HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-02-23 Business and Economic Development Committee Minutes BUSINESS& ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
• Wed., Feb. 23, 2011, 5 pm
City Hall Council Chambers
MINUTES
Councilors: Chair Weston, Blanchette, Bronson, Durgin,Gratwick, Longo
Staff: Conlow, McKay, Bradley,Wallace
Others: Sally Tardiff, Executive Director at Shaw House, Bangor; Mike Bush, Penquis CAP,
Bangor; Dennis Marble, Director at the Bangor Area Homeless Shelter; Mike Andrick,
Director of Hope House, Bangor; Kerry Sack with the Charlotte White Center. Bangor.
1. PUBLIC HEARING - Amount of Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds expected to
be available for the Period July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012 and the Eligible Uses of
Community Development Funds
Community Development Director Rod McKay presented this item to the Committee stating that this is
the first of two required Public Hearings to explain the Federal Community Development Block Grant
Program (CDBG). This is the process to let the public know of the amount of funds expected to be
available for the CDBG Program Year that will begin on July 1, 2011, and to identify the range of
activities that are eligible under the program guidelines. Public input may be presented in person at
tonight's public hearing or submitted in writing to the Community Development Office prior to the 2"d
• public hearing that will be held in late April prior to the Consolidated Plan's submission to HUD by May
15. This year's annual HUD Entitlement grant will be approximately$1,115,432 (the same amount
received last year).
Rod passed out booklets explaining the CDBG Program in detail. He stated that the City of Bangor is an
entitlement community and, as such, receives their funding by formula each year and thusly do not have
to apply for the funding. They do, however, have to let the U.S. Dept. of HUD know what they intend to
use the funds for.
In the initial years of the City's Community Development Program,the funds were used in targeted
neighborhoods; for the past 12 years or so the Program has been City-wide. The funds have been used
for various activities. The City's Community Development Program has provided property rehabilitation
financing to low-and moderate-income homeowners and investment property owners who rent or
agree to rent to low-and moderate-income tenants. The Community Development property
rehabilitation loans are typically at lower interest rates and longer terms than are available from a
private lender.
The Community Development staff also prepared a brochure that explains what other programs in
addition to the CDBG Program are available in Bangor through local agencies that might assist in making
energy improvements to their homes. Under the CDBG Program energy efficiency is one of the things
that can be financed, as well as correction of health and safety issues that are violations of the City's
Codes, and improvements to homes to make them more readily maintainable.
•
Other eligible activities currently funded in addition to the Property Rehabilitation Loan Program are:
• Business Development Loans for businesses locating or expanding in Bangor that are creating jobs
principally for low and moderate-income persons; Park Woods-for case management services as part of
the City's transitional housing program; acquisition of property that is not feasible to rehabilitate, and
demolition and clearance of acquired property; relocation of persons and businesses that may be
displaced from acquired property; disposition of acquired property; improvements to public
infrastructure in low-and moderate-income neighborhoods; reimburse to Planning and other City
departments for their support of the Community Development program. It is anticipated that the FY
2011-2012 Community Development Block Grant received by the City will continue the general activities
of the previous few years.
Rod added that at committee meetings between now and May 15, staff will make several suggestions to
the BED Committee for what should be funded under the program; will also allow the public to make
their requests and accept any suggestions from the City Council members on how they feel these funds
should be spent. The submission deadline is May 15;the funding is usually approved by July 1 and then
the program can be carried out for the ensuing year.
Chair Weston asked those Councilors present if they had any questions or comments.
Councilor Nealley expressed that in past years it has been helpful to have funds from the CDBG Program
to assist with sidewalk maintenance in the City and he knows that, if necessary in the upcoming budget
year,these funds can assist with that basic maintenance. He added that any financial assistance that
can be considered to clean up property blight is helpful and in case of City budget shortfalls the
opportunity of compensating other City depts. for some of the work they do is also helpful.
• Councilor Blanchette inquired if all of the CDBG funds are dispensed in a year's time and if not, do they
roll over or go back to the federal government? Rod replied that funding is on a draw down basis as
activities take place and that there cannot be more than 3 days of Community Development funding on
hand. The City actually finances the activities, then Community Development gets reimbursed.
Community Development cannot generally have more than a year and a half of unspent grant funds
available, and unspent funds remain available until spent as long as no more than 1 Y2 years of grant
funds remain available. HUD has been very happy with the timeliness of the City's use of these funds.
Councilor Durgin asked if staff is able to apply for the grant without having specific projects ready or do
you need to have those projects ready to go for the grant? Rod replied that the City Council needs to
determine in general terms what activities they want to fund such as the waterfront infrastructure (that
is an eligible activity). CDBG funds have been generally used to match other federal funds or other grant
funds that might be available from the state or federal government. The City Council approves how the
funds are expended by project.
Councilor Longo, on behalf of a Bangor resident, inquired about the former dry cleaning business on
Fern Street—could this property be used for something productive? Rod replied that the property is
owned by Bob &Suzanne Kelly who have cleaned it up with federal assistance. They had approached
the City for partial financing in order to convert the building into 15-16 condo units. The City Council
had approved partial funding up to $250,000 in tax increment financing for that project, but the Kelly's
were unable to get the private financing needed to move the project forward. Rod added that he will
look into this further as it is an eligible project under the CDBG program.
