HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-10-22 Municipal Operations Committee MinutesMunicipal Operations Committee
October 22, 1996
Minutes
Councilors Present: David Leen, Pat Blanchette, Jim Tyler
Staff Present: Ed Barrett, Bob Farrar, Joe Sewell
Several city employees
1 Council Resolve tion of Funds
far mho Huw°
Committee recommended approval.
2. Ree gmenzataone_Recommendacionm
Staff has had a chance to review the report put together by
BACTS and Tom Cricklair regarding The Bus system. Don
Cooper from BACTS was present to discuss three areas: route
maps and booths, monthly pass program, and bus stop signage.
A survey was performed by BACTS with results indicating
improvements in the following areas:
--existing schedule is difficult to understand and study
recommends a redesigned schedule with a color. coordinated
route maps. -
--implementation of monthly pass system. The study
recommends introduction of amonthly pass into The Bus
program to be promoted by one of several options: by direct
mail promotion with cost associated perhaps piggyback with
an existing business mailing already in the Bangor area,
Promotional signs in the busses and shelter; possible 3
second radio ads. in addition, there is the issue of bus
atop signs for those not familiar with routes or are
Biting the area. Committee discussed the placement of bus
signs at the bus stop locations or placing them at major
stop locations. Committee discussed cost implication
information relating to mounting signs to utility poles.
Production and erection of bus stop signs are approximately
$90/each. Local share would approximate $3,000; Bangor's
share would be 60%.
Tyler questioned monthly pass system due to holidays, sick
tiMwB, etc. when passes would not be used and asked about a
debit card system. .Passengers would buy a certain dollar --
amount of tickets, pass their card through a machine on the
bus which would indicate approval by light. This system
would be easier for bus drivers. Debit cards are
progransuable to adapt to pricing structure. Councilor Tyler
felt it might be worth a couple of phone calls to check into
such a system.
Blanchette talked about passes being dated and not valid
after a certain date, whether the pass has been used one
time or thirty times. Barrett said the City offers a five -
ride discount ticket ($3.00) which gives people a choice of
buying a monthly pass or the five-day ticket. It gives
people an economic determination.
Bus drivers know 90% of the people and would know who has a
pass. Tyler indicated that the monthly pass system to him
seems like it would be abused and it seems to be a nuisance.
Blanchette talked about radio ads and the approximate $4,000
in credit from two local radio stations owed to the City.
Radio ado are boring and offend people. We need to have
^jingle" and perhaps have an agency create one for The Bus.
McNeil indicated that perhaps the station themselves could
create something along this line.
Leen indicated several Councilors bad expressed approval of
sign placement on utility poles as opposed to regular sign
poles. Barrett said they could be painted on poles. Tyler
indicated that in the downtown area stop sign poles are used
for other purposes. Signs will be color coded as well to
map routes. Blanchette mentioned that the City used to have
yellow stripe on utility poles indicating bus stops.
Mrs. Whitehouse stressed importance of courteous bus
drivers. She cited an incident of foreign visitors who had
a problem with one of the has drivers as well as problems at
Capehart with users who have to carry heavy bags of
groceries and not having clarified bus stop sites.
Tyler mentioned that we currently have a system that stops
n demand and, if we encourage further ridership through
advertising, we run the risk that you end up stopping so
frequently that the route schedule is off. He suggested
that at some point The Bus may have to switch to a fixed
stop system as opposed to stopping on demand. Farrar
indicated that by marking poles that riders will congregate
at these locations. McNeil indicated that currently some
bus signs have schedules mounted as well.
Farrar indicated that if at this point the Committee is in
general agreement with the approach mapped out, the staff
Would prepare a Council Resolve to appropriate the maximum
of $2991 and begin Working on the recommendations. Staff
will come to Committee to discuss other major component of
the study which is the actual delineation of the runs.
Public meetings will be held to inform community of changes.
3. Q=iDURd RAN14W Of Revised Personnel Rules and Regalations.
Committee discussed three outstanding issues relative the
revised Personnel Rules and Regulations from their prior
meeting: vacation schedule, compensatory time for exempt
mmployees, and City Council/Council subcommittee involvement
in employee grievance procedure.
Regarding the 5th weak vacation, a survey showed that of the
10 largest private sector employers in the area, 6 of those
did provide acme sort of vacation beyond four weeks. 8 0£
the 11 largest Public sector employers did offer additional
vacation time. Reference was made to the survey summary
provided in the agenda packet.
Connie Strout, an Airport Department employee, added several
comments regarding long term employees. She indicated that
there are valuable, dedicated employees and that this would
be one way for the City to recognize their loyalty to the
City.
Concerning compensatory time for employees exempt from the
Pair Labor Standards Act (PLEA), the City Manager spoke i
favor or establishing some level of compeneatoryiO time for
these employees, many of whom routinely work considerable
hours in excess of the normal work week. The Committee
expressed concern that the proposal allowing accrual to 40
hours was too high and that employees would be able to
accumulate 40 Mors and then take a week of vacation. Staff
was asked to review these two concerns and report back to
the Committee with further suggestions.
Erik Stumpfel handed out information to the Committee
regarding State Statutes and employee appeal processes.
With respect to Police and Fire, they have an appeal to
their Civil Service Commission.
Blanchette stated that during the past year, there have been
several grievances heard by the Municipal Operations
Committees which have been time consuming with coat
Implications. The employee has a right to appeal and cannot
be denied the process, but it is difficult for councilors to
devote the time required. She suggested a grievance appeal
board for the grievance process beyond the City Manager, and
suggested it be outside People. Lean agreed.
Barrett agreed there needs to be an appeal process beyond
that of the City Manager as technically, if there is n
appeal beyond that of the City Manager, the Manager hoe to
distance himself from the discipline which he doesn't feel
comfortable doing. Be suggested the Manager needs to be
involved earlier in the grievance process. Under court
rulings, if the Manager is the final appeal, the Manager is
automatically written out of the loop. The Manager needs to
be aware of major discipline prior to it being administered.
The Committee asked the City Solicitor to draft appropriate
language to form an appeals board to incorporate into the
revised Personnel Rules and Regulations. Stumpfel suggested
it could be designed similar to the Zoning Board of Appeals
to meet on a monthly basis to hear cases.
The City Manager, speaking to employees who were in
attendance, indicated that a rumor was going around that
after the last Committee meeting that vacation days were
being taken away from employees and that is not the case.
He asked employees to clarify it within their respective
departments. The proposal was to take two established
holidays away and add two floating holidays. The Manager
indicated that was the proposal but that the Municipal
Operations Committee had decided to retain the established
schedule of twelve holidays.
Committee adjourned at 6:30 p.m.