HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-01-29 Government Operations Committee Minutes
Government Operations Committee
January 29, 2008
Minutes
Councilors: Hawes, D’Errico, Palmer, Gratwick, Wheeler
Staff: Barrett, Farrar
Others: Moriarty, Water District Trustees
1. Quarterly Update – Bangor Water District
A. Introduction of Trustees and Staff
Chair Fournier introduced members of the District.
B. Bangor Water District 2007: A Year in Review
Using a PowerPoint presentation, Kathy Moriarty started with a
recap of 2007. Last year the District’s 17th annual open house was attended by
230 students from six area schools. It is the District’s largest public education
and public relations event and was held at Floods Pond treatment facility and
pumping station. The District also holds quarterly tours with a record breaking
th
attendance of 1,359 attendees in the fall tour. On May 9, the unveiling of the
Thomas Hill Standpipe model was unveiled at BIA, where it continues to be
housed. Their web site and their annual newsletter is another educational and
public relations tool. The Board reviewed fluoride information this past year and
presented a report to the Council regarding the District’s position regarding
fluoridation. Looking at water resources and water protection efforts, the
District’s source of supply is exempt from filtration. This was a 1991 exemption
from the EPA and each year the District needs to continue to meet the criteria
and file a watershed control report and have an inspection by the State Drinking
Program each year. The District finalized a forest management plan revision.
The primary goal of this plan is to protect the District’s source water quality.
They referred to LD 165 which designated the artic charr as the state’s heritage
fish and there are charr in Floods Pond. In planning for the future, the District is
looking at additional water sources. The District has identified a site in Hermon.
Water quality and water treatment accomplishments for 2007 include conversion
of hazardous gaseous chemicals to their liquid former which was safer and less
expensive. There are two new drinking regulations on the horizon for 2008.
One is the EPA long term 2 enhanced surface water treatment rule. The second
rule was the state two disinfection by-product rule. The District’s levels are well
below what is required by EPA but the rule would require more frequent testing.
She referenced the EPA’s requirement for led and copper rules. The District’s
2007 test results indicating that the District still continues to comply. Regarding
distribution and storage, the District has 8 storage facilities. One is the Thomas
Hill Standpipe and extensive renovations were started in 2007 and will be
completed in 2008. Bangor Water District worked with the Brewer Water
District testing the interconnect between Bangor and Brewer, a pipeline that
goes under the Penobscot River Bridge. The test was to show that if Brewer
needed water in case of an emergency that Bangor could supply at a quantity
and quality. The test was a huge success. 2007 capital improvements projects
included replacement of approximately 3,000 feet of pipeline on Hogan Road.
This pipeline has had many breaks throughout the year. 1,000 feet of pipeline
was replaced on Venture Way. She spoke of older valves on either side of the
Essex Street Bridge and a waterline will be installed underneath the new bridge
in 2008. The District totaled 53 water leaks for 2007 which is average. The
District has 172 miles of pipeline in its distribution system. The District has also
completed its 2007 program directional flush of all 172 miles of pipeline. A micro
turbine was installed at the Veazie control value site. This will be used for
producing electrical energy at the control valve site. It is expected to be on line
in 2008. Plans are being worked on regarding meter reading which is currently a
home to home reading. The District is looking to move into radio-read meters
which can be done by a drive by, not a home to home reading. The District has
evaluated the best system to start the new program. It will be installed
throughout 2008. Public relations will take place through bill stuffers, the web
site and the District’s newsletter. The District has requested a 7% rate increase
from the PUC. Bangor Water will still continue to have one of the lowest rates in
Maine. The District is working with the City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant to
evaluate a new billing software system. The two agencies currently share a very
outdated system.
Responding to Wheeler, Moriarty said the interconnect would supply water
from Bangor to Brewer when Brewer is in need. In 2008, Bangor will be working
with Brewer to look at another interconnect near the Rooks Road on Rt. 9 where
Brewer would be able to supply Bangor with water in the case of an emergency.
C. Invitation to City Council and City Staff to tour water supply and
treatment facilities
Moriarty extended an invitation to tour the District’s facilities.
D. Council Members’ comments and/or questions
Palmer commended the District for its role and efficiency in providing
quality water. Wheeler talked about fluoridation being introduced at a public
meeting which took place at the old City Hall auditorium. Gratwick mentioned the
importance of not flushing pharmaceuticals down the drain, as they have a
negative impact on water quality. D’Errico asked how aquifer is recognized.
Moriarty indicated by geologist.
2. Resolve, Supporting Penobscot County’s Grant Application to the State
Fund for the Efficient Delivery of Local and Regional Services
Farrar introduced Ken Huhn, David Casavant, Candy Guerette. Farrar
had provided background information to the Committee with their agenda to
discuss a Chamber of Commerce effort, through its Regional Collaboration
Subcommittee, to explore opportunities for municipal collaboration along the
Penobscot River Corridor. There are currently seven communities interested.
