HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-09-03 Planning Board Minutes
PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF BANGOR
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 2002
MINUTES
Board Members Present: Frederick Costlow, Vice Chairman
Robert Guerette
David Clark
John Hanson
Hal Wheeler
Bill Masters
City Staff Present: Katherine Weber
James Ring
Peter Witham
David Gould
Lynn Johnson
News Media Present: None
Vice Chairman Costlow called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. In the
absence of Chairman Fournier, Associate Members Hanson and Masters were
asked to vote.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mr. Clark had a question regarding Item No. 1. Therefore, Item No. 1
was removed from the Consent Agenda, and placed under New Business.
Mr. Guerette then moved to approve the remaining item under the
Consent Agenda (Item No. 2). Mr. Masters seconded the motion. The motion
passed by a vote of 4 to 1. The item approved is:
Item No. 2: Site Development Plan Approval to relocate an
entrance and add a 304 square foot loading dock at
805 Stillwater Avenue in a Shopping and Personal
Service District. Goodwill Industries of Northern New
England, applicant.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Item No. 3: Conditional Use/Site Development Plan Approval to
construct a 3,530 square foot building for retail auto
service use located at 140V Haskell Road in a General
Commercial and Service District. Patricia L. Quirk,
applicant.
Vice Chairman Costlow opened the Public Hearing, and asked for
comments from proponents. Mr. Richard Day of Plisga & Day, representing
Patricia Quirk, spoke in favor of the project. He explained that the applicant was
seeking Conditional Use/Site Development Plan approval to construct a 3,530 sq.
ft. building for automobile reconditioning use. Mr. Day explained that this
proposed use falls within the definition of retail auto service use and includes
hand washing, vacuuming, waxing, and exterior touch up done prior to the sale
of vehicles. He noted that this service will also be available to the general public,
but that there would be no bodywork done on vehicles. All work would be
conducted in either 4 or 6 bays with drive-thru doors.
Mr. Day told the Board that he felt that this proposal meets all the
requirements of the General Commercial & Service District. Mr. Day discussed
the conditional use criteria, and told the Board that this use meets all of these
standards. Mr. Day also discussed the Site Plan as proposed, and said that he felt
that the plans met the standards for submittal.
Vice Chairman Costlow then asked for opponents. There being none, he
closed the Public Hearing, and asked for comments from Staff. Planning Officer
Weber told the Board that the proposal meets the two specific conditional use
provisions of the General Commercial and Service District, namely, queueing, and
accessory parking. She indicated that the application also meets the four
general standard conditions for the granting of conditional use approval. Staff
recommended approval of the Conditional Use application.
Ms. Weber noted that there were engineering issues that remained to be
worked out at the time that the Staff Memorandum was written. Since that time,
a revised Site Plan had been submitted, and reviewed by the Engineering
Department. Mr. Jim Ring, City Engineer, explained that the Site Plan as originally
2
submitted proposed a 2 to 1 side slope along Haskell Road. The Engineering
Staff had concerns about slope stability adjacent to the road.
Rather than holding up the process, the Engineering Staff recommended
flattening these ditch slopes, and also recommended that the applicant submit
amended plans. The Engineering Department recommended that approval be
subject to a proposed condition that the plan be amended to revise the ditch
grading on the easterly side of the proposed entrance to create a 3 to 1 side
slope, and that a revised Site Plan be submitted to the Planning Office within one
week of approval.
Vice Chairman Costlow expressed his concern about plans being submitted
the Friday before a meeting and after the application has been advertised, so that
the public does not have a chance to review them.
Vice Chairman Costlow asked for a motion. Mr. Clark moved to approve
the Conditional Use application. Mr. Guerette seconded the motion. The Board
voted 5 to 0 in favor. Mr. Guerette then moved to approve the Site Development
Plan with the condition that the plan be amended to revise the ditch grading on
the easterly side of the proposed entrance drive to achieve a 3 to 1 side slope,
and that a revised site plan be submitted to the Planning Office within one week
of approval. Mr. Clark seconded the motion, that also carried by a vote of 5 to 0.
Item No. 4: Conditional Use/Site Development Plan Approval to
reuse the existing buildings at 253, 265, and 273
Hammond Street for office use in a Multi-Family and
Service District. David Lawler, applicant.
Vice Chairman Costlow opened the Public Hearing, and called for
proponents. David Lawler, the applicant, gave a history of the uses of these
buildings. He presented to the Board several photographs of the buildings in
question that illustrate the interior and exterior rehabilitation work that he has
completed to date. He indicated that when he first applied, there were a number
of issues City Staff had with the Site Plan as submitted. He told the Board that
after submitting a revised plan, City Staff found more issues, and subsequently he
missed the advertising deadline. He explained that Weber Mortgage Company,
that now operates in an adjacent building, wishes to expand into the former
Atrium House.
