Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-01-24 94-86 RESOLVEIntroduced For
®Passege
LJ First Heading Page _of
C] Referral
III 1 M6LIL HI
Date Item No. 94-06
RES Wt AlsDmein9 5� asel Auth izixg C tyIALd>78Y W
Exe:ute Claim SeLtlemit At¢eaoe¢t with Battey Canstnntimt
Item/Subject: COMFOICIrl
I . arta Baxtt Fixe ]neuxazre Gassy
RE;
Weatc-0atex Primary gleatia'ent Plant Up atle Project
Responsible Department
Leen] � 'ts4annt
Commentary:
Bass AVxI i Cmv®staxy,
�aae
Manager's Comments:
CiryMaw r
Associated Informrtion:©
Budget Approval:
re ni,ea
Legal Approval:
i
- ciry5oliaira
Introduced For
®Passege
LJ First Heading Page _of
C] Referral
Assignee to Councilor Shubert
January 26, 1996
CITY OF BANGOR
RITLEJ ¢s0(t�¢,.. A pprOvi g Set tlemme.t sure nucmrtzmg my Managar
amace........__.... .....y ..........0 ._.__...
to Claim Settla�R ance Comp with HarvoY Construction Cerny,
Inc. Up Hartford Fire Irouranse cooga:9 re: Wastewater Primary 1lealaent
Plant Upgeade naojmt.
Jiy 1M City Cowell oftM Ciq mflianymr:
R OLVVD,
the City Cowcll of tte City of Bangor hereby
approves a settlement with Harvey mattuM:^^ Cospery, mc. arse with
Hartfo ft Ineuta:ce Cmgav y, in its wes right arc] as perfomarcx house
SmsetV for sod subrogee of tWtch Concrete attracting Cor(,satia:, of
Cerfw:n general contractor• subcontractor ani surety chits arising cut of
execution of carnets work On the City of Barngor's irivary wast iter
14aatmmt Plant Upgrade lauded, as set cut in the Parties, draft
"Settlmm¢ AyeamenR" a orgy of which is ce file in the City Clerk's
Office.
Putt vent to the foregoing approval, the Cfty Manager is hereby au[lrzimtl,
on belwlf of the City of Bangor, m execute said "SetTlment PgxeemenK"
with Harvey crma[xvctiwt Cmpay Inc. am •ourford Fire rasurarce
sCamnQany The finel "Settlement Agreement" as exmix[e3 by the City 19aager
approved by the City Solicitor, With changes to he
negotiated by the City Solicitor.
The Cfty Msnager is furter autrorized on behslf of: the City of Bangor, to,
execute any additional d msnTs, echsdvine and releasee called for in the
"Settlement Agseanent". All such a]diticnal documents, sondes aM
releasee shall be in a fonn approved by the City Solicitor.
Upon execution of the final Settlement A9wamrmtc by all parties, the City
Manages is further autlnrired to execute any necessary progst cwRract
change carters: to dicot payment, forec ommtly-appropriated fouls, of
the settlarerR a nant aM retainage amounts as sSeci£ied in said
egreeQent, arse to do all other things necessary, to hoplenent the
Settlement Agreement. f>m is necessary to i plment the eettlee3tt
Agreement Shall be paid frame aecoarc no. BO -70-A95.
94-86
IN CITY COUNCIL N E S U E V E
January 24, 1994
PASSED
Approving Settlemlent and Authorizing City
"' d Manager to Execute Claim S-ettlement with
CITY CL ( Harvey Construction Company,Inc. and Hartford P1ie
In Company Primary Treatment Plant
Upg(r�pi�7f: 0 e
. S
Ate attached foxed Resolve would approve a settlement of grains arising
out of concrete .k on the City of Bangor's pxinsxy wmatam[er txeataant
plant upgrade (secesiary treatment plant) project, and world autharize
execution of a "Settlement Agreement" and other d evmnsts inplamentilg the
settlement. inolu�l asorzg the claims issues m be settled axe all claims
of Hervey Construction CaPa Y, Inc., the project general contracWx;
Hartford Fire Insurance C®1any, project Performance bad surety, mw..w
Concrete Contracting Corporation, Concrete sutcorltrector• and Charwill
Coshix:tiax Cagpany, replacement; subooMracmr for MKch; for ingrate of
a "ebangad site condition' created by the late alandoxmmut of Mobile Pipe
Line curany's petrolam prodcts pipeline crossing the secondary
txezbrent plant project site. This is a major claim settlement by the
City of Hagar, and has been the subject of extensive zvva by the Bangor
City Council in past executive sessions. O settlement will be reviewed
further in executive session prior to the Council's xeTclac snaring on the
24th.
