HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-07-10 95-315 ORDINANCECOUNCIL ACTION
Date July 29, 1995 Item No. 5-315
Item/Subject: Amending Land Development Code - 91 Grove Street -
C.O. d 95-315
Responsible Department: Planning Division
The Planning Board held a public hearing at its regularly scheduled
meeting of July 18, 1995 on the above -noted sone change request.
Albert Smaha and Jean Laing represented the applicant and spoke in
favor of the proposed change.
Deborah Armstrong, an abutting property owner, spoke in opposition
to this sone change as it could allow more than one additional
apartment unit in this building.
The Board voted 5 to D in favor of a motion to recommend to the
City Council that the sone change request contained in C.O. i 95-
315 be denied. '��y �/�j�
Da artment' mead—
Manager's Cos®ants:
City Mane
Associated Lnformationo
Finance Director
Legal � Approval per 4rttvle a, $pc. 6S Q ® /y�q
d' M 0/yi conal 7(M'+®�fir 67A, i; (I1✓i "l°I.
ikm /mw ng s� q vn'^ k w r h city solicitor
4,601 psmS & 0/3 sok}.
X Passage
First Reading Page 1 of 1
Referral
95-315
Auip:ed to Counaor Baldaccf July 10, 1995
CITY OF BANGOR
(TITLE.) Vvrbin==, Amending., Land Development cc" _._.__
_.._.. 91 Grove Stneet ....". ................. .... .........
Be N ordained by Ne CRY Cousag of Us Cita o£Bazper. ae£o9omv
THAT the zoning boundary lines as established by the Boning Map of
the City of Bangor dated October 28, 1991, as amended, be hereby
further amended as follows:
By changing a parcel of land located at 91 Grove Street (Tax Nap
No. 48, Parcel 73) fron Urban Residence 1 District to Urban
Residence 2 District. Said parcel containing approximately 10,000
sq. ft. and being more particularly indicated on the map attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
0 CITY COUNCIL
July 10, 1995
First Reading
Re d to Plan ng Board
CITY C
IN CITY COUNCIL
July26, 1995
ebtlon for Passage
Al Snafu, representing owners of
91 Grove, d Ann Using spoke
n favor of the amendment
Ordinance failed Passage
Vote: 8 No, l Yes
Voting No: Baldacci, Blanchette,
Cohen, Frankel, Popper, Sullivan,
Tyler d woodcock
Votin ' : Sou
CITY f E "
95-315
ORDINANCE
( TITLE,) Amending Land Development Code -
91 Grove Street
URD^2
ski
TO:
1.
APPLICATION FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND
THE CITY COUNCIL AND DATE
THE PLANNING BOARD OF BANGOR, MAINE:. NO.
I(WB) Mary E. Tyson (Dudley B. Tyson)
95-315
MAP AMENDMENT /1/99
2.
of 91 Grove Street Bangor, PIE
942-5784
Address City or Poet Office
Telephone
hereby petition to amend the Land Developpmmant
Code of the City of
Bangor, Maine by reclassifying from - llRD-1
district to the URD -2.
district for the
property outlined in red on the maps attached
hereto, which are
part of this application, and described as follows:
3.
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY (if any) 91 Grove St.
Total Area (acres Or square feet) 10.
t
4.
PROPERTY LOCATION (General location): Example
o South side of
State Street 400_. yards. East gf. Pine Street
East side
Grove SL
5.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY - Assessors Map
No. 48 Parcel 73
6.
EXISTING USE: Sinele-family
). PROPOSED USB: P AnaY ime�rc
S. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD: Name Mary E. Tyson
Address 91 Grove St_, Bangor
9. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACT OWNER (if such):
30. SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR CONTRACT OWNER: /91 Dudley B. Tyson
11. REPRESENTATIVE OF APPLICANT: Name
(if applicable)
Address
12. ATTACH ANY CONDITIONS PROPOSED FOR A CONTRACT ZONE REQUEST.
RETURN FORM & DUPLICATE NMIMI DIVISION,CITY MAIL, BANGOR, ME
Aoolication fee Processine Advertising Tota
Zone Change (1/2 acre or less) $289..50 $212.00* $501.50
Zone Change (in excess of 1/2 acre) $463.25 $212.00* $675.25
Contract Zone Change $694.75 $265.00* $959.75
*Two Ade Required
PLEASE READ PROCESSING PROCEDURE ON REVERSE SIDE
Excerpt from Staff Memorandum for July 18, 1995 Planning Board
Meeting
It® No. 5, Zone Change - 91 Grove Street - Mary E. and Dudley
B. Tyson - C.O. $ 95-315.
a. General Description. Applicant requests a zone change for a
10,000 square foot parcel from Urban Residence District -1
(URD -1) to Urban Residence District -2 (URD -2) located at 91
Grove. Street. The URO -2 would allow the subject premises,
currently a single family structure, to be converted into a
two dwelling unit structure.
b. Land Use and Sonino Policy. The area in question is
basically located on the boundary line between the URD -2 and
URD -1 zoning of this area of the City. At the time of the
adoption of the Land Development Code the Board will recall
that there was extensive analysis of land use and
residential densities in the old established neighborhoods
of the City. The west aide of Grove Street was zoned URD -2
and the east side was zoned URD -1 which makes the street the
demarkation line between these two zoning districts in this
area.
At the time of the Land Development Code revision in 1990
the City conducted a thorough analysis of residential
densities and existing use of the older built-up
neighborhoods of the City. It was determined that the
densities in those areas zoned for multi -family use were
excessive due to the smaller lots prevalent in the older
lotting of these areas and the process of conversion of
larger older homes into multi -family units over time. Thus,
in this area the density on the wast aide of Grove Street is
approximately 16 1/2 dwelling units per acre and on the east
side it is approximately 12 dwelling units per as The
present zoning is designed to prevent the 30 andl2 dwelling
unit per acre areas from turning into 15 and 20 dwelling
unit per acre areae with the attendant off-street parking
problems, lack of open space and overall congestion in these
predominantly single-family neighborhoods. (As Planning
Board Members know, the highest density permitted in the
City's HDR Sone for multi -family dwellings is capped at 12
dwelling units per acre under present ordinance standards.)
C. Urban Services. The parcel proposed for the sone change is
located in the Primary Services Area and has a complete
range of urban services available to it.
d. Rxistinc Conditions. As discussed above the applicant
proposes to convert a single-family unit sited on a 10,000
sq. ft, lot to 2 -unit structure with no additional
construction (without avariants). The residence is a large
structure containing approximately 15 rooms. On-site
parking is feasible. The parcel is abutted by a 2 -unit
structure tothe north and rear as well as a single-family
structure to the south and rear. Directly across the street
are a 3 -unit, 2 -unit, and single family structure.
G. Recommendation. The fundamental criteria for a zone change
is that it is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan
and that it isconsistent with the existing uses and zoning
in the area. The proposal before you would grant an
individual property zoning options not enjoyed by other
Property owners on this side of Grove Street to their
detriment and to the detriment of the neighborhood. If the
City is to fulfill the Comprehensive Plan objectives of
protecting existing residential neighborhoods from
overcrowding, then it must 'hold the line" on the zoning.
Based on the above considerations, Staff would recommend
that the Planning Board recommend denial of the proposed
zone change to the City Council.