The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995-09-27 95-412 ORDINANCE�> m Iter W. 95-412 Mm SmT be 27. 1995 It®vS jert: Tmmxu <I I Develop Mt code -- Chapter MI, Part v, nrticle 20 -- Ula = Site Det910PJ StaMatds Pasp¢Ihle Dap t: PIaMiM/Iegf A.is ofdimm�ce anmvLoent establishes a 50 foot ot width in the Dzhv: industry Zone. '&ie arteeasent hes bei ptopo byff at the inquest of attorney Bob Miller, xePR l rtie was of a15=1M xeu loe oEE the Odlin xaxl a jac t to the Senora tum lire. effect of the artaxAant, whin zma fn wnjMatfm with x le 10, Section . of the City's Tana 0evelopna t code (why attecls33J, will be to pewit the tlemic;ua:t. of w_xtain exastvg n:o-zMm xaar lois rlat do rot neat the [antl mvalop�ms: Code's "flag lot^ xemvixao�te. R��au. , Una JL Passage Fust Pesdv:g Pef��ey5eralqq��to /P�Lmmi :g BoaN Page v' of eW COUNCIL Date October 23, 1995 Item No. g5119 Item/Subject: Amending Land Development Code - Chapter Viii, Part V, Article 20 - District Site Development Standards C.O. 4 95-412 Responsible Department: Planning Division The Planning Board held a public hearing on the above -noted zoning amendment at its regularly scheduled meeting of October 17, 1995. No one spoke in opposition to the proposed zoning amendment. The Planning Board voted 4 to 0 in favor of a motion to recommend to the City Council that the zoning amendment contained in C.O. Y 95-412 be approved. f f.� artme t tlac Manager's Comments: City Manaqer Associated Information: Finance Director :.agar npprovai: 4401 / 7(q) GAP fe9elfPP+4/ P�nA� �FSSaj,e tii Elis 111`cnl-MOM city Solicitor VU Introduced For R Passage _ First Reading Page I of 1 Referral 95-412 Aceigned to Councilor Woodcock September 27, 1995 CITY OF BANGOR (TITLE.) &MMIUM, rpre mnq Ia„d or elopvmc mda — a�ee* .. V111, pati V, Article 20 -- olstri.et Bit Development :^tmtlaxda Btu ordaieed M W City CMTA{ of the Cita of Bettor. at foVor+c 1f WT the Iatd Oa aloprent C of the City of B gtt, 00pptar VIII, Pavy V, Article 20, be mreMsi in fable V-1 as follows: 5� attached table S lrmtnt of Pam: Wl icns axe adtliucins am tt�a. ' s amen r establishes a 50 foot mUlLmnn lot width for deoelopom.t of iaM in t Urban pndustry zone. IN CITY COUNCIL September 27, 1995 First Reading Referred to Planning Board lliy CI C M IN CITY COUNCIL October 30, 1995 Consider Next Meeting CITY CLRRR IN CITY COUNCIL October 23, 1995 Passed Vote: g yes, 1 absent Councilors Voting yes: Baidacci, Blanchette, FruekeL Poppet, Soucy, Sullivan, Tyler d Woodcock Councilor Absent: Ruben CITY CLERK 95-412 ORDINANCE ( TITLE,) Amending Laud Development Code - Chapter VI I1, Part V, Article - District Site Development standards. Assigned to Llx)"lt IONICLZATI U 35 ft. Mike Sq. It. EST 25 It. PART v - ARTICLE 20 TABLE V-1 URBAN DEVELOPED AREA - ARTICLE li - SECTIONS 1-I0 Nin. Min. Min. Max.. Xin Has. Min. Front Side Rear His. Mextrnu District Let ml Lot vara vara yaw useable Floor Neigh Area LOeenge Width Depth Depth DOPES. Been Area - (Feet) (Sq. Ft.) _(Percem)_(Feet) r.I6 3 00 (Feet) (rest) (Feet) Space Patio Urban Resm,Aee 1 35 ft. Mike Sq. It. EST 25 It. (Bad -1) 20 ft. 8 rt. 20 ft. uet/ 10cft. Urban Residence 2 10 ft. S 6 F OU 9,000 35- 33 ft IDPO�?) r.I6 3 00 20 ft. 8 ft. 20 ft. 600 sq. f4/ OU 30,500 sq, Ipc rvet: 4 OOilI2.OW sq. ft. 10 ft. Xultl-(milylI Service 45 ft. 6."0a 10 61) In 3 50 for t02 011'5 ft. 10 IL 10 rt. 10 rL 200 sq. IL/OU 1.0 Plus I.We Sq. R. plus no sq. It. /or eacu aa. OU Per btdmw In - Xel gb Service 35 !t. IU,eW iqft. 35: excess of me (115n) IxsO) . 