Aha "Settlement Agreement" referred to in the ffiixled Resolve is a draft
Prepared by attorneys for Harvey Construction and H fovd nuaranse
tsp y. mhs draft has bean reviewed by the City legal apartment and by
outside wsnsel. While the general form of the Settlement Agreement se
drafted is deemed acceptable by Bangor's legal corneal, sergdore of the
agreement relating to ind®udficatiou and assignment of claims xeguirs
revision. The attached Pesolve specifiea that the final settlement
Agremmxt as executed cast be in a form approved by the City Solicitor,
acid auUprirae the City Solicitor to negotiate changes to the carrent
draft document. tone of Ursa cbanges will affect the agreed settlers¢
a sunt ($835,000), nor will the substance of the settling parties' ngtoal
coinages be affected.
Additional Caverns consenting the proposed settlement ars apprgp rate, as
follows;
1. The proposed cetclerent avatituf a c®pradse by all parties
achieved after lengthy negotiiation. It will plae a cap on the City of
Bangor's potential liability, for a significant changed site coxlitimx at
the secondary treatment plant project sits. By agreeing to this
settlement, all Patties avoid the delay, em;nnse, and risk of Ws tally
Protracted litigation over the issues ad re ge d In the settlement.
2. Settlement of these issues with niazvoy and Hagtford will clear the
rocs for the City of Baer to pursue its awn recovery efforts against
xespxsible thiri Parties - we hava already inutiated that process, with
certain discussions pe ding. Because it is in the City's interest that
those discussions Proceed fn a free and fair maser, public corrects
concerning their progress will be limited. The City Council has been
fully bciefad fn e>erutive sessiax, and will reoain close to the Process
as those discussions progress.
3. Fads for the settlement ($835,000) are included within the current
tomd authnrivation for the secondary treatment plant project. ion
ad itie appropriation will be required. 'Hue settlevent assist and all
94-86
socfated meta base alxmdy been £aPmrai i,rco the City's financial
analysis of coat Of the
treahrent plant. xb serer rate ircrease• betorcl tlnse mtmnlly
ached• wi11 ke necessary to fuetl the as t cos[. On Hre other
h it anY fx ia»veied
by the City as a Eeauult of ois thixi party
ef
e�rnavy forts of cu[iently�
future serer cote ircmases.
4. 'Phe Wml mal To the City of Eangx' for curatruCGim of the secmvlary
lreaaent Plant, incl✓H� the ProPesed settlevmrtr all relates expenaea,
all past exparaes related w the Mbit pipeline issue, and all anticiP%ted
exPa ,s for rerc]utim of rereLting chive, m roc =ludiug pmaibie
t1LLrd-party r ®veries y tle City, Ss less then our mguieay.' eiginal
lawatl p¢annetxuctim estimate of the Proimt mnstructim cost.
Irc1 N•^; sll project ebange ordem to dace, tiD? P o settle
mels, all relates cents, mtl the anticipated met ofof xesolvixg rawnavtin9
Project crates, total mnNn.rflm costs £m this Project wlll the
original bid cost by les6 then 10&.
fK"
Agreement made this - day Of 1994 reflecting
the final Settlement (the "Settlement') of a controversy which
has arisen between, the undersigned City of Bangor, Maine (a
Maine municipal corporation)(hereafter referred to as "Bangor!')
and 1) Harvey Construction Company, Inc., a New Hampshire
Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Harvey"), and 2)
Hartford Fire Insurance Company, (a Connecticut corporation)
(hereinafter referred to as "Hartford") as surety on certain
performance and payment bonds issued on behalf of Hutch Concrete
Contracting Corporation, (a Vermont corporation) ("Hutch") to
Harvey and Bangor, as well as surety on the concrete Work portion
(defined below) of certain performance and payment bonds issued
on behalf of Harvey to Bangor, and 3) Hutch, hereinafter all _
collectively referred to as "the Settling Parties".
WITNESSETH•
WHEREAS, on or about January 141 1991 Bangor entered into a
contract with Harvey for construction of an upgrade of Bangor's
Sewage Treatment Plant (the "Prime Contract"); and,
WHEREAS, Harvey procured a payment and performance bond
required under the Prime Contract from Hartford; and
WHEREAS, the payment and performance bond covers loot of the
Prime Contract, but Hartford's participation in this Settlement
relates only to the Concrete work portion thereof; and
WHEREAS, on or about Tune 28, 1991 Harvey entered into a
Subcontract with Hutch dated as of February 1, 1991 (hereinafter
"Hutch Subcontract") whereby Hutch agreed to perform certain
concrete portions of the Prime Contract; and
WHEHMAS, Hutch precured apayment and performance bond.