Mr. Lawler also explained that he had not finished the landscaping on his
adjacent building because of on-going construction. Mr. Lawler wished to wait
until the construction was finished before landscaping the site. He told the Board
that he did not need any more delays because he has a crew ready to go to work.
He asked the Board for their help.
3
Mr. Masters asked if all three buildings would be used for office use. Mr.
Lawler indicated that he proposed all office use of the building. Mr. Wheeler
noted that the Staff had been “put through the paces” with this project, and said
that he felt that the Staff is very thorough. He had questions regarding the
proposed loading area and handicap parking spaces.
Mr. Fred Marshall, Plymouth Engineering, explained that, because this
project is a Planned Group Development, two handicap parking spaces are
required. The applicant is proposing to share one of these spaces with a loading
zone that, in their opinion, probably will never be used.
Mr. Wheeler had questions regarding the size of the two driveways and the
buffer. Mr. Lawler indicated that the driveway between the two brick houses was
wider, and he wished to keep this two-way. He indicated that he had been at
this location for 25 years, and that there have not been many accidents. Mr.
Lawler indicated that he was proposing to erect a fence between the brick house
and the neighboring Gambino property. He did not plan to use this driveway.
Gil Weber, President of Weber Mortgage Co., explained that his business
needs to expand, and he asked the Board to grant Mr. Lawler approval of his
application.
As no one spoke in opposition, Vice Chairman Costlow closed the Public
Hearing, and asked for Staff comments. Planning Officer Weber complimented
Mr. Lawler on the rehabilitation of the Weber Mortgage building, and emphasized
that he should be commended on his efforts. She explained that the Board
needed to take two votes on the application (one on the Conditional Use, and one
on the Site Plan). She discussed what the Board needed to consider on each
vote. Planning Officer Weber discussed the specific Conditional Use criteria
contained in the Multi-Family and Service District, in addition to the four standard
conditional use requirements for the approval.
Ms. Weber indicated that three of the four general conditional use criteria
have not been completely met by this application. While the proposal was
“almost there,” Staff did not feel that it would not create unreasonable traffic
congestion, that the public safety issues were not satisfied, that the loading zone
and handicap spaces needed to be separated and relocated somewhere else on
the site, and that assurances needed to be made that the shared access to this
property remain in tact.
Planning Officer Weber explained that Staff does not feel that all
development standards and conditions of the Ordinance are met in this
application, specifically, that the proposal, given the traffic circulation issues, will
not create unreasonable traffic congestion on Hammond Street, and that there
4
was adequate provision for handicapped parking and loading. Staff felt that a
revised Plan that addressed these concerns would satisfy the applicant’s ability to
meet all four general conditional use standards, as well as, all the district-specific
conditional use standards. Ms. Weber indicated that Staff could not recommend
Conditional Use approval of the current application. Therefore, the same would
hold true for the Site Plan as submitted.
Mr. Wheeler said that, while he respects the professional staff’s ability to
assess these matters, he felt that there was an area in which the applicant and
the Staff could come together and agree to approve this application. Mr. Hanson
asked how scientific was the Staff’s opinion. Planning Officer Weber explained
that all Site Plans are reviewed by highly-trained professional Staff comprised of
Planning, Engineering, Legal and Code Enforcement Staff. This group of
professionals in City Hall looks at all applications, and makes judgements on them
based on their professional expertise.
Vice Chairman Costlow indicated that he shared Mr. Wheeler’s practical
approach that the minor changes of moving one handicap space, providing
buffers and changing a two-way to a one-way driveway be worked out with the
applicant to get this matter moving along.
Mr. Lawler indicated that he would do what it takes to accommodate the
Staff. However, with respect to making the upper driveway one-way, he was
adamant that he did not want to make this change as this was “not Central
Street.” He said he did not feel this would be a problem, and it would create
problems for him with snow removal and landscaping.
Mr. Masters indicated that he was familiar with these properties, and that
Mr. Lawler’s properties look very nice. He had an opportunity to go into the
Weber Mortgage building, and was stunned at the difference. He noted that this
building was within weeks of being torn down at taxpayers expense. He said that
he was satisfied with what Mr. Lawler has done to this building.
Vice Chairman Costlow discussed the Board’s options in that they could
take a vote as the project stands, or the Board could continue this matter for two
weeks to give the parties time to work something out and come back to the
Board.