•
Councilor Bronson inquired if the CDBG funds could be used to demolish the former police station as it is
• a site of blight and possibly a Brownfield? Also, if that could not be organized by May 15, 2011 could it
potentially be organized within the next 12 months so that it could be considered; or could the County
itself apply for CDBG funds or can we do it together or would we have to do it and then hand the parcel
off to them? Rod replied that the larger municipalities in Maine (Bangor, Lewiston, Biddeford, and
Portland) are entitlement communities. Funding for communities that aren't entitlement communities
is made available through the state;the state has a competitive process where they can apply for funds.
As Bangor is an Entitlement Community, Penobscot County could not apply for funds for a project in
Bangor. As to whether or not Community Development funds can be used to demolish the former
police station, Rod replied that these funds can be used for infrastructure improvements in eligible
neighborhoods. Rod added that a problem with demolishing that building is it's holding up the street;
you may be able to stretch it a ways but I think it's going to cost probably more then we have available
in Community Development funds, but I don't think it's been costed out yet or designed. My
understanding is that the building would be demolished and the materials left in place and then
terraced to hold up Court Street. If we followed that concept that would be an infrastructure
improvement that probably would be eligible.
Sally Tardiff, Executive Director at The Shaw House in Bangor, presented a proposal she submitted last
year at this time to expand their transitional living program to include a shared-housing model. This
would significantly increase the number of people that Shaw House would be able to take into the
program now and provide additional support for young people who are beginning to age out of the
program.
Rod stated that for anyone from the public who has an interest in CDBG funding and has a project in
• mind, if they would submit it to the Community Development office, staff will bring them to the BED
Committee's attention and let them know if the projects are eligible.
Mike Bush from Penquis CAP in Bangor spoke in regard to the housing portion of the CDBG program. He
stated that in previous years, historically Penquis has done home repair. Maine Housing formerly
supported this program and those monies were eligible to be directed to the City and also 2 other
counties. This year,those monies are not available. Consequently, home repairs are one thing that the
City program also does but due to lack of funds at Penquis the City won't be getting the support as in
past years. Mike added that Penquis wants to be able to work with the City of Bangor anyway they can
but so much of the housing is in such bad shape and the neighborhoods are so crucial to the fabric of
the City, so he sees the necessity of the Community Development CDBG program keeping some of that
money in their repair program. He also suggested that the City look at ways to utilize the money not
only to support the existing lower income housing and the housing that is serving lower income people
but also to leverage more mixed neighborhoods—thinks there's opportunity to make some of the
neighborhoods more vibrant and perhaps CDBG can assist in that way.
Councilor Gratwick asked Mike Bush how can the City Council be pro-active in dealing with the possible
reduction of HUD and state funds as these have been the life of the inner part of Bangor. Mike replied
that at the state level they have been collecting a lot of testimony and comments from communities
that they are compiling into a document that they intend to share with our congressional people.
Sometimes the state program doesn't always connect with the entitlement program, so I don't know if
you folks were invited to participate in that or not, but I think that would be helpful. Mike Baran of the
State Dept. of Economic& Community Development is heading this up. This is also a program that is
• locally determined and locally built, and this is a great selling point to communities. Communities value
the program because it does do that; also federal and congressional people value the program as it puts
• local control where it should be.
Councilor Gratwick asked Rod and City Manager Conlow (for the next BED Committee meeting)to come
up with a specific statement we can push on in order that it will make some difference for future
funding.
Dennis Marble, Executive Director at the Bangor Area Homeless Shelter, expressed his recognition of
Rod McKay's excellent work historically. Dennis added that 'housing' is his major concern and with the
way things are poised at the state and federal levels he's afraid that it will increase homelessness and
the demand on Bangor as a service center. Housing can be a win,win, although the current CDBG
funding will not be enough money to do what Bangor needs to do in terms of both meeting needs and in
terms of community development. He advocates for housing over programs like the homeless shelter
because he feels it is about serving both needs. Dennis further added that if we do our jobs in terms of
infrastructure and actual housing we might have more leverage to talk with the state about doing this in
terms of service support which is what's being eroded right now. Scattered site developments, mixed
community developments (that Mike Bush alluded to) are much healthier for everybody.
Mike Andrick, Director of Hope House (affiliated with Penobscot Community Health Care - PCHC),
expressed an interest in PCHC developing a community homeless health clinic. Hope House is a 100-bed
facility and has 40 units of transitional housing. They're looking to consolidate their homeless health
clinic whether that is adjacent to Hope House or renovating Hope House;they're interested in utilizing
CDBG funding to possibly assist with that. Mike concluded by saying that housing can only help
homelessness and reduce it in our community. With cutbacks that are being discussed at the state level
• and the impact of those this is a complex issue.
Kerry Sack, of the Charlotte White Center, expressed her appreciation that the City of Bangor has always
taken such a pro-active and active role in solving the problems in the community and that it has been an
honor and privilege for her to work with the Community Development office. Kerry further stated that
there is a project at 97 Court Street (the former Knights of Columbus Hall)that will provide 7 affordable
housing units for people who have physical disabilities who are non-elderly and low income. These
people had to be placed in nursing homes because there were no other housing supports for them. The
units will be equipped to meet some rigorous physical disabilities. Other benefits in these types of
housing projects are that they create jobs; many programs that are social service based or supported
housing come with creating additional jobs in the social service sector.
Chair Weston thanked those from the public who briefly spoke on their proposed projects. Rod will look
forward to hearing back from them at a future committee meeting outlining their projects.
Meeting adjourned.