required by the Hutch Subcontract from Hartford, and;
w BAB, Hutch on or about August 230 1991 voluntarily
defaulted on the Hutch Subcontract and Hartford arranged for the
completion of Hutch's obligations under it pursuant to its
performance bond to Harvey and Bangor; and
WHEREAS, Hartford signed a contract with charwill
construction Company ("Charwill") for Charwill to perform certain
portions of Hutch's responsibilities under the Hutch Subcontract,
and;
WHEREAS, a dispute has arisen over expenses which Harvey,
Hutch, and Hartford, have incurred as a result of a differing
site condition involving an active Mobil Oil petroleum pipeline
on the treatment plant site ("Site") which are more fully set
forth in a claim dated May 21, 1992, as supplemented, filed by
Harvey on behalf of itself and Hutch and Hartford against Bangor;
and
WHEREAS, a second dispute has arisen involving cracking of
concrete; and
WHEREAS, certain cracking of the concrete has occurred which
Bangor maintains is "normal cracking" which Bangor claims Harvey
.2_
(and by the terms of the Hutch Subcontract and Hutch Performance
Bond, Hutch and Hartford) are obligated to repair; and
WHEREAS, Hartford and Harvey have arranged for the repair of
such cracks under protest asserting that such cracking is
abnormal and not covered by the Prime Contract or Hutch
Subcontract; and
WHEREAS, Bangor has asserted various deficiencies with the
concrete work; and
WHEREAS, the above-described disputes will result in the
commencement of a legal action if not settled ,in which the
Settling Parties will incur significant expenses to pursue; and
WHEREAS, the Settling Parties have deemed it in their best
interests to settle and resolve certain issues related to the
Mobil Oil pipeline and all issues between them relating to the
Concrete Work as hereinafter defined but reserving their
respective rights as to all other issues which may arise under
the Prime Contract;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings
and covenants contained in this Settlement Agreement, including,
without limitation, the undertakings and covenants of the
Settling Parties to enter into, execute and deliver the
Settlement Documents (as hereinafter defined) provided for herein
upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein,
and other good and valuable considerations, the sufficiency and
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Settling Parties,
-3-
intending to be legally bound, agree to the forgoing recitals as
well as to the following terms and conditions:
1. Scope and Effect of It is intended by the
Settling Parties that this Settlement will resolve all
outstanding and potential claims and disputes hereinafter
described and identified between the Settling Parties as relating
to or arising out of the "Concrete Work" which is more fully
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof,
and all claims related to the Mobil Oil pipeline differing site
condition claim except as reserved herein. The Concrete Work
consists of that work under the Prime Contract and Hutch
Subcontract described in Exhibit A, as is, and as of the date
hereof. It is further acknowledged and intended that a
fundamental principle underlying this Settlement is that, upon
delivery to an escrow agent of a certified check made payable to
Hartford in the amount of $835,000 as provided in Paragraph 5
below as well as payment of the balance of the retainage on the
Concrete Work to Hartford and Harvey as provided in paragraphs
5(b) and 5(C) below, Bangor shall be free of any responsibility
for any claims by any. Settling Party, arising out of or in any
way related to i) payment for the Contractual performance of the
"Concrete Work" and ii) for damages due to the presence of the
Mobil Oil Pipeline as a differing site condition except as
outlined below. The payment by Bangor in conjunction with this
settlement is made with the intent that it will obtain a final
and complete resolution of all of these matters and the legal and
-4-
financial responsibility of Bangor for payment for the
contractual performance of the Concrete Work by Harvey, Hartford,
Hutch, and Charwill will be extinguished.
Harvey will agree to indemnify and hold Bangor harmless
against Claimsforpayment for labor rendered on, and/or
materials incorporated into, the Concrete Work provided by any
Party Harvey employed directly on, or from which Harvey purchased
materials incorporated into, the Concrete Work, except for Hutch,
Hartford and Charwill.
Hartford will agree to indemnify and hold Bangor harmless
against claims for payment for labor rendered on, and/or
materials incorporated into, the Concrete Work by any party Hutch
or Hartford employed directly on, or from which Hartford or Hutch
Purchased materials incorporated into, the Concrete Work,
including without limitation Charwill.
It is also agreed that Bangor will release to Harvey and
Hartford 100$ of all retainage now held on the Concrete Work in
the total amount of $ s provided in paragraphs
5(b) and 5(c) below.
Bangor may, pursue claims for damages caused to it by other
persons than the settling parties (hereinafter "Responsible
Parties") due to the presence the site of the Mobil Oil
pipeline (including the Mobil Oil Company) and due tothe
concrete cracking (including CH2M Hill, the Engineer on the Prime
Contract) and agrees to release and hold Harvey, Hutch, Hartford
and Charwill harmless from any and all damages or liabilities of
-5-
them to any person including but not limited to the Responsible
Parties due to the impact of the presence on the site of the
active Mobil oil pipeline, and/or concrete cracking and/or any
other aspect of the Concrete Work, including claims made by the
Responsible Parties against Harvey, Hutch Hartford, and/or
Charwill for contribution, indemnification, or damages arising
out of Bangor's claims against such Responsible Parties.