25 ft. 20 ft. 10 ft. 20 ft. 200 $4. ft./OU 0.4 Urban 5emme 35 n. 10.000 sq. ft. 30: 80 fn. (HED) 40 ft. 10 rt. 20 re. z0) sq.: re./Du point oevelOWent None None Imre (o W) Porte Done Pope Pon. Done a.J Waterfront Development 65 IL 10,00) sq. ft. 60, IOU ft. (VOD) 15' x10 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 2,0 150' r Mean 30' Trans bine „Ater w an high Airport Derelopvemt mbiect to L.me nermmLzct Perrot aeon em by Plannlrrq Dmrd and Federal (AM) natation Regulations omen Industry (lone Bonn 401 -Nmey- 30 IL (VIA) 10 ft. 20 ft 50 ft- (excepting yam set bad Iron 1.0 6ovemment and 00 IL Xnne -- railroad rlgbt-of-Day - mule) Inatitutlonai Service 301 Iluuu 30 ft. 20 ft. 30 ft. (6 6 ISO) 2'0 95-412 Excerpt from Staff Memorandum for October 10, 1995 Planning Board Meeting. POBLic BEARINGS Item No. 3: Amending Land Development Code - Chapter VIII, Part V, Article 20 - District Site Development Standards - C.O. $ 95-412 a. The City has proposed this amendment to the development standards in Table V-1 in the 'Urban Developed Area" (Article 14) to amend the Urban Industry District to add a minimum lot width of 50 feet. The only change to the Ordinance would be replacement of no lot width requirement in the zoning district with "50 feat." b. Most zoning districts in the Land Development Code have a minimum lot width. One of the two exceptions in the Urban Developed area was the Urban Industry District (and the other is the Downtown Development District which has different approach to lotting in that it has la ma imam floor area ratio, only, as a common standard). Elsewhere In the Ordinance, specifically, in Part PI, Section 1, dealing with supplemental yard requirements under the provisions of Section 1.6, there area series of requirementa and provisions for grandfathered lotting which are based on the supposition that they apply to 'each lot for which a minimum lot width is required The Urban Industry District is a follow-on to the old I-3 Sena which had minimal development standards to allow for flexibility adjacent to railroad tracks, etc. It did not have a minimum lot width provision. Therefore, it was rot eligible for treatment under the above -noted section and there are an provisions available to deal with grandfathered lacking street frontage. There is no reason why the Urban Industry lot requirements should not include a minivan lot width and should not have provisions made for their treatment antler pre-existing lotting situations contained in this Article. C. Since this amendment simply clarifies the applicability of standards that are basically available to all other zones in the Urban Developed Area, Staff would re oueend that the Planning Board reccuseend this zoning amendment to the City Council. (2) 95-412 Such let meets the requirements of the district in which it lies in accordance with subsection A. - (4) of this Sec- tion, above; (9) Only one tier of such rear lots shall be permitted behind the tier of lots fronting on the street; (4) The access strip to such r r portion of such lot shall not exceed two hundred feet in length. 1.7 Planned group Development. P planned development for any residential ocommercial complex permit- - ted under other provisions of this Ordinance shall be considered as one site development parcel under the applicable site development standards of the zoning district in which it lies and for subdivi- sion purposes, regardless of she proposed method of ownership for the land area, buildings, por- tiensof buildings, site improvements or any combi- nation thereof provided: A. The planned development shall not create increases in prescribed densities and/or lot coverage,reduce the required area for yards and off-street parking, or iolate any other site development standards applicable' to the district; a. Any method of ownership for the land are buildings, portions of buildings, siteim- provements or any combination thereof shall afford those acquiring such on cownership inter- ests access to and u of such other portions of the planned development as are necessary for: (1) Access to all portions of the planned development from a public right-of-way; (2) Access to the parking areas required under this ordinance; (9) Access to the common areas of the planned development, including the yards and openspaces required under this Ordinance; or (4) Compliance with the site development standards required under this Ordinance n the district in which such group development lies. II-54 95-412 ARTICLE IO - SUPPLEMENTAL LOT AND YARD LIMITATIONS Sec. 1. Yard Limitations. 