HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-11-01 Planning Board Minutes
PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF BANGOR
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1, 2005
MINUTES
Board Members Present: Robert Guerette, Chairman
Harold Wheeler
David Clark
Nathaniel Rosenblatt
Alice Brown
Miles Theeman
City Staff Present: David Gould
James Ring
Peter Witham
Lynn Johnson
News Media Present Bangor Daily News
Chairman Guerette called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. In the
absence of Member King, Associate Members Mitchell, Brown and Theeman were
asked to alternate voting. Chairman Guerette outlined the procedures for
conducting a Public Hearing for the benefit of the audience. He indicated that
the order would be a presentation from the applicant, comments from
proponents and opponents, closure of the Public Hearing, and then comments
from Staff.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Item No. 1: To amend the Land Development Code by changing a
parcel of land located at 118 Congress Street from
Urban Residence One District to Government and
Institutional Service District. Said parcel containing
approximately 3,800 sq. ft. Kenneth G. Tsoulas,
applicant. C.O. # 05-340.
2
Chairman Guerette opened the Public Hearing and asked for a
presentation from the applicant. Mr. Ken Tsoulas, the applicant, spoke in favor
of the proposed change. Mr. Tsoulas indicated that he is requesting this zone
change as he has entered into a Purchase and Sales Agreement with St. Joseph
Hospital, and as a condition of the sale that the zoning be changed to
Government and Institutional Service District to be consistent with the zoning of
the abutting hospital properties. Mr. Tsoulas said that this property has been a
rental property for the last 8 or 9 years and it was his understanding that the
Hospital had no immediate plans other than to continue renting this property.
Mr. Tsoulas said that he had spoken to three other neighbors who were not in
opposition to this zone change, that the hospital had been a good neighbor, and
that he felt that this zone change request is consistent with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Jim Kimball, a Board Member of M & J Corporation the real estate
holding company for St. Joseph Hospital, indicated that the applicant asked if
the Hospital wished to purchase the property. The Hospital owns the properties
on either side of 118 Congress Street and feels that it is a strategic parcel for
them to own. At the present time, there are no plans for reuse of this property
other than to continue to rent it. Mr. Kimball gave a brief history as to the
Hospital’s growth. He indicated that this parcel lies within the area the City
envisions for the future expansion of the Hospital. He added that the Hospital
moved its entrance from Center Street to Broadway at the urging of the City
and he did not feel that the property values have suffered in this area as a
result of the Hospital’s expansion.
There being no other proponents, Chairman Guerette asked for
opponents. Attorney Lisa Cohen Lunn, representing Michelle Campbell an
abutting land owner who lives at 16 North Park Street, spoke in opposition.
Ms. Lunn indicated that this is a traditional neighborhood and that her client was
very concerned about the propensity for St. Joseph Hospital to encroach into
the neighborhood. She said that she did not feel that this zone change was
appropriate for this single-family neighborhood and Ms. Campbell strongly
objects to this zone change request. Ms. Lunn also indicated that she grew up
on French Street and now lives in the Little City area. She expressed her
concerned with encroachment. She said that she felt that the Hospital should
indicate what their intentions are for this parcel before applying for a zone
change.
Chairman Guerette indicated that usually the person acquiring the
property makes a presentation before the Planing Board and asked why the
owner did. Mr. Kimball explained that in past years the Hospital has made
acquisitions without first asking for a zone change. When the time came to
request a zone change the votes were very close. The Hospital feels that it may
3
be better to ask the seller to request the zone change. Then if the zoning is not
changed, then the Hospital will not own a property that will not serve its
purposes. Mr. Kimball said that the Hospital does not wish to assume more risk
than they have to.
Chairman Guerette indicated that the exchange could be contingent upon
the Planning Board’s vote with a properly executed Purchase and Sales
Agreement.
Attorney Lunn felt that the Hospital was putting the cart before the horse
and that it would make more sense to figure out first what they want to do with
the parcel.