Bangor, Brewer, Hampden, Hermon, Old Town, Orono and Veazie. Four major
areas identified: assessing, general assistance, animal control, and road striping
or painting. If approved by this Committee and the City Council, the Resolve
would indicate Bangor’s intention to support a grant application made to the
State in the amount of $75,000 to be managed and implemented by the County.
Casavant said the intent of the grant is on a contract for services model on the
services mentioned by Farrar. The strength of the model is in the fact that this is
a contract for services model, it doesn’t require redistricting, it doesn’t look at
potential cost sharing, but it involves the County providing contracts with
municipalities for purposes of suggesting they could actually provide and deliver
services in a cost effective model that would save municipalities money. A
contract for services model could certainly be extended beyond the current seven
municipalities. The grant has been facilitated by the Chamber of Commerce and
as facilitator they cannot receive the grant. Once the model has been
implemented with this group, it would be the intent that it would be a self-
sustaining model. The grant actually provide seed money. The model will be
evaluated afterwards by a group put together by the Chamber to see if the
model could be put forward in other areas.
Guerette said with her ten years of history in municipal government she feels this
would be particularly valuable to the area of general assistance. Huhn said with
the changing state demographics and consolidations all coming about is because
of expenses. This is unique because it sets up a model under the County and
sets up a model where it is a volunteer effort.
Gratwick commended the group. He spoke about the actual ways in which the
model would work. Casavant said with the seed money there would be a hired
individual to oversee the contract for services model and would also seek expert
consultants in terms of implementing the model. Since this is a contract for
services model, if there were concerns by the municipalities they wouldn’t be
required to participate. Through this model, current expertise from the
municipalities will be used. Barrett provided two examples. In the area of animal
control, there is nothing to prevent the county from providing animal control
services for which individual municipalities would contract. It is similar to what
the City of Bangor now does for kennel services at the Bangor Humane Society.
In the area of assessing services, it is equally spread among the municipalities.
In the model, it might be different along the lines of the regional communication
center where there is a separate advisory board overseeing the operation. Each
of the services could be structured differently depending upon the service.
Gratwick said it would seem to be a complex project. In the municipalities,
Barrett stated there is a huge diversity of services that are provided and the
extent of the services provided. Guerette mentioned the health officer positions
and duties. Barrett said it has been discussed and it may not be in the initial list.
A number of communities have expressed interest in contracting with Bangor
due to the nature of our health department. Barrett said that Bangor is doing its
own internal audit in this area to have a better handle on who does what. Huhn
said he recognizes that the County does not have an infrastructure at all and this
is why they started with the services and communities selected and a grant to
further study it. Gratwick asked if there is receptivity at the county level.
Casavant replied yes. Guerette said the group is not interested in just another
layer of government and it seemed the way for this region to go was with the
County and to see which of the Chamber’s 21 municipalities are interested.
Wheeler asked about the role of the County Commissioners and if the number of
Commissioners would be affected. Casavant said there are no plans to change
the structure of County government. Wheeler asked about the project
management budget of $50,000 with a completion date of May 30, 2008.
Casavant said it is draft model which demonstrates the nature of the grant
application and how it might be structured. The model needs to be run by the
State Planning Office. Responding to Wheeler, Casavant said the Council
Resolve, if approved by the Council, is a non-binding resolution that expresses
the support of the City of Bangor to go forward in cooperation with six
municipalities and the County to apply for the grant which is based on a contract
for services model with the County receiving the money for and with the intent
of hiring an individual and implementing the contract for services model.
Palmer talked about the need to regionalize services and this item might help
bring that about. He agrees with the concept of this proposal as discussed this
evening.
D’Errico asked if purchasing might be added to the list for sharing costs among
the municipalities. Guerette said there is a history of this with the PVCOG but
not all municipalities are members of PVCOG. This model might provide another
option. She thanked D’Errico for the recommendation.
Responding to Gratwick, Barrett said there is another model called inter-
municipal contracting. He used traffic signal maintenance as an example.
Currently, most all work is done by Bangor and the local municipalities are billed
for that service. Regarding health and welfare, there is a regional entity based in
a municipality, it can be used as the model. It doesn’t have to be transferred to
the County. Barrett said that Bangor has the most professional assessing
operation in this part of the state if not the state as a whole. Not all
communities reach the same standard in policy and professionalism as Bangor
has in place. He thinks that perhaps the other communities can be brought up
to Bangor’s level of standard. He cited one area as the area of assessing
personal property. It comes down to a question of how to fit service provision
models into a governmental structure that requires modernization.
A motion was made and seconded to recommend approval to the full Council.
Committee adjourned at 6:15 p.m.