Bangor agrees that the warranty an the Concrete Work under
the Prime Contract has expired and is no longer in effect. The
Settling Parties shall execute a Mutual Release in which Bangor
will release and hold harmless Harvey, Hutch, Hartford and
Charwill from all latent and patent defects or breaches of
contract including but not limited to claims for consequential
damages, now existing or hereinafter arising in the Concrete Work
or due to the Mobil Oil pipeline, and Harvey, Hutch, and Hartford
will release Bangor from any and all obligations to pay for the
completed concrete Work and any and all claims arising out of the
Mobil Oil pipeline differing site conditions claim, except from -;:t
Harvey's claims based upon claims of Coleman Construction.
2. finitions: Unless expressly stated otherwise, the
following definitions shall apply hereinafter:
(a) "Harvey" means Harvey Construction Company, Inc., its
officers, director, employees, representatives, successors
or assigns. -
(b) "Indemnified Claims" mean those claims. as to which
Harvey, Hartford (including Charwill where
-6-
7T
appropriate), Hutch and Bangor are entitled to be
indemnified and held harmless, as provided in paragraph
3 below.
(c) "Bangor" means the city. of Bangor, Maine its
employees, officials, inhabitants, representatives,
successors and assigns.
(d) "Settlement Documents" mean this Settlement Agreement
and all documentsincluding checks referred to herein which
are to be executed and exchanged as part of this settlement.
(e) "Hartford' means Hartford Fire Insurance company its
subsidiaries, affiliates and parent companies and their
officers, directors and employees, for itself, and as surety
of Hutch and, as surety of Harvey on the concrete Work, and
any entity retained by Hartford toundertakeany part of the
Concrete Work, including but not limited to Charwill.
(f) 'Hutch' means Hutch Concrete Contracting Corporation,
its officers, directors, employees, representative,
successors and assigns.
3. Indemnity
A. Individual Indemnity obligations:
i. Harvey's Indemnification. Upon delivery to
Hartford's escrow agent of the $835,000, as provided in
paragraph 5(a) below, and payment to Hartford and Harvey of
the final retainage on the Concrete Work provided in
paragraphs 5(b) and 5(c) below; and execution of the Mutual
Release provided for in paragraph 5(d) below, Harvey hereby
-7-
agrees and undertakes to indemnify and hold harmless Bangor
for any and all actions, judgments, causes of action, claims
or demands for damages, including,. without limitation,
costs, expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees), or
other claims arising in law or equity asserted in the past,
present or future, arising out of or in any way relating to
the payment of labor, materials or equipment for any part of
the Concrete Work; it being intended that Harvey with regard
to Bangor only and no one else, waives, releases and
compromises with such payment its own claims for payment for
the concrete Work, and guarantees to Bangor that all
legitimate claims of subcontractors, suppliers, laborers or
materialmen to Harvey on the Concrete Work have been or will
be paid, except for Hutch, and its subcontractors,
suppliers, subrogees-, and those claiming by, through or
under Hutch, which Hartford will pay or otherwise settle
with;
11.Hartford's Indemnity; Upon delivery to
Hartford's escrow agent of the $835,000, as provided in
paragraph 5(a) below, and payment to Hartford
$ as its share of the final retainage on
the Concrete Work provided in paragraph 5(b) below, and
.execution of the Mutual aelease provided for in paragraph
5(d) below, Hartford hereby agrees and undertakes to
indemnify and hold harmless Bangor and Harvey for -any and
all actions, causes of action, judgments, claims or demands
-8-
for damages, including, without limitation, costs, expenses
(including reasonable attorneys' fees), or other claims in
law or equity asserted in the past, present or future,
arising out of or in any way relating to the payment for
labor, materials, or equipment on the concrete Work arranged
to be completed by Hartford, Hutch or Charwill under the
Hutch Subcontract, it being intended that Hartford as
Hutch's surety, Charvill's general contractor, and Hutch for
itself waives, releases and compromises with such payment
its and Hutch's own claims for payment for the Concrete
Work, and guarantees to Bangor and Harvey only that all
legitimate claims of subcontractors, materialmen or
suppliers, to Hartford and Hutch on the Concrete Work,
including specifically Charwill and its laborers,
materialmen, suppliers or equipment providers have been or
will be paid or their claims for payments finally settled.
iii. Banaorts Indemnity: Bangor hereby agrees and
undertakes to indemnify and hold harmless Harvey, Hutch, and
Hartford for any and all actions, causes of action,
Judgments,, claims or demands for damages, including, without
limitation, claims for consequential damages, costs,
expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees),
assessments, fines or other claims of any type, arising in
law or equity or by statute or regulation including, but not
limited to, those expressly arising from Harvey, Hutch's,
and/or Hartford's own negligence, asserted in the past,
-9-
present or future, arising out of or in any way relating to
the, presence on site of the mobil oil petroleum pipeline,
and all matters relating to the Concrete Work including but
not limited to cracking of the concrete; it being intended
that Bangor waives, releases and compromises its own claims
regarding these matters, and guarantees to Harvey, Hutch,
and Hartford (including Charvill) that if any party,
including any Responsible Party, should sue or claim against
any of them for identification, contribution, or payment Of
damages, or for any equitable relief, Bangor will assume all
defense thereof at its sole expense and will�pay whatever
amounts Hutch, Hartford (including Charwill) and/or Harvey
may be obligated to pay, up to the amount of five million
dollars ($5,eec,e0o.00).