Mr. Rosenblatt indicated that Government and Institutional Service District
(G & ISD) zoning is consistent wit the Comprehensive Plan. Attorney Lunn
argued that this is not a G & ISD neighborhood, but a single-family
neighborhood and that her client feels that this neighborhood is changing and
she is very concerned.
Mr. Kimball indicated that the Hospital does have a proper Purchase and
Sales Agreement with the applicant.
As no one else spoke, Chairman Guerette closed the Public Hearing and
asked for Staff comments. Planning Officer Gould gave a brief history of the
zoning in the area and the Hospital’s development in this area. Back in the
1980’s the City’s development policy was that the Hospital’s operations be
directed towards Broadway and away from Center Street. The current
institutional area is bounded by Congress Street, Center Street and Broadway.
Mr. Gould noted that this request is consistent with the City’s Land Use and
Zoning Policy Maps. Should this property become part of the Saint Joseph
Hospital complex the City would expect that the institution would develop it
consistent with the previously outlined policy, and to include additional required
setbacks and buffers between G&ISD development and adjacent residential
properties. The Comprehensive Plan envisions this property to be Government
and Institutional Service District. Those properties held by private individuals
have the ability to maintain their property as long as they want to. As this
request is consistent with the City’s development policy for this area and
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Staff recommended that the Planning
Board make a positive recommendation to the City Council.
Mr. Theeman said that he felt that it is very bad public policy to approve a
zone change without the knowledge of the proposed use by the perspective
owner.
4
Chairman Guerette noted that the Board has spent a lot of time in
updating the Comprehensive Plan and that it is clear that this entire area is
recognized as an area to be available for Government and Institutional Service
District zoning. For that reason, he indicated that he intended to vote in favor of
this request. Chairman Guerette asked Associate Member Mitchell to vote on this
item.
Mr. Rosenblatt moved to recommend approval to the City Council of the
application submitted by Mr. Tsoulas at 118 Congress Street to change the zone
from Urban Residence One District to Government and Institutional Service
District as depicted in Council Ordinance No. 05-340. Mr. Wheeler seconded the
motion. The Board voted four in favor and one opposed to recommending
approval of C.O. # 05-340.
Item No. 2: To amend the Land Development by changing a
parcel of land located at 229 Bomarc Road from
Urban Service District to Low Density Residential
District. Said parcel containing approximately 4.1
acres. Woods of Maine, Inc., applicant. C.O. # 05-
341.
Chairman Guerette opened the Public Hearing and asked for a
presentation from the applicant. Mr. Mike Wood, representing Woods of Maine,
Inc., indicated that they are requesting a zone change to use the 4.1-acre parcel
for residential use apartments and possibly as condominiums. Woods of Maine
Inc., is the developer of the abutting residential Woodridge Subdivision.
Previously, the applicant received Planning Board approval to construct a
warehouse and 30 self-storage units on this site.
Mr. Rosenblatt asked if this area was previously used for industrial uses.
Mr. Wood indicated that it has been vacant for quite some time. Mr. Rosenblatt
indicated that the parcel presently serves as a buffer between the existing
residential use and the industrial area. He indicated that because there are a
variety of industrial uses that will be permitted next door to this, any use of the
property needs to include buffers to mitigate the impact. He asked the applicant
if he had given thought to this. Mr. Wood indicated that there is presently a
street that goes by WA Bean that separates this lot from the abutting industrial
lot. The WA Bean building is the closest industrial business to this site and the
street separates the lots. Mr. Wood added that his presently approved site plan
includes a B Buffer and he would do the required buffering.
Mr. Brian Snowden, who lives on Lot 29 in the abutting Woodridge
Subdivision, indicated that he had purchased his lot with the expectation that
there would be storage buildings built next door. He indicated that he was very
5
concerned that the applicant was now proposing to construct condominiums on
this site. He said that with the storage building proposal he pictured them as a
low-impact buffer with a fence that would provide more protection and privacy
to his lot.
