Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-06-25 90-260 ORDERDate WJune 25, 1990 Item No. ' 90-260 Item/Subject: Order, Accepting Various Categories of State Funds Responsible Department City Manager Commentary: Both State Law and City Ordinances require the Council to accept various categories Of State Funds. This acceptance must be filed with the State prior to the State releasing any funds to The attached order would fulfill this requirement. Also attached you will find separate summaries of each of the funding programs. These summaries meet the requirements of our City ordinance. We will be prepared to discuss any ofthisinformation with you on Monday. a - OptlmnfNaad manga's Comments: CirY M+ry^Sv Associated Information Order, State Funds Summary Sheets, MMA notice, State Certification Form, Attorney General opinion, letter from Sudan Approval: States DepmaIsseeb ef Finance_ Finance Dmcto Legal Approval: cy Solicits, Introduced For DPauage ❑ First Reading Page—of— Referral age—of— Referral 90-260 Anipmd to Councilor Stone, June 27, 1990 CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) (orbgrAccepting various Categories of State Funds By Ow City CooxeR of W aty ofBanpor. @fl9M3a1p TWT The City Council of the City of Bangor hereby accepts the following categories of State funds during the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1990: 1. Municipal Revenue Sharing 2. Local Road Assistance 3. State Aid to Education (including Federal pass-through funds and property tax relief). 4. Public Library State Aid car Capita S. Civil Emergency Funds (Emergency Management Assistance) 6. Snowmobile Registration Money ]. Tree Growth Reimbursement 0. General Assistance Reimbursement 9. Veterans Exemption Reimbursement 10. State Grants or Other Funds (including all funds received from the State that are not included in items 1 through 9 above). BE IT FURTHER ORDERED, THAT: The City Clerk is ordered to file the "Certification of Municipal Vote to Accept State Funds" form with the Commissioner of the State Department of Finance by the earliest practicable date. 90-260 IN CITY COUNCIL June 25, 1990 Accepting Various Categories of Pawed by the following yea and no State Funds. votes. Councilors voting yes Baldaccf, Blanchette, Cohen, England, Sawyer, Saxl. Sosmud, Stone and Sullivan. 6.—dl. as I z� CITY CLEM i ®Maine Municipal Association WMMMIN DRIVE NI W&MNNE04330 M7) 621O428 .. .. _ .. ......:" ss NOTICE NOTICE *•:NOTICE **',NOTICE—** NOTICE"** _.`. 10: Key Municipal Officials FROM: Crary C. Wood, Director, State and Federal Relations DATE June 6, IM _. RE: Enclosed Mailing by Department of Finance re Acceptance of State Funds . PLEASE NOTE THAT A "CERTIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL VOTE TO ACCEPT STATE FUNDS" FORM (SEE THE ENCLOSED BLUE SAMPLE) IS A SUBSTITUTE FOR COPYING AND PROVIDING THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE WITH YOUR MUNICIPALITY'S WARRANT ARTICLES) ACCEPTING STATE FUNDS. THE ENCLOSED ATTORNEY GENERAL'S MEMORANDUM INDICATES THAT COPIES OF THE WARRANT ARTICLES HAVE TO BE CERTIFIED BY THE MUNICIPAL CLERK AND PROVIDED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE. THIS DOES NOT HAVE TO BE DONE IF YOU USE THE CERTIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL VOTE TO ACCEPT STATE FUNDS FORM. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO DO BOTH COMPLETING THE "CERTIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL VOTE TO ACCEPT STATE FUNDS" FORM AND MAILING IT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CONSTITUTES ADEQUATE PROOF OF ACCEPTANCE. - NOTE, COPY FOR YOUR II1p0AMA1TON ONLY CBRTIFICATIaN OP MUNICIPAL m6. I Ruaaell J mc K nna4Tf the duly authorised. Clark for,.the - Yleaae Print or lypa) municipality Of Dan9ot hereby cartify that th .. - (Please Pram or 'Type) legislative body of the municipality voted on'. Ju 27, 19 2Q_ r to accept the following categories Of State funds during the fiscal year beginning July 1. 19 -90 .� ... _ Check all categories included is above were: 1. Municipal Revenue Sharing - - X 2. Local Road Assistance 3. State Aid to Education (including Pederal pass-through funds and x property tax relief) X 6. public Library State Aid par Capita X 5. Civil Rmexgency panda (Emergency Management Assistance) 3" _y_ 6. Snowaobile Registration Money - `I: Y J. Tree Growth Reimbursement - r S. General Assistance Reimbursement w _ * 9. Veterans Exemption Reimbaraament - - X 10. State Grants or Other Funds (This category includes all funds received -i` from the State that are not included 1n 11 - items 1 through 9 above)-.- . Dated: June 29,1990 19 Signed: Muni5lp 1 Clerk PI.RLSH SEND BY JUNE 30, 1990 T0: Ctl4Q5SIDN01t - --"` (1£ an action is taken after DEPARUKERy OF FINANCE .. ... June 30, send certification STATE HOUSE STATION 70 as soon as possible.) - AUGUSTA, NAIIffi 04333 1oEn Rqui R. Mlm, it N. Satin Millen. h.. 6,W,v, Comnivbm DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE wephoae c1p) 259,11,16 June 4, 1990 ➢ear Municipal Clark: As you may know, recant legislation requires that, effective July 1, 1990, each miticipalitym et - through its legislative body - vote affirmatively to accept State funds before such funds can be paid to the municipality (30-A, MRSA, Section 5682). It is critically Smpoxtunt that ve receive acceptable evidence that year municipality has complied VM this containment Or the State will have