James Ring, Director of Infrastructure and Development Support, asked if
the Board was willing to take a recess on this item to give Staff and the applicant
time to work together to resolve the outstanding issues. Mr. Wheeler moved to
recess this item. The motion was seconded, and it passed by a vote of 5 to 0.
5
The item was subsequently reopened for discussion. Mr. Ring indicated
that the applicant had agreed to move the handicap parking spot, to restrict
ingress one-way in on the upper driveway, provide two-way traffic within the
center drive-way, and submit a revised site plan to the Planning Office within one
week.
Planning Officer Weber indicated that those conditions were the four
changes that the Planning Office had previously requested of the applicant; and
she was grateful that Mr. Lawler had agreed to make these changes to his Site
Plan.
Mr. Master moved to approve the conditional use. Mr. Wheeler seconded
the motion. The Board voted 5 to 0 in favor. Mr. Wheeler then moved to
approve the Site Development Plan with the conditions described by the City
Engineer and accepted by Mr. Lawler, and that a revised plan be submitted to the
Planning Office within a week. The Board voted 5 to 0 in favor of the motion.
NEW BUSINESS
Item No. 1: Site Development Plan Approval to construct a 203
space employee parking lot at 246 Sylvan Road in a
General Commercial and Service District. – Eastern
Maine Medical Center, applicant.
The Board voted to consider Item No. 1 out of order. Mr. Clark had a
question as to whether or not this lot would be utilized by the Hospital after the
construction at the Eastern Maine Medical Center campus was complete. John
McCormack, of CES, Inc., indicated that the Hospital planned for this to be a
long-term, permanent parking facility.
There being no further discussion, Vice Chairman Costlow asked for a
motion. Mr. Hanson moved to approve the Site Development Plan as presented.
Mr. Clark seconded the motion. The Board voted five in favor and none opposed
to approve the Site Development Plan.
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
Item No. 5: To amend the Land Development Code by changing
parcels of land located on Spruce Street from Urban
Residence 1 District to Contract Government and
Institutional Service District. Said parcel containing
approximately 20,070 square feet. Eastern Maine
Medical Center, applicant. C.O. # 02-317.
6
Vice Chairman Costlow opened the Public Hearing, and asked for comments
from proponents. Attorney Thomas Johnston represented the applicant who is
requesting a zone change from Urban Residence 1 District to Contract
Government and Institutional Service District for four parcels of land located on
Spruce Street, and containing approximately 20,000 square feet in area. Mr.
Johnston explained that the intended use was to construct a building to be used
for temporary residential accommodations for visiting doctors and medical
students.
Mr. Johnston discussed the proposed contract zone change conditions that
limit the use to facilities operated by public service agencies or private nonprofit
organizations limited to health, education, social welfare, and cultural uses; group
day-care or nursery school; nursing homes; and accessory uses on the same lot
and customarily incidental and subordinate to the above uses. The contract
conditions also place restrictions on the development standards within the
District. Mr. Johnston noted that the configuration of this parcel would also limit
the size of any building that could be constructed. John McCormack of CES, Inc.,
and Don Fletcher of Eastern Maine Medical Center were both present to answer
questions of the Board.
As no one spoke in opposition, Vice Chairman Costlow closed the Public
Hearing, and asked for comments from Planning Officer Weber. Ms. Weber
indicated that The Comprehensive Plan 2000 “Land Use Concepts” and
“Zoning Policy” designate Spruce Street as a transition area between the low
density urban residential neighborhood off of State Street and the government
and institutional uses associated with the Eastern Maine Health Care campus.
The side of Spruce Street where the properties are located falls within the
Government and Institutional Service zoning policy designation.
Given that the parcels are in a transitional area between EMMC’s
institutional uses and the mixed residential and business uses around State
Street, and that the proposed conditions are restrictive enough to minimize
potential impacts on the neighborhood, Planning Staff recommended that the
Planning Board recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed zone
change contained in C.O. # 02-317.
After some discussion as to the size of any future building to be
constructed on the combined lots, and the conditions as proposed, Mr. Hanson
moved to recommend to the City Council that the zone change request contained
in C.O. # 02-317 be adopted. Mr. Wheeler seconded the motion. The motion
passed by a vote of 5 to 0.
7
Item No. 6: To amend the Land Development Code by changing a
parcel of land located on Front Street from Park and
Open Space District to Waterfront Development
District. Said parcel containing approximately 43,550
square feet. City of Bangor, applicant. C.O. # 02-318.