Mr. Theeman asked if the zone change request were approved would
there be access for the property owners to Lot 41 and how did they get access.
Mr. Wood indicated that the existing open space will not be altered in any way
and that access was thru a pathway that goes through to Briarwood Drive.
Ms. Debbie Russell, owner of Lot 31 in the abutting subdivision, also
spoke in opposition. She indicated that when she purchased the property she
was told that nothing would be developed on the adjacent lot but storage units.
She indicated that the applicant had just spoken to her and indicated that they
are planning to build as many condominiums on this lot as the density will allow.
She indicated that she did not like the idea of condominiums being built there
and was very concerned. Ms. Russell wondered why all the residents in the
subdivision did not get individual notice of the proposed rezoning as it abutted
the commonly held open space parcel.
Planning Officer Gould indicated that the open space parcel was included
in the notice list, but that the tax assessment still goes to Woods of Maine Inc.
Chairman Guerette noted that the Board sees many many items with
requests that effect neighbors. The items that are easier to deal with are those
where the developer has had full disclosure with the neighbors. He indicated
that he would encourage the applicant to do some public relations work to
explained what his plans are to have more clarity and support for what he is
trying to do.
As no one else spoke, Chairman Guerette closed the Public Hearing and
asked the applicant for rebuttal comments. Mr. Wood indicated that he felt that
he was being a better neighbor by adding residential units as opposed to storage
units as they can be utilized at all hours.
Mr. Clark asked what the density would be for this development. Mr.
Wood indicated that the 4.1-acre parcel would not have access to Edgewood
Drive but off of Bomarc Road. At this point he is look at constructing
condominiums possibly in a cluster to keep them closer together. At this time,
however, he does not have a concept plan.
Chairman Guerette then asked for comments from Staff. Planning Officer
Gould noted that the parcel of land is at the south end of an area proposed for
industrial use in the City’s Comprehensive Plan Land Use Concepts Map.
6
However, the Zoning Policy Map proposes it as Low-Density Residential. The
basic issue for any zone change is its consistency with the City's Comprehensive
Plan. The industrial uses and zoning in the Bomarc Industrial Park were
encouraged there before the area’s residential growth as a way to reuse the pre-
existing Bomarc Missile Base, which originally was established there far from
other development. The Planning Staff finds that the inconsistency between the
maps of the Comprehensive Plan could allow it to go either way. Mr. Gould noted
that the Urban Industry District is the City’s most intensive and least restrictive
industrial district. While the City should continue to support the existing
businesses in the park, it would be better for the surrounding and growing
residential neighborhood that it not expand. Expansion of residential
development in the area would be preferable. For this reason, Staff
recommended that the Planning Board recommend approval of the zone change
request to the City Council.
Mr. Rosenblatt said that he understood how it would be a problem if
developed for industrial purposes as there are a wide range of uses that could be
permitted on this property. He indicated that he would have more enthusiasm if
there was some buffering that was going to happen. Mr. Rosenblatt asked if
Staff had discussed a contract zone change. Planning Officer Gould indicated
that Staff did not feel that contract zoning was warranted. The debate is to
buffer the new residential and the existing industrial and the people in the
subdivision want buffering between the old residential and the new residential.
This is an area where Low Density Residential use fits. Staff would like to
eventually see this entire area for residential use.
Mr. Rosenblatt asked what the differences would be in buffers. Planning
Officer Gould indicated that it would depend on the zoning and the development.
If it is a single-family development, there would be no buffer.
Mr. Theeman asked if the applicant could increase the size of this 4.1 acre
parcel. Mr. Gould indicated that the applicant owns the adjacent Low Density
Residential Parcel and the potential to get a greater than 5 acre parcel is highly
likely. There is significant acreage that is not developed.
As there were no other comments, Chairman Guerette asked for a motion.