B, General IndmnitV Orlicati2nn:If any claim, demand,
lawsuit or other proceeding with respect to which any Settling
Party is entitled to indemnity under the provisions of this
paragraph is asserted, commenced or threatened, the indemnified
party shall promptly notify the indemnifying party or parties, as
the case may be, of said Indemnified Claims and, the indemnifying
party shall thereafter be obligated and entitled to conduct and
control, through counsel of their own choosing, and at their own
expense, the defense thereof. The indemnified party shall
cooperate fully in the defense of said indemnified Claims
including but not limited to by making available all relevant
documents within its possession, custody and control and
-10-
appearing personally to give testimony as needed, all at the
expense the indemnifying party._
It is the intention of the parties hereto that the indemnity
rights created herein shall pertain only between Bangor on the
one hand, and Harvey, Hutch and/or Hartford, as the case may be,
on the other hand, or between Hartford, Hutch and/or Harvey, and
shall not create rights in or be enforceable by or benefit any
person or entity other than Bangor, Hartford, Match and/or Harvey
and their successors, representatives and assigns, except in
those instances where Charvill is designated.
4. Closing and Settlement Documents: On a date (the
,Closing Date") to be established by mutual agreement, but not
later than 14 days after the execution of this Settlement
Agreement by the last party affixing its signature hereto, the
Settling Parties shall execute and/or provide each of the
documents and money described and set forth below, at a closing
(the nClosingn) to be held, commencing at 10:00 a.m., at the
offices of Bernstein Shur Sawyer and Nelson at 100 Middle Street,
Portland, Maine:
5. Cj2514bli t' : At the Closing, the Settling
Parties will deliver the following Settlement Documents:
(a) Bangor shall deliver at the Closing to an escrow agent
for Hartford eight hundred thirty-five thousand dollars
($815,000.00) by certified check in full settlement of all
claims relating to the Mobil 011 pipeline differing site
condition claim (except for claims made by Coleman
-11-
Construction Company ("Coleman") which are specifically
reserved therefrom) and Concrete Work crack repair claim.
(b) Bangor will deliver to Hartford, on its behalf and on
behalf of Hutch, a certified check in the amount of
$ as Hartford and Hutch's share of the
final retainage related to the Concrete Work due to them
under the Hutch Subcontract.
(c) Bangor will deliver to Harvey a certified check in the
amount of $ as Harvey's direct share of the
final retainage relating to the Concrete Work.
(d)The Settling Parties shall each execute and deliver to
the other the Mutual Release attached hereto, as Exhibit e.
The Mutual Release shall, among other things, completely
release Bangor on the one hand, and Harvey, Hutch and
Hartford (including Charwill) ontheother, from any claims
by or obligations to the other arising out of payment for,
i) the Concrete work, except for the claims of Harvey based
upon claims of Coleman as they relate to the Mobil Oil
pipeline and, ii) the Mobil Oil pipeline differing site
condition claims. Each Settling party shall receive an
original Mutual Release. The Mutual Release also releases
Harvey and Hartford as Harvey's surety, from any and all
obligations to pay liquidated damages to Bangor except as
Harvey may recover from subcontractors which were
responsible for any delay, it being expressly understood
that recovery of liquidated or other damages from such
-12-
subcontractors will be the sole source of payment of any
liquidated damages by Harvey to Bangor. Bangor also agrees
that its claim for such liquidated damages does net exceed
one hundred and two thousand ($102,000.00), and that in no
event shall Hartford be liable for any liquidated damages.
(e) Harvey and Hartford and Hutch shall provide to
Bangor, evidence authorising. execution of and
acceptance of the Settlement Documents. Bangor shall
provide to Harvey and Hartford duly certified copies of
the resolution of the Bangor City council duly
authorizing the City Manager to execute and accept the
Settlement Documents on behalf of Bangor, and the
opinion of outside legal counsel (not serving as city
Solicitor or other official municipal office) that the
city Manager has the authority to sign and accept the
settlement Documents.
(f) Harvey and Hartford and Hutch will provide mechanics
lien waivers in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C
covering all aspects of the concrete Work.
