 1980 census data.
Amount antici listed for 1990-91: $58,000
Amount to be expended: $58,800
Cost per pupil: $13.30
Will casts exceed grant amount?: No
Division 73-03: Local Entitlement or -Flow-Thra-
These federal grant funds are spend to help approximated y 500 students who have disabilities
that range from mi nor speech problems to very complex physical and emotional problems. Each
student has ne be evad uated by a Pupil Eval uation Team (PE T.) fee a was assessment. The
money must be spent for meeting the needs of ha iscapped children above and beyond regular
school year budget appropriations, antl are spend mmtly for salaries.
Basis for calculatiow $290 per pupil
Amount anticipated foe 1990-91: $147,000
Amount to be experMed:$147,000
Cost per pupil: $290
Will ash exceed grant amount?: No
Division 73-08: Children Moving/Children Learning Grant
Early Childhood Education Plan grant, which trains physical education teachers to provide
individualized developmental physical education for primary -age children IK -3) who have
delayed motor development.
Basis for calculation: Competitive grant application
Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $18,968
Amount to be expanded: $18,968
Cost per pupil: $12.49
Will casts exceed grant amount?: No
Division 73-10: follow -the -Child
Tle Follow -Me -Child provides funds from the federal government to fallow children with special
education needs who have been in private institutions or schools and are now in a public school
sotti ng.
Basis for calculations: Slate allocation of federal funds for 21 mentally retarded students.
Amount antica pated for 1990-91: $10,000
Amount to be expended: $10,000
Cost per pupil: $476
Will costs exceed great amounts: No
Division 73-11: Drug Free Schools Grant
Federal funds to establish, Implement or augment mandatory, age-appropriate, developmental y -
based drug some education and prevention programs far students at all grade levels.
Basis for calculations: Per pupil allocation
Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $21,000
Amount to be experied:$21 ,000
Cost par pupil: $4.81
Will costs exceed grant amount'; No
Division 73-04: Teacher Training Great
Funds provided to the School Department from the federal government for teacher training in
mathematics and science curriculum areae.
Basis for calculation: $2.52 per pupil
Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $I 1 000
Amount to be expended; $1 1,000
Cost per pupil: NA
Will cost exceed grant amount?: No
Division 73-05: Innovative Grants
Teacher -based and school-based innovative 9ranis are accounted for hare, and expsndilursa and
receipts are kept separately for each of the grants received by the use of inter nal School
Depart me it'pre9rem" codes.
Basis for calculation: Application reviewed by State, and funds awarded on a competitive basis
with other school district.
Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $0
Amount to be expended: 0
Cost per pupil: NA
Will costs exceed grant amount?: NA
Division 73-07: Arts and Humanities Grant
Provides grantsbased on competitive applications 1 n amounts rangi ng from $75 to $500 for
performances by travail ng theaters and musicians. -
Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $150
Amount to be expended: $150
Cost per pupil: NA
Will coats exceed grant amount? W
Division 73-12: Recertification Grant
Stale funds to offset coats of teacher and admini atrator recartifiootion.
Basis for calculation: $100 per teacher and $250 per administrator
Amount anticipated for 1990-91 s $33,Ouu
Amount to be expended: $33,000
Will costs ezcetl grant amount?: No
Division 73-13: WellspringlProject Rebound
Operated by Wellspring, Inc. as an alternative end individualized residential ?earning
environment for i 2- I S st Wenis. Educational component is funded by the State Department of
Education, with administrative oversight being prwided by the Director of Pupil Services
Basis for calculation: State decision based on need and funds available
Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $65,500
Amount to be expended: $65,500
Cost per student. $4,366
Will costs exceed grant amount?: No
Division 73-14: AIDS Education Grant
To be used for efforts in comprehensive health education that support AIDS prevention education.
Basis for calculation: State grant
Amount entletpated for 1990-91:$2,000 _
Amount to be expended: $2,000
Cost per Pupil: $.46
Will coats exceed grant amount: W
Division 73-15: Migrant Education Grant
To meet educational needs of children of migrant families.
Gems for calculation: State Grant, anima on 60 eligible children.
Amount anticipated for 1990-01: $66,900
Amount to as sxpended:$66,900
Coat per pupil: $1,115
Will costa exceed grant amount?: No
ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FONDS
1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND
Bangor City Marsang Facility Medicaid for nursing hone
2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES
Principles of established by the State.
3. AMOUNT RECEIVED
Current note is 510.46 for ICP care and $67.99 for skilled care.
Tnis is r®d3ustad when the cost- report for that year is audited.
4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURESFOR PROGRAM
Budgeted FY'911 $2,085,864, approsimtely.
S. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE
(Student, Client, Road Mile, Program,. Etc.)
$103.60 per Patient per day. approximately.
6. Reason for"Difference, If Any, Between Our Coat and State
Funding.
Failure of the City tc set sadarfes and £rfnge benefits bad on the
principies of