Mr. Clark moved to recommend approval to the City Council of the zone change
request at 229 Bomarc Road from Urban Industry District to Low Density
Residential District for Woods of Maine Inc., as depicted in C.O. # 05-341. Mr.
Rosenblatt seconded the motion. The Board voted five in favor and none
opposed to the motion recommending approval.
7
Item No. 3: To amend the Land Development Code by changing a
parcel of land located at 40 High Street from Multi-
family and Service District to Downtown
Development District. Said parcel containing
approximately .18 acres. Anastasia International ,
applicant. C.O. # 05-342.
Chairman Guerette opened the Public Hearing and asked for comments
from the applicant. Mr. Phillip Sykes, General Manager of Anastasia
International, Inc., spoke in favor of the proposed zone change request. He
indicated that he wishes to use this historic property for mixed-use, office and
residential use. He has acquired this property with the intention or renovating it.
Anastasia International is a Russian-American Dating Agency. They propose to
move their offices and their three employees into the first floor of this building.
The remainder of the building will be for residential use. In order to do this, it
would need to be rezoned as Downtown Development District Zoning. He noted
that he has been before the Historic Preservation Commission and has received
their approval. Because of the topography it is impossible to provide parking so
re-use of the building is limited. They propose to rent 6 parking spaces from
the adjacent property owner for tenant use. Mr. Sykes also owns the Elk River
Development Company which has its main shop located in Freedom ndustrial
Park.
Mr. Rosenblatt asked if there was pedestrian access to Columbia Street.
Mr. Sykes indicated that they had a pedestrian access to Columbia Street but due
to the fact that the stairs are so steep they are planning to block them off with a
gate. They also plan to rent poles from Bangor Hydro to install lights to shine on
this area for security.
Mr. Wheeler commended the applicant on his presentation and the quality
of materials presented to the Board. He indicated that he highly supported this
application.
No one spoke in opposition. Chairman Guerette closed the Public Hearing
and asked for Staff Comments. Planning Officer Gould indicated that the City’s
Comprehensive Plan recognizes this property as one suited for commercial use
and the Zoning Policy Map indicates it as one suited for Downtown Development
District use. The Downtown Development District allows a high level of
development on a property with no parking requirements. The Planning Staff
recommended approval of the proposed zoning change because of its
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan 2000 that indicates commercial uses
and Downtown Development District Zoning.
8
Chairman Guerette asked for a motion and indicated that Mr. Theeman
would be voting. Mr. Wheeler moved to recommend to the City Council approval
of the application for Anastasia International for a zone change from Multi-Family
and Service District to Downtown Development District at 40 High Street as
depicted in C.O. # 05-342. Mr. Rosenblatt seconded the motion. The motion to
recommend approval passed unanimously
Item No. 4: Conditional Use/Site Development Plan approval to
construct 4, two-story, six-unit buildings; 2, one-
story, 2 handicap unit buildings; and a community
center at 222V Griffin Road in a High Density
Residential District and a Resource Protection
District. Penquis CAP applicant.
The Public Hearing was opened by Chairman Guerette who asked for a
presentation from the applicant. Attorney Ed Bearor, and Mr. Randy Bragg of
Carpenter Associates, were present representing the applicant. Mr. Bearor noted
the applicant’s recently completed housing development across the street from
this proposal saying that it is a great success for the applicant to provide housing
for a number of families. Mr. Bragg’s firm designed that development and also
this one. Mr. Bearor indicated that the proposal is to construct four, six-unit
buildings, two, one-story, 2 handicap unit buildings and a community center at
222V Griffin Road for a total of 28 units on a 5 acre parcel. Mr. Bearor indicated
that the proposal meets all of the conditional use and site development plan
approval standards. Mr. Bearor noted the sensitivity of the storm water run off
to Birch Stream and that the applicant will be required to obtain a stormwater
license from DEP under the new regulations that went into effect on November
1, 2005. He noted that City Engineer Ring would also be having input into this
process.