The Public Hearing was opened by Vice Chairman Costlow. Planning
Officer Weber explained that the proposed zone change request consisted of one
lot and a portion of another lot to be rezoned from Park and Open Space District
to Waterfront Development District. Ms. Weber explained that this area will be
incorporated into a larger area proposed for a parking area along the waterfront.
This property is currently the site of the City’s small parking lot and the
waterfront area beside the Seadog Restaurant, and will be part of a larger future
parking area that will serve the City’s Waterfront Redevelopment Area.
As no one spoke in opposition, Vice Chairman Costlow asked for comments
from Staff. Planning Officer Weber indicated that a zone change to Waterfront
Development District for these parcels is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
2000, and is appropriate for inclusion in the City-owned waterfront property.
Therefore, the Planning Staff recommended that the Planning Board recommend
to the City Council adoption of C.O. # 02-318.
As no one else spoke, Vice Chairman Costlow closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Hanson had questions regarding the proposed larger parking area and the
overall waterfront development project. Mr. Costlow asked if the shoreland
zoning provisions still apply to this lot. Planning Officer Weber discussed the
future developments along the waterfront, the proposed parking lot, and
indicated that the shoreland zoning provisions would apply to projects within 250
feet of the Penobscot River.
Mr. Hanson moved to recommend to the City Council that the zoning
change request contained in C.O. # 02-318 be approved. Mr. Guerette seconded
the motion. The Board voted 5 in favor and 0 opposed to recommend approval
to the City Council.
Item No. 7: Amending the Land Development Code – Chapter 165,
Section 165-94 – Waterfront Development District.
City of Bangor, applicant. C.O. # 02-319.
Vice Chairman Costlow opened the Public Hearing. Planning Officer Weber
explained that the proposed zoning amendment was a refinement of permitted
and conditional uses in the Waterfront Development District. Ms. Weber
8
discussed with the Board the changes between the existing District provision and
the proposed District provisions. She noted that to the extent possible, use
categories have been combined and that some Conditional Uses are now
Permitted uses. For example, recreational facilities and residential use are now
permitted uses, as are conference centers and museums. This amendment also
addresses the height issue where the maximum height limit has been reduced
from 40’ to 35’ within the Shoreland Zone. Also, the high rise hotel use has been
moved back from 200 feet to 250 feet to remove this use from the Shoreland
Zone.
Mr. Wheeler had questions regarding the types of residential uses that would
be allowed. Planning Officer Weber told the Board that the provisions for
residential uses has been left intentionally broad. Some of the concepts proposed
have been for condominium development, others for attached housing as
opposed to detached. Since the waterfront property is City-owned, the City can
dictate what uses and development will occur on its property. Mr. Wheeler
added that he had never been pleased with height limitations in the City. He said
the City has no skyline. He had a question as to the number of stories that would
be allowed under the proposed standards. Ms. Weber indicated that a story is
considered to be 12 to 15 feet .
Mr. Guerette asked why small wooden boats could not be manufactured on
the waterfront, and thought that this was odd to exclude them. Ms. Weber
indicated that because the manufacturing of small wooden boats could produce
hazardous and noxious materials, it was felt that this was not a use that was
appropriate for the City’s waterfront. Mr. Hamer indicated that small handcrafted
boats would be allowed, but not the manufacturing of small boats.
Vice Chairman Costlow closed the Public Hearing, and asked for a motion.
Mr. Hanson moved to recommend to the City Council adoption of C.O. # 02-319.
Mr. Clark seconded the motion. The Board voted 5 to 0 in favor of the motion.
Item No. 8: Amending the Land Development Code – Chapter 165,
Section 165-135 – Application and Explanation of
standards. Section A. City of Bangor, applicant. C.O.
# 02-320.
The Public Hearing was opened by Vice Chairman Costlow. Planning
Officer Weber explained that the proposed amendment will bring the “Maximum
District Height” standards for the Waterfront Development District into
compliance with State Shoreland Zoning Statute for the shoreland zone (within
250’ of the mean high water mark) along the Penobscot River. Presently, the
Land Development Code exceeds State Shoreland Zoning Standards by 10 feet.
This amendment would bring the Ordinance into compliance with State Statues.
9
Mr. Fred Marshall, Plymouth, Engineering, asked if this would affect those
areas zoned Government and Institutional Service District. Planning Officer
Weber said that this would be addressed in another amendment.
The Planning Staff recommended that the Planning Board recommend to
the City Council adoption of CO # 02-320 to bring the maximum allowable height
in the Waterfront Development District into compliance with State Statutes.