6. P t C1 Obli ti : After the Closing Date the
parties agree to Cooperate with one another as follows:
(a) Hartford agrees to disclose to Bangor copies of all
studies, reports, correspondence, tests and other written
information in Hartford's possession relating to the
cracking of the concrete and the design mix of said
concrete. Hartford understands that Bangor needs this
-13-
information to evaluate a possible action against a
Responsible Party. Hartford will provide these documents
with no representations, warranties or guarantees.
(b) Hartford and Hutch and Harvey will execute a full
assignment to Bangor of all claims they individually,
collectively, or in a representative/subrogee capacity may
have against any Responsible Party including, but not
limited to, Mobil oil Pipeline company, CH3M Hill or any
other third party arising out of the presence and late
abandonment of the Mobil Oil petroleum pipeline on the site,
or arising out of issues related to the design of Bangor's
secondary wastewater treatment plant. The assignment shall
be in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D. Hartford,
Hutch, and Harvey do not in said assignment represent or
guarantee that any such claim exists, or that if one does
exist, that it is assignable to Bangor or that Bangor may
recover under such claim. -
(c) Harvey., and Hartford and Hutch agree that should Bangor
prosecute any civil action against a Responsible Party for
recovery of its payments hereunder, they will reasonably
cooperate with Bangor.. Such reasonable cooperation shall be
at Bangor's full expense, including but not limited to
payment by Bangor of all traveling and housing costs, photo
copying, attorney's fees, experts fees, reasonable per diem
charges for personnel time and/or any other costs incurred
in providing such cooperation. Cooperation shall include
-14-
providing disclosure and access to documents, records, and
reports, including expert reports, involving the Mobil 011
pipeline or concrete cracking issues. It shall also include
providing, at Bangor's expense, copies of any such
documents, and the voluntary attendance on a reasonable per
diem charge, with all expenses paid, of any principal
employees and/or officers of Harvey at arbitration hearings,.
depositions, and trial. Hartford agrees to use all
reasonable efforts to provide Hutch employees and/or
officers on a similar basis, but Bangor acknowledges that
Hartford does not have control over Hutch.
(d) Harvey agrees that should Bangor mediate any dispute
with JE -Electric, or arbitrate with Coleman Construction
company, it will reasonably cooperate with Bangor. such
reasonable cooperation shall be at Bangor's full expense,
including, but not limited to, payment by Bangor of all
traveling and housing costs, photo copying, attorney's fees,
experts fees, reasonable per diem Charges for personnel time
and/or any other costs incurred in providing such
cooperation. cooperation shall include providing disclosure
and access to documents, records, and reports, including
expert reports, involving the Mobil 011 pipeline issue. It
shall also include providing, at Bangor's expense, copies of
any such documents, and the voluntary attendance on a
reasonable per diem charge, with all expenses paid, of any
-15-
principal employees and/or officers of Harvey at mediation
or arbitration hearings.
7. Limited obligations Under This Settlement e t:
The delivery of the certified checks as provided in paragraph 5,
the execution and delivery of the Settlement Documents referred
to herein, the giving of the warrantiesand representations
provided, and the giving of notice and cooperation in the defense
of Indemnified claims as set out in paragraph 3 above, shall be
the only obligations of the Settling Parties under this
Settlement Agreement or in any matter related to this settlement
(but excluding matters unrelated in any manner to the subject
matter of this Settlement Agreement including any obligations
Harvey may have to Hartford by common law or contract and
including any obligations that Hutch may have to Hartford by
common law or contract), and no Settling Party hereunder has
promised or undertaken to do or will be called upon to do
anything else in the future in conjunction with this settlement
or the Settlement Agreement. Specifically, and without
limitation, no Settling Party shall be under any obligation,
pursuant to contract, common law or otherwise, to indemnify any
other Settling Partyorany assignee of any such party with
respect to any obligations or claims which are not expressly
provided for in paragraph 3 above.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is specificallyagreed
that neither the Settlement Agreement nor any documents
referenced therein shall alter,amend, change or diminish any or
-16-
all indemnification obligations owedbyHarvey to Hartford, as
its surety, either by common law and/or in accordance with the
terms of the General Indemnity Agreement (^G.I.A.a) dated
September 14, 1990 executed by Harvey in favor of Hartford. Said
G.I.A. remains in full force and effect.
Likewise, it is further agreed that neither the Settlement
Agreement nor any documents referenced therein shall alter,
amend, change or diminish any or all indemnification obligations
owed by Hutch to Hartford, as its surety, either by common law
and/dr in accordance with the terms of the General Indemnity
Agreement (^G.I.A.^) dated May 22, 1991 executed by Hutch in
favor of Hartford. Said G.I.A. remains in full force and effect.