Mr. Randy Bragg indicated that a couple of difficult items were the sewer
connection and the environmental concerns regarding stormwater runoff to Birch
Stream. The applicant has decided to move one of the sewer man holes out of
the Resource Protection Zone and completely bore the run from man hole to
manhole and not have any open trenching, except for a receiving pit and the
actual inline manhole connection, essentially eliminating any sewer connection
problem to the Stream. Mr. Bragg indicated that they have a meeting with DEP
on Thursday to talk about storm water runoff to Birch Stream. They are well
aware of the new rules and they have brought in some expertise to help to make
a plan of attack to meet those new requirements. The applicant is confident that
they can meet the DEP standards as there are several options that they can do.
The issue is quality not quantity. He noted that this project cannot move
forward without the DEP’s blessing and they have asked the City Engineer to
attend that meeting to make sure that the City’s concerns are well known.
9
Mr. Rosenblatt indicated that he was somewhat uncomfortable deferring
entirely to the DEP because of the nature of the project, its proximity to the
Stream, and that the Land Development Code requires that the applicant show
that proposed development will not have an undue affect on Stream. Mr. Bragg
explained that the traditional method proposed would be to provide most of the
treatment through a wet pond. There are other methods that can be done such
as putting scoops in front of a wet pond, placing catch basins, etc. The have
provided at a 100 foot buffer. If need be, there are other methods that could be
employed.
Mr. Rosenblatt had a concern regarding the proximity of new driveways to
existing driveways, how close they will be to the existing Airport Mall driveway,
and how this will affect traffic and safety. Mr. Bragg indicated that they had
asked Mike Waugh and Brett Hart, Traffic Engineers with James W. Sewall
Company, to analyze this situation and they did not see it as being an impact to
the area.
Ms. Mitchell asked why there are two entrances and how far away were
they from the Airport Mall entrance. Mr. Bragg indicated that it is better for a
project to have two ways in and out for emergency vehicles, loading and
unloading. The entrances were a couple of hundred feet away.
No one spoke either in favor of or in opposition to this application.
Chairman Guerette closed the Public Hearing and asked for Staff comments.
Planning Officer Gould explained that this is an application for Conditional Use
and Site Development Plan approval to construct 4, six unit buildings, 2, 2-unit
buildings and a community center. The Resource Protection District looks at
utilities as a conditional use which is also something for the Board to consider.
This is the second project that Penquis CAP has brought before the City that is
designed to provide affordable housing in the City. This project will have public
sewer and water and approximately 71 parking spaces to serve the units. The
applicant has opted to construct 6 units within a building which makes it a
conditional use in the District. (Had they proposed to construct four unit
buildings this would have been a permitted use in the District.) That is an
allowable option as they have at least 5 acres and the development does not
exceed the maximum density. The project meets the development standards of
the district and also meets the setbacks, lot coverage, parking, and buffer
standards. Staff feels that the project is consistent with the building bulk and
styles in the area.
Mr. Gould noted that the applicant has provided pedestrian access within the
development itself. At the time of the Staff Memorandum there were two
outstanding issues regarding storm water quality. For many years the City has
10
dealt with the quantity of stormwater to make sure that the peak run off at the
predevelopment stage is no greater than the post development stage. Storm
water quality is a new standard. It is not in the Land Development Code but
Staff was uncomfortable, with all of the issues surrounding Birch Stream, to
rushing in and approve this without having some discussions with DEP regarding
water quality because the City wants to work with the DEP. The applicant needs
to get a permit from the State, Therefore, Staff is comfortable to condition
approval subject to a DEP permit, or if there are other changes to the plan that it
comes back to the Board.
The other issue was relative to work in the Resource Protection District
relative to a sewer crossing. The applicant has amended the plan to move the
manhole outside of the Resource Protection District and now proposes to bore
underground without digging an open trench to go from manhole to manhole
thus eliminating erosion in the streambed.