1.1 visual Clearance on Corner Lots. On a corner lot -in any district except the Downtown Development i. - District, in order to provide adequate vehicular visual clearance, no building or structure may be acted, and novegetation other than shade trees may be placed, grown or aintained between the heights of 2 1/2 feet and 10 feet above the curb level, or its equivalent, within the triangular space formed by two intersecting street lines o their projections and a line joining points a such street lines located a minimum of 20 feet from the point of intersection of street lot lines. 1.2 Front Yard on Planned Streets. After the street line of a planned future street is placed on the Official Map of the City of Bangor, buildings thereafter constructed shall be set back from such line as though it were anexisting street line, i accordance with the front yard requirements of the applicable zoning district. 1.3 Side Yard Width. Wherever a side yard is adjacent to a street, the regulations for front yard setback shall apply to the side yard. 1.4 Yard Space for Group Buildings. Where a parcel of res land is to be occupied by more than one building, ' other than a accessory building, each principal building shall betreated as though on separate lot, unless the Planning Board, aftersite develop- ment review, authorize% a redistribution of re- quired yard space in harmony with the intent and purpose of this ordinance. 1.5 Requirements at Zoning District Boundaries. Where the side or roar lot line of a lot in Neighborhood Service District (NED),Urban Service District (USD), Airport Development District (ADD), Urban Intlustry District NIDI, Government and Institutional Service District, (G & 160), Shopping and Personal Service District (G & PS), General Commercial and Service District (GC & S) on n Industry and Service District (I & S) abuts any residential district, a Resource Protection District (RP) on a Park and Open Space District (P & 0), a transitional yard will be established in accordance with the district development standards, but in any case such yard will be increased by ten (10) feet and at least a buffer yard "B" (as defined in Article 20 - Section 1.40 will be established. 11-52 (1) Such lot meets the minimum street front- age requirement of Section 1.6 above of 50 feet; 11-53 95-412 NIP r 1.6 Lot Frontage. Each lot for which a minimum lot width is required shall have a inimum frontage o street not less than fifty feet, a capt as fol lows: A. Where a lot is located to the rear of another lot or lots which front an an improved public street, such lot may be used far uses permit- ted in the zone provided that: (1) Thereexists an unobstructed across to the rear lot from the public street over land which is not needed to meet the minimum requirements Of the district for the front lot) (2) Such accessis at least twenty-five feet in width for the full distance along the front yard and from the public street to the rear lot; - (3) Such access strip shall not be used in the computation Of minimum a and dimensional requirements of the district for said rear lot; (4) Such Pear lot meats the requirements of the district in which it lies (other than the exemption of this section with 6% regard to frontage). For the purposes of -"area and yard requirements the front yard setback line of such lots will be deemed to be at the prescribed setback distance from the deepest Pear property line of the lot or lots between said rear lot and the nearest public street. Lv (5) The provisions of this subsection (I.J) shall apply to lots lacking the n es - ary street frontage on the date of passage hereof and not to any new lots C. created hereafter unless such lot o .. lots are developed under other provi- sionsof this Ordinance as part of a group development approved under Article 17. B. "Flag Lots." Subject to approval under Arti- cle ST meeting the requirements of Article 19 the Planning Board may allow the creation Of "flag late" in any district provid- edcalled that: (1) Such lot meets the minimum street front- age requirement of Section 1.6 above of 50 feet; 11-53