The parties' obligations relating to or arising out of the
giving of the warranties and representations provided herein
shall survive the execution of this settlement Agreement and the
delivery of the Mutual Release.
e. Multiple Oriainalg, The Settlement Agreement and all
Settlement Documents except for the certified cbeckSshall be
executed in multiple originals, so that each Settling Party who
requests may receive an executed original of the Settlement
Agreement, provided that each signatory to this Settlement
Agreement may affix his, her or its signature to a separate
signature page.
9. Successors and T anmfergg All covenants,. promises
and agreements of each of the parties contained herein shall be
-17-
binding upon and inure to the benefit of their respective
successors, transferees and assigns, immediate and remote.
is.h Dcumsnts, The Settling Parties agree to. execute
any other documents including changeorders to the Prime Contract
or Hutch Subcontract, and to undertake any other actions
necessary to effect and accomplish the purposes of this -
-
Settlement Agreement, and further agree to do so as promptly as
possible.
_
11. Incomoration, All documents referred to in this
Settlement Agreement are incorporated by reference herein and
made a part hereof.
12, Confidentiality, The Settling Parties agree that the
f
terms of this Settlement Agreement will be kept confidential, (V
L
rI,i
except to the extent that any Settling Party, in its sole
discretion, determines that disclosure of the terms of this
Settlement Agreement is necessary (a) to protect, preserve or
,ca
assert any rights or consequences of this settlement (b) to
`
comply with any rule, regulation, Statutes, order of the Court or
other law, (c) as part of an audit, (d) in connection with the
obtaining of insurance policies, the making of any claim
thereunder or in complying with the terms and conditions of any -
such insurance policy, (e) for other legitimate business reasons.
11. T int Authorship and Intecration. The Settling Pasties
have had the advice of counsel in the negotiation of this
Settlement Agreement. This Settlement Agreementis the joint
product of negotiation between the Parties, and no Settling Party
-Is-
is deemed to be the author or creator of this Settlement
Agreement or any Settlement Document for purposes of applying any
rule of construction in its interpretation. This Settlement
Agreement and the Settlement Documents constitute a complete and
integrated statement of the terms of the agreement between the
Settling Parties, and no Settling Party has made any promise to
any other Settling Party which is not contained therein.
la. Reservation of claims Not Settled. All claims inuring
to any Settling Party to this Settlement Agreement not expressly
released under any Settlement Document against persons or
entities not participating in the settlement are preserved. This
Settlement Agreement, including but not limited to the
indemnification obligations created herein, shall not create any
rights or in any manner be enforceable by or benefit any person
or entity not a Settling Party hereunder or otherwise expressly
stated herein to be intended to benefit hereunder. No Third
Party beneficiary rights are thus intended to be created hereby.
15. Notices. Any notice which is permitted or compelled
under the terms of this Settlement Agreement shall be given by
certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following
persons, or to such other persons as may subsequently be
specified by certified mail, return receipt requested, by the
party entitled or required to receive the notice:
-19-
A. On behalf of. Harvey:
B. On behalf of Hartford:
Robert A. O'Connell, Esq.
C. On behalf of Bangor:
D. On behalf of Hutch:
is. Attorneys Fees. In the event that any party breaches
the terms of this settlement Agreemant, the party damaged thereby
shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys fees
incurred in asserting their rights and claims hereunder. -'17.
survival, The obligations of the parties as set forth in this
Settlement Agreement shall survive the exchange of the settlement
proceeds and the execution and delivery of the Settlement
Documents.
18. No Waiver. Neither any Settlement Document, nor any
provision thereof, may be changed, waived, terminated or
discharged orally, or by failure to protest, laches, silence or
otherwise, but only by an instrument in writing signed by the
party or parties against whom enforcement of that change, waiver,
termination or discharge is sought.
19. Maine few Annlies. The parties acknowledge that the
transactions contemplated hereby are to be performed in the State
of Maine and that after due consideration and consultation with
counsel, they have each elected to have the internal laws of the
State of Maine apply hereto and, accordingly, this Settlement
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be
-20-
deemed made under and shall be construed in accordance with and
governed by the internal laws of the State of Maine without
regard to principles of conflicts of laws.
20. Vacua for Resolving D1 - In the event that a
dispute arises between the Settling Parties, it is hereby agreed
that the parties will attempt to resolve the dispute through non-
binding mediation using Rndispute,. Inc. as mediator, prior to
filing any action in any court of law. If mediation fails, any
dispute may be litigated in any state or federal court of -
competent jurisdiction located in the State of Maine and the
Settling Parties hereby agree to submit themselves to the
personal jurisdiction of said Courts for these purposes.