City Engineer Ring explained that there is 150 feet of distance between the
entrance and the Airport Mall and 230 feet to Mitchell Street. There is a center
turn lane that allows for these movements. The center lane allows for 7 or 8
vehicles to turn 400 feet between of the major access points and that is an
excellent sight distance. The sanitary sewer solution that has been proposed
addresses concerns of Staff. Mr. Ring explained that there has been sensitivity
about the Birch Stream water quality as it doesn’t meet the requirements. The
DEP has been working with the City and other stakeholders to analyze impacts of
water quality on Birch Stream and how to fix it. They have issued a draft report
and it predicts the amount of pollutants.
Ms. Mitchell asked if Mr. Ring saw a conflict on the other side of Griffin
Road with other driveways. Mr. Ring indicated that the impact of 34 vehicles per
peak hour is not an awful lot and he did not think it will be large issue here. Mr.
Ring indicted that the City recently adopted a storm water ordinance that does
speak to impacts. There are no special permits for these size projects. The City
won’t issue permits, but will be involved with the DEP in its decision to issue the
permit.
As there were no further comments, Chairman Guerette indicated that Ms.
Mitchell would be voting on this item. Mr. Rosenblatt moved to approve the
conditional use request for the proposed project at 222V Griffin Road, Penquis
CAP, applicant. Mr. Wheeler seconded the motion, which passed by a vote of 5
to 0. Mr. Rosenblatt moved to grant Site Development Plan approval at 222V
Griffin Road, Penquis CAP, applicant with the condition that applicant obtain a
DEP storm water permit. Mr. Wheeler seconded the motion. The Board voted
unanimously in favor the motion.
11
NEW BUSINESS
Item No. 6: Site Development Plan approval and Planned Group
Development approval for construction of a 10,470
sq. ft. parking lot expansion and associated
improvements at 28 Somerset Street and 112
Broadway in a Government and Institutional Service
District and a Multi-family and Service District. John
Bapst Memorial High School and Seven Islands Land
Company, applicants.
Mr. Wheeler indicated that he found it necessary to make disclosure to the
Board that he occasionally is a substitute teacher at John Bapst Memorial High
School. He said that he is of the personal opinion that he does not have a
financial interest but to be on the safe side he contacted the City Attorney’s
Office who felt that it does constitute a financial interest. Mr. Wheeler asked the
Board Members for their opinion. Ms. Mitchell felt that if the City Solicitor felt
that there was a potential conflict that it would be safe for Mr. Wheeler to recuse
himself. Ms. Brown and Mr. Clark agreed. Mr. Rosenblatt indicated that while he
did not feel that Mr. Wheeler’s decision would be influenced, it would be best to
abide by the advice from the Solicitor’s Office. Mr. Wheeler indicated that he
would accept the Board’s opinions and asked to be recused. Mr. Rosenblatt
moved to recuse Mr. Wheeler from voting on this item. Mr. Clark seconded the
motion, which carried unanimously.
Chairman Guerette noted that Associate Members Brown and Theeman
would be voting and he asked for a presentation from the applicant.
Mr. Ray Bolduc of WBRC Architects-Engineers represented the applicants
John Bapst Memorial High School(JBMH) and Seven Islands Land Company
(SILC) who are requesting Site Development Plan approval and Planned Group
Development approval for construction of a 10,470 sq. ft. parking lot expansion
and associated improvements at 28 Somerset Street and 112 Broadway in a
Government and Institutional Service District and a Multi-family and Service
District. Mr. Bolduc noted that Landis Green, Headmaster of John Bapst
Memorial High School and Attorney Mike Clishman of Eaton Peabody were also
present to answer questions. Mr. Bolduc explained that they are proposing a 21-
space parking lot expansion, lighting, curbing, and landscaping. Both applicants
will access the site thru a shared drive off of Somerset Street. Additional
buffering will be placed along Broadway that exceeds Land Development Code
requirements. The proposed lighting will match that on Broadway next to the
school but will be at a smaller scale.