no alternative but to withhold the payment of womb funds that have not been locally accepted. With this in mind acmmittes Of State officials, representatives of the Attorney General's Office and Maine Municipal Association have been meeting to develop Simple, but acceptable, procedures to verify compliance with this n law. Bodes" yaw will find a copy of A legal mmtrendm fron the Departomt of Attorney General that provide an interpretation of the lou. Alen enclosed is a Certification Form that we have determined to be acceptable in meting the requirements of proof of acceptance a contained in the law and interpreted in the Attorney General's memorandum. To make sure that we do not have to withhold any State funds from your municipality, copies of this letter and enclosures are being sent to the Chairs of Boards of Selectmen, Town and City Councils, Plantation Boards of Assessors, Municipal Premature, as well s to Superintendents of Schools. We only need to receive one form from each municipality and are therefore directing this letter to youand have designed the enclosed form to be completed and signed by you as the Municipal Clerk. I am asking that you magalmot, sign, and Veld the enclosed form tun as on or before June 30, 1990. If you moat hold a special meting after June 30 to take this required vote, forward your certification form to me f®ediately after that meeting. If you have any questions regarding this law or the enclosed materials, you any want to call Maine Municipal Association (Department of State and Federal Relations) at 1-800-452-8786 for advice and assistance. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in complying with this important request. Sincerely, Commissioner Yom( Pc! Chairs, Boards of Selecment, Town and City Councils Chaim, Plantation Boards of Assessors Municipal Presenters Superintendents of Schools Star Coca Station 79, Augusn, Maine 0333 —Omec Loused on 3N Moon Sale Office guiding Department of Attornev General MostoPANDUM To: M. Sawin Millett, Jr.,Ommissioner, Finance From: Crombie J.D. Garrett�Deputy Attorney General Date: May 29, 1990 Subject: Municipal Acceptance of State Funds As you are aware, 30—A M.R.S.A. 5 5682, effective July 1, 1990, imposes strict requirements on municipalities which receive state funding. This statute requires an affirmative vote by the appropriate municipal legislative body to accept each category of state funds in order for the munieil)ality to be eligible to receive such funds. State agencies disbursing funds to municipalities on or after July 1, 1990, must have proof of municipal acceptance of each category of state funds prior to payment Of those funds to the municipality. A copy of the appropriate warrant article(s) certified by a municipal clerk would constitute adequate proof of acceptance. State Revenue Sharing 5.1% of all sales and income taxes received by the State are allocated to the Revenue Sharing Fund. This is then allocated to each community based on that communities Dercentage of the State's assessed value. k1�Nj�Fii?aSYUND Estimated at $2,300,000 for £Y91 None. These are unrestricted funds which may be used for any municipal purpose. N/A N/A no MOM �91 Private School Subsidy Program 2. BASLE PM CAFLTFATINI. TMAIlSF = � 50% of actual costa for school transeortation and books based upon actual expenditures two years ago. 3. ATIIINP fir= $59,500 $133,032 State Formula reimburses only SG% of posts based on actual costs two years ago. 71. DE6[RIPl'ICd!/1@ME OF PIQ9 Snowmobile Registration a. a�sxs lm csscur�xxxc xxmm clxr tacexves State of Maine establishes the amount, presently, $6.00 per registration 1991 estimated receipts; $3,600 (600 registration at $6.00 per registration) F Ute-495>�lVr•11�'1aF�31Ti9Y.Ya['i'lGle}nul $8]] based upon 8 minutes per registration (Student, client, Roai Mile, A-ayas, Son.) $1.46/registration �I � FIREMMOMM Highway Block Grant. Grant program began as way of reimbursing municipalities for maintenance of State Highways and to assist in overall highway maintenance. 2. H.4S15 FYAt ra.rtrt.nm...c A}r CITs HgBBlygq Based on actual City road mileage :mem_ i�s�7 $200,000 $2,000,000 (Highway Maintenance -- Summer and winter) 5. 1dPAt e..cm49)T® COST PER UNIT OF SShvHCE (Student, Client, Read Mile, Program, Son.) 13,793 per mile State program not intended to pay Full cost. Program does not even provide full funding for maintenance required on State designated highways within the Compact Boundary. " State AeVOlVing Loan Fund. This fund provides low interest loans to municipalities who are constructing secondary Treatment Facilities. RIM 6 �Y_ MR , IO a te; Based on the City's estimated cost of construction, Funds are allocated on a priority basis. $25 million over a two to three year varied $25 million. City's costs will actually be repayment of principle and interest on the loan. Our current estimate is that interest costs will be approximately $13 million over a 20 year period. The Secondary Treatment Program will cost approximately $25 million. 6. BBASON FOR DIPPFlt@LE, IF ANY. BN1W�i QQt 6'BP Alm STATS FUNDING Federal Sewage Construction Grant Programs have been eliminated and replaced by low interest loan programs. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND S.T.D. Clinic 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Salaries b Fringes for two (2) full time staff Salty for part time Lab Tech 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED STO Grant - 56,175 HIV Grant - 2,450 Fees - 28,262 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM -0- 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) Varies depending of function being performed. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Dur Cost and State Funding. ��,Ql1 N/A 6�A cgYwe o• ---g ° n State Airport Improvement Project Funds �hMOM MY4 5% of total Federally approved AIP projects $90,000 $90,000 from Airport Revenues in addition t0 approximately $1.8 million in Federal Funds AIP Program is set up on a formula: 908 Federal, 58 State; 58 City. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FDNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME of FUND Section 9 4ederal urban mass transportation funding 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES 50 - 50 match is based on usage of parking garage/bus shelter. 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED initial application only C. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM $67,500 4or paving and curbing and 412.250 40r traffic signal 5. ESTIMATED COST F'ER UNIT OF SERVICE N/A 6. REASON FOR DIFERENCE IF ANY BETWEEN OUR COST AND STATE FUNDING No state 4untls involved. ACCEPTANCE. OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Section 9 federal urban mass transportation and state funding for operating assistance. 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Federal is based on 50 percent of operating deficit and state funding is based on 10 percent of operating deficit. 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED Initial application only, request is for $161,465 federal and $32,297 state funding. 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM The total budget for the bus is 8565,550 and the local share far Bangor is %60,1!2. 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE Total cost per passenger was $1.19. Total cost per mile was $1.27. 6. REASON FOR DIFERENCE IF ANY BETWEEN OUR COST AND STATE FU'NDINO None expected. A,wa M ASSESSING DEPS. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE BURGS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Veter8R5 aaas tltll 2. BASIS FORD CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES S ta... 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED 1989 - $6,457.36 1990 - Estimated $7,000.00 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM NIL 5, ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) N/A - 6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. NIA- ASSESSING DELT. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Tree GrwN Reirtdwcsarent 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING MOUNTCITYRECEIVES 909 Of Tax lost based an the lessor of the State or City valuation oaxne (1) acre of undevelopal land. 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED 1989 - $2,591.08 1990 - $2,600.00 Estimated 6. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRM ,1� 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) N/A - Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and state Funding. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Coastal Zone Management Planning Grant ("CZM")'(Approved by Council Order No. 89-144). 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES 50-50 matching grant (Local share in this case split equally between Bangor and Brewer.). 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED $15,000. State Award 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY £%PENOITURES FOR PROGRAM $],500* 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) N/A Consulting Contract - $28,000* and. Bangor -Brewer Admin. Costs. 6. Reason for Difference, If My, Between Our Cost and State Funding. (Expectation is to cover total project cost $30,000 within matching budget.)' Matching Grant Program { - ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND 8: I. D. E. reimbursement 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Salary and benefits of three persons involved on a monthly basis. 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED $114,267 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM $114,267 Coat and State Funding. 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) N/A 6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Coat and State Funding. None ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Traffic Safety Grant I. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES The grant is for $15,000. 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED _ Expenditure reimbursement up to $15,000. 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRM1 $5,000 in-kind match (salary of Services Division lieutenant) S. ESTIMATED COST. PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Nile, Program, Etc.) N/A _. 6. ReasOn for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost, and State Funding. N/A ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NME OF FUND School Dental Program 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES $2.00/participant - Fluoride Program $1.50/participant - Education Program 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED $5,075 - Based upon 2,178 participantsfluoride 510 participants. education. 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PRDORRyl $3,804 - 14% of hygienist's. time (mJI is" H S. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) Total cast per fluoride participant - $3.48 (City.