21. No Admission of wrongdoing. This Agreement, whether or
not consummated, shall in no event be construed or be deemed to
be evidence or an admission or a concession on the part of any
Settling Party with respect to any claim or cause of action, or
any fault or liability or damages whatsoever. The Settling
Parties deny any and all wrongdoing of any kind whatsoever in
connection with the Prime contract or Hutch Subcontract, and do
not concede any infirmity in the defenses which they,
collectively or individually, have asserted or intended to assert
in any action. The Settling Parties are entering into this
Agreement in order to avoid further expense, inconvenience and
delay, and to dispose of potentially extremely expensive,
burdensome and protracted litigation. This Agreement, whether or
-21-
not consummated, and any proceedings taken pursuant to this
Agreement, are not and shall not in any event be;
(a) Construed as or deemed to be evidence of a presumption,
concession or an admission by any of the Settling Parties of
the truth of any fact alleged or the validity of any claim
or cause of action which has or could have been asserted in
any proceeding, or the deficiency of any defense which has
or could have been asserted in such proceeding, or of any
liability, fault, wrongdoing or otherwise on the part of the -
Settling Parties, or any of them, or as a presumption,
concession or an admission of any Infirmity in a claim of or
against any of the Settling Parties; or
(b) Offered or received as evidence of a presumption,
concession or an admission of any fault, misrepresentation
or omission in any statement or written document approved or
made by any of the, Settling Parties; or
(c) Offered or received as evidence of a presumption,
concession or an admission of any liability, fault or _
wrongdoing or in any way referred to for any other reason by
any of the parties in any other civil, criminal or
administrative action or proceeding other than such
proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions
of this agreement; or
(d) construed by anyone for any purpose whatsoever as a
presumption, concession or an admission of any infirmity in
-22-
a claim, liability, fault, wrongdoing or otherwise on the
part of any of the Settling Parties; or
(a) construed as an. admission or concession by anyone that
the consideration to be given hereunder represents the
amount which could be or would have been recovered after
trial of any of the claims settled hereby.
22: Consideration. No breach of this Agreement or of any
of the Settlement Documents shall constitute a failure or lack of
consideration or breach with respect to any other Settlement
document, and all such Settlement Documents shall be enforceable
without reference to this Agreement or any of the other
Settlement Documents.
23. vntire Agreement. All written and oral agreements
heretofore made among the parties hereto, or any of them, in
contemplation of this Agreement and the Settlement, the
transactions contemplated hereby, or the subject matter hereof,
are superseded by this Settlement Agreement and are hereby
terminated in their entirety, except with regard to any of the
Settlement Documents. No party will be bound by or charged with
any oral or written agreement, representation, warranty,
statement, promise, information, arrangement or understanding
relating to the terms of this Agreement which is not specifically
set forth either in this Agreement or in the Settlement
Documents; and this Agreement along with the Settlement Documents
constitutes the entire agreement between the parties relating to
the scope of the settlement and does not in any way affect the
-23-
�',,,.�.
General indemnity Agreement between Harvey and Hartford dated
September 14, 1990, and/or the General Indemnity Agreement
between Hartford and Match dated May 22, 1991.
24.yalnntary and Informed Entrv. Each party enters into
this Agreement and each of the Settlement Documents freely,
voluntarily, and in good faith, and with the advice of
independent counsel. In the case,of Bangor, it warrants that the
person executing this Agreement and the Settlement Documents has
the authority to do so, and that such authority is granted
pursuant to the normal and appropriate process consistent with
the charter, laws, ordinances, and regulations of Bangor and the
state of Maine respectively. Further each party acknowledges
that the terms of this Agreement and the Settlement Documents are
fair, reasonable, and a good faith settlement of the claims
covered thereby.
25. No Rescission. No party hereto shall seek rescission
of this Agreement. None of the parties to this Agreement shall
have the right to terminate the same.
26. survival of obligation. Me obligations of the parties
as set forth in this Agreement shall survive the exchange of
settlement proceeds and the execution and delivery of the
Settlement Documents.
27. Amendments in Writing. Neither this Agreement, nor any
provision hereof, may be changed, waived, terminated or
discharged orally, but only by an instrument in writing signed by
-24-
the party or parties against whom enforcement of the change,
waiver, termination or discharge is sought.
28. N ledge, f Claim. Harvey and Bangor acknowledge
that to the beet of their current information and belief, Exhibit
E attached hereto represents an accurate itemization of all
project related claims which are left unresolved by the
settlement, including but not limited to any and all punch list
and credit items, outstanding subcontractor payment claims,
disputed Change orders and so forth. Bangor also warrants that
it has no claims against Harvey, Hartford or Hutch, or knowledge
of any claims against them by third parties except as set forth
in Exhibit F.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this
Settlement Agreement this _ day of , 1993.
'SEEN AND AGREED TO IN THE PRESENCE OF:
Witness HARVEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Witness HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
-25-
Witness THE CITY OF BANGOR, WHINE
Witness NOTCH CONCRETE CONTRACTING CORPORATION
UG.=
•Klrtnt nel
Iw. 01/W/N
-26-