12
Mr. Rosenblatt asked if the property immediately adjacent is a residence,
what kind of buffer is proposed and if the lighting will have any impacts or issue.
Mr. Bolduc indicated that the plan depicts a stockade fence, the existing
vegetation will remain and they do not expect any issues from the proposed
lighting.
No one spoke either in favor or in opposition and Chairman Guerette
asked for Staff comments. Planning Officer Gould explained that in 1994 the
applicants on adjoining parcels that formerly housed the Jewish Community
Center received approvals to reuse the building on the corner of Broadway and
Somerset Streets as an office for SILC and to construct parking lots with a
shared driveway. SILC completed their portion of the project, but JBMHS never
built theirs and the approval lapsed. The plan now before the Board seeks the
same goal of parking lots with joint access, except that JBMHS proposes a larger
parking lot through demolition of a post-World War II addition built for the
Jewish Community Center. A new walkway from the parking lot will be
constructed to the much older remaining building. The plan depicts 15 existing
parking spaces and proposes 21 additional spaces for a total of 36 spaces. The
applicant has provided a document for cross-easements and as a Planned Group
Development (Section 165-69) buffers and setbacks are not required between
adjoining parcels as they are provided around the perimeter of the proposed
parking lots.
Mr. Gould indicated that this plan has received approval from the Historic
Preservation Commission (HPC). Among the details of the HPC approval were
lighting fixtures similar to those on Broadway by the existing school. The plan
provides B Buffers along the street and C Buffers where the parking lot abuts
residential districts to the north. Mr. Gould indicated that Staff finds that the
proposed plan meets Ordinance and submittal requirements and Staff
recommended Site Development Plan approval of the Planned Group
Development for John Bapst Memorial High School and Seven Islands Land
Company at 28 Somerset Street and 112 Broadway.
Chairman Guerette noted that the Board need to make two motions. Mr.
Rosenblatt moved to grant Site Development Plan approval for the project at 28
Somerset Street and 112 Broadway John Bapst Memorial High School and Seven
Islands Land Company, applicants. Mr. Theeman seconded the motion, which
passed by unanimously. Mr. Rosenblatt moved to grant Planned Group
Development approval to the proposed project located at 28 Somerset Street and
112 Broadway John Bapst Memorial High School and Seven Islands Land
Company, applicants. Mr. Theeman seconded the motion that passed
unanimously.
13
Item No. 7: Site Development Plan approval to locate a new
storage tank on a 144 sq. ft. concrete pad located at
58 Bennett Street in an Urban Industry District.
Down East Emulsions Limited Liability, applicant.
Chairman Guerette indicated that Associate Member Mitchell would be
voting on this item, and then asked for a presentation from the applicant. Mr.
Dick Day of Plisga & Day, spoke on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Day explained
that this is a modification of an existing site plan. The changes to the site are to
add a single-storage tank with a capacity of 10,000 gallons and the storage tank
is to be set on a 12’ x 12’ concrete pad 16 feet high. The issue that took time
to resolve was the setback of the tank that is going to be positioned 15.9 feet
from Bennett Street. The applicant had an easement that provided an additional
25 feet for the purpose of maintenance but that easement could not be used for
purpose of meeting the setback requirements. The applicant has negotiated with
City Staff a language amendment to meeting the setback requirements. Mr. Day
indicated that this is a well-established industrial use in the zone and is
surrounded by other industrial uses.
Mr. Rosenblatt asked if there is still rail line there, and is the area within
the easement is this part of the street or travelway. Mr. Day indicated that there
is a rail line there which is inactive and no cars are using that siding now and the
applicant does not receive product via rail. The travelway of Bennett Street
actually ends at the entrance drive of the applicant’s driveway. The street does
not continue beyond that point even though the right-of-way still exists. There is
no actual street.
Chairman Guerette then asked for Staff comments. Planning Officer
Gould explained that the applicant, Down East Emulsions Limited Liability,
requests Site Development Plan approval to construct a new storage tank on a
144 square-foot concrete pad at 58 Bennett Street in an Urban Industry District
(UID). Mr. Gould indicated that the applicant has submitted additional
information requested by Staff such that the plans are now complete and have
all required elements. Staff finds that the Site Development Plan is consistent
with the Site Plan Submittal requirements (under 165-114) and Staff
recommended approval.
14
Chairman Guerette asked for a motion. Ms. Mitchell moved to grant site
development plan approval at 58 Bennett Street for Down East Emulsions
Limited Liability, applicant. Mr. Clark seconded the motion, which passed
unanimously.
Item No. 8: Site Development Plan approval to construct a 2,000
sq. ft. addition to the existing building located at 345
Target Industrial Circle in an Industry and Service
District for storage use and loading docks. Bangor
Millworks/ Hardy Associates, applicants
Chairman Guerette asked for a presentation from the applicant. Mr. David
Hardy, M.D. Hardy Associates, explained that his company owns the property at
345 Target Industrial Circle. In 1994 they sold property at 355 Target Industrial
Circle to Bangor Millworks who wishes to expand their building by constructing a
2,000 sq. ft. addition to their building. I doing so, they created a setback issue
that they have tried to address with this plan. To make both facilities conform to
the new standards, as far as set backs, it is necessary to lease additional
property to Bangor Millwork from Hardy Associates so that they can maximize
their expansion on their lot to satisfy the requirements that they need to expand
their business. Mr. Hardy indicated that they submitted stormwater information
requested by the City Engineer.
Planning Officer Gould indicated that the proposal before the Board is to
expand the Bangor Millworks’ building. The Bangor Millwork building was
originally approved in 1979 and expanded in 1986. It was approved as two
buildings on one lot in 1986 and the site was split into two separate lots in 1994.
The proposal to expand the millwork building is complicated by the fact that the
existing lot was built-out to near the maximum impervious surface (ISR) limit of
70%. In order for the site to meet the ISR standard, 10,635-square feet will
need to be leased from the adjacent property. Staff has worked with the
applicant’s designer and the adjoining property owner (both MD Hardy Inc.) to
insure that both lots will conform to the minimum district standards of the
Industry & Service District.
Mr. Gould indicated that both buildings are served by public sewer and
water utilities. The expanded Bangor Millworks building will provide the current
ordinance buffer yards on the portions of the lot where the new expansion is
occurring and the existing vegetation will be preserved in the side and rear yard
of the land that will be leased. The City Engineer’s Office had requested that the
applicant provide more information to insure that the proposed new impervious
area does not create any adverse off-site impacts. The applicant has provided
this information and the City Engineer has found it acceptable.
15
The Planning Staff finds that the Site Development Plan application is in
order with the exception of an executed lease agreement and Staff would
condition any approval upon the lease agreement being executed and submitted
to the City within 30 days of Planning Board’s approval.
Chairman Guerette indicated that Ms. Brown would be voting on this item.
Mr. Rosenblatt moved to approve the Site Development Plan at 345 Target
Industrial Circle for Bangor Millworks/ Hardy Associates, applicants with the
condition that there be a lease of sufficient adjacent land area to satisfy the
Industry and Service District, and that a copy of the executed lease be provided
to the City within 30 days. Mr. Wheeler seconded the motion. The motion
passed unanimously
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Item No. 5: Planning Board Approval of Minutes
There were no minutes ready for approval.
OTHER DISCUSSION
Chairman Guerette noted that the Board would continue discussion on the
proposed changes to the By-laws, if the schedule allows, at the next regularly
scheduled meeting. He noted that Mr. Gould would be providing the Board with
comments.
There being no further discussion, the Meeting was adjourned at 10:03
p.m.