HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-06-10 Business and Economic Development Committee Minutes Recycle Committee Minutes
June 10, 2010
Persons Present:
Jerry Hughes, Geoff Gratwick, Dana Wardwell, Monique Gautreau, Nick Bearce, Paul
Lodgek,
Kate Dickerson, Guest- Greg Edwards
Call to Order:
Councilor Gratwick called the meeting to order at 4:30 PM
Revise Approve Agenda:
The agenda was approved as written
Minute Approval:
The minutes from the May 2010 meeting were approved as written.
Recycling Report:
Dana reported that no checks had been received from the Maine Resource Recovery
Association during the month of May and that the recycling report is unchanged from last
month.
Solid Waste Rubbish Collection RFP Status:
Dana Wardwell informed the committee that BBI, (Blow Brothers Incorporated) had been
selected as the trash hauling contractor and that final approval would be addressed at the
next council meeting. Nick Bearce asked about the status of Brewer and Hermon and Dana
mentioned that both Hermon and Brewer would be remaining with Pinetree. Kate Nickerson
had questions about what would happen if we would recycle more regarding contract price.
Dana answered by explaining that there would be no price difference under our current
system. If Pay as you throw was initiated there would be a decrease in the contractual cost
of picking up rubbish.
Recycling RFP Status:
Dana reported that if we were to go with a PAYT Single Stream program, Pinetree would
receive that contact. Dana further explained that Single Stream would cost more due to the
fact that there is no revenue return on single stream recyclables. A discussion between
committee members focused on recycling in general. Geoff Gratwick facilitated discussion.
Comments follow:
• Nick feels that an outside advertising firm and or consultants should be used to
inform the public about PAYT and or Single Stream.
• Kate is hesitant to bring in a PR firm because of the expenses involved and believes
that the committee could be used to educate and inform the public.
• Kate requested that Dana provide details that directly relate to PAYT at the next
meeting.
• Monique and Nick feel that PAYT and Single Stream are not necessarily tied together.
In other words, we could have a PAYT program and still collect sorted material at the
curb.
• Kate and Jerry both mentioned that Single Stream allows residents to recycle more
materials than what we are recycling now.
• Monique reminded the committee that composting can play a very large role in waste
reduction and that composting should be included in any plan that is created to
increase recycling volumes.
• Greg Edwards, a student at UMO mentioned that Brewer and Abbott have already
gone to the Single Stream concept and that as time goes on Bangor will continue to
lose more recyclables to Single Stream and that processing cost will be higher as a
result.
• Committee members discussed how to best label the PAYT concept. General
consensus of the committee was to present the concept as a user fee system and
that a user fee promotes fairness. Nick compared PAYT to a water meter and
suggested that people would understand the water meter concept. There was also
discussion regarding how to present PAYT concept to the council. General consensus
seemed to be to present the PAYT concept as a cost shift to residents that promotes
fairness.
• Paul Lodgek asked if there would be any money coming back to residents in a mill
rate deduction as a result of PAYT. The assumption is that moneys would be
returned.
• Committee members were asked about what people should be brought in to continue
the discussion about PAYT, Single Stream and other recycling options. Some people
thought that civic groups and Bangor Citizens should be invited. Others thought that
the educational community and local schools should participate. Some members felt
that it was too early for continued efforts and suggested that we concentrate on
getting council approval and moving forward after approval is given.
• The question of who would receive free bags under a PAYT system was also
mentioned. Committee members agreed that General Assistance would be the best
agency to handle the distribution of free bags.
Meeting Adjourned:
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 5:45 PM.