The Public Hearing was closed, and Vice Chairman Costlow asked for a
motion. Mr. Guerette moved to recommend to the City Council that the zoning
amendment contained in C.O. # 02-230 be adopted. Mr. Clark seconded the
motion. The motion to recommend carried by a vote of 5 in favor and 0 opposed.
Item No. 9: Amending the Land Development Code – Chapter 165,
Section 165-13 – Definitions of Hotel and Motel. City
of Bangor, applicant, C.O. # 02-321.
Vice Chairman Costlow opened the Public Hearing. Planning Officer Weber
explained that the Land Development Code makes a distinction between Hotel
and Motel with respect to permitted uses in the Waterfront Development District,
but does not currently define these terms in the Ordinance. This proposed
amendment adds definitions for Hotel and Motel to the Definition Section of the
Ordinance.
Mr. Hanson asked if any thought had been given to a motel with access
only from the water. Mr. Hamer said that the shoreland zoning setbacks would
prohibit this. Mr. Guerette expressed concern over the term “transient” contained
in the definition. He felt that the term was not “politically correct” because he felt
that the term is derogatory. Planning Officer Weber indicated that the definition
for hotel and motel were taken directly from the current Webster’s Dictionary.
After some discussion about substituting language for the word “transient,”
Mr. Wheeler moved to recommend the adoption of the amendment to the LDC
contained in C.O. # 02-321 as written and submitted by the Planning Office. Mr.
Masters seconded the motion. The vote was 3 in favor and 2 opposed to
recommend approval of #02-321.
Item No. 10: Amending the Land Development Code – Chapter 165,
Section 165-73, D (2) – Parking Area Location and
Screening. City of Bangor, applicant. C.O. # 02-322.
The Public Hearing was opened by Vice Chairman Costlow who asked for
Staff comments. Planning Officer Weber indicated that this amendment was
10
proposed for practical reasons to provide options for buffer yard landscaping of
parking lots and off-street loading areas when space is limited. The Ordinance
requires at least a B-Buffer Yard for parking and loading areas that front on a
public street or private way. Currently this requirement can be met with a
landscaped, 3-foot berm in a 10-foot by 100-foot buffer yard.
Planning Officer Weber explained that from an engineering standpoint, this
type of berm is not always practical in our climate. This amendment offers the
option of additional landscaping instead of a berm to meet the Ordinance
requirements. Therefore, Staff recommended that the Planning Board
recommend adoption of C.O # 02-322.
Mr. Guerette asked if the proposed amendment would make a berm
illegal? Planning Officer Weber indicated that it would not but that this
amendment would provide another option. James Ring, City Engineer, explained
that from an engineering standpoint, a berm with a three-foot rise and five feet
of width is not always practical.
There being no further questions, Vice Chairman Costlow closed the Public
Hearing as asked for a motion. Mr. Hanson moved to recommend to the City
Council that the zoning amendment contained in C.O. # 02-322 be adopted. Mr.
Guerette seconded the motion. The motion to recommend passed by a vote of 5
to 0.
Item No. 11: Amending the Land Development Code – Chapter
165-37 – Principal and Accessory Structures. City of
Bangor, applicant. C.O. # 02-323.
Vice Chairman Costlow opened the Public Hearing. Planning Officer Weber
indicated that the purpose of this proposed Ordinance amendment is to increase
the maximum height of principal and accessory structures in the Downtown
Development District (DDD) adjacent to tidal waters from 35 feet to 80 feet. The
current height limit of 35 feet for structures along Kenduskeag Stream in the
Downtown Development District makes many buildings non-conforming
structures. The proposed height limit of 80 feet in the Downtown Development
District, which is permissible under State-mandated Shoreland zoning, will make
these structures conforming, and make the DDD standard consistent with that of
the Government and Institutional Service District.
Ms. Weber informed the Board that Staff has discussed this proposed
amendment with DEP and the State indicated that it is appropriate for the
shoreland zone to have an increased height in the old urban core district.
Without this amendment, any new construction along the Kenduskeag Stream
would have a maximum height limit of 35 feet. For these reasons, the Planning
11
Staff recommended that the Planning Board recommend to the City Council
adoption of C.O. # 02-323.
The Public Hearing was closed. Mr. Clark moved to recommend approval
of C.O. # 02-323 to the City Council. Mr. Guerette seconded the motion. The
motion passed by a vote of 4 to 1.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Item No. 12: Planning Board Approval of Minutes
Consideration of the Minutes of the August 20, 2002 Meeting was
continued to the Board’s next meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
12