- $1.48/Ptata - $2.00) Total cost per education participant - $3.63 (City.-.$1.12/State - $1.50) 6. Reason for Difference, if Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. Program pays for materials only., - ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Iumanisation program 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Total cast of program 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED $42.003 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM -0- 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) Varied depending on type of function being performed. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. �j� N/A 6Wrt�CEN+^fi1 4 ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND General Assistance 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Program Costs Only 50% Reim1sursement--1$-$153,645 908 Reimbursement --Over $153,645 3C AMOUNT RECEIVED $452,347 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM Administration -4216,600 Program --$124,547 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) Total Cost Per Household Per Month: Administration --$63.22 Program --$169.73 6. Reason for Difference, I£ Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. Structure of program makes city responsible for percentage of program costs and 1001 of administrative costs. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Public Health Nursing --MCH 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Flat Grant amount plus minimal C.O.L.A. 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED $]1,541 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITTY FOR PROGRAM 'E'XPEENNDITURES S"F�) $89,]36 (,,,,; , S. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) $22.43/home visit 6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. Grant was initially designed to fund two (2) positions -- over time. the C.O.L.A, granted each year has been in the 28 range and the percent of the program funded by the grant. has fallen further and further behind.. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND W.I.C. RECEIVES Total 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Total cost of program 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED $244.630 administration 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) 59.65/case/mo. 6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. N/A (� U QAJ 0 1 ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Children's DentalClinic 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Flat rate Medicaid Grant - $16.000 Standard Medicaid Fees 40.000 G.A. @ Medicaid Bates 8.000 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED $64.000 4. TOTAL ESTIMATEDCITYEXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM $56.958 �d)aXa J 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client. Road Mile, Program, Etc.) Total cost/visit = $40.31 (City cost/visit - $19) 6. Reason for Difference. If Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. Nedlcade rata pay far lees than actual cost of service on the private market. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Breeder Stakes Refund for 1989 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES City receives back what it paid out for Breeder Stakes during the 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED $52,025 for 1989 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM $52,025 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) 6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. None ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Bangor State Fair Stipend Fund for 1989 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Rased on the racing handle for pari -mutual harness racing meet. 1.13% from exotic and regular wagers. 5% from taxes paid to the State. 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED Regular stipend $13,428 4. TOTAL ESTINATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM N/A 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE Etc.) (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, N/A 6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between our Cost and State Funding. None ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS a 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Facility Improvement Stipend for 1989 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Based on premiums paid by pari -mutual fairs. 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRADR N(s,ul 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE Etc.) (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, NSR 6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS` R 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Purse Supplement for 1989 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Total purse supplement generated by state law is divided by total racing dates to create a reimbursement. This was $1,2998]3 per day in 1989. 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED $5],881 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM r)/A- 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) N/A 6. Reason for Diffezence, If Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. None ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS L 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Commercial Meet Stipend 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Percentage of the excess over $37,000,000 pari -mutual handle. 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED $5,757.73 6. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM N/A 5. ESTIMATED COST PER OMIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile] Program, Etc.) N/A 6. Reason for Difference, I£ Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. N/A ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS .1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Extended Meet Stipend 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Shared by extended meets in proportion to their percentage of contribution to the total wagered. 3, AMOUNT RECEIVED $15,545.53 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM N/A 5, ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT of SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) N/A 6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and state Funding. Norte ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FUNDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND - ^EXPANSION OF CITY OF RANCOR RECYCLING PROGRAM^ This in a grant program administered by the Maine Haste Management Agency, expressly for the purpose of purchasing recycling equipment. 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING M40UNT CITY RECEIVES Tae grant program provides far reimbursement of 75% of the cost of purchasing recycling equipment, _ 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED Estimated reimbursement is $151.575 based on cosQ estimates provided in the grant application uhirh was approved by the Waste Management Agency. 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURES FOR PROGRAM Total Estimated Cost: - $202,100 Less: 75% State Reimbursement : — 151.575 Net Estimated Cost me City : $ 50:525 5. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program, Etc.) The proposed program will serve approximately 7,500 households, making Lee oat per household approximately $27.00 (equipment only), labor and operating coats will be approximately $7.55 per household annually. 6. Reason for Difference, If Any, Between Our Cost and State Funding. Grant Program requirements stipulate that 2% of capital investment cost moat be bores by the municipality, and also that labor and cperating costa are non-reimeursible. Fire inspections for State Licenses, child Boarding Homes, Adult Foster Homes, Group Day Care, Day Care Centers and Nursery Schools. per license 3. AMOUNT NOCE= 10.00 per inspection 155 inspections per year=$1,550.00. M/p Y44. 1i• yM4 26 +ii Y9 • e. i\ $4,650 5. TOTAL FSlIlMTED CO3r PER DNPP OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Read Mile, Pt yms, Imp.) $30.00/inspection 6. REASON FOR DIFFERENCE, IF ANY, BE1N®i OUR OSP AND SfATE FUNDING In addition to the $10.00 received from the State, each licensee must may $10.00 tothe City for a certificate of occupancy. Code Enforcement has requested that the State fee be increased to $20.00. If this is done, the State reimbursement and Certificate of Occupancy fee will cover Our costs. TO: James F. Doughty; School Committee; City Council FROM: Rager A. Moody SUBJECT: GRANT REVENUE ESTIMATED TO BE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE OF MAINE IN 1990-91 DATE: June 1, 1990 GENERAL FUND REVENUE - DEPARTMENT 71 State Education Subsidy Basis for Calculation: The State of Maine provides an educational subsidy to local school districts based on a formula determined by the Slate Legislatureand incorporated In Statute. Thefbrmule takes into account actual expenses from two years prior to the year being fu Med, the number of pupilsenrolled, act I nel uses special adjustment features for special education, vocational education, pupil transportation, debt service, and the State valuation for Bangor. Amount anticiepted for 1990-91: $9,765,600.75 Amount M be expended: $9,768,600.75 Cost per pupil: $2982 for K-8 students $4213 far 9-12 students Will costa exceed grant amount? Yes SPECIAL REVENUE - DEPARTMENT 73 Division 73-01: Chapter 1 Chapter I is a federally funded program that provides supplementary help to children from law income familles for supplemental instruction in reading, math, and language arts to help them achieve at grade level. Bangor students in grates K through 8 in five schools are served, as well as the children in two private schools (total of 700 students). Basisfor calculation: Federal allocation to State,based on number of studentseligible for free lunches as determined by family income levels asteblished bg federal government. Amountanticipsted for 1990-91:$500,000 - Amount to be expended: $500,000 Cost per pupil: $770 Will costs exceed grant amount?: No Division 73-02: Chapter II Funds The Chapter II program: 1. provides the initial funding to enable state and local educational agencies to implement promising educational programs that con be supported by state and local sources of funding alter such programa are demonstrated t0 be effective; 2, previous a continent lg source of innovation, educational improvement and support for library andlrntructional materials; 3. meet the special educational needs of at- risk and high cost students; 4 enhances the quality of tsami ng and learnt ng through i hitter ng and expo ndi ng effective school programs. Basta for calculation: Federal allocation at $13.30 per pupil, based on family incomes below poverty level and 1980 census data. Amount antici listed for 1990-91: $58,000 Amount to be expended: $58,800 Cost per pupil: $13.30 Will casts exceed grant amount?: No Division 73-03: Local Entitlement or -Flow-Thra- These federal grant funds are spend to help approximated y 500 students who have disabilities that range from mi nor speech problems to very complex physical and emotional problems. Each student has ne be evad uated by a Pupil Eval uation Team (PE T.) fee a was assessment. The money must be spent for meeting the needs of ha iscapped children above and beyond regular school year budget appropriations, antl are spend mmtly for salaries. Basis for calculatiow $290 per pupil Amount anticipated foe 1990-91: $147,000 Amount to be experMed:$147,000 Cost per pupil: $290 Will ash exceed grant amount?: No Division 73-08: Children Moving/Children Learning Grant Early Childhood Education Plan grant, which trains physical education teachers to provide individualized developmental physical education for primary -age children IK -3) who have delayed motor development. Basis for calculation: Competitive grant application Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $18,968 Amount to be expanded: $18,968 Cost per pupil: $12.49 Will casts exceed grant amount?: No Division 73-10: follow -the -Child Tle Follow -Me -Child provides funds from the federal government to fallow children with special education needs who have been in private institutions or schools and are now in a public school sotti ng. Basis for calculations: Slate allocation of federal funds for 21 mentally retarded students. Amount antica pated for 1990-91: $10,000 Amount to be expended: $10,000 Cost per pupil: $476 Will costs exceed great amounts: No Division 73-11: Drug Free Schools Grant Federal funds to establish, Implement or augment mandatory, age-appropriate, developmental y - based drug some education and prevention programs far students at all grade levels. Basis for calculations: Per pupil allocation Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $21,000 Amount to be experied:$21 ,000 Cost par pupil: $4.81 Will costs exceed grant amount'; No Division 73-04: Teacher Training Great Funds provided to the School Department from the federal government for teacher training in mathematics and science curriculum areae. Basis for calculation: $2.52 per pupil Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $I 1 000 Amount to be expended; $1 1,000 Cost per pupil: NA Will cost exceed grant amount?: No Division 73-05: Innovative Grants Teacher -based and school-based innovative 9ranis are accounted for hare, and expsndilursa and receipts are kept separately for each of the grants received by the use of inter nal School Depart me it'pre9rem" codes. Basis for calculation: Application reviewed by State, and funds awarded on a competitive basis with other school district. Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $0 Amount to be expended: 0 Cost per pupil: NA Will costs exceed grant amount?: NA Division 73-07: Arts and Humanities Grant Provides grantsbased on competitive applications 1 n amounts rangi ng from $75 to $500 for performances by travail ng theaters and musicians. - Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $150 Amount to be expended: $150 Cost per pupil: NA Will coats exceed grant amount? W Division 73-12: Recertification Grant Stale funds to offset coats of teacher and admini atrator recartifiootion. Basis for calculation: $100 per teacher and $250 per administrator Amount anticipated for 1990-91 s $33,Ouu Amount to be expended: $33,000 Will costs ezcetl grant amount?: No Division 73-13: WellspringlProject Rebound Operated by Wellspring, Inc. as an alternative end individualized residential ?earning environment for i 2- I S st Wenis. Educational component is funded by the State Department of Education, with administrative oversight being prwided by the Director of Pupil Services Basis for calculation: State decision based on need and funds available Amount anticipated for 1990-91: $65,500 Amount to be expended: $65,500 Cost per student. $4,366 Will costs exceed grant amount?: No Division 73-14: AIDS Education Grant To be used for efforts in comprehensive health education that support AIDS prevention education. Basis for calculation: State grant Amount entletpated for 1990-91:$2,000 _ Amount to be expended: $2,000 Cost per Pupil: $.46 Will coats exceed grant amount: W Division 73-15: Migrant Education Grant To meet educational needs of children of migrant families. Gems for calculation: State Grant, anima on 60 eligible children. Amount anticipated for 1990-01: $66,900 Amount to as sxpended:$66,900 Coat per pupil: $1,115 Will costa exceed grant amount?: No ACCEPTANCE OF STATE FONDS 1. DESCRIPTION/NAME OF FUND Bangor City Marsang Facility Medicaid for nursing hone 2. BASIS FOR CALCULATING AMOUNT CITY RECEIVES Principles of established by the State. 3. AMOUNT RECEIVED Current note is 510.46 for ICP care and $67.99 for skilled care. Tnis is r®d3ustad when the cost- report for that year is audited. 4. TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY EXPENDITURESFOR PROGRAM Budgeted FY'911 $2,085,864, approsimtely. S. ESTIMATED COST PER UNIT OF SERVICE (Student, Client, Road Mile, Program,. Etc.) $103.60 per Patient per day. approximately. 6. Reason for"Difference, If Any, Between Our Coat and State Funding. Failure of the City tc set sadarfes and £rfnge